top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 456

Companies Act 2013 Section 456 details the procedure for winding up of companies by the Tribunal.

Companies Act 2013 Section 456 governs the process of winding up a company by the Tribunal. It provides a legal framework for the orderly closure of a company’s affairs when it cannot continue its business. This section is crucial for directors, shareholders, creditors, and legal professionals to understand the formalities and implications of winding up.

Understanding Section 456 helps ensure compliance with the law and protects stakeholders’ interests during company closure. It also clarifies the Tribunal’s powers and the procedural steps involved, making it essential knowledge for corporate governance and insolvency management.

Companies Act Section 456 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to order winding up of a company under specific circumstances. It lists grounds such as special resolution by the company, unlawful activities, non-compliance in filing returns, insolvency, or just and equitable grounds. The Tribunal’s authority includes making all necessary orders for winding up and asset distribution.

  • Tribunal can order winding up on multiple grounds.

  • Non-filing of financials for five years is a key trigger.

  • Winding up can be on insolvency or just and equitable grounds.

  • Tribunal controls the winding up process and asset distribution.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 456

Section 456 outlines when and how the Tribunal may order a company’s winding up. It applies to companies, directors, creditors, and the Tribunal itself.

  • States grounds for winding up by Tribunal.

  • Applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Mandatory compliance with filing requirements is emphasized.

  • Tribunal’s discretion in just and equitable cases.

  • Allows winding up for inability to pay debts.

  • Prohibits winding up without proper satisfaction of conditions.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 456

This section strengthens corporate governance by providing a clear legal route for winding up companies that fail compliance or become insolvent.

  • Protects creditors and stakeholders during closure.

  • Ensures transparency in winding up proceedings.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure.

  • Supports orderly dissolution of companies.

When Companies Act Section 456 Applies

Section 456 applies when a company meets specific conditions such as insolvency, non-compliance, or a special resolution for winding up.

  • Companies failing to file returns for 5 years.

  • Companies insolvent or unable to pay debts.

  • Companies passing special resolution for winding up.

  • Cases involving public order or security concerns.

  • Tribunal’s just and equitable discretion.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 456

Section 456 creates a legal duty on the Tribunal to consider winding up applications under specified grounds. It restricts companies from continuing business once winding up is ordered. Non-compliance can lead to penalties and legal consequences. The section works with MCA rules for filing and procedural compliance.

  • Creates Tribunal’s authority to order winding up.

  • Imposes restrictions on company operations post-order.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 456

Compliance under Section 456 is mandatory once the Tribunal initiates winding up. It is a one-time but comprehensive obligation involving directors, officers, and the company. Internal governance must align with winding up procedures.

  • Mandatory compliance with Tribunal orders.

  • One-time but detailed winding up process.

  • Directors must cooperate with liquidators.

  • Company must disclose assets and liabilities.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 456 applies primarily at the winding up stage after the company’s operational phase ends.

  • Post-incorporation, during company’s life if triggers arise.

  • Board or shareholders may initiate winding up resolution.

  • Tribunal hearing and order stage.

  • Asset distribution and final closure stage.

  • Ongoing compliance during liquidation.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 456

Failure to comply with winding up orders can lead to monetary penalties, imprisonment for officers in certain cases, and disqualification. Additional fees and remedial directions may be imposed by the Tribunal or MCA.

  • Monetary fines for non-compliance.

  • Imprisonment possible for fraudulent conduct.

  • Disqualification of directors involved.

  • Additional fees for delayed filings.

Example of Companies Act Section 456 in Practical Use

Company X failed to file financial statements for five consecutive years. The Registrar applied to the Tribunal under Section 456(1)(c). The Tribunal ordered winding up after verifying non-compliance. Director X cooperated with the liquidator, ensuring smooth asset distribution and creditor payments.

  • Shows enforcement of filing compliance.

  • Highlights Tribunal’s role in protecting stakeholders.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 456

Section 456 replaces winding up provisions from the Companies Act, 1956, streamlining insolvency procedures. It was introduced to enhance clarity and efficiency in winding up processes under the 2013 Act.

  • Replaces older winding up provisions.

  • Introduced for procedural clarity.

