top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 206AE

Section 206AE of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates higher TDS rates on specified persons who do not furnish PAN in India.

Section 206AE of the Income Tax Act 1961 is legal and enforced in India. It requires deductors to apply a higher rate of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) when the specified person does not provide a valid Permanent Account Number (PAN).

This provision aims to improve tax compliance and reduce tax evasion by ensuring that individuals and entities furnish their PAN details during financial transactions.

Understanding Section 206AE of the Income Tax Act 1961

This section was introduced to strengthen the tax collection system by penalizing non-furnishing of PAN. It applies specifically to specified persons, typically those who have filed income tax returns in the past.

The law mandates a higher TDS rate to encourage taxpayers to submit their PAN details to the deductor.

  • Section 206AE applies when a specified person fails to provide PAN to the deductor at the time of TDS deduction.

  • The TDS rate under this section is 5%, which is higher than the normal TDS rates applicable.

  • Specified persons generally include taxpayers who have filed returns in the last two years and have PAN but fail to furnish it.

  • The provision aims to reduce tax evasion by linking TDS rates with PAN submission compliance.

This section is part of the government’s effort to improve transparency and accountability in tax deduction processes.

Who Are Considered Specified Persons Under Section 206AE?

Specified persons are those taxpayers who have filed income tax returns in the previous two assessment years and possess a PAN. The law targets these individuals or entities to ensure they provide PAN during transactions.

Understanding who falls under this category helps you comply and avoid higher TDS deductions.

  • Specified persons include individuals, Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), companies, firms, and other entities who filed returns in the last two years.

  • If you have filed income tax returns in the last two years and have a PAN, you are a specified person under this section.

  • Non-furnishing of PAN by these persons triggers the application of the higher TDS rate of 5%.

  • The section does not apply to persons who have never filed returns or do not have a PAN.

Knowing your status as a specified person helps you avoid unnecessary higher TDS deductions.

When Does Section 206AE Apply?

This section applies during the deduction of tax at source on specified payments when the specified person does not furnish PAN. It is important to know the timing and conditions for its application.

The deductor must verify PAN details before deducting tax to avoid applying the higher rate unnecessarily.

  • Section 206AE applies only when a specified person fails to provide PAN to the deductor at the time of TDS deduction.

  • The higher TDS rate of 5% is applied on the sum paid or credited to the specified person.

  • The provision is applicable to all payments where TDS is deductible under the Income Tax Act.

  • If PAN is furnished later, the specified person can claim refund of excess TDS deducted.

Timely furnishing of PAN prevents the application of this higher TDS rate and avoids cash flow issues.

Legal Consequences of Non-Furnishing PAN Under Section 206AE

Failing to provide PAN as a specified person leads to higher TDS deduction, which can affect your liquidity. It also signals non-compliance to tax authorities.

Understanding the consequences helps you stay compliant and avoid unnecessary financial burdens.

  • Higher TDS at 5% reduces the immediate cash available to the specified person.

  • Non-furnishing of PAN may invite scrutiny from tax authorities for compliance verification.

  • The specified person must file income tax returns to claim credit or refund of excess TDS deducted.

  • Repeated non-compliance may affect your credibility with financial institutions and government agencies.

Providing PAN timely is the best way to avoid these legal and financial consequences.

How to Comply With Section 206AE Requirements?

Compliance involves furnishing your PAN to the deductor before any payment subject to TDS. This simple step helps you avoid higher tax deductions.

Deductors also have responsibilities to verify PAN and apply correct TDS rates.

  • You should provide your valid PAN to the deductor before receiving any payment liable for TDS.

  • Deductors must verify PAN details using the government’s PAN verification system before deducting tax.

  • If PAN is not provided or invalid, deductors must apply the 5% TDS rate as per Section 206AE.

  • Keep records of PAN submissions and TDS certificates for income tax filing and refund claims.

Following these steps ensures smooth transactions and avoids unnecessary tax deductions.

Common Mistakes and Enforcement Reality

Many taxpayers and deductors make errors related to Section 206AE, leading to disputes and delays in refunds. Understanding these mistakes helps you avoid them.

