top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 49

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

Information Technology Act Section 49 focuses on the preservation and retention of digital records and evidence by intermediaries and service providers. This section ensures that electronic data relevant to investigations or legal proceedings is maintained securely for a specified period. It plays a crucial role in supporting law enforcement and judicial processes in the digital age.

In today's digital environment, where cybercrimes and online disputes are increasingly common, Section 49 helps maintain the integrity of digital evidence. It impacts users, businesses, and authorities by mandating timely preservation of data, which is essential for effective investigation and prosecution of cyber offences.

Information Technology Act Section 49 – Exact Provision

This section empowers authorities to instruct intermediaries or persons controlling computer resources to preserve specific digital information. The preservation period is determined by the order. This provision is vital for securing evidence that might otherwise be lost or altered.

  • Allows authorities to order preservation of digital data.

  • Targets intermediaries and persons in control of computer resources.

  • Specifies preservation period as per the order.

  • Aids in securing evidence for investigation or adjudication.

  • Supports legal processes involving electronic records.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 49

Section 49 mandates preservation of digital evidence upon official order. It applies primarily to intermediaries and persons controlling computer resources.

  • The section states that authorities can direct preservation of electronic data.

  • Applies to intermediaries, service providers, and computer resource controllers.

  • Triggered when an investigation or adjudication requires specific data.

  • Legal criteria involve a written order from the Controller or adjudicating officer.

  • Allows preservation but does not authorize data disclosure.

  • Prohibits destruction or alteration of ordered data during preservation period.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 49

The main purpose of Section 49 is to protect digital evidence crucial for cybercrime investigations and legal disputes. It ensures that electronic information is not lost or tampered with before it can be examined by authorities.

  • Protects users and law enforcement by securing digital evidence.

  • Prevents destruction or alteration of relevant electronic data.

  • Supports timely and effective cybercrime investigations.

  • Ensures availability of evidence for adjudication and prosecution.

When IT Act Section 49 Applies

This section applies when an official order is issued to preserve digital data relevant to a case. It is invoked during investigations or adjudications involving electronic evidence.

  • When a Controller or adjudicating officer issues a preservation order.

  • Applicable to intermediaries and computer resource controllers.

  • Evidence must be relevant to ongoing investigation or legal proceeding.

  • Digital data includes emails, logs, files, and other electronic records.

  • Exceptions may apply if data is unrelated or preservation is impractical.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 49

Section 49 creates a legal obligation for intermediaries and persons controlling computer resources to preserve specified digital information. Failure to comply may lead to penalties. It supports the integrity of evidence used in cybercrime cases and complements other laws like the Indian Penal Code.

  • Creates duty to preserve digital evidence upon official order.

  • Non-compliance can attract penalties under the IT Act.

  • Supports prosecution of offences involving electronic records.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 49

The section imposes regulatory compliance obligations on intermediaries and computer resource controllers. It is not a criminal offence by itself but failure to comply may lead to penalties and legal consequences.

  • Regulatory compliance obligation.

  • Non-compliance may attract civil or penal consequences.

  • Not a cognizable offence but enforceable by authorities.

  • No arrest provisions directly linked to this section.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 49 Applies

Section 49 is relevant during investigation and evidence preservation stages. It ensures that digital data is retained for examination and trial.

  • Investigation stage – preservation of relevant electronic data.

  • Evidence collection – securing logs, files, and records.

  • Filing of complaint – data preserved supports charges.

  • Trial – preserved data used as evidence.

  • Appeal – evidence integrity maintained.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 49

While Section 49 itself does not specify penalties, failure to comply with preservation orders may attract penalties under related provisions of the IT Act. Intermediaries may face fines or other sanctions for non-compliance.

  • Penalties for non-compliance under IT Act provisions.

  • Possible fines or adjudication orders.

  • Corporate liability for failure to preserve data.

  • Intermediary liability emphasized.

  • Compensation claims possible if evidence loss causes harm.

Example of IT Act Section 49 in Practical Use

Consider a scenario where a cybercrime investigation involves fraudulent transactions through an online platform. The adjudicating officer issues an order under Section 49 to the platform's service provider to preserve all transaction logs and user data for six months. The service provider complies, ensuring that critical evidence is available for investigation and prosecution. This preservation helps law enforcement trace the fraudsters and supports successful legal action.

  • Preservation orders secure vital digital evidence.

  • Compliance by intermediaries aids effective cybercrime investigation.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 49

The IT Act 2000 was introduced to regulate electronic commerce and address cybercrime. Section 49 was included to empower authorities to preserve digital evidence, a necessity as cyber offences grew. The 2008 Amendment Act expanded provisions related to evidence and intermediary liability, reinforcing Section 49's importance in digital investigations.

