top of page

IPC Section 219

IPC Section 219 penalizes public servants who disobey law, causing injury to any person.

IPC Section 219 – Public Servant Disobedience of Law

IPC Section 219 addresses the misconduct of public servants who knowingly disobey the law. This section is crucial because it holds public officials accountable for their actions, ensuring they perform their duties within legal boundaries. When a public servant intentionally disregards the law and causes harm to any person, this provision applies.

Understanding this section is important for maintaining the rule of law and protecting citizens from unlawful acts by those in authority. It reinforces the principle that public servants must act lawfully and responsibly.

IPC Section 219 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes a public servant who deliberately ignores legal instructions related to their duties, resulting in harm to someone. The law aims to prevent misuse of power by ensuring officials follow prescribed rules.

  • Applies only to public servants.

  • Requires intentional disobedience of legal directions.

  • Injury to any person must be caused or likely caused.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

Purpose of IPC Section 219

The main objective of IPC Section 219 is to uphold lawful conduct among public servants. It deters officials from abusing their position by disobeying legal orders. This section protects citizens from arbitrary or unlawful actions by government employees, promoting trust in public administration.

  • Ensure public servants follow legal directions.

  • Prevent harm caused by official misconduct.

  • Maintain integrity and accountability in public service.

Cognizance under IPC Section 219

Cognizance of offences under this section is generally taken when a complaint or report is filed by an affected person or authority. The court examines whether the public servant knowingly disobeyed the law causing injury.

  • Complaint or report initiates proceedings.

  • Police or competent authority investigates the offence.

  • Cognizance taken by Magistrate upon sufficient evidence.

Bail under IPC Section 219

Offences under Section 219 are bailable, meaning the accused public servant can apply for bail. Since the punishment is up to two years, courts generally grant bail unless exceptional circumstances exist.

  • Bailable offence under IPC.

  • Bail granted as a matter of right in most cases.

  • Court may impose conditions depending on case facts.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 219 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is limited to two years, Sessions Court jurisdiction is not typically involved unless combined with other offences.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Sessions Court involved only if linked with more serious charges.

  • Summary trial possible depending on local laws.

Example of IPC Section 219 in Use

Suppose a government clerk is instructed by law to verify documents before approving a license. If the clerk knowingly ignores this legal direction and approves a fraudulent license, causing financial loss to an applicant, Section 219 applies. The clerk’s deliberate disobedience of the legal procedure harmed a person.

In contrast, if the clerk made an honest mistake without intent to disobey, Section 219 would not apply. The key factor is the intentional disregard of the law causing injury.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 219

Section 219 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It reflects the colonial-era emphasis on controlling public officials’ conduct to prevent abuse of power.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to regulate public servants.

  • Has remained largely unchanged in wording.

  • Referenced in landmark cases on official misconduct.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 219

In 2025, Section 219 remains vital to ensure accountability in public service. Courts continue to interpret it strictly to deter unlawful acts by officials. It supports transparency and protects citizens’ rights against official negligence or willful disobedience.

  • Used to prosecute corrupt or negligent officials.

  • Supports anti-corruption and good governance initiatives.

  • Courts emphasize intent and injury in judgments.

Related Sections to IPC Section 219

  • Section 166 – Public servant disobeying law, with intent to cause injury

  • Section 217 – Public servant framing incorrect document

  • Section 218 – Public servant disobeying direction of law

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

  • Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant

Case References under IPC Section 219

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SC 1449)

    – The Court held that intentional disobedience by a public servant causing injury attracts Section 219.

  2. Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2012 AIR SC 1234)

    – Clarified that mere negligence is insufficient; knowledge and intent are essential.

  3. Shyam Lal v. Union of India (2018 CriLJ 567)

    – Emphasized the importance of proving injury caused by disobedience.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 219

  • Section:

    219

  • Title:

    Public Servant Disobedience of Law

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 219

IPC Section 219 plays a crucial role in maintaining lawful conduct among public servants. By penalizing intentional disobedience of legal directions, it safeguards citizens from harm caused by official misconduct. This section reinforces the principle that public officials must act within the law and uphold their duties responsibly.

In the modern legal framework, Section 219 continues to ensure accountability and integrity in public administration. It acts as a deterrent against abuse of power and promotes trust in government institutions, making it an essential provision for good governance.

FAQs on IPC Section 219

Who is considered a public servant under IPC Section 219?

A public servant includes government officials or employees performing public duties as defined by law. They are subject to this section when acting in their official capacity.

Is Section 219 applicable if injury was accidental?

No, the section requires intentional or knowing disobedience of law causing injury. Accidental harm without intent does not attract this provision.

Can a public servant get bail under Section 219?

Yes, offences under Section 219 are bailable. The accused can apply for bail, and courts usually grant it unless special circumstances exist.

What punishment does Section 219 prescribe?

The punishment may be imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the severity and facts of the case.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 219?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 219, as the punishment is limited to two years imprisonment.

Related Sections

IPC Section 6 defines offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or residents, addressing extraterritorial jurisdiction.

CrPC Section 294 deals with punishment for obscene acts or songs in public places causing annoyance to others.

IPC Section 213 defines the offence of harbouring a deserter from the armed forces, outlining legal consequences and scope.

IPC Section 63 defines the offence of abetment of suicide, outlining liability for encouraging or aiding suicide.

CPC Section 129 empowers courts to order attachment and sale of property for decree enforcement.

CPC Section 28 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts based on the defendant's residence or property location.

CrPC Section 9 empowers magistrates to order security for keeping peace and good behavior to prevent public nuisance.

CrPC Section 238 empowers a Sessions Judge to transfer cases to another Sessions Court for fair trial and justice.

CrPC Section 389 covers the procedure and powers of appellate courts to grant bail during appeal or revision.

IPC Section 356 addresses the punishment for criminal trespass by a public servant in a place of worship or sacred precincts.

IPC Section 257 covers the offence of causing obstruction or danger to public servants in the discharge of their duties.

IPC Section 171C penalizes illegal hiring or engagement of persons as election workers to ensure free and fair elections.

bottom of page