Tax authorities actively enforce this provision to improve PAN compliance and tax collection.

  • Not providing PAN or providing incorrect PAN details is a common mistake leading to higher TDS deductions.

  • Deductors sometimes fail to verify PAN properly, causing wrongful application of Section 206AE.

  • Specified persons often delay filing returns to claim refunds of excess TDS deducted under this section.

  • Tax authorities monitor compliance and may penalize persistent non-furnishing of PAN or incorrect TDS deductions.

Being aware of these issues helps you maintain compliance and avoid enforcement problems.

Practical Impact of Section 206AE on Taxpayers and Businesses

This section impacts both individuals and businesses by enforcing stricter PAN submission rules. It affects cash flow and tax planning.

Understanding its practical effects helps you manage your finances and tax obligations better.

  • Higher TDS deductions reduce immediate funds available to taxpayers and businesses.

  • It encourages timely and accurate PAN submission, improving tax record transparency.

  • Businesses must update their records and systems to verify PAN and apply correct TDS rates.

  • Taxpayers should file returns promptly to claim refunds of any excess TDS deducted under Section 206AE.

Overall, this section promotes better tax compliance and accountability in financial transactions.

Conclusion

Section 206AE of the Income Tax Act 1961 is a legal and enforceable provision in India. It mandates a higher TDS rate of 5% on specified persons who fail to furnish their PAN.

Understanding who is affected, when it applies, and how to comply helps you avoid unnecessary tax deductions and legal complications. Timely furnishing of PAN and proper record-keeping are key to smooth tax compliance under this section.

FAQs

Who is a specified person under Section 206AE?

A specified person is one who has filed income tax returns in the last two years and holds a PAN but fails to furnish it during TDS deduction.

What is the TDS rate under Section 206AE?

The TDS rate is 5% on payments made to specified persons who do not provide their PAN to the deductor.

Can I claim a refund if excess TDS is deducted under Section 206AE?

Yes, you can claim a refund of excess TDS by filing your income tax return and providing your PAN details.

Does Section 206AE apply if I never filed income tax returns?

No, it applies only to specified persons who have filed returns in the last two years and have a PAN.

What should deductors do to comply with Section 206AE?

Deductors must verify the PAN of specified persons before deducting TDS and apply the 5% rate if PAN is not furnished or invalid.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 321 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of register or records of the company.

Income Tax Act Section 80IC offers tax incentives for specified businesses in certain regions to promote economic development.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 131 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

CrPC Section 318 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another within the criminal justice system.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 24 provides deductions on income from house property, including interest on home loans.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 244 deals with refunds of excess tax paid by taxpayers.

Companies Act 2013 Section 439 governs the power of the Central Government to grant relief in cases of winding up of companies.

IPC Section 234 penalizes wrongful confinement in secret, protecting personal liberty and privacy.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 18 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Understand the legality of dual employment in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 165 governs disqualification of directors to ensure effective corporate governance.

IPC Section 55 defines punishment for the sale of noxious food or drink, protecting public health from harmful substances.

IPC Section 403 defines dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person, outlining its scope and punishment.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73 deals with the admissibility of evidence of character to prove conduct in civil or criminal cases.

SNRIs are prescription medicines in India and legal only when prescribed by a registered doctor.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Gay marriages are not legally recognized in India, but some legal protections exist under specific laws.

Friendship clubs are legal in India if they comply with local laws and do not engage in unlawful activities.

Eur/USD trading is legal in India only through authorized platforms under RBI rules, with strict regulations on forex trading.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10 lists incomes exempt from tax, helping taxpayers understand non-taxable earnings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 150 explains the presumption of ownership when possession is proved, aiding proof of title in legal disputes.

Bike modifications in India are conditionally legal with strict rules on safety, pollution, and approval from authorities.

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

Crocin is legal in India as an over-the-counter pain reliever and fever reducer with regulated sale and usage.

CrPC Section 41A mandates police to issue a notice before arresting a person in certain cases, ensuring fair procedure and protecting individual liberty.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 103 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

bottom of page