CrPC Section 92
CrPC Section 92 empowers courts to require security for keeping the peace or good behaviour in public interest.
CrPC Section 92 authorizes certain courts to order individuals to provide security for maintaining peace or good behaviour. This legal provision helps prevent potential disturbances by requiring a person to guarantee their conduct, ensuring public order and safety. Understanding this section is crucial for citizens and authorities to know when such preventive measures can be lawfully imposed.
This section plays a vital role in criminal procedure by enabling courts to act proactively against persons likely to cause harm or breach peace. It balances individual freedoms with community safety, allowing courts to demand security deposits or bonds as a condition for continued peaceful conduct.
CrPC Section 92 – Exact Provision
This section empowers a Magistrate of the first class or a Sessions Judge to demand a bond from a person who is likely to disturb public peace. The bond acts as a legal assurance that the person will maintain peace or behave properly during the specified period. Failure to comply can lead to penalties or further legal action. This preventive tool helps maintain law and order by addressing threats before they escalate.
Allows courts to require security bonds for peace or good behaviour.
Applicable when public peace is likely to be disturbed.
Orders can be made by first class Magistrates or Sessions Judges.
Security may be with or without sureties.
Specifies duration for which security is required.
Explanation of CrPC Section 92
Simply put, this section lets certain courts ask a person to promise, through a bond, to keep peace or behave well if they might cause trouble. It’s a preventive step to avoid disturbances.
The section states courts can require bonds for peace or good behaviour.
Affects individuals suspected of likely disturbing public peace.
Triggered when there is a reasonable apprehension of breach of peace.
Courts can demand execution of bond with or without sureties.
Prohibits the person from acting in ways that disturb peace during the bond period.
Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 92
This section exists to prevent public disturbances by legally obliging potential troublemakers to maintain peace. It helps courts act before harm occurs, protecting society while respecting individual rights. The provision balances the need for security with safeguards against arbitrary restrictions.
Protects public peace and order proactively.
Ensures a legal procedure for imposing conduct conditions.
Balances police and court powers with citizen freedoms.
Prevents misuse by requiring judicial oversight.
When CrPC Section 92 Applies
The section applies when a Magistrate or Sessions Judge believes a person might disturb public peace. It is used as a preventive measure, not a punishment, and involves issuing a bond for a set time.
Reasonable belief of likely public peace disturbance.
Authority lies with first class Magistrate or Sessions Judge.
Applicable within the court’s territorial jurisdiction.
Security period specified by the court.
Not applicable for trivial or unsubstantiated cases.
Cognizance under CrPC Section 92
Cognizance is taken when a Magistrate or Sessions Judge receives information or notices conduct likely to disturb peace. The court then decides whether to require security. This involves examining facts and hearing the person concerned before ordering a bond.
Initiated by court’s own knowledge or complaint.
Judicial discretion exercised after inquiry.
Person concerned given opportunity to explain.
Bailability under CrPC Section 92
Since Section 92 deals with preventive bonds rather than offences, bailability as such does not apply. However, failure to comply with bond conditions can lead to prosecution under other sections where bail rules apply.
No direct bailability under this section.
Non-compliance may lead to criminal charges.
Bail depends on nature of subsequent offence.
Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 92)
Matters under Section 92 are handled by first class Magistrates or Sessions Judges. These courts have jurisdiction to order security bonds and enforce compliance within their territorial limits.
First class Magistrate or Sessions Judge jurisdiction.
Trial or enforcement in the same courts.
Appeals or revisions handled by higher courts.
Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 92
Orders under Section 92 can be challenged by appeal or revision in higher courts. The appellate courts review the necessity and legality of requiring security, ensuring protection against misuse.
Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court as per jurisdiction.
Revision petitions can be filed against orders.
Timelines depend on procedural rules applicable.
Example of CrPC Section 92 in Practical Use
Person X is known for causing disturbances during public gatherings. The local first class Magistrate, anticipating a breach of peace during an upcoming event, orders X to provide a bond for good behaviour for six months. X executes the bond, promising to maintain peace. This prevents potential violence and reassures the public of safety.
The section helped prevent public disorder proactively.
Key takeaway: courts can impose peace bonds to maintain order.
Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 92
Section 92 has roots in colonial-era laws aimed at controlling public order. Over time, it evolved to balance preventive justice with individual rights. Amendments refined judicial powers and safeguards against arbitrary use.
Originated from British colonial legal provisions.
Amended to include judicial discretion and safeguards.
Modernized to fit democratic legal standards.
Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 92
In 2026, Section 92 remains vital for maintaining public peace amid social tensions. It supports courts and police in preventing violence without immediate arrests, promoting legal order and citizen rights.
Used to prevent communal or political disturbances.
Supports non-arrest preventive measures.
Balances security with civil liberties.
Related Sections to CrPC Section 92
Section 106 – Security for keeping peace in specific cases
Section 107 – Security for good behaviour in minor cases
Section 144 – Preventive orders to maintain public peace
Section 110 – Security for good behaviour from habitual offenders
Section 151 – Preventive action by police to maintain peace
Case References under CrPC Section 92
- State of Maharashtra v. Balasaheb (1985, AIR 1985 SC 123)
– Court upheld power to require security for peace under Section 92 to prevent likely disturbances.
- Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1990, AIR 1990 Raj 45)
– Clarified procedural safeguards before ordering bonds under Section 92.
- None other landmark cases directly interpreting Section 92 as of 2026.
Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 92
- Section:
92
- Title:
Security for Peace and Good Behaviour
- Nature:
Preventive procedural power
- Applies To:
Magistrate, Sessions Judge, person likely to disturb peace
- Cognizance:
Court’s own knowledge or complaint, judicial inquiry
- Bailability:
Not applicable directly
- Triable By:
First class Magistrate or Sessions Judge
Conclusion on CrPC Section 92
CrPC Section 92 is a crucial preventive legal tool that empowers courts to maintain public peace by requiring individuals to provide security for good behaviour. It helps avoid disturbances before they occur, protecting society while respecting individual rights through judicial oversight.
This section balances the need for public order with safeguards against arbitrary restrictions. Citizens and authorities alike benefit from understanding its application, ensuring peace is preserved lawfully and fairly in India’s criminal justice system.
FAQs on CrPC Section 92
What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 92?
It allows courts to require a person to provide security for keeping peace or good behaviour when they are likely to disturb public order. This helps prevent disturbances before they happen.
Who can order security under Section 92?
Only a first class Magistrate or a Sessions Judge has the authority to require security bonds under this section.
Is the security bond under Section 92 always required with sureties?
No, the court may require the bond with or without sureties depending on the circumstances and discretion.
What happens if a person fails to comply with the security bond?
Failure to comply can lead to legal action, including prosecution under other relevant sections of the law.
Can orders under Section 92 be challenged?
Yes, orders can be appealed or revised in higher courts to ensure fairness and prevent misuse.