Evidence Act 1872 Section 27
Evidence Act 1872 Section 27 covers admissions by persons whose statements explain or are connected to a fact in issue, aiding proof in trials.
Evidence Act Section 27 deals with statements made by persons who are not parties to a case but whose statements help explain or are connected to a fact in issue. These statements, though not direct evidence, can be admitted to assist the court in understanding the case better. This section is crucial in both civil and criminal trials to establish the truth.
Understanding Section 27 is important because it allows the court to consider relevant admissions that might otherwise be excluded. It helps in proving facts indirectly by linking statements to the main issue, thus enhancing the evidence's strength and reliability.
Evidence Act Section 27 – Exact Provision
This section allows certain statements made by unavailable persons to be admitted as evidence against parties responsible for their absence or death. It helps courts consider relevant facts when direct testimony is impossible, ensuring justice is not defeated by absence.
Admits statements of unavailable persons linked to the case.
Applies when absence or death is caused by a party.
Includes statements made in ordinary course of business.
Supports proof of relevant facts indirectly.
Prevents parties from benefiting from their wrongdoing.
Explanation of Evidence Act Section 27
Section 27 permits admission of statements from persons who cannot testify due to death, absence, or incapacity, especially when a party caused such unavailability.
Allows proof of statements by unavailable persons.
Affects accused, witnesses, litigants, and courts.
Requires the party against whom evidence is used to have caused absence or death.
Statements must relate to facts in issue or relevant facts.
Ensures fairness by preventing misuse of absence.
Purpose and Rationale of Evidence Act Section 27
The section ensures that parties cannot escape liability by causing a witness's absence or death. It promotes fairness and truth by admitting relevant statements when direct evidence is unavailable.
Ensures reliable evidence despite witness absence.
Promotes fairness by preventing manipulation.
Strengthens judicial truth-finding process.
Prevents parties from benefiting from wrongdoing.
When Evidence Act Section 27 Applies
This section applies when a person whose statement is relevant is dead, missing, or cannot be found, and the party against whom the statement is used caused or is responsible for this unavailability.
Applicable when witness is dead or absent.
Party against whom evidence is used must have caused absence.
Used in both criminal and civil cases.
Cannot be invoked if absence is unrelated to party's actions.
Limited to statements relevant to facts in issue.
Burden and Standard of Proof under Evidence Act Section 27
The burden lies on the party seeking to admit the statement to prove the unavailability was caused by the opposing party. The standard of proof depends on the case nature—beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases and preponderance of probability in civil cases. Section 27 works alongside Sections 101–114, especially regarding presumptions about absence and admissions.
Burden on party adducing the statement.
Standard varies by criminal or civil context.
Interacts with presumption sections for evidentiary weight.
Nature of Evidence under Evidence Act Section 27
This section deals with admissibility of statements as admissions by persons unavailable to testify. It focuses on relevance and indirect proof rather than direct oral or documentary evidence. Limitations include the necessity of proving the party's responsibility for absence and the statement's connection to facts in issue.
Admissibility of statements as admissions.
Focus on relevance and connection to facts.
Requires proof of party's role in absence.
Not direct oral or documentary evidence.
Procedural obligation to establish unavailability cause.
Stage of Proceedings Where Evidence Act Section 27 Applies
Section 27 is mainly relevant during the trial stage when evidence is being examined. It may also be considered during investigation if statements are recorded, and on appeal if admissibility is challenged. It is important during cross-examination to test the validity of such statements.
Trial stage for admitting statements.
Investigation stage for recording statements.
Appeal stage for admissibility challenges.
Cross-examination to test reliability.
Appeal and Challenge Options under Evidence Act Section 27
Rulings on admissibility under Section 27 can be challenged by appeal or revision. Higher courts intervene if there is a legal error or miscarriage of justice. Appellate review focuses on whether the unavailability and connection to the party were properly established.
Admissibility rulings challengeable by appeal.
Revision possible for procedural errors.
Higher courts review for legal correctness.
Timelines depend on case type and court.
