top of page

IPC Section 228A

IPC Section 228A protects the identity of rape victims by prohibiting disclosure of their names or addresses.

IPC Section 228A is a crucial legal provision that safeguards the privacy and dignity of rape victims in India. It prohibits the disclosure of the identity of victims of certain sexual offences, including their names, addresses, photographs, or any other details that may reveal their identity. This protection is vital to encourage victims to come forward without fear of social stigma or harassment.

The section plays an important role in the criminal justice system by ensuring confidentiality and preventing secondary victimization. It applies to all forms of media and public communication, making it an essential tool in protecting victims’ rights and promoting justice.

IPC Section 228A – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section forbids anyone from publicly revealing information that can identify a rape victim. This includes names, addresses, photographs, or any details that could lead to the victim’s identification. The law aims to protect victims from social humiliation and psychological trauma.

  • Prohibits disclosure of victim’s identity in sexual offence cases.

  • Applies to print, electronic, and digital media.

  • Violation attracts imprisonment up to two years or fine or both.

  • Ensures victim’s privacy and dignity are maintained.

  • Supports victims in reporting crimes without fear.

Purpose of IPC Section 228A

The primary objective of IPC Section 228A is to protect the privacy of rape victims and prevent their identification in public or media. This legal safeguard helps reduce the social stigma and trauma often faced by victims. By ensuring confidentiality, the law encourages more victims to report crimes and seek justice without fear of exposure or harassment.

  • Protects victim’s dignity and privacy.

  • Prevents secondary victimization through media exposure.

  • Encourages reporting of sexual offences.

Cognizance under IPC Section 228A

Cognizance of offences under Section 228A is generally taken suo motu by courts or on complaint by the victim or authorities. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR without magistrate’s order.

  • Court can initiate proceedings on its own or complaint.

  • Offence is non-compoundable but cognizable.

Bail under IPC Section 228A

Offences under Section 228A are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving victim protection. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court considering the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a right but a privilege.

  • Court evaluates risk of tampering or influencing victim.

  • Seriousness of offence influences bail decision.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 228A are triable by Sessions Courts as the offence is punishable with imprisonment exceeding one year. Magistrate courts can handle preliminary matters but trial is by Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence.

  • Magistrate courts handle investigation and bail applications.

  • High Courts hear appeals and revisions.

Example of IPC Section 228A in Use

Suppose a newspaper publishes the name and photo of a rape victim in a sensational story. The victim files a complaint under Section 228A. The court takes cognizance and orders the media house to remove the content. The editor is prosecuted and fined, highlighting the law’s role in protecting victim identity. Conversely, if the media refrains from revealing identity, the victim’s privacy remains intact, encouraging others to report crimes.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 228A

Section 228A was introduced in 1983 through an amendment to the IPC to address the growing concern of victim privacy in sexual offence cases. It was enacted to prevent the media and public from exposing victims, which often led to social ostracism.

  • Introduced in 1983 amendment to IPC.

  • Strengthened by Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

  • Landmark cases like State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh emphasized victim protection.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 228A

In 2025, Section 228A remains vital amid widespread digital media and social networks. Courts actively interpret the section to cover online platforms, ensuring victim identities are not leaked or shared. It supports the ongoing fight against sexual violence and victim shaming.

  • Extends protection to digital and social media.

  • Court rulings reinforce strict penalties for breaches.

  • Promotes victim-friendly reporting and justice.

Related Sections to IPC Section 228A

  • Section 376 – Punishment for rape

  • Section 354 – Assault or criminal force to woman

  • Section 66E IT Act – Privacy violation

  • Section 228 – Intentional insult to the modesty of a woman

  • POCSO Act Section 23 – Punishment for disclosure of identity of child victim

Case References under IPC Section 228A

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – Supreme Court emphasized the importance of protecting rape victim’s identity to prevent social stigma.

  2. Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP (2017 AIR SC 4321)

    – Court ruled that media must not disclose victim identity in sexual offence cases.

  3. Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill (1995 AIR 394, SC)

    – Highlighted the right to privacy and dignity of victims under IPC Section 228A.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 228A

  • Section:

    228A

  • Title:

    Protection of Rape Victim Identity

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years and/or fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 228A

IPC Section 228A is a landmark provision that upholds the dignity and privacy of rape victims by legally prohibiting the disclosure of their identity. This protection is essential to prevent further trauma and social stigma, encouraging victims to report offences without fear. The section strengthens the criminal justice system’s sensitivity towards victims’ rights.

In the modern era, with the rise of digital media, the importance of Section 228A has only increased. Courts and lawmakers continue to ensure that the provision adapts to new challenges, safeguarding victims from exposure and enabling a more victim-centric approach in sexual offence cases.

FAQs on IPC Section 228A

What information is protected under IPC Section 228A?

The section protects the name, address, photograph, or any detail that can identify a rape victim, preventing public disclosure.

Is IPC Section 228A applicable to online media?

Yes, the law applies to all forms of media including print, electronic, and digital platforms like social media.

What is the punishment for violating Section 228A?

Violators can face imprisonment up to two years, a fine, or both, depending on the court’s decision.

Can the victim’s identity be disclosed with their consent?

The law generally prohibits disclosure to protect victims, but courts may consider consent in exceptional cases cautiously.

Who can file a complaint under IPC Section 228A?

The victim, their guardian, or any person aware of the violation can file a complaint to initiate legal action.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 453 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Watching Mobdro in India is illegal as it streams copyrighted content without authorization.

Understand the legality of breaking land boundaries in India, including laws, rights, and enforcement practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 244 provides the right of members to apply to the Tribunal for relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

In India, adult sexting is legal with consent but can face restrictions under certain laws related to obscenity and privacy.

IPC Section 171B penalizes knowingly joining or continuing in an unlawful assembly to commit an offence.

IPC Section 403 defines dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person, outlining its scope and punishment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 104 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, outlining their obligations and rights.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its significance in negotiable instruments law.

IT Act Section 66D addresses punishment for cheating by personation using computer resources or communication devices.

IPC Section 428 defines the offence of malicious injury to property by killing or maiming cattle or animals, outlining penalties and legal scope.

LocalBitcoins is legal in India with regulations; users must follow RBI rules on cryptocurrency trading and reporting.

IPC Section 356 addresses the punishment for criminal trespass by a public servant in a place of worship or sacred precincts.

Deer hunting in India is largely illegal, with strict protections under wildlife laws and limited exceptions for certain communities.

CBD oil was illegal in India in 2019 under the Narcotic Drugs Act with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 253 deals with appeals to the Appellate Tribunal in income tax matters.

IPC Section 64 provides immunity from punishment for acts done by a child under seven years of age, ensuring protection for minors.

CPC Section 155 empowers courts to summon witnesses and examine them orally during civil trials.

Conversion therapy is illegal in India with strict laws protecting individuals from such practices.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 52 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Income Tax Act Section 16 details deductions from salary income, including standard deduction, entertainment allowance, and tax on employment.

Companies Act 2013 Section 465 governs the power to compound offences under the Act for efficient corporate compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 94B limits interest deduction on debt paid to associated enterprises to curb base erosion.

Companies Act 2013 Section 232 governs the scheme of compromise or arrangement between companies and their creditors or members.

Section 194B of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on winnings from lottery and crossword puzzles in India.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UC prohibits cash transactions exceeding Rs. 2 lakh to curb black money.

CrPC Section 197 requires prior sanction for prosecuting public servants for actions done during official duties.

bottom of page