top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 25

IT Act Section 25 addresses penalties for failure to protect sensitive personal data or information under the IT Act, 2000.

Section 25 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, deals with penalties related to the failure in protecting sensitive personal data or information. This section is crucial in today's digital age where data privacy and security are paramount. It mandates that entities handling sensitive data must implement reasonable security practices to prevent unauthorized access or data breaches.

This section impacts users, businesses, and law enforcement by setting legal standards for data protection. It holds companies accountable for negligence in safeguarding personal information, thereby fostering trust in digital transactions and online services.

Information Technology Act Section 25 – Exact Provision

This provision imposes liability on any person or entity that does not adequately protect sensitive personal data. It emphasizes the responsibility to maintain data security and provides a remedy for individuals whose data is compromised due to negligence.

  • Mandates protection of sensitive personal data.

  • Imposes liability for failure to secure data.

  • Allows compensation to affected individuals.

  • Applies to entities handling personal information.

  • Supports enforcement of data privacy standards.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 25

This section states that failure to protect sensitive personal data attracts liability and compensation claims.

  • Applies to data controllers and service providers.

  • Triggered by negligence or inadequate security measures.

  • Legal criteria include breach of reasonable security practices.

  • Allows affected persons to claim damages.

  • Prohibits careless handling of personal data.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 25

The section aims to protect individuals' privacy by ensuring entities take responsibility for data security. It deters negligence and promotes trust in digital services.

  • Protects users' sensitive data.

  • Prevents data breaches and misuse.

  • Ensures accountability of data handlers.

  • Supports secure electronic transactions.

When IT Act Section 25 Applies

This section applies when sensitive personal data is mishandled or inadequately protected, leading to harm or loss.

  • Occurs upon data breach or negligence.

  • Invoked by affected individuals or authorities.

  • Requires evidence of failure to secure data.

  • Relevant to digital data and network security.

  • Exceptions include lawful data processing.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 25

Section 25 creates a legal obligation to protect sensitive data and imposes penalties for failure. It enables compensation claims and complements other cybercrime provisions.

  • Creates duty of care for data protection.

  • Allows compensation for damages.

  • Supports enforcement of privacy laws.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 25

This section imposes civil liability for negligence in data protection. It is non-cognizable and does not involve arrest but focuses on compensation and compliance.

  • Civil liability for data protection failure.

  • Non-cognizable offence.

  • No arrest powers under this section.

  • Emphasizes regulatory compliance.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 25 Applies

Section 25 is relevant during investigation of data breaches, evidence gathering, filing compensation claims, and trial proceedings.

  • Investigation of data security incidents.

  • Collection of digital evidence.

  • Filing of compensation claims.

  • Trial for liability determination.

  • Appeal against compensation orders.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 25

Penalties include payment of damages to affected persons. Corporate entities may face compensation claims and reputational damage. Intermediaries must ensure compliance to avoid liability.

  • Compensation payments to victims.

  • Corporate liability for negligence.

  • Intermediary responsibility for data security.

Example of IT Act Section 25 in Practical Use

Consider a company "X" that collects sensitive customer data but fails to implement adequate security measures. A data breach occurs, exposing customers' personal information. Affected individuals claim compensation under Section 25 for the company's failure to protect their data. The company is held liable and ordered to pay damages, reinforcing the importance of data security.

  • Highlights liability for data breaches.

  • Emphasizes need for reasonable security practices.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 25

The IT Act, 2000 was introduced to regulate electronic commerce and address cybercrime. Section 25 was added to enforce data protection responsibilities. The 2008 Amendment enhanced provisions related to data security and privacy.

  • Introduced with IT Act, 2000 for digital regulation.

  • Amended in 2008 for stronger data protection.

  • Evolved with growing cyber security needs.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 25

In 2026, with increasing cyber threats, Section 25 remains vital for data protection. It supports secure online payments, fintech, and digital identity systems. Enforcement challenges persist due to evolving technologies.