  • Introduced to support e-commerce and cybercrime regulation.

  • 2008 Amendment enhanced digital evidence provisions.

  • Section 49 evolved to meet growing cyber investigation needs.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 49

In 2026, cybersecurity and data protection remain critical. Section 49 helps maintain digital evidence integrity amid increasing online transactions, fintech growth, and social media use. It supports enforcement agencies in tackling cybercrimes and ensures online safety by mandating data preservation.

  • Supports digital evidence in cybercrime investigations.

  • Ensures online safety and accountability.

  • Addresses enforcement challenges in digital era.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 72 – Breach of confidentiality and privacy.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant for online fraud.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 49

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 49

  • Section: 49

  • Title: Preservation of Digital Evidence

  • Category: Digital Evidence, Cybercrime Investigation

  • Applies To: Intermediaries, Service Providers, Computer Resource Controllers

  • Stage: Investigation, Evidence Collection, Trial

  • Legal Effect: Obligation to preserve data upon official order

  • Penalties: Fines and sanctions for non-compliance

Conclusion on IT Act Section 49

Section 49 of the Information Technology Act 2000 plays a vital role in preserving digital evidence necessary for cybercrime investigations and legal proceedings. By mandating intermediaries and persons in control of computer resources to retain specified data, it safeguards the integrity of electronic records. This legal obligation supports law enforcement and judicial authorities in effectively addressing cyber offences.

In the evolving digital landscape, Section 49 remains crucial for maintaining trust in electronic transactions and online communications. Its enforcement ensures that critical digital information is available when needed, thereby strengthening the overall cyber legal framework in India.

FAQs on IT Act Section 49

What types of data must be preserved under Section 49?

Section 49 requires preservation of any electronic information specified in the official order, including emails, logs, files, and other digital records relevant to an investigation or adjudication.

Who can issue a preservation order under Section 49?

The Controller or an adjudicating officer appointed under the IT Act has the authority to issue a written order directing preservation of digital data.

Does Section 49 allow disclosure of preserved data?

No, Section 49 mandates preservation but does not authorize disclosure. Disclosure is governed by other provisions and legal processes.

What happens if an intermediary fails to comply with a Section 49 order?

Failure to comply may attract penalties, including fines and other sanctions under the IT Act, as intermediaries have a legal duty to preserve specified data.

Is Section 49 applicable to individuals or only intermediaries?

Section 49 applies to intermediaries and any person in charge of a computer resource, which can include individuals controlling digital systems relevant to the order.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 258 empowers a Magistrate to issue a warrant for arrest when a person absconds or conceals to avoid summons or appearance.

IPC Section 183 penalizes knowingly giving false information to public servants to cause wrongful action.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 123 defines when oral admissions are relevant, impacting proof and credibility in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 156 empowers police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information, ensuring prompt legal action.

CrPC Section 173 details the police report submission procedure after investigation, crucial for trial initiation.

Income Tax Act Section 276CC prescribes punishment for failure to file income tax returns within due dates.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 65 defines the liability of a drawer when a cheque is dishonoured due to insufficient funds or stopped payment.

CrPC Section 268 defines public nuisance and its legal implications under Indian criminal procedure.

CPC Section 63 defines the procedure for attachment before judgment to secure a decree in civil suits.

IPC Section 46 defines the right of private defense of the body, detailing when and how force may be used to protect oneself.

IPC Section 281 penalizes causing hurt by rash or negligent driving or riding of vehicles, ensuring road safety and accountability.

IPC Section 305 addresses abetment of suicide by a child or insane person, outlining punishment and legal scope.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115 covers special provisions for taxation of income from certain sources.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 67 deals with the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring written agreements are upheld.

Income Tax Act Section 263 empowers the Commissioner to revise erroneous or prejudicial income tax assessments.

In India, the legal age to marry is 18 for women and 21 for men, with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

Dafabet is not legally licensed in India, with strict regulations on online betting and gambling activities enforced nationwide.

CrPC Section 427 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

In India, pedal cycles with engines are legal if they meet motor vehicle regulations and registration requirements.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 3 defines the charge of income tax on total income of individuals and entities.

Understand the legality of hedging in India, its regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about this financial practice.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 64 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Keeping guns in India is legal only with a valid license under strict regulations governed by the Arms Act, 1959.

In India, spa services with 'happy endings' are illegal and considered prostitution under the law.

Flash sales are legal in India but must follow consumer protection and e-commerce regulations to avoid penalties.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A governs appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ensuring proper appellate procedure.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 70 deals with set-off of losses from one head of income against income from another head.

bottom of page