top of page

IPC Section 279

IPC Section 279 addresses rash and negligent driving or riding on public roads, penalizing acts endangering human life or safety.

IPC Section 279 – Rash and Negligent Driving

IPC Section 279 deals with the offence of rash and negligent driving or riding on a public way. It penalizes those who drive vehicles in a manner that is reckless or careless, thereby endangering human life or safety. This section is crucial as it promotes road safety and holds individuals accountable for careless behavior behind the wheel.

Understanding this section helps in recognizing the legal consequences of irresponsible driving and encourages safer road practices to protect all users.

IPC Section 279 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person drives or rides a vehicle carelessly or recklessly on a public road and this behavior puts others at risk of injury or death, they can be punished. The law does not require actual harm to occur; the mere act of endangering others is enough for liability.

  • Applies to driving or riding on public roads.

  • Focuses on rashness or negligence causing danger.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Does not require actual injury, only risk of harm.

Purpose of IPC Section 279

The legal objective of Section 279 is to deter reckless and negligent driving that threatens public safety. It aims to reduce accidents and injuries caused by careless behavior on roads. By penalizing such conduct, the law promotes responsible driving habits and protects lives.

  • Prevent accidents caused by rash driving.

  • Encourage drivers to exercise caution on public roads.

  • Protect public safety and reduce road fatalities.

Cognizance under IPC Section 279

Cognizance of offences under Section 279 is generally taken by courts upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since it involves public safety, police can register a case suo motu or on complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable; police can investigate without court order.

  • Cognizance taken on police report or complaint.

  • Courts proceed after formal charge is framed.

Bail under IPC Section 279

Section 279 is a bailable offence, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. Courts usually grant bail unless there are exceptional circumstances. Bail helps ensure the accused’s appearance in court while balancing liberty.

  • Offence is bailable as per law.

  • Bail granted as a matter of right in most cases.

  • Court may impose conditions to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under Section 279 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to six months or fine, it falls under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries the offence.

  • Sessions Court not involved unless compounded with other offences.

  • Summary trial possible for minor cases.

Example of IPC Section 279 in Use

Consider a motorcyclist speeding through a crowded market street without caution. Although no accident occurs, his rash riding forces pedestrians to jump aside to avoid being hit. Police register a case under Section 279 for endangering public safety. If convicted, he may face imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the rider was driving carefully and no danger was posed, no offence would arise.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 279

Section 279 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860, reflecting early recognition of road safety issues. Over time, amendments and judicial interpretations have clarified its scope and application.

  • IPC enacted in 1860 including Section 279.

  • Judicial clarifications on rashness and negligence standards.

  • Increased enforcement with motor vehicle laws development.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 279

In 2025, Section 279 remains vital due to rising vehicle numbers and road accidents. Courts interpret rashness and negligence considering modern traffic conditions. The section complements motor vehicle regulations to enhance safety.

  • Supports road safety amidst growing traffic.

  • Courts apply it alongside Motor Vehicles Act provisions.

  • Raises public awareness on responsible driving.

Related Sections to IPC Section 279

  • Section 304A – Causing death by negligence

  • Section 337 – Causing hurt by act endangering life

  • Section 338 – Causing grievous hurt by act endangering life

  • Section 304 – Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder

  • Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act – Driving dangerously

Case References under IPC Section 279

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that rashness or negligence must be judged objectively, focusing on the driver’s conduct and its consequences.

  2. Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Subhagwanti (1966 AIR 1754, SC)

    – The Court emphasized that the act must be so rash or negligent as to endanger human life or likely cause hurt.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011 3 MLJ 1)

    – The Court clarified that mere speeding without endangering others may not attract Section 279.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 279

  • Section:

    279

  • Title:

    Rash and Negligent Driving

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months, or fine up to ₹1,000, or both

  • Triable By:

    Judicial Magistrate First Class

Conclusion on IPC Section 279

IPC Section 279 plays a crucial role in maintaining road safety by penalizing rash and negligent driving. It acts as a deterrent against careless behavior that endangers lives on public roads. The section’s provisions help ensure that drivers exercise caution and responsibility.

In modern times, with increasing traffic and road accidents, Section 279 remains relevant and effective. It complements other traffic laws and judicial interpretations to promote safer roads and protect citizens from harm caused by reckless driving.

FAQs on IPC Section 279

What does rash and negligent driving mean under IPC Section 279?

It means driving or riding a vehicle carelessly or recklessly on public roads, putting others at risk of injury or death, even if no accident occurs.

Is Section 279 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 279 are bailable, so the accused has the right to be released on bail pending trial.

Which court tries offences under Section 279?

Offences under Section 279 are triable by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, as the punishment is limited to six months imprisonment or fine.

Does actual injury need to occur for punishment under Section 279?

No, the law punishes the act of endangering human life or safety, even if no actual injury or accident happens.

How is Section 279 different from Section 304A IPC?

Section 279 penalizes rash driving endangering life, while Section 304A punishes causing death by negligence resulting in actual death.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 270 defines the offence of public nuisance and its legal consequences under Indian criminal law.

CrPC Section 161 details police powers to examine witnesses during investigation without oath or affirmation.

CPC Section 113 deals with the power of courts to order the sale of property when a decree for partition cannot be executed.

IPC Section 328 penalizes causing hurt by means of poison or other harmful substances to endanger life or cause grievous hurt.

IPC Section 365 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting with intent to secretly and wrongfully confine a person.

IPC Section 47 defines the punishment for belonging to a gang of thieves, outlining legal consequences for group criminal activity.

CrPC Section 42 details police powers to arrest without warrant when a person commits a non-bailable offence in presence of an officer.

IPC Section 344 defines punishment for wrongful confinement for three or more days, ensuring protection of personal liberty.

IPC Section 258 penalizes public servants who intentionally disobey the law to cause injury to any person.

CrPC Section 298 deals with the procedure for complaints about defamatory words spoken in public against public servants.

IPC Section 166A penalizes public servants for disobeying directions during public servant duties, ensuring lawful compliance.

CrPC Section 368 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and justice.

bottom of page