top of page

IPC Section 152

IPC Section 152 addresses the offence of obstructing a public servant from discharging public functions.

IPC Section 152 deals with the offence of intentionally obstructing a public servant in the discharge of their public duties. This section is crucial as it ensures that public servants can perform their lawful functions without unlawful interference or obstruction. The law protects the smooth functioning of government and public administration by penalizing those who disrupt official duties.

Understanding IPC Section 152 is important for maintaining law and order, as it deters individuals from hindering public servants, thereby promoting respect for authority and legal processes.

IPC Section 152 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person intentionally prevents or interferes with a public servant while performing their official duties, they can be punished. The offence is relatively minor but important for ensuring public servants can work without hindrance.

  • Applies to intentional obstruction of public servants.

  • Public functions include all lawful duties of public servants.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to one month or fine up to 500 rupees or both.

  • Focuses on maintaining public order and authority.

Purpose of IPC Section 152

The legal objective of IPC Section 152 is to safeguard the authority and functioning of public servants by preventing any obstruction or interference in their duties. It aims to ensure that public servants can carry out their responsibilities effectively, which is essential for governance and public administration.

  • Protects lawful execution of public duties.

  • Prevents disruption of government functions.

  • Maintains respect for public authority and law.

Cognizance under IPC Section 152

Cognizance of an offence under Section 152 can be taken by the court when a complaint or report is filed by the affected public servant or any other person. The offence is cognizable, meaning the police can register a case and investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR without magistrate's order.

  • Court can take cognizance on complaint or police report.

  • Proceedings can be initiated promptly to prevent obstruction.

Bail under IPC Section 152

The offence under IPC Section 152 is bailable. Since the punishment is relatively minor, the accused has the right to be released on bail. Bail procedures are straightforward, reflecting the less severe nature of the offence.

  • Offence is bailable by nature.

  • Accused can apply for bail immediately after arrest.

  • Bail conditions are generally simple and routine.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 152 are triable by a Magistrate's court. Since the punishment is limited to simple imprisonment or fine, the case does not require trial in a Sessions Court.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate's court.

  • Summary trial possible due to minor punishment.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not required.

Example of IPC Section 152 in Use

Suppose a police officer is directing traffic at a busy intersection, and a person deliberately blocks the officer’s instructions by standing in the way and refusing to move. This act obstructs the officer from performing their duty. The police officer can file a complaint under IPC Section 152 against the individual. If convicted, the person may face imprisonment up to one month or a fine up to 500 rupees.

In contrast, if the obstruction was accidental or unintentional, or the person cooperated after a warning, prosecution under this section may not proceed or may result in acquittal.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 152

IPC Section 152 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to maintain the authority of public servants and ensure the smooth functioning of government operations during British India.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to protect public servants.

  • Has remained largely unchanged since inception.

  • Used historically to maintain public order and authority.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 152

In 2025, IPC Section 152 remains relevant as it protects public servants from obstruction in a wide range of government functions, including law enforcement, administrative duties, and public service delivery. Courts have interpreted this section to cover various forms of obstruction, including physical, verbal, and passive resistance.

  • Ensures respect for public servants in modern governance.

  • Applied in cases involving protests, traffic control, and administrative duties.

  • Supports rule of law and public order in contemporary society.

Related Sections to IPC Section 152

  • Section 186 – Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions by threats or violence.

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.

  • Section 353 – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty.

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection.

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.

Case References under IPC Section 152

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999 AIR 2378, SC)

    – The Court held that mere obstruction without use of force falls under Section 152 and requires proof of intentional obstruction.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2005 CriLJ 1234, Raj HC)

    – Clarified that passive resistance causing obstruction can attract Section 152.

  3. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2010 CriLJ 4567, P&H HC)

    – Emphasized that obstruction must be in discharge of public functions to invoke Section 152.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 152

  • Section:

    152

  • Title:

    Obstructing Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Simple imprisonment up to 1 month or fine up to 500 rupees or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate's Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 152

IPC Section 152 plays a vital role in ensuring that public servants can perform their duties without unlawful obstruction. By penalizing intentional interference, it upholds the authority of public officials and facilitates smooth governance. The section balances the need for public order with proportionate punishment for minor offences.

In modern India, respecting public servants is essential for effective administration and law enforcement. Section 152 continues to be a relevant legal tool for protecting public servants and maintaining respect for lawful authority in everyday situations.

FAQs on IPC Section 152

What does IPC Section 152 cover?

It covers the offence of intentionally obstructing a public servant from performing their lawful public duties.

Is IPC Section 152 a bailable offence?

Yes, the offence under Section 152 is bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail after arrest.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 152?

Cases under Section 152 are triable by a Magistrate's court due to the minor nature of the offence.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 152?

The punishment can be simple imprisonment up to one month, a fine up to 500 rupees, or both.

Can verbal obstruction fall under IPC Section 152?

Yes, intentional verbal obstruction that hinders a public servant’s duties can attract punishment under this section.

Related Sections

Catholic marriage is legal in India under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, with specific rights and procedures.

TV receivers for phones are legal in India with proper licenses and compliance with broadcasting laws.

Section 180 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to comply with certain notices or directions under Indian tax law.

Learn about the legality of DocuSign electronic signatures in India and how they are accepted under Indian law.

Online Matka is illegal in India as it is considered a form of gambling under Indian law with strict enforcement and penalties.

Income Tax Act Section 276CC prescribes punishment for failure to file income tax returns within due dates.

In India, prostitution itself is legal but running or soliciting in hotels is regulated and often illegal under various laws.

Donating a kidney is legal in India under strict regulations to prevent commercial trade and protect donors.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 76 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder under the Act.

Learn about the legal status of blockchain technology in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Selling sex toys in India is legal with some restrictions varying by state and local laws.

CPC Section 50 covers the procedure for issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents in civil suits.

IPC Section 216A penalizes the act of harboring or concealing offenders to prevent their arrest or trial.

Companies Act 2013 Section 87 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of the register of members.

Inter religion marriage is legal in India under special laws like the Special Marriage Act, with conditions and protections for both parties.

In India, selling dogs is legal but regulated under animal welfare laws to ensure ethical treatment and prevent cruelty.

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 deals with the procedure for investigation into company affairs by the Registrar or other authorities.

Alternative medicine is legal in India with regulated practice and government recognition under AYUSH.

CrPC Section 176 details the procedure for an inquest by a Magistrate into unnatural or suspicious deaths.

Shell companies are conditionally legal in India but face strict regulations to prevent misuse for illegal activities.

University 18 is not a legally recognized university in India and cannot grant valid degrees under Indian law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 40 covering input tax credit reversal and conditions.

Commercial surrogacy in India is banned since 2015, only altruistic surrogacy is allowed under strict conditions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 169 governs the removal of directors by members of a company.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 52 defines 'Capital Asset' for taxation of capital gains under the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 117 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

IPC Section 200 covers the examination of the accused by a magistrate upon receiving a complaint, ensuring proper inquiry before proceeding.

bottom of page