top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 298

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 298 defines 'firm' for tax purposes, clarifying its scope and application under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 298 deals with the definition of the term "firm" for the purposes of income tax. It clarifies what constitutes a firm under the Act, which is important for determining tax liability and compliance requirements for partnerships.

This section is crucial for taxpayers, professionals, and businesses engaged in partnership firms. Understanding it helps in proper assessment, filing, and adherence to tax laws applicable to firms.

Income Tax Act Section 298 – Exact Provision

This section explicitly states that the term 'firm' in the Income Tax Act refers to the definition provided under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. It ensures consistency in legal interpretation and application of tax provisions to partnership firms.

  • Defines 'firm' by reference to the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

  • Ensures uniformity in tax treatment of partnership entities.

  • Applies to all partnership firms for income tax purposes.

  • Clarifies scope for assessment and compliance.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 298

This section states that 'firm' means the same as defined under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

  • Applies to partnership firms recognized under Indian law.

  • Relevant for individuals, firms, and tax authorities.

  • Triggers tax obligations on income earned by the firm.

  • Ensures firms are distinct taxable entities separate from partners.

  • Facilitates correct filing and assessment procedures.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 298

The purpose is to provide a clear and consistent definition of 'firm' for taxation. This avoids ambiguity and aligns tax law with partnership law.

  • Ensures fair and uniform tax treatment of firms.

  • Prevents confusion in tax assessments.

  • Supports proper revenue collection from partnership entities.

  • Encourages compliance by clearly defining taxable entities.

When Income Tax Act Section 298 Applies

This section applies whenever the term 'firm' is used in the Income Tax Act, affecting tax treatment of partnership income.

  • Relevant for all financial years and assessment years.

  • Applies to income earned by partnership firms.

  • Impacts resident and non-resident firms operating in India.

  • No exceptions; universally applicable to partnerships.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 298

By defining 'firm' as per the Indian Partnership Act, the section ensures that partnership income is taxed as per provisions applicable to firms. The firm is treated as a separate taxable entity, distinct from its partners, impacting income computation and tax liability.

  • Firm's income is computed separately from partners.

  • Tax rates and provisions applicable to firms apply.

  • Partners are taxed on their share of income.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 298

This section creates a legal basis for tax obligations on firms. It mandates compliance by partnership entities and benefits tax authorities by clarifying taxable entities.

  • Creates tax liability for partnership firms.

  • Mandatory compliance for firms under the Act.

  • Benefits tax administration by clear definitions.

  • Does not provide exemptions or deductions.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

The section applies at the initial stage of identifying taxable entities, impacting assessment and filing procedures for firms.

  • Income accrual and receipt by the firm.

  • Return filing by the firm as a separate entity.

  • Assessment and reassessment of firm’s income.

  • Appeal and rectification processes involving firms.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 298

While Section 298 itself does not specify penalties, incorrect classification of entities may lead to penalties under other provisions. Non-compliance by firms can attract interest and penalties for defaults.

  • Incorrect firm classification may cause assessment issues.

  • Penalties under general tax provisions may apply.

  • Interest on late payment or defaults possible.

  • Prosecution unlikely directly under this section.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 298 in Practical Use

Assessee X operates a partnership firm named Company X. For tax purposes, the firm is recognized as per Section 298, meaning it must file its income tax return separately. The firm’s income is assessed distinctly from the partners, who report their share individually.

  • Firm files separate tax returns.

  • Partners report income share individually.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 298

Originally, the Income Tax Act did not define 'firm' explicitly. Section 298 was introduced to align tax law with the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, ensuring clarity. Amendments have maintained this alignment, supported by judicial interpretations reinforcing the definition.

  • Introduced to clarify 'firm' definition.

  • Aligned with Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

  • Supported by judicial rulings on partnership taxation.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 298

In 2026, with digital filings and faceless assessments, clear entity definitions remain vital. Section 298 ensures firms comply with digital tax processes and facilitates accurate TDS and AIS reporting.

  • Supports digital compliance and filing.

  • Ensures correct tax treatment of firms.