  • Supports digital evidence protection.

  • Enhances online safety and privacy.

  • Addresses enforcement challenges in cybercrime.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 72A – Punishment for disclosure of information in breach of lawful contract.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating, relevant for online fraud.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 25

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 25

  • Section: 25

  • Title: Penalty for Data Protection Failure

  • Category: Data Protection, Cybersecurity

  • Applies To: Data controllers, service providers, companies

  • Stage: Investigation, Trial, Appeal

  • Legal Effect: Liability for failure to protect sensitive data

  • Penalties: Compensation for damages

Conclusion on IT Act Section 25

Section 25 of the IT Act, 2000, plays a critical role in safeguarding sensitive personal data. It imposes liability on entities that fail to implement reasonable security measures, ensuring accountability in the digital ecosystem. This provision strengthens data privacy and fosters trust among users and businesses.

As cyber threats evolve, Section 25 remains a key legal tool to address data breaches and enforce data protection standards. Its focus on compensation and liability encourages organizations to prioritize cybersecurity and protect individuals' privacy rights effectively.

FAQs on IT Act Section 25

What types of data are protected under Section 25?

Section 25 protects sensitive personal data or information, including financial details, passwords, biometric data, and other private information requiring security.

Who can be held liable under Section 25?

Data controllers, service providers, companies, or any entity responsible for handling sensitive personal data can be held liable for failure to protect it.

What penalties does Section 25 impose?

The section imposes liability to pay damages or compensation to individuals affected by failure to protect their sensitive personal data.

Is Section 25 a criminal offence?

No, Section 25 primarily imposes civil liability for negligence in data protection, focusing on compensation rather than criminal punishment.

How does Section 25 impact businesses?

Businesses must implement reasonable security practices to protect sensitive data, failing which they may face compensation claims and reputational harm.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 12 defines the relevancy of admissions, crucial for proving facts by statements against interest in civil and criminal cases.

Income Tax Act Section 80CC provides deductions for contributions to notified pension funds under specified conditions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 289 mandates audit of accounts by a chartered accountant for certain entities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 9 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

IPC Section 193 penalizes giving false evidence or fabricating false documents to mislead judicial proceedings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 124 defines 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Owning a helicopter in India is legal with proper licenses and approvals from DGCA and other authorities.

Playing Louf music in India is legal with no specific restrictions, but public performance rules and copyright laws apply.

Sride is not a recognized legal term or item in India; its legality depends on context and specific usage under Indian law.

IPC Section 47 defines the punishment for belonging to a gang of thieves, outlining legal consequences for group criminal activity.

Section 206CC of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates PAN quoting for tax deduction at source in India.

Smoking in roadside cafes in India is generally prohibited by law, with strict enforcement in public places including cafes.

Learn about the legality of Predict and Win games in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misunderstandings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 23 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance or non-payment.

CrPC Section 204 details the magistrate's duty to take cognizance of offences upon receiving a complaint or police report.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 139 establishes the presumption of consideration for negotiable instruments, aiding enforceability.

In India, sex chat on Instagram is subject to strict laws under IT and obscenity laws, making it largely illegal and punishable.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 158 defines the scope of cross-examination, crucial for testing witness credibility and truthfulness in trials.

IPC Section 1 introduces the Indian Penal Code, its extent, and commencement across India.

CrPC Section 71 defines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to appear before the court.

Santhara, the Jain practice of fasting to death, is legal in India with nuanced legal and cultural considerations.

Understand the legal status of nudity in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 127 governs the manner and timing of dividend payments by companies in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 1 defines the short title, commencement, and extent of the Act.

Flunipam is a prescription medication in India, legal only when prescribed by a doctor and used under medical supervision.

CrPC Section 84 defines the legal defense of unsoundness of mind, exempting accused from criminal liability if mentally incapable.

Companies Act 2013 Section 296 governs restrictions on powers of the Board of Directors regarding company property and contracts.

bottom of page