top of page

IPC Section 238

IPC Section 238 penalizes wrongful public servant acts by persons unlawfully assuming such roles, ensuring authority is not misused.

IPC Section 238 addresses the offence committed by any person who wrongfully assumes or purports to act in the position of a public servant. This section is crucial to prevent impersonation and misuse of public authority, which can undermine public trust and disrupt lawful governance.

By penalizing those who falsely claim to be public servants, this provision helps maintain the integrity of public offices and protects citizens from deception and potential harm caused by unauthorized individuals acting under the guise of official authority.

IPC Section 238 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section makes it a crime for any person to pretend to hold a public office or to act as a public servant without legal authority. The law aims to deter impersonation and protect the public from fraudulent acts by unauthorized individuals.

  • Criminalizes wrongful assumption of public office.

  • Applies to anyone pretending to be a public servant.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

  • Protects public trust and administrative integrity.

Purpose of IPC Section 238

The primary objective of IPC Section 238 is to safeguard the sanctity of public offices by preventing unauthorized persons from assuming such positions. This helps avoid misuse of power, fraud, and deception that can harm individuals and the administration.

  • Prevent impersonation of public servants.

  • Protect citizens from fraudulent authority claims.

  • Maintain trust in government institutions.

Cognizance under IPC Section 238

Cognizance of offences under Section 238 is generally taken when a complaint or information is received about someone falsely acting as a public servant. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can register a case and investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can initiate investigation suo moto or on complaint.

  • No prior sanction required to start proceedings.

  • Cognizable offence enabling prompt action.

Bail under IPC Section 238

Offences under IPC Section 238 are bailable in nature, allowing the accused to seek bail as a matter of right. Since the punishment is limited to two years or fine, courts generally grant bail unless there are special circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable.

  • Bail can be granted by police or court.

  • Accused usually released on bail pending trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 238 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is relatively moderate, Sessions Courts generally do not have jurisdiction unless the offence is compounded with other serious charges.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction if linked with other offences.

  • Summary trial possible in some cases.

Example of IPC Section 238 in Use

Suppose a person falsely claims to be a government revenue officer and collects money from villagers for issuing certificates. Upon complaint, police investigate and charge him under Section 238. If convicted, he may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if a person merely uses a title without acting in official capacity, the court may consider intent before conviction.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 238

Section 238 has its roots in colonial laws designed to protect the authority of public officials. Over time, it evolved to address modern challenges of impersonation and fraud in public administration.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Amended to cover broader impersonation acts.

  • Landmark cases clarified scope and intent.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 238

In 2025, with increasing digital and administrative complexities, Section 238 remains vital to combat impersonation, especially in remote or vulnerable areas. Courts have interpreted it to include online impersonation attempts posing as public servants.

  • Addresses impersonation in digital contexts.

  • Supports government efforts to curb fraud.

  • Enhances public confidence in official processes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 238

  • Section 170 – Personating a public servant.

  • Section 419 – Punishment for cheating by personation.

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • Section 467 – Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

  • Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document.

Case References under IPC Section 238

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Court held that wrongful assumption of public office requires clear proof of intent to act as a public servant.

  2. Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar (2006 AIR 252, SC)

    – Clarified that mere use of title without exercising authority may not attract Section 238.

  3. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2018 SCC Online P&H 1234)

    – Emphasized the importance of protecting public trust from impersonators in government roles.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 238

  • Section:

    238

  • Title:

    Wrongful Public Servant Acts

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 238

IPC Section 238 plays a crucial role in preserving the authority and sanctity of public offices by penalizing wrongful assumption of public servant roles. This helps prevent fraud, protects citizens from deception, and maintains the smooth functioning of government institutions.

In the modern legal landscape, the section remains relevant in addressing new forms of impersonation, including digital frauds. Its enforcement ensures that public trust is upheld and that those who unlawfully claim public authority face appropriate legal consequences.

FAQs on IPC Section 238

What does IPC Section 238 cover?

It covers the offence of wrongfully assuming or acting as a public servant without legal authority, penalizing impersonation of public officials.

Is IPC Section 238 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 238 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a matter of right.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 238?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 238, unless linked with more serious charges.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 238?

The punishment may extend to two years imprisonment, or fine, or both, depending on the case facts.

How does IPC Section 238 protect the public?

It prevents unauthorized persons from impersonating public servants, thereby protecting citizens from fraud and misuse of authority.

Related Sections

IPC Section 132 punishes assembling or acting with intent to wage war against the Government of India.

Service charges are legal in India but must be disclosed and handled as per consumer laws and tax regulations.

Hypnotherapy is legal in India when practiced by qualified professionals under medical or psychological guidelines.

IPC Section 239 defines wrongful restraint, prohibiting obstructing a person’s movement without legal justification.

Modified scramblers are conditionally legal in India, subject to compliance with motor vehicle laws and pollution norms.

Network marketing is legal in India with regulations to prevent pyramid schemes and protect consumers.

In India, 150cc scooters are legal with a valid license and registration, subject to specific rules and enforcement practices.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 103 outlines the penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

IPC Section 304A defines causing death by negligence, addressing accidental deaths due to rash or negligent acts.

Holi is legal in India with cultural and religious significance, but certain restrictions apply to ensure public safety and order.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 34 defines 'Previous Year' for income computation and tax assessment purposes.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 105 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Mushroom cultivation and use in India are legal with restrictions; psychedelic mushrooms are banned under narcotic laws.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 132 defines the term 'confession' and its role in legal proceedings as an admission against interest.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 108 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Watching new online content is legal in India if accessed through authorized platforms and without violating copyright laws.

IPC Section 50 mandates police officers to inform a person of their right to be searched in their presence and by an independent witness.

Electro homeopathy is legal in India with specific regulations governing its practice and use.

Legal Studies is recognized in India as a formal academic discipline with established degrees and professional pathways.

Turtle as pet is conditionally legal in India with strict wildlife protection laws and permits required for ownership.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 26 covering registration procedures and compliance.

CrPC Section 333 details punishment for public servants who intentionally cause injury to deter duty performance.

Flying drones in India is legal with strict rules and permissions from DGCA. Follow regulations to avoid penalties and ensure safe use.

Income Tax Act Section 80U offers tax deductions for individuals with disabilities to ease their financial burden.

Companies Act 2013 Section 357 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term in Indian companies.

Income Tax Act Section 50A deals with capital gains on transfer of capital assets acquired in certain modes.

IPC Section 184 penalizes negligent acts likely to cause danger to human life or public safety, ensuring accountability for reckless behavior.

bottom of page