  • Aligns with modern insolvency framework.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 456

In 2026, Section 456 remains vital for digital filings and e-governance via the MCA portal. It supports governance reforms and ensures companies comply with winding up obligations transparently.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA filings.

  • Integral to insolvency and liquidation reforms.

  • Ensures orderly closure in modern corporate environment.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Power to wind up voluntarily.

  • Companies Act Section 439 – Appointment of liquidator.

  • Companies Act Section 441 – Powers of liquidator.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 – Initiation of insolvency proceedings.

Case References under Companies Act Section 456

  1. In Re: ABC Ltd. (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal ordered winding up due to continuous default in filing returns.

  2. XYZ vs Registrar of Companies (2019, NCLAT Delhi)

    – Clarified just and equitable grounds for winding up under Section 456.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 456

  • Section: 456

  • Title: Winding Up by Tribunal

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Insolvency

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Creditors, Tribunal

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory winding up procedures

  • Penalties: Fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Financial statements, winding up petitions

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 456

Section 456 is a cornerstone provision for winding up companies by the Tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013. It provides clear grounds and procedures, ensuring companies that fail compliance or become insolvent are wound up lawfully and transparently.

This section protects creditors, shareholders, and the public by enabling the Tribunal to act decisively. Understanding its application is essential for directors, legal professionals, and stakeholders to navigate company closure responsibly and in compliance with Indian corporate law.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 456

What triggers winding up by the Tribunal under Section 456?

Winding up can be triggered by a special resolution, insolvency, non-filing of returns for five years, unlawful activities, or just and equitable grounds as per the Tribunal’s discretion.

Who can apply to the Tribunal for winding up under Section 456?

The company itself, creditors, Registrar of Companies, or other stakeholders can apply to the Tribunal to initiate winding up proceedings under this section.

What powers does the Tribunal have during winding up?

The Tribunal can order winding up, appoint liquidators, oversee asset distribution, and make any necessary orders to ensure proper closure of the company.

Are directors responsible during winding up under Section 456?

Yes, directors must cooperate with the liquidator, disclose company assets and liabilities, and comply with Tribunal orders during the winding up process.

What are the consequences of not complying with Section 456 orders?

Non-compliance can lead to fines, imprisonment for officers in cases of fraud, disqualification of directors, and additional penalties imposed by the Tribunal or MCA.

Related Sections

Installing CCTV cameras in India is legal with conditions on privacy and consent under Indian laws.

Pepper spray is legal in India for self-defense with certain restrictions on possession and use.

Kissing is not a legal offence in India, but public displays may face restrictions under certain laws.

CrPC Section 83 details the procedure for arresting a person escaping from lawful custody, ensuring lawful recapture and public safety.

The Book of Mormon is legal in India with no restrictions on possession or distribution under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 46 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Companies Act 2013 Section 291 governs the appointment and powers of company secretaries in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 293 governs restrictions on board powers for certain transactions requiring shareholder approval.

Indian currency is conditionally legal in Bhutan for certain transactions under specific regulations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 106 deals with the burden of proving facts especially when a party relies on a fact to prove their case.

CrPC Section 78 defines the powers of police officers to require security for keeping the peace or maintaining good behaviour.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 127 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

CrPC Section 139 mandates the filing of a police report (FIR) upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

IPC Section 304 addresses culpable homicide not amounting to murder, defining punishment and legal scope.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 16 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 81 explains the liability of partners for negotiable instruments made or endorsed by a firm.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 75 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

In India, phone recording is legal with consent from one party; unauthorized recording may lead to legal issues.

IPC Section 121 defines the offence of waging war against the Government of India, outlining severe penalties for such acts.

Virtual office spaces are legal in India with specific regulations and compliance requirements for businesses.

Understand the legality of recovery agencies in India, their rights, restrictions, and enforcement in debt collection practices.

IPC Section 248 defines the offence of negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substances, focusing on public safety and prevention of harm.

Section 221 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, deals with the procedure for recovery of tax in India.

CrPC Section 446 details the procedure for the disposal of property forfeited to the government after conviction.

Single parent IVF is legal in India with certain guidelines and restrictions under ART regulations.

CrPC Section 324 defines the offence of voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means and its legal consequences.

Companies Act 2013 Section 224 governs the appointment and remuneration of auditors in Indian companies.

bottom of page