Example of Evidence Act Section 27 in Practical Use
In a criminal trial, person X is accused of causing the death of witness Y who had made statements implicating X. Since Y is deceased, the prosecution seeks to admit Y's prior statements under Section 27 against X. The court admits the statements as X caused Y's death, making Y unavailable to testify.
Shows use of statements from deceased witnesses.
Prevents accused from benefiting from witness's absence.
Historical Background of Evidence Act Section 27
Introduced in 1872, Section 27 addressed challenges in proving facts when witnesses were unavailable due to death or absence caused by parties. Historically, courts struggled with such evidence, leading to this provision. Judicial interpretations have refined its scope over time.
Introduced to address witness unavailability.
Court interpretations expanded its application.
Amendments clarified party responsibility criteria.
Modern Relevance of Evidence Act Section 27
In 2026, Section 27 remains vital with the rise of electronic evidence and digital records. Courts increasingly rely on such statements when direct testimony is impossible. It supports e-courts and digital trials by allowing relevant admissions despite witness absence.
Applicable to digital and electronic statements.
Supports judicial reforms for e-trials.
Ensures evidence reliability in modern contexts.
Related Evidence Act Sections
- Evidence Act Section 32 – Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found is relevant
– Allows admission of statements by unavailable persons under certain conditions.
- Evidence Act Section 17 – Admissions defined
– Defines what constitutes an admission in evidence.
- Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proof
– Establishes who must prove facts in issue.
- Evidence Act Section 114 – Court may presume existence of certain facts
– Deals with presumptions related to evidence.
- CrPC Section 311 – Power to summon material witnesses
– Enables courts to call witnesses whose evidence is relevant.
Case References under Evidence Act Section 27
- Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab (1965 AIR 1043)
– Statements of a deceased witness admitted against accused responsible for death.
- State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 3191)
– Clarified conditions for admitting statements under Section 27.
- Ram Narayan v. State of Bihar (1962 AIR 1167)
– Emphasized necessity of proving party's role in witness absence.
Key Facts Summary for Evidence Act Section 27
- Section:
27
- Title:
Admissions by Persons Connected
- Category:
Admissibility, Admissions, Evidence of Unavailable Persons
- Applies To:
Accused, witnesses, litigants, courts
- Proceeding Type:
Civil and Criminal trials
- Interaction With:
Sections 32, 17, 101, 114, CrPC Section 311
- Key Use:
Admitting statements of unavailable persons caused absent by party
Conclusion on Evidence Act Section 27
Evidence Act Section 27 plays a crucial role in ensuring that justice is not defeated by the absence of key witnesses. By allowing statements of persons who cannot testify due to death or absence caused by a party, it promotes fairness and truth in legal proceedings. This provision prevents parties from benefiting from their wrongdoing and strengthens the evidentiary framework.
Its application in both civil and criminal cases highlights its broad importance. Understanding Section 27 helps legal practitioners navigate complex evidentiary challenges and supports courts in making informed decisions based on all relevant facts, even when direct testimony is unavailable.
FAQs on Evidence Act Section 27
What types of statements are admissible under Section 27?
Statements made by persons who are dead, missing, or unable to testify due to party-caused absence can be admitted if relevant to facts in issue. These include verbal or written statements made in the ordinary course of business.
Who can invoke Section 27 during a trial?
Typically, the party seeking to admit the statement against an opposing party who caused the witness's absence or death can invoke Section 27 to prove relevant facts.
Does Section 27 apply in both civil and criminal cases?
Yes, Section 27 is applicable in both civil and criminal proceedings wherever statements of unavailable persons are relevant and the opposing party caused their absence.
How does Section 27 interact with burden of proof?
The party relying on Section 27 must prove that the witness is unavailable due to the opposing party's actions. The standard of proof varies by case type but generally requires establishing this connection clearly.
Can statements under Section 27 be challenged on appeal?
Yes, rulings on admissibility of such statements can be challenged through appeals or revisions, and higher courts review whether legal conditions for admission were properly met.