top of page

IPC Section 25

IPC Section 25 defines the offence of counterfeiting government stamps and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 25 addresses the offence of counterfeiting government stamps. It is a serious crime involving the illegal creation or imitation of stamps issued by the government, which are used for official purposes. Such acts undermine public trust and can lead to significant legal penalties.

This section is important as it protects the integrity of government-issued stamps, which are often used in revenue collection and legal documentation. Violations can disrupt administrative processes and cause financial losses to the state.

IPC Section 25 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this means that anyone who creates fake government stamps or changes genuine ones dishonestly commits an offence. The law punishes such acts to prevent fraud and protect government revenue.

  • Counterfeiting includes making fake stamps or altering real ones.

  • The offence is punishable with imprisonment up to seven years.

  • Fines may also be imposed along with imprisonment.

  • The law aims to protect government revenue and official documents.

Purpose of IPC Section 25

The main objective of IPC Section 25 is to safeguard government interests by preventing the misuse of official stamps. Government stamps are used as proof of payment or authorization in various legal and financial matters. Counterfeiting these stamps can lead to fraud, loss of revenue, and legal complications.

  • Protect government revenue from fraudulent activities.

  • Maintain trust in official documents and processes.

  • Deter illegal production and use of fake stamps.

Cognizance under IPC Section 25

Cognizance of offences under IPC Section 25 is usually taken by courts when a complaint or report is filed by a government official or authorized agency. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can initiate investigation suo moto or on complaint.

  • Cognizable offence allowing prompt legal action.

  • Government agencies often involved in detection and prosecution.

Bail under IPC Section 25

Offences under IPC Section 25 are generally non-bailable due to their serious nature involving fraud against the government. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but granted by court discretion.

  • Seriousness of offence may lead to denial of bail.

  • Early legal representation can assist in bail applications.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 25 are triable by Sessions Courts due to the severity of punishment prescribed. Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is generally held in higher courts.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence in most cases.

  • Magistrate Court may handle initial proceedings.

  • Special courts may be involved if related to other offences.

Example of IPC Section 25 in Use

Suppose a person illegally prints fake revenue stamps to affix on property documents to avoid paying government taxes. When discovered, the person is charged under IPC Section 25 for counterfeiting government stamps. If found guilty, they face imprisonment and fines. Conversely, if the person can prove the stamps were genuine and not altered, they may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 25

IPC Section 25 has its roots in colonial laws aimed at protecting government revenue through stamp duties. Over time, the section has evolved to address modern forms of counterfeiting and fraud.

  • Introduced in the original Indian Penal Code of 1860.

  • Amended to include various forms of fraudulent alterations.

  • Landmark cases have clarified its scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 25

In 2025, IPC Section 25 remains crucial as government stamps continue to be used in digital and physical formats. Courts have interpreted the section to cover electronic stamps and digital signatures, adapting to technological changes.

  • Covers counterfeiting in both physical and digital forms.

  • Supports anti-fraud measures in government transactions.

  • Helps maintain integrity in e-governance and documentation.

Related Sections to IPC Section 25

  • Section 26 – Counterfeiting Government Paper

  • Section 27 – Counterfeiting Government Seals

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

Case References under IPC Section 25

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1969 AIR 1006, SC)

    – The Court held that fraudulent alteration of government stamps attracts Section 25 IPC.

  2. Rameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar (2005 AIR 3228, SC)

    – Clarified the burden of proof in counterfeiting government stamps cases.

  3. Union of India v. K.K. Verma (1983 AIR 146, SC)

    – Emphasized the importance of protecting government revenue through strict application of Section 25.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 25

  • Section:

    25

  • Title:

    Counterfeiting Government Stamps

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 25

IPC Section 25 plays a vital role in protecting government interests by criminalizing the counterfeiting of official stamps. This helps maintain the authenticity of government documents and ensures proper revenue collection. The section acts as a deterrent against fraudulent practices that can harm public administration.

As technology advances, the scope of Section 25 continues to evolve, covering new forms of counterfeiting including digital stamps. Its enforcement is essential for upholding trust in government processes and safeguarding public resources in modern India.

FAQs on IPC Section 25

What is the main offence under IPC Section 25?

The main offence is counterfeiting or fraudulently making or altering government stamps, which is punishable by imprisonment and fine.

Is IPC Section 25 offence bailable?

Generally, the offence is non-bailable due to its serious nature, but bail may be granted at the court's discretion.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 25?

Sessions Courts usually try these offences, while Magistrate Courts handle preliminary matters.

Can digital stamps be covered under IPC Section 25?

Yes, courts have interpreted the section to include counterfeiting of digital or electronic government stamps.

What is the punishment for counterfeiting government stamps?

The punishment can extend up to seven years imprisonment along with a fine.

Related Sections

Marijuana seeds are conditionally legal in India, allowed for industrial hemp but restricted for cultivation or consumption.

Companies Act 2013 Section 414 mandates the filing of annual returns by companies with the Registrar of Companies.

IPC Section 123 defines the offence of concealing with intent to cause wrongful loss or damage to public servant.

Having a girlfriend is legal in India; relationships are private and not criminalized under Indian law.

Back to back tenders are conditionally legal in India, subject to strict compliance with procurement laws and anti-corruption rules.

IPC Section 454 defines house trespass in order to commit an offence, focusing on unlawful entry with criminal intent.

CrPC Section 41 explains police powers to arrest without warrant under lawful conditions, protecting citizens from arbitrary arrests.

Love marriage is legal in India with no specific law against it, but social and family dynamics affect its acceptance.

Crossbows are generally prohibited in India, with strict regulations under arms laws and limited exceptions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 326 governs the punishment for false statements in declarations and affidavits by company officers.

Car sun shades are legal in India with specific restrictions on size and placement to ensure driver visibility and safety.

Caging parrots in India is conditionally legal but regulated under wildlife laws to protect their welfare and species.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 94 empowers courts to ask questions or order production of evidence to discover truth and ensure justice.

IPC Section 335 covers causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety, defining punishment and scope.

IPC Section 275 penalizes adulteration of food or drink intended to cause hurt or danger to health.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 58 defines oral evidence as statements made by witnesses in court, crucial for proving facts in trials.

CrPC Section 105L details the procedure for attachment and sale of property to recover fines imposed by courts.

Killing a tortoise in India is illegal under wildlife protection laws with strict penalties and few exceptions.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 169 covering offences and penalties under GST law.

CrPC Section 154 mandates police to register FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence promptly and accurately.

Uplay is legal to use in India, but some content and features may have restrictions due to regional laws and licensing.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 70 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

Streaming movies in India is legal if done through authorized platforms; unauthorized streaming is illegal and punishable by law.

Section 194Q of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on purchase of goods exceeding ₹50 lakh from a resident seller in India.

CrPC Section 307 defines the offence of attempt to murder and its legal consequences under Indian criminal law.

Contract Act 1872 Section 67 deals with the obligation of parties to perform contracts with due diligence and care.

Xm Broker is legal in India but operates under strict regulations and guidelines by Indian authorities.

bottom of page