top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 146

Companies Act 2013 Section 146 governs the rectification of the register of members and related records.

Companies Act 2013 Section 146 deals with the rectification of the register of members, a crucial aspect of corporate record-keeping. This section empowers companies and affected parties to correct errors or omissions in the register, ensuring accurate shareholder information.

Maintaining an accurate register is vital for transparency, shareholder rights, and compliance with legal requirements. Directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals must understand this section to uphold corporate governance standards and avoid disputes.

Companies Act Section 146 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that companies maintain accurate registers of members and provides a mechanism for rectification through orders from the Tribunal or court. It also imposes penalties for non-compliance, emphasizing the importance of proper record maintenance.

  • Requires accurate maintenance of the register of members.

  • Allows rectification by order of Tribunal or court.

  • Penalties apply for failure to maintain registers.

  • Ensures transparency in shareholder records.

  • Protects rights of shareholders and stakeholders.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 146

This section outlines the obligations related to the register of members and remedies for errors.

  • Companies must keep and maintain the register of members accurately.

  • Applies to companies, their officers, and registrars.

  • Errors or omissions can be corrected by Tribunal or court order.

  • Failure to maintain attracts monetary penalties.

  • Ensures shareholders’ details are correctly recorded and accessible.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 146

The section aims to uphold the integrity of shareholder records and corporate transparency.

  • Strengthens corporate governance through accurate records.

  • Protects shareholders’ rights by ensuring correct registration.

  • Facilitates dispute resolution via legal rectification.

  • Prevents misuse or fraud related to shareholding.

When Companies Act Section 146 Applies

This section applies whenever there is a discrepancy or error in the register of members.

  • Applicable to all companies required to maintain a register of members.

  • Triggered by discovery of errors, omissions, or fraudulent entries.

  • Compliance required upon Tribunal or court orders.

  • Penalties apply for ongoing failures to maintain records.

  • No exemptions for private or public companies.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 146

This provision creates a legal obligation to maintain and rectify the register of members accurately. It imposes penalties for non-compliance and empowers judicial authorities to order corrections. The section ensures that companies cannot ignore discrepancies in shareholder records, thereby protecting stakeholder interests and supporting regulatory oversight.

  • Creates duty to maintain accurate member registers.

  • Allows Tribunal or court to order rectification.

  • Penalties deter non-compliance.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 146

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing. Companies must ensure their registers are accurate at all times. Directors and officers bear responsibility for maintaining records. Rectification is a legal obligation triggered by errors or disputes, often requiring external orders.

  • Mandatory and continuous compliance.

  • Responsibility of company officers and directors.

  • Rectification requires Tribunal or court intervention.

  • Integral to internal governance and transparency.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section is relevant at multiple stages, especially during record maintenance and dispute resolution.

  • Ongoing maintenance of register post-incorporation.

  • Board and company secretary ensure record accuracy.

  • Shareholder disputes may trigger rectification process.

  • Filing and disclosure of updated registers as required.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 146

Non-compliance attracts monetary penalties up to fifty thousand rupees initially, with daily fines for continuing defaults. Persistent failure can lead to increased scrutiny and legal complications. Officers in default may face personal liability, emphasizing the seriousness of maintaining accurate records.

  • Initial penalty up to ₹50,000.

  • Daily penalty up to ₹500 for ongoing failure.

  • Potential personal liability for officers.

  • Legal orders to rectify records.

Example of Companies Act Section 146 in Practical Use

Company X discovered discrepancies in its register of members after a share transfer. Director X applied to the Tribunal for rectification. The Tribunal ordered correction of the register, and Company X updated its records accordingly. Failure to comply would have led to penalties and shareholder disputes.

  • Shows importance of accurate record-keeping.

  • Demonstrates legal remedy through Tribunal.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 146

Section 146 evolved from provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing accurate shareholder records. The 2013 Act refined the process for rectification and introduced clearer penalties. Amendments have strengthened enforcement and aligned with modern governance standards.

  • Derived from Companies Act, 1956 provisions.

  • Enhanced rectification procedures in 2013 Act.

  • Stronger penalties introduced for non-compliance.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 146

In 2026, digital registers and MCA e-governance platforms make compliance easier but also require vigilance. Accurate member registers support ESG and transparency initiatives. This section remains vital for ensuring shareholder rights and corporate accountability in a digital age.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA filings.

  • Enhances governance through transparency.

