top of page

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Section 141

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 141 defines offences by companies for cheque dishonour and liability of officers in default.

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 addresses the liability of companies and their officers when a cheque issued by the company is dishonoured. It extends the provisions related to cheque dishonour offences to corporate entities, ensuring accountability of responsible persons.

This section is crucial for companies, their directors, partners, and authorized signatories, as it clarifies who can be held liable for offences under the Act. Banks and legal professionals must understand this to enforce cheque payments and prosecute defaults effectively.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 141 – Exact Provision

This section holds both the company and the responsible officers liable for offences under the Act. It ensures that directors or managers cannot escape liability simply because the company is a separate legal entity. However, if an officer can prove lack of knowledge and due diligence, they may avoid punishment.

  • Applies when a company commits an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

  • Holds officers in charge liable along with the company.

  • Provides a defence if the officer proves no knowledge and due diligence.

  • Ensures corporate accountability for cheque dishonour offences.

Explanation of NI Act Section 141

This section states that when a company commits an offence under the Act, persons responsible for the company’s conduct are also liable.

  • The section applies to companies, their directors, managers, partners, or authorized signatories.

  • Liability arises if the person was in charge and responsible at the time of the offence.

  • Offences typically relate to cheque dishonour under sections like 138.

  • The officer can avoid liability by proving lack of knowledge and due diligence.

  • This section complements the criminal provisions by extending liability to individuals behind the company.

Purpose and Rationale of NI Act Section 141

This section promotes corporate responsibility and deters misuse of negotiable instruments by companies.

  • Ensures companies cannot evade liability by hiding behind their legal personality.

  • Encourages officers to exercise due diligence in financial dealings.

  • Supports enforcement of cheque dishonour provisions against companies.

  • Prevents fraud and protects payees and banks.

  • Maintains trust in negotiable instruments involving corporate entities.

When NI Act Section 141 Applies

This section applies when a company issues a cheque that is dishonoured and an offence under the Act is committed.

  • Relevant for cheques issued by companies, firms, or corporate bodies.

  • Applies in cases of dishonour due to insufficiency of funds or other reasons.

  • Involves officers responsible at the time of offence, such as directors or authorized signatories.

  • Time limits and procedural requirements of related sections like 138 must be followed.

  • Exceptions may include cases where officers prove no knowledge or due diligence.

Legal Effect and Practical Impact under NI Act Section 141

This section creates joint liability of the company and its responsible officers for offences under the Act. It enables prosecution of individuals behind corporate defaults.

It strengthens the enforceability of cheque dishonour provisions by ensuring officers cannot hide behind the company’s separate legal entity. This leads to better compliance and accountability in corporate financial transactions.

  • Creates personal liability for officers in charge.

  • Supports criminal prosecution alongside civil remedies.

  • Encourages companies to maintain proper financial discipline.

Nature of Obligation or Protection under NI Act Section 141

This section imposes a conditional liability on company officers, making them accountable for offences committed by the company.

The liability is procedural and substantive, ensuring that both the company and responsible individuals can be punished unless due diligence is proved.

  • Creates a duty of care and responsibility for officers.

  • Liability is conditional on knowledge and control.

  • Provides a defence for officers exercising due diligence.

  • Applies to both companies and individuals.

Stage of Transaction or Legal Process Where Section Applies

This section becomes relevant after a cheque issued by a company is dishonoured and an offence under the Act is established.

  • Applies post-dishonour during investigation and prosecution.

  • Involves identification of responsible officers at the time of offence.

  • Relevant during complaint filing, trial, and sentencing stages.

  • Supports enforcement of penalties against companies and officers.

  • May be considered during appeal or revision proceedings.

Consequences, Remedies, or Punishment under NI Act Section 141

Offences by companies under this section attract criminal penalties similar to those under section 138, including fines and imprisonment.

Both the company and responsible officers can be prosecuted. Non-compliance with procedural requirements may affect liability. Compensation to the payee may also be ordered.

  • Criminal prosecution of company and officers.

  • Fines and imprisonment for responsible individuals.

  • Possible compounding of offences.

  • Civil recovery of cheque amount remains separate.

Example of NI Act Section 141 in Practical Use

Company X issues a cheque to Payee X which is dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The payee files a complaint under section 138. During investigation, it is found that the managing director authorized the cheque.

Under section 141, both Company X and the managing director are held liable for the offence. The director cannot avoid liability unless he proves lack of knowledge and due diligence.

  • Ensures accountability of company officers.

  • Supports enforcement of cheque dishonour laws against corporate entities.

Historical Background of NI Act Section 141

Section 141 was introduced to extend cheque dishonour offences to companies, recognizing the growing role of corporate entities in financial transactions.

It was added to address the gap where companies could evade liability due to their separate legal status. Judicial interpretations have clarified the scope of officer liability and defences.

