top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 67B

IT Act Section 67B addresses punishment for publishing sexually explicit material involving children online.

Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, deals with the punishment for publishing or transmitting material in electronic form that depicts children in sexually explicit acts. This section aims to combat child pornography and protect minors from exploitation in the digital space. It is crucial in today's environment where online content spreads rapidly, and children are vulnerable to abuse through digital platforms.

This section impacts internet users, content providers, intermediaries, and law enforcement agencies by setting clear legal boundaries and penalties for offenses involving child sexual abuse material. It helps ensure safer online environments and supports the prosecution of offenders exploiting technology for illegal purposes.

Information Technology Act Section 67B – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the electronic publication or transmission of child pornography. It imposes severe penalties to deter such acts. The law covers anyone who directly or indirectly causes such material to be shared or made available online.

  • Targets child pornography in electronic form.

  • Applies to publishing, transmitting, or causing publication.

  • Prescribes imprisonment up to five years.

  • Includes fines up to ten lakh rupees.

  • Aims to protect children from sexual exploitation online.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 67B

This section prohibits the electronic dissemination of sexually explicit material involving children. It applies to all individuals and entities involved in publishing or transmitting such content.

  • States that publishing or transmitting child pornography electronically is illegal.

  • Applies to users, intermediaries, content creators, and service providers.

  • Triggered when child sexual abuse material is shared online.

  • Legal criteria include depiction of children in sexually explicit acts.

  • Allows prosecution of those causing or facilitating such publication.

  • Prohibits creation, sharing, or distribution of such material electronically.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 67B

The section aims to protect children from sexual exploitation through digital media. It deters offenders from creating or distributing abusive content and supports law enforcement in combating child pornography.

  • Protects minors in the digital ecosystem.

  • Prevents online child sexual abuse material.

  • Ensures accountability for electronic content involving children.

  • Supports secure and safe internet use.

When IT Act Section 67B Applies

This section applies when sexually explicit material involving children is published or transmitted electronically. It can be invoked by law enforcement agencies upon detection or complaint.

  • When child pornography is shared online or via electronic means.

  • Invoked by police, cybercrime units, or authorized officers.

  • Requires evidence of electronic publication or transmission.

  • Relevant to digital platforms, websites, social media, emails.

  • Exceptions do not apply for child protection offenses.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 67B

This section creates criminal liability for publishing or transmitting child pornography electronically. It restricts such acts and imposes imprisonment and fines. It complements IPC provisions on sexual offences and child protection.

Individuals and companies can face penalties, including imprisonment up to five years and fines up to ten lakh rupees. Platforms hosting such content may also be held liable under intermediary rules.

  • Creates criminal offence for child pornography online.

  • Penalties include imprisonment and heavy fines.

  • Supports prosecution alongside IPC child protection laws.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 67B

The offence under Section 67B is criminal and cognizable. It involves strict liability for publishing or transmitting child sexual abuse material electronically. Arrest can be made without warrant due to the serious nature of the crime.

  • Criminal liability for offenders.

  • Cognizable and non-bailable offence.

  • Arrest without warrant permitted.

  • Strict liability to deter child exploitation.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 67B Applies

The section applies throughout investigation, trial, and appeal stages. Digital evidence like electronic records, metadata, and logs are crucial for prosecution.

  • Investigation involves collecting electronic evidence.

  • Complaints filed by victims or authorities.

  • Trial conducted in sessions court or special courts.

  • Appeals handled by higher courts.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 67B

Penalties include imprisonment up to five years and fines up to ten lakh rupees. Corporate entities and intermediaries may face liability if they fail to prevent such content. Compensation to victims may also be awarded.

  • Imprisonment up to five years.

  • Fine up to ten lakh rupees.

  • Corporate and intermediary liability possible.

  • Victim compensation may be ordered.

Example of IT Act Section 67B in Practical Use

X, a website administrator, knowingly allows sexually explicit images of children to be uploaded and shared on their platform. Authorities investigate and find evidence of transmission of child pornography. Under Section 67B, X is prosecuted and sentenced to imprisonment and fined. The platform is also ordered to remove the content and implement stricter controls.

  • Section 67B deters hosting child pornography online.

  • Supports prosecution of digital child exploitation.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 67B

The IT Act was introduced in 2000 to regulate electronic commerce and cybercrime. Section 67B was added via the 2008 Amendment to address growing concerns about child pornography online. The law has evolved to strengthen child protection in cyberspace.

  • IT Act 2000 established cybercrime laws.

  • 2008 Amendment introduced Section 67B.

