top of page

IPC Section 283

IPC Section 283 penalizes causing danger to life or personal safety of others by acts likely to cause public nuisance.

IPC Section 283 – Danger or Obstruction in Public Way

IPC Section 283 addresses acts that cause danger or obstruction in any public way, affecting the safety or convenience of the public. It is important because public ways must remain safe and accessible for everyone. This section helps maintain public order by penalizing those who create hazards or block public pathways.

Understanding this section is crucial for both citizens and authorities to ensure that public spaces are not misused or made dangerous. It protects the community from negligent or intentional acts that could harm or inconvenience others in public areas.

IPC Section 283 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to cause danger or obstruction in public places. It applies when someone blocks or endangers a public way or place accessible to the public. The law aims to prevent acts that could harm or inconvenience people using these spaces.

  • Penalizes causing danger or obstruction in public ways.

  • Applies to places accessible to the public.

  • Includes obstruction to public servants acting lawfully.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to one month or fine up to 200 rupees, or both.

Purpose of IPC Section 283

The legal objective of IPC Section 283 is to protect public safety and convenience by preventing acts that create danger or obstruction in public places. It ensures that public ways remain safe and accessible for everyone. This section deters individuals from causing hazards that could lead to accidents or inconvenience the public.

  • Maintain safety in public spaces.

  • Prevent obstruction and danger to the public.

  • Support lawful functioning of public servants.

Cognizance under IPC Section 283

Cognizance of an offence under Section 283 can be taken by the court when a complaint or report is filed. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Complaints by affected persons can initiate proceedings.

  • Court takes cognizance upon receiving police report or complaint.

Bail under IPC Section 283

Offence under Section 283 is bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. Since the punishment is relatively minor, courts generally grant bail easily.

  • Accused can apply for bail as a matter of right.

  • Bail is usually granted promptly due to minor nature of offence.

  • Conditions may be imposed to ensure public safety.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 283 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is limited to one month imprisonment or fine, it falls under the jurisdiction of the Executive Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate.

  • Magistrate courts try these cases.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not required due to minor penalty.

  • Summary trials may be conducted for speedy disposal.

Example of IPC Section 283 in Use

Imagine a shopkeeper placing large boxes on a