  • Introduced post-1988 amendments to cheque dishonour laws.

  • Strengthened corporate accountability.

  • Developed through case law on officer responsibility.

Modern Relevance of NI Act Section 141

In 2026, with increased corporate transactions, section 141 remains vital to enforce cheque dishonour provisions against companies and their officers.

Digital banking and electronic payments coexist with traditional cheques, but this section ensures accountability for physical cheque offences. Courts encourage mediation and summary trials to resolve such cases efficiently.

  • Supports business and banking discipline.

  • Facilitates practical litigation and settlements.

  • Emphasizes compliance and proper authorization.

Related Sections

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 4 – Definition of promissory note.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 5 – Definition of bill of exchange.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 6 – Definition of cheque.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 138 – Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 139 – Presumption in favour of holder.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 140 – Offences by persons in charge of company.

Case References under NI Act Section 141

  1. Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement (2005, AIR SC 2628)

    – Clarified liability of company officers under section 141 for cheque dishonour offences.

  2. Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2010, AIR SC 2449)

    – Affirmed due diligence defence for officers under section 141.

  3. Rajendra Prasad v. State of Maharashtra (2016, Bom HC)

    – Held that mere position does not impose liability without knowledge and control.

Key Facts Summary for NI Act Section 141

  • Section: 141

  • Title: Offences by Companies

  • Category: Offence, Liability

  • Applies To: Companies, directors, managers, authorized signatories

  • Legal Impact: Extends criminal liability to company officers

  • Compliance Requirement: Due diligence and knowledge defence available

  • Related Forms/Notices/Filings: Complaint under section 138, notice of dishonour

Conclusion on NI Act Section 141

Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 plays a critical role in holding companies and their responsible officers accountable for cheque dishonour offences. It ensures that corporate entities cannot escape liability by relying solely on their separate legal personality.

This provision promotes financial discipline and trust in negotiable instruments involving companies. Understanding its scope, defences, and procedural requirements is essential for businesses, banks, and legal professionals to enforce payment obligations and prosecute defaults effectively.

FAQs on Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141

Who is liable under Section 141 when a company issues a dishonoured cheque?

Both the company and the persons in charge of the company’s conduct at the time of the offence, such as directors or authorized signatories, are liable under Section 141.

Can an officer avoid liability under Section 141?

Yes, an officer can avoid liability by proving that the offence was committed without their knowledge and that they exercised all due diligence to prevent it.

Does Section 141 apply to all companies?

Section 141 applies to all companies and corporate bodies that issue negotiable instruments like cheques and commit offences under the Act.

Is Section 141 applicable only to cheque dishonour offences?

Section 141 primarily applies to offences under the Act related to negotiable instruments, especially cheque dishonour offences under Section 138.

What is the punishment under Section 141?

Punishment includes fines and imprisonment similar to those prescribed for offences under Section 138, applicable to both the company and responsible officers.

Related Sections

House arrest is legal in India under specific conditions governed by law and court orders.

Companies Act 2013 Section 185 governs loans to directors, ensuring compliance and preventing misuse of corporate funds.

Companies Act 2013 Section 387 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

In India, filtering on roads is legal but subject to specific rules and conditions enforced by traffic laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 82 deals with the power to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

Ketamine is a controlled substance in India, legal only for medical use under strict regulation.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 251 covers the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders and assessments.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 121 defines when oral admissions are relevant, detailing their use in proving facts in civil and criminal cases.

Understand the legality of silent strikes by laborers in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 195A details the procedure for filing complaints about offences against public servants during duty.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 279B deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 166 mandates that courts must record evidence in the presence of the accused to ensure fairness and transparency in trials.

White labeling is legal in India with conditions on trademarks, contracts, and consumer rights compliance.

In India, the legal age of consent for sex is 18 years, with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

Understand the legal status of Devar Bhabhi relationships in India, including cultural context and legal implications under Indian law.

CrPC Section 44 empowers police to arrest without warrant when a person obstructs lawful arrest or escapes custody.

Income Tax Act Section 114 empowers the Assessing Officer to summon persons for inquiry or production of evidence.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

Section 197 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows you to obtain a certificate for lower or no TDS deduction in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 109 explains the burden of proving possession of stolen property by the accused in criminal cases.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 53 covering tax payment and refund procedures.

GPS trackers are legal in India but with strict rules on privacy and consent.

Discover the legal status of making an online poker app in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

In India, bidding is legal with regulations varying by context like auctions, government contracts, and online platforms.

IPC Section 479 defines punishment for using a false document as genuine, protecting authenticity in legal and official matters.

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 deals with the procedure for investigation into company affairs by the Registrar or other authorities.

Killing a tortoise in India is illegal under wildlife protection laws with strict penalties and few exceptions.

bottom of page