  • Reflects growing need to combat online child exploitation.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 67B

In 2026, with increased internet use and social media, child protection remains critical. Section 67B is vital for combating online child sexual abuse material. Challenges include detecting content and enforcing laws across platforms.

  • Digital evidence crucial for prosecution.

  • Ensures online safety for children.

  • Enforcement faces challenges with encrypted and cross-border content.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66E – Punishment for violation of privacy.

  • IT Act Section 67 – Publishing obscene material online.

  • IPC Section 292 – Obscenity laws applicable to child pornography.

  • IPC Section 376 – Sexual offences against children.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

Case References under IT Act Section 67B

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Praful Desai (2003, 4 SCC 601)

    – Established principles on electronic evidence admissibility relevant to IT Act prosecutions.

  2. No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 67B

  • Section: 67B

  • Title: Punishment for publishing sexually explicit material involving children

  • Category: Cybercrime, child protection

  • Applies To: Users, intermediaries, content providers

  • Stage: Investigation, trial, appeal

  • Legal Effect: Criminal liability, imprisonment, fines

  • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment, fine up to 10 lakh rupees

Conclusion on IT Act Section 67B

Section 67B of the IT Act is a critical legal provision aimed at curbing the spread of child pornography through electronic means. It provides stringent penalties to deter offenders and protect children from sexual exploitation online. The law empowers authorities to take swift action against those publishing or transmitting such material.

In the digital age, where content can be shared instantly worldwide, Section 67B plays a vital role in safeguarding minors. It complements other child protection laws and supports a safer internet environment. Continuous enforcement and awareness are essential to uphold the section's objectives effectively.

FAQs on IT Act Section 67B

What does Section 67B of the IT Act prohibit?

Section 67B prohibits publishing or transmitting sexually explicit material involving children in electronic form. It criminalizes such acts to protect minors from exploitation online.

Who can be held liable under Section 67B?

Any individual or entity that publishes, transmits, or causes to publish or transmit child pornography electronically can be held liable under this section.

What are the penalties under Section 67B?

Penalties include imprisonment up to five years and fines up to ten lakh rupees. Corporate and intermediary liability may also apply.

Is Section 67B a cognizable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 67B are cognizable and non-bailable due to the serious nature of child exploitation crimes.

How does Section 67B protect children online?

It deters the creation and sharing of child sexual abuse material electronically, supports prosecution of offenders, and promotes safer digital environments for children.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 210 details the procedure for filing a complaint before a Magistrate and the Magistrate's duty to take cognizance of the offence.

CrPC Section 203 details the Magistrate's power to take cognizance of offences upon receiving a police report.

CrPC Section 228 details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants in relation to their official duties.

Contract Act 1872 Section 34 explains the effect of subsequent illegality on contracts and their enforceability.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 83 defines the presumption of death when a person has been missing for seven years, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

CrPC Section 183 defines the procedure for recording information about offences by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint.

CrPC Section 173 details the police report submission procedure after investigation, crucial for trial initiation.

IPC Section 359 defines kidnapping, covering unlawful removal or confinement of a person, protecting personal liberty and safety.

CrPC Section 303 mandates enhanced punishment for repeat offenders convicted of murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Companies Act 2013 Section 100 governs the procedure for calling extraordinary general meetings by directors or shareholders.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 115 explains the presumption of fact when a person is found in possession of stolen property shortly after theft.

IPC Section 40 defines the term 'Court of Justice' to clarify jurisdiction and authority in legal proceedings.

IPC Section 149 defines liability of every member of an unlawful assembly for offences committed in prosecution of common object.

CrPC Section 430 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during a criminal investigation.

IPC Section 325 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, specifying imprisonment and fines for such offences.

CPC Section 50 covers the procedure for issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents in civil suits.

Contract Act 1872 Section 20 defines free consent and its role in making contracts valid and enforceable.

Companies Act 2013 Section 90 mandates disclosure of significant beneficial ownership in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 32 details the admissibility of statements made by a person who is dead or cannot be found as evidence in court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 92 mandates annual return filing requirements for companies in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113 presumes culpable homicide if a person causes death by rash or negligent act, shifting burden to the accused.

IPC Section 76 defines acts done by a person bound or justified by law, explaining legal protection for such acts.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 70 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 21 defines admissions and their role as relevant facts in legal proceedings.

CPC Section 95 empowers courts to order attachment of property to secure satisfaction of a decree.

IT Act Section 17 defines 'Electronic Signature' and its legal recognition under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

bottom of page