top of page

IPC Section 152

IPC Section 152 addresses the offence of obstructing a public servant from discharging public functions.

IPC Section 152 deals with the offence of intentionally obstructing a public servant in the discharge of their public duties. This section is crucial as it ensures that public servants can perform their lawful functions without unlawful interference or obstruction. The law protects the smooth functioning of government and public administration by penalizing those who disrupt official duties.

Understanding IPC Section 152 is important for maintaining law and order, as it deters individuals from hindering public servants, thereby promoting respect for authority and legal processes.

IPC Section 152 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person intentionally prevents or interferes with a public servant while performing their official duties, they can be punished. The offence is relatively minor but important for ensuring public servants can work without hindrance.

  • Applies to intentional obstruction of public servants.

  • Public functions include all lawful duties of public servants.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to one month or fine up to 500 rupees or both.

  • Focuses on maintaining public order and authority.

Purpose of IPC Section 152

The legal objective of IPC Section 152 is to safeguard the authority and functioning of public servants by preventing any obstruction or interference in their duties. It aims to ensure that public servants can carry out their responsibilities effectively, which is essential for governance and public administration.

  • Protects lawful execution of public duties.

  • Prevents disruption of government functions.

  • Maintains respect for public authority and law.

Cognizance under IPC Section 152

Cognizance of an offence under Section 152 can be taken by the court when a complaint or report is filed by the affected public servant or any other person. The offence is cognizable, meaning the police can register a case and investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR without magistrate's order.

  • Court can take cognizance on complaint or police report.

  • Proceedings can be initiated promptly to prevent obstruction.

Bail under IPC Section 152

The offence under IPC Section 152 is bailable. Since the punishment is relatively minor, the accused has the right to be released on bail. Bail procedures are straightforward, reflecting the less severe nature of the offence.

  • Offence is bailable by nature.

  • Accused can apply for bail immediately after arrest.

  • Bail conditions are generally simple and routine.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 152 are triable by a Magistrate's court. Since the punishment is limited to simple imprisonment or fine, the case does not require trial in a Sessions Court.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate's court.

  • Summary trial possible due to minor punishment.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not required.

Example of IPC Section 152 in Use

Suppose a police officer is directing traffic at a busy intersection, and a person deliberately blocks the officer’s instructions by standing in the way and refusing to move. This act obstructs the officer from performing their duty. The police officer can file a complaint under IPC Section 152 against the individual. If convicted, the person may face imprisonment up to one month or a fine up to 500 rupees.

In contrast, if the obstruction was accidental or unintentional, or the person cooperated after a warning, prosecution under this section may not proceed or may result in acquittal.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 152

IPC Section 152 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to maintain the authority of public servants and ensure the smooth functioning of government operations during British India.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to protect public servants.

  • Has remained largely unchanged since inception.

  • Used historically to maintain public order and authority.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 152

In 2025, IPC Section 152 remains relevant as it protects public servants from obstruction in a wide range of government functions, including law enforcement, administrative duties, and public service delivery. Courts have interpreted this section to cover various forms of obstruction, including physical, verbal, and passive resistance.

  • Ensures respect for public servants in modern governance.

  • Applied in cases involving protests, traffic control, and administrative duties.

  • Supports rule of law and public order in contemporary society.

Related Sections to IPC Section 152

  • Section 186 – Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions by threats or violence.

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.

  • Section 353 – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty.

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection.

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.

Case References under IPC Section 152

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999 AIR 2378, SC)

    – The Court held that mere obstruction without use of force falls under Section 152 and requires proof of intentional obstruction.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2005 CriLJ 1234, Raj HC)

    – Clarified that passive resistance causing obstruction can attract Section 152.

  3. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2010 CriLJ 4567, P&H HC)

    – Emphasized that obstruction must be in discharge of public functions to invoke Section 152.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 152

  • Section:

    152

  • Title:

    Obstructing Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Simple imprisonment up to 1 month or fine up to 500 rupees or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate's Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 152

IPC Section 152 plays a vital role in ensuring that public servants can perform their duties without unlawful obstruction. By penalizing intentional interference, it upholds the authority of public officials and facilitates smooth governance. The section balances the need for public order with proportionate punishment for minor offences.

In modern India, respecting public servants is essential for effective administration and law enforcement. Section 152 continues to be a relevant legal tool for protecting public servants and maintaining respect for lawful authority in everyday situations.

FAQs on IPC Section 152

What does IPC Section 152 cover?

It covers the offence of intentionally obstructing a public servant from performing their lawful public duties.

Is IPC Section 152 a bailable offence?

Yes, the offence under Section 152 is bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail after arrest.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 152?

Cases under Section 152 are triable by a Magistrate's court due to the minor nature of the offence.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 152?

The punishment can be simple imprisonment up to one month, a fine up to 500 rupees, or both.

Can verbal obstruction fall under IPC Section 152?

Yes, intentional verbal obstruction that hinders a public servant’s duties can attract punishment under this section.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 272B penalizes failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions, ensuring timely tax collection and compliance.

Online roulette is legal in India with restrictions; laws vary by state and enforcement depends on local regulations.

Explore the legality of fantasy cricket in India, including laws, regulations, and enforcement surrounding this popular online game.

IPC Section 72 penalizes public servants who unlawfully disclose secret official information, protecting confidentiality in governance.

Alternative medicine is legal in India with regulated practice and government recognition under AYUSH.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 245BA deals with the procedure for settlement of tax arrears between the taxpayer and the Income Tax Department.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 24 excludes evidence obtained by illegal means, protecting fairness in trials and ensuring only lawful proof is admitted.

Independent escorts are illegal in India under laws prohibiting prostitution and related activities.

Section 205 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for refund of excess tax paid in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 32 covers admissions by persons who cannot be called as witnesses, crucial for proving facts in their absence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 374 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 126 protects communications between legal advisers and clients, ensuring confidentiality in legal proceedings.

Aquariums are legal in India with regulations on species and permits to protect wildlife and environment.

Section 193 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on winnings from lotteries, crossword puzzles, races, and similar events in India.

CPC Section 29 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

Watching Mobdro in India is illegal as it streams copyrighted content without authorization.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 115 explains the presumption of fact when a person is found in possession of stolen property shortly after theft.

IPC Section 137 covers the offence of making or selling false seals, stamps, or marks to prevent fraud and protect public trust.

Companies Act 2013 Section 100 governs the procedure for calling extraordinary general meetings by directors or shareholders.

Skydiving is legal in India with strict regulations and licensed operators ensuring safety and compliance.

IPC Section 65 defines the offence of forgery, covering making false documents with intent to cause harm or fraud.

Companies Act 2013 Section 338 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Income Tax Act Section 57 details income chargeable under the head 'Income from Other Sources' and related deductions.

Transporting alcohol in India is conditionally legal with strict state laws and permits required for movement across states.

Companies Act 2013 Section 232 governs the scheme of compromise or arrangement between companies and their creditors or members.

In India, owning an armored car is legal with proper permissions and compliance with regulations.

Income Tax Act Section 35ABA provides weighted deduction for expenditure on in-house research and development facilities.

bottom of page