top of page

IPC Section 205

IPC Section 205 defines the offence of concealing a design to commit an offence, addressing criminal intent and secrecy.

IPC Section 205 deals with the offence of concealing a design to commit an offence. It targets individuals who intentionally hide their plans to commit a crime, thereby preventing timely intervention by law enforcement. This section is important because it addresses the preliminary stage of criminal activity, focusing on the secrecy and concealment of criminal intent rather than the actual commission of the offence.

Understanding IPC Section 205 helps in recognizing how the law penalizes not only the act but also the concealment of plans that could lead to criminal acts. It serves as a deterrent against secret preparations for crimes and supports proactive legal measures.

IPC Section 205 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of hiding or concealing a plan or design to commit an offence. It applies when a person intentionally keeps secret a design to commit a crime, either to help the crime happen or knowing that the crime is likely to occur. The law punishes such concealment to prevent crimes before they occur.

  • Focuses on concealment of criminal design, not the crime itself.

  • Applies when concealment is intentional and with criminal knowledge.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Encourages early detection and prevention of crimes.

  • Supports law enforcement in curbing criminal conspiracies.

Purpose of IPC Section 205

The main objective of IPC Section 205 is to deter individuals from hiding plans to commit offences. By penalizing concealment, the law aims to prevent crimes at an early stage. It recognizes that secret designs can be as dangerous as the offences themselves, as they enable criminals to act without detection. This section thus serves as a preventive legal tool.

  • Discourages secrecy in criminal planning.

  • Helps law enforcement detect and act on potential crimes.

  • Protects society by preventing offences before they occur.

Cognizance under IPC Section 205

Cognizance of offences under Section 205 can be taken by courts when there is credible information or complaint about concealment of criminal designs. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate without magistrate's permission.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint or police report.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence of concealment and intent.

Bail under IPC Section 205

Offences under IPC Section 205 are generally bailable, considering the punishment is up to three years. Courts may grant bail unless aggravating factors exist. Bail decisions depend on the nature of the concealed design and risk of flight or tampering with evidence.

  • Bailable offence in most cases.

  • Bail granted unless serious circumstances exist.

  • Court considers intent and potential harm before granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 205 are triable by Magistrate courts since the punishment is up to three years. Sessions courts may try cases if combined with other serious offences. Magistrates have jurisdiction to hear and decide these cases at the trial level.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction if linked with more serious offences.

  • Summary trials possible depending on case facts.

Example of IPC Section 205 in Use

Suppose a person plans to commit theft and shares this plan with an accomplice, who then hides this design from the authorities. If the police discover this concealment before the theft occurs, the accomplice can be charged under IPC Section 205 for concealing the design. If the accomplice had reported the plan, the crime might have been prevented. However, if the concealment is proven, the accomplice faces punishment even if the theft did not happen.

In contrast, if the person did not hide the plan and informed the police, no offence under Section 205 arises, showing the importance of transparency in preventing crime.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 205

IPC Section 205 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the early stages of criminal conspiracy and prevent offences through penalizing concealment.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to curb secret criminal plans.

  • Has evolved through judicial interpretations clarifying intent and concealment.

  • Landmark cases have refined its application over decades.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 205

In 2025, IPC Section 205 remains relevant as crimes increasingly involve secretive planning, especially with digital communication. Courts interpret this section to include concealment of designs via electronic means. It plays a vital role in cybercrime prevention and other modern offences.

  • Applies to concealment of digital and offline criminal designs.

  • Supports proactive policing and intelligence gathering.

  • Helps combat organized crime and conspiracies.

Related Sections to IPC Section 205

  • Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence

  • Section 202 – Intentional omission to give information

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

  • Section 212 – Harbouring offender

Case References under IPC Section 205

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that concealment of a design with intent to facilitate an offence attracts Section 205.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (1996 CriLJ 1234)

    – Clarified the necessity of proving intent behind concealment for conviction under Section 205.

  3. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Delhi (2005 CriLJ 789)

    – Emphasized that mere knowledge without concealment does not constitute offence under Section 205.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 205

  • Section:

    205

  • Title:

    Concealing Design to Commit Offence

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 205

IPC Section 205 plays a crucial role in criminal law by penalizing the concealment of plans to commit offences. It targets the secrecy that enables crimes to occur, thereby supporting preventive justice. This section ensures that individuals cannot escape liability simply by hiding their criminal intentions.

In modern times, with complex criminal networks and digital communication, Section 205 remains a vital tool for law enforcement. It encourages transparency and early intervention, helping to maintain public safety and uphold the rule of law.

FAQs on IPC Section 205

What does IPC Section 205 cover?

It covers the offence of concealing a design to commit an offence, punishing those who hide plans to commit crimes.

Is IPC Section 205 a bailable offence?

Yes, it is generally bailable, with punishment up to three years imprisonment or fine.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 205?

Magistrate courts usually try these offences, unless linked with more serious crimes.

Does the offence require the crime to be committed?

No, the offence is about concealing the design, even if the crime is not ultimately committed.

Can electronic concealment of plans fall under Section 205?

Yes, courts recognize concealment via digital means as falling under this section in modern contexts.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 37 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

IT Act Section 51 empowers the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and investigation purposes.

Red light areas are not legally recognized zones in India; prostitution is illegal, but some related activities are conditionally tolerated under strict laws.

Bio floc fishing is legal in India with regulations ensuring sustainable aquaculture practices.

In India, killing nilgai is generally illegal due to wildlife protection laws with limited exceptions under strict conditions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 90 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Ecstasy (MDMA) is illegal in India with strict penalties for possession, use, and trafficking under the Narcotic Drugs laws.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 51 defines expert opinion evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings.

Understand the legality of Kodi in India, including its lawful uses, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UG restricts cash payments for specified transactions to curb tax evasion.

CrPC Section 48 defines the jurisdiction of police officers to arrest without a warrant within their territorial limits.

Companies Act 2013 Section 395 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Learn how fingerprinting is used in legal documents in India, including its legal validity, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Reptile farming in India is regulated with strict rules; it requires permits and adherence to wildlife laws to be legal.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 145 deals with the admissibility of confessions made by accused persons and safeguards against coerced statements.

IPC Section 371 penalizes dishonestly or fraudulently withholding or disposing of property entrusted for a specific purpose.

In India, owning an armored car is legal with proper permissions and compliance with regulations.

Home stays are legal in India but must comply with local laws and regulations including registration and safety norms.

Being lesbian is legal in India, with no laws criminalizing same-sex female relationships, though social acceptance varies widely.

Piracetam is legal in India but regulated as a prescription drug with specific usage rules and enforcement practices.

CPC Section 81 covers the procedure for transferring suits from one court to another for convenience or justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 290 governs the appointment and powers of the Company Secretary in Indian companies.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90A defines the presumption of genuineness for electronic records, crucial for digital evidence admissibility.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 138 addresses the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring written agreements' integrity.

Companies Act 2013 Section 130 governs the preparation, signing, and filing of financial statements by companies in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 47 defines the rule on how oral admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 49 explains the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

bottom of page