top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 465

Companies Act 2013 Section 465 governs the power to compound offences under the Act for efficient corporate compliance.

Companies Act Section 465 deals with the power to compound offences committed under the Act. This provision allows certain offences to be settled by paying a compounding fee, avoiding prolonged litigation. It plays a vital role in easing the burden on courts and promoting timely compliance among companies and their officers.

Understanding this section is essential for directors, company secretaries, auditors, and legal professionals. It helps them navigate legal risks and take advantage of the compounding mechanism to resolve violations efficiently, ensuring smoother corporate governance and regulatory adherence.

Companies Act Section 465 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Central Government or authorized officers to compound offences by accepting a monetary sum. It excludes offences punishable only by imprisonment unless court approval is obtained. The provision prevents compounding once investigations begin, ensuring serious offences face due process. Compounding leads to closure of proceedings, saving time and resources.

  • Allows compounding of certain offences by paying a fee.

  • Requires court approval for offences involving imprisonment.

  • Prohibits compounding after investigation starts.

  • Ends prosecution upon compounding payment.

  • Empowers Central Government or authorized officers.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 465

This section outlines the process and conditions for compounding offences under the Companies Act.

  • States that the Central Government or authorized officers can compound offences.

  • Applies to persons concerned with the offence, including directors and officers.

  • Mandatory court approval needed if offence involves imprisonment.

  • Compounding not permitted after investigation or inquiry begins.

  • Permits closure of proceedings upon payment of compounding sum.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 465

The section aims to reduce litigation and promote efficient resolution of corporate offences.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by encouraging compliance.

  • Protects companies and officers from prolonged legal battles.

  • Ensures transparency by involving court approval for serious offences.

  • Prevents misuse by disallowing compounding after investigations.

When Companies Act Section 465 Applies

This section applies when offences under the Companies Act are detected before or after prosecution begins.

  • Applicable to offences punishable by fine or imprisonment.

  • Compounding allowed before or after prosecution initiation.

  • Not applicable once investigation or inquiry has started.

  • Central Government or authorized officers must approve compounding.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 465

This provision creates a legal mechanism to settle offences by payment, avoiding trial. It imposes conditions like court approval for imprisonment offences and bars compounding after investigations. Non-compliance with compounding rules can lead to prosecution continuation. It interacts with MCA rules governing offence procedures and compounding fees.

  • Creates duty to seek court approval for serious offences.

  • Allows settlement of offences by paying compounding fees.

  • Stops further proceedings once offence is compounded.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 465

Compliance is conditional and procedural, triggered by offence detection. It is a one-time obligation to compound the offence by paying a fee. Directors or officers must coordinate with authorities for compounding. It impacts internal governance by resolving legal risks promptly.

  • Conditional compliance based on offence type and stage.

  • One-time obligation to pay compounding sum.

  • Responsibility lies with concerned persons and company.

  • Supports internal risk management and governance.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies during enforcement actions related to offences under the Companies Act.

  • Before prosecution initiation stage.

  • After prosecution but before investigation stage.

  • Not applicable post-investigation or inquiry.

  • Relevant during legal compliance and dispute resolution.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 465

Failure to compound offences properly can lead to continued prosecution, fines, or imprisonment. The section itself does not prescribe penalties but facilitates avoiding them through compounding. Court approval ensures serious offences are not lightly compounded. Additional fees or remedial directions may apply as per MCA rules.

  • Monetary penalties via compounding fees.

  • Possible imprisonment if offence is not compounded.

  • Disqualification not directly linked but may arise from offences.

  • Remedial directions by authorities possible.

Example of Companies Act Section 465 in Practical Use

Company X was found guilty of late filing of annual returns, an offence punishable by fine. The company approached the authorized officer and paid the compounding fee before prosecution began. This avoided court proceedings and penalties. Director X ensured timely compliance thereafter.

  • Compounding resolved offence efficiently.

  • Encouraged better future compliance.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 465

This section replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, to streamline offence resolution. Introduced in 2013 to reduce litigation and promote ease of doing business. Amendments have clarified conditions for compounding and court involvement.

  • Shifted from 1956 Act’s compounding rules.