  • Facilitates faceless assessment procedures.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 5 – Scope of total income.

  • Income Tax Act Section 139 – Filing of returns.

  • Income Tax Act Section 184 – Return of income by firm.

  • Income Tax Act Section 40(b) – Remuneration to partners.

  • Income Tax Act Section 44AB – Audit of accounts.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 298

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 298

  • Section: 298

  • Title: Definition of Firm

  • Category: Definition, Assessment

  • Applies To: Partnership firms

  • Tax Impact: Determines taxable entity status

  • Compliance Requirement: Mandatory for firms

  • Related Forms/Returns: ITR-5 (for firms)

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 298

Section 298 plays a foundational role in income tax law by defining 'firm' as per the Indian Partnership Act. This clarity ensures partnership firms are correctly identified as separate taxable entities, facilitating proper tax assessment and compliance.

Understanding this section is essential for partners, tax professionals, and authorities to avoid confusion and ensure smooth tax administration. It supports transparent taxation and aligns partnership law with income tax provisions effectively.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 298

What does Section 298 define in the Income Tax Act?

Section 298 defines the term 'firm' by referring to the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. It clarifies which entities are considered firms for tax purposes.

Who does Section 298 apply to?

It applies to all partnership firms recognized under Indian law, impacting their tax assessment and compliance obligations.

Does Section 298 create any tax liability?

While it does not create tax liability itself, it defines firms as taxable entities, making them liable under other tax provisions.

Is Section 298 relevant for digital tax filings?

Yes, it remains relevant as it helps identify firms correctly for digital return filing and faceless assessments.

Are there penalties under Section 298?

The section does not specify penalties, but misclassification of firms can lead to penalties under other tax laws.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 113 governs the procedure for service of documents to companies and their members.

Understand the legal status of Lord Rama in India and how religious figures are treated under Indian law.

Selling beef in India is legal with regional restrictions; laws vary by state with strict enforcement in some areas.

CrPC Section 370 defines the offence of human trafficking and the procedures for investigation and trial under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Section 211 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the assessment of income when the assessee fails to comply with notices, allowing income to be estimated by tax authorities.

CrPC Section 3 defines the extent of the Code of Criminal Procedure across India, clarifying its territorial application.

CrPC Section 460 details the procedure for compounding offences and the court's power to accept compromise between parties.

CrPC Section 269 covers the procedure when a person with a contagious disease negligently exposes others, focusing on public health safety.

Gardasil is legal in India for HPV prevention, approved by health authorities with regulated use and availability.

IPC Section 22 defines the term 'movable property' under Indian Penal Code, clarifying what constitutes movable property for legal purposes.

IPC Section 156 empowers police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information, ensuring prompt legal action.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

In India, recording meetings is legal with consent; understand consent rules, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

In India, graffiti is generally illegal without permission, with strict enforcement in public and private spaces.

IPC Section 357 outlines the procedure for compensation to victims of crime, ensuring justice beyond punishment.

Car roof wrapping is legal in India with specific regulations on colors and reflectivity to ensure road safety.

IT Act Section 38 empowers police officers to investigate cyber offences without prior magistrate approval.

Income Tax Act Section 271C penalizes failure to deduct tax at source (TDS) as required under the Act.

Sativa is illegal in India under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

E-prescribing is legal in India with specific regulations ensuring secure and authorized digital prescriptions.

Understand the legal status of owning, trading, and protecting owls in India under wildlife laws.

Manufacturing cigarettes in India is legal but strictly regulated under various laws and licenses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 115 explains the presumption of fact when a person is found in possession of stolen property shortly after theft.

Rohypnol is illegal in India; its manufacture, sale, and possession are strictly prohibited under drug laws.

IPC Section 349 defines force used against a person without consent, covering its scope and legal implications.

IPC Section 150 defines the offence of assembling with intent to commit an offence, focusing on unlawful gatherings aimed at criminal acts.

IPC Section 161 mandates police officers to record statements of witnesses during investigations to ensure accurate evidence collection.

bottom of page