top of page

IPC Section 238

IPC Section 238 penalizes wrongful public servant acts by persons unlawfully assuming such roles, ensuring authority is not misused.

IPC Section 238 addresses the offence committed by any person who wrongfully assumes or purports to act in the position of a public servant. This section is crucial to prevent impersonation and misuse of public authority, which can undermine public trust and disrupt lawful governance.

By penalizing those who falsely claim to be public servants, this provision helps maintain the integrity of public offices and protects citizens from deception and potential harm caused by unauthorized individuals acting under the guise of official authority.

IPC Section 238 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section makes it a crime for any person to pretend to hold a public office or to act as a public servant without legal authority. The law aims to deter impersonation and protect the public from fraudulent acts by unauthorized individuals.

  • Criminalizes wrongful assumption of public office.

  • Applies to anyone pretending to be a public servant.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

  • Protects public trust and administrative integrity.

Purpose of IPC Section 238

The primary objective of IPC Section 238 is to safeguard the sanctity of public offices by preventing unauthorized persons from assuming such positions. This helps avoid misuse of power, fraud, and deception that can harm individuals and the administration.

  • Prevent impersonation of public servants.

  • Protect citizens from fraudulent authority claims.

  • Maintain trust in government institutions.

Cognizance under IPC Section 238

Cognizance of offences under Section 238 is generally taken when a complaint or information is received about someone falsely acting as a public servant. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can register a case and investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can initiate investigation suo moto or on complaint.

  • No prior sanction required to start proceedings.

  • Cognizable offence enabling prompt action.

Bail under IPC Section 238

Offences under IPC Section 238 are bailable in nature, allowing the accused to seek bail as a matter of right. Since the punishment is limited to two years or fine, courts generally grant bail unless there are special circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable.

  • Bail can be granted by police or court.

  • Accused usually released on bail pending trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 238 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is relatively moderate, Sessions Courts generally do not have jurisdiction unless the offence is compounded with other serious charges.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction if linked with other offences.

  • Summary trial possible in some cases.

Example of IPC Section 238 in Use

Suppose a person falsely claims to be a government revenue officer and collects money from villagers for issuing certificates. Upon complaint, police investigate and charge him under Section 238. If convicted, he may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if a person merely uses a title without acting in official capacity, the court may consider intent before conviction.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 238

Section 238 has its roots in colonial laws designed to protect the authority of public officials. Over time, it evolved to address modern challenges of impersonation and fraud in public administration.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Amended to cover broader impersonation acts.

  • Landmark cases clarified scope and intent.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 238

In 2025, with increasing digital and administrative complexities, Section 238 remains vital to combat impersonation, especially in remote or vulnerable areas. Courts have interpreted it to include online impersonation attempts posing as public servants.

  • Addresses impersonation in digital contexts.

  • Supports government efforts to curb fraud.

  • Enhances public confidence in official processes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 238

  • Section 170 – Personating a public servant.

  • Section 419 – Punishment for cheating by personation.

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • Section 467 – Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

  • Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document.

Case References under IPC Section 238

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Court held that wrongful assumption of public office requires clear proof of intent to act as a public servant.

  2. Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar (2006 AIR 252, SC)

    – Clarified that mere use of title without exercising authority may not attract Section 238.

  3. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2018 SCC Online P&H 1234)

    – Emphasized the importance of protecting public trust from impersonators in government roles.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 238

  • Section:

    238

  • Title:

    Wrongful Public Servant Acts

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 238

IPC Section 238 plays a crucial role in preserving the authority and sanctity of public offices by penalizing wrongful assumption of public servant roles. This helps prevent fraud, protects citizens from deception, and maintains the smooth functioning of government institutions.

In the modern legal landscape, the section remains relevant in addressing new forms of impersonation, including digital frauds. Its enforcement ensures that public trust is upheld and that those who unlawfully claim public authority face appropriate legal consequences.

FAQs on IPC Section 238

What does IPC Section 238 cover?

It covers the offence of wrongfully assuming or acting as a public servant without legal authority, penalizing impersonation of public officials.

Is IPC Section 238 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 238 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a matter of right.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 238?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 238, unless linked with more serious charges.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 238?

The punishment may extend to two years imprisonment, or fine, or both, depending on the case facts.

How does IPC Section 238 protect the public?

It prevents unauthorized persons from impersonating public servants, thereby protecting citizens from fraud and misuse of authority.

Related Sections

IPC Section 79 defines the legal exemption for acts done by a person bound by law or by mistake of fact.

Porn sites are illegal to access in India under current laws, with strict government blocks and penalties for violations.

Income Tax Act Section 245H details the procedure for set-off and adjustment of refunds against outstanding tax demands.

CrPC Section 415 defines the offence of cheating and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

Understand the legality of port scanning in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices.

CrPC Section 422 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by a Magistrate upon police report or complaint.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 106 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange and the consequences of such acceptance.

Income Tax Act Section 271FA imposes penalty for failure to furnish TDS/TCS statements on time.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 161 covers the examination of witnesses by police during investigation, crucial for admissibility and proof in trials.

IPC Section 403 defines dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person, outlining its scope and punishment.

CrPC Section 221 details the procedure when a Magistrate finds no sufficient ground to proceed with a case.

Income Tax Act Section 43 defines 'actual cost' for asset valuation, crucial for depreciation and capital gains calculations.

Brothels are illegal in India under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, but some activities occur under strict legal restrictions.

Understand the legality of contract-based jobs in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

IPC Section 221 defines the offence of dishonestly framing an incorrect document with intent to cause damage or injury.

CrPC Section 364 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting in order to murder, detailing its legal consequences.

IPC Section 36 defines the punishment for an attempt to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment for life or a term of years.

Camel meat is legal to consume in India with regional variations and specific regulations on slaughter and sale.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 136 empowers courts to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by unfair prejudice or delay.

Rail guns are not legal in India due to strict arms regulations and lack of authorization for such weapons.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 62 explains the liability of parties for payment of negotiable instruments and their obligations.

iForex is not fully legal in India due to regulatory restrictions on forex trading platforms without RBI approval.

Algorithmic trading is legal in India with specific regulations by SEBI ensuring fair and transparent markets.

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) is legal in India with regulations under the ART Act and guidelines by the ICMR.

Section 171 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the taxation of undisclosed income in India.

CPC Section 134 details the procedure for executing decrees against government property in civil suits.

Understand the legal status of Ocean Of Games in India and the risks of using such game download sites.

bottom of page