  • Introduced to reduce court burden.

  • Refined with amendments for clarity.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 465

In 2026, this section supports digital filings and MCA portal enforcement. It aligns with e-governance by enabling swift offence settlement. It complements CSR and ESG compliance by reducing legal risks. Governance reforms emphasize timely dispute resolution.

  • Supports digital compliance and filings.

  • Facilitates governance reforms.

  • Enhances practical corporate legal management.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • Companies Act Section 454 – Cognizance of offences.

  • Companies Act Section 455 – Power to grant immunity.

  • Companies Act Section 466 – Power to compound offences by Regional Directors.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 15HB – Penalties for failure to comply with SEBI regulations.

Case References under Companies Act Section 465

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 465

  • Section: 465

  • Title: Power to Compound Offences

  • Category: Compliance, Governance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Officers, Persons concerned

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, procedural, one-time

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, possible imprisonment if not compounded

  • Related Filings: Compounding application with MCA and court approval if needed

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 465

Companies Act Section 465 provides a vital legal mechanism to compound offences under the Act. It balances the need for enforcement with efficiency by allowing settlement through payment of fees. This reduces litigation and helps companies maintain good governance.

However, it safeguards serious offences by requiring court approval and disallowing compounding after investigations. Understanding this section is crucial for companies and professionals to manage legal risks and ensure compliance in today’s corporate environment.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 465

What types of offences can be compounded under Section 465?

Offences punishable by fine or imprisonment can be compounded, but court approval is needed if imprisonment is involved. Serious offences under investigation cannot be compounded.

Who has the authority to compound offences under this section?

The Central Government or officers authorized by it have the power to compound offences under Section 465.

Can compounding be done after prosecution has started?

Yes, compounding can occur before or after prosecution begins, but not after investigation or inquiry has started.

Does compounding under Section 465 eliminate all penalties?

Compounding ends prosecution for the offence compounded, but penalties or consequences from other laws may still apply.

Is court approval always required for compounding offences?

Court approval is mandatory if the offence is punishable with imprisonment, either alone or with fine.

Related Sections

CPC Section 12 allows a defendant to set off a legal debt against the plaintiff’s claim in a civil suit.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 15 covering value of taxable supply under GST.

Contract Act 1872 Section 9 defines what agreements are contracts and when they become legally enforceable.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 87A provides a rebate on tax payable for resident individual taxpayers with income below a specified limit.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 4 defines promissory notes and their essential features under Indian law.

Learn about the legality of light stun gun torches in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement details.

Companies Act 2013 Section 463 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the Act’s provisions.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 12 covering deemed supply provisions under CGST Act.

H2 Carbon is not street legal in India due to strict vehicle regulations and lack of official approval.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269T prohibits cash repayments of loans exceeding Rs. 20,000 to curb tax evasion.

Traditional surrogacy is illegal in India; only altruistic gestational surrogacy is allowed under strict conditions.

IPC Section 428 defines the offence of malicious injury to property by killing or maiming cattle or animals, outlining penalties and legal scope.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 130 explains the presumption of possession as evidence of ownership in legal disputes.

Marijuana seeds are conditionally legal in India, allowed for industrial hemp but restricted for cultivation or consumption.

Companies Act 2013 Section 93 mandates annual return filing requirements for Indian companies.

Contract Act 1872 Section 46 explains the effect of refusal to perform promise wholly or in part.

E-prescribing is legal in India with specific regulations ensuring secure and authorized digital prescriptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 64 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, crucial for fair criminal trials.

CPC Section 20 defines the proper place of suing in civil cases based on defendant's residence or property location.

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 1 defines the short title, extent, commencement, and application of the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 375 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal under insolvency proceedings.

IPC Section 207 covers the offence of disclosing the identity of a person accused of an offence to protect privacy and ensure fair trial.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 129 defines the term 'confession' and its role in legal proceedings as an admission against interest.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 119 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Shotguns are conditionally legal in India with strict licensing under the Arms Act, 1959 and related rules.

IPC Section 98 defines the offence of concealing design to wage war against the Government of India, addressing threats to national security.

CPC Section 145 details the procedure for the arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil suits to enforce decrees.

bottom of page