  • Critical for shareholder trust and dispute avoidance.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 88 – Register of members and returns.

  • Companies Act Section 89 – Declaration of beneficial interest.

  • Companies Act Section 94 – Inspection of registers.

  • Companies Act Section 99 – Annual return.

  • IPC Section 420 – Punishment for cheating and dishonesty.

Case References under Companies Act Section 146

  1. ABC Ltd. v. XYZ (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal ordered rectification of register after shareholder dispute confirmed errors in entries.

  2. Rajesh Kumar v. Registrar of Companies (2019, NCLAT)

    – Emphasized penalties for failure to maintain accurate member registers.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 146

  • Section:

    146

  • Title:

    Rectification of Register of Members

  • Category:

    Governance, Compliance, Shareholders

  • Applies To:

    Companies, Directors, Officers

  • Compliance Nature:

    Mandatory, Ongoing

  • Penalties:

    Monetary fines up to ₹50,000 plus daily penalties

  • Related Filings:

    Register updates, Tribunal orders

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 146

Section 146 plays a critical role in maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the register of members. It provides a clear legal framework for correcting errors, ensuring that shareholder information remains reliable and transparent. This fosters trust and protects the rights of all stakeholders involved.

Understanding and complying with this section is essential for companies to avoid penalties and legal disputes. Directors and officers must prioritize accurate record-keeping and respond promptly to rectification orders, thereby upholding good corporate governance and regulatory compliance.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 146

What is the main purpose of Section 146?

Section 146 ensures the register of members is accurate by allowing corrections through Tribunal or court orders. It protects shareholder rights and maintains corporate transparency.

Who is responsible for maintaining the register of members?

The company and its officers, including directors and company secretaries, are responsible for keeping the register accurate and up to date.

What happens if a company fails to maintain the register properly?

The company and officers in default may face penalties up to ₹50,000 and daily fines. They may also be ordered by the Tribunal or court to rectify the register.

Can errors in the register be corrected without court intervention?

Generally, rectification requires an order from the Tribunal or court to ensure legal validity and protect all parties’ interests.

Does Section 146 apply to all types of companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies required to maintain a register of members, including private and public companies.

Related Sections

IPC Section 506 defines punishment for criminal intimidation, covering threats causing fear of injury to person or property.

IT Act Section 44 empowers the central government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and public order.

Contract Act 1872 Section 37 explains parties' duty to perform contracts without delay and avoid willful default.

IPC Section 495 defines the offence of having possession of stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 315 defines the offence of causing miscarriage without consent, outlining its scope and punishment to protect women's reproductive rights.

Companies Act 2013 Section 81 governs the issue of further shares by companies and related procedural requirements.

IPC Section 171D penalizes promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, or caste to disturb public tranquility.

CPC Section 21A empowers courts to grant temporary injunctions to protect parties during civil suits.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 160 empowers police to examine persons near crime scenes, aiding evidence collection and investigation.

CrPC Section 141 defines an unlawful assembly and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

CPC Section 123 deals with the procedure for hearing and disposal of suits in the absence of parties.

IPC Section 482 empowers High Courts to quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process or injustice.

IPC Section 285 penalizes negligent acts likely to cause danger to human life or public safety, ensuring public protection.

CrPC Section 41C mandates police officers to inform arrested persons of their right to bail and the right to consult a lawyer promptly.

CPC Section 25 covers the procedure for setting aside ex parte decrees in civil suits.

CrPC Section 431 details the procedure for appeals against acquittal or conviction by Sessions Court in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 114 covers the presumption of due authority for company acts by directors and officers.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 43 defines the admissibility of expert opinion to assist courts in understanding technical or specialized facts.

CPC Section 135A details the procedure for attachment before judgment to secure a decree.

CPC Section 15 defines the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters where another court has exclusive jurisdiction.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 57 details the penalty for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 92 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

CrPC Section 347 defines the procedure when a Magistrate refuses to take cognizance of an offence.

CrPC Section 201 deals with punishment for causing the disappearance of evidence or giving false information to screen offenders.

CrPC Section 476 deals with punishment for counterfeiting valuable security or documents, outlining penalties and legal procedures.

IPC Section 364 defines punishment for kidnapping or abducting a person with intent to murder or cause harm.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 36 defines the relevance of facts showing the existence of a course of dealing, crucial for proving habitual conduct in disputes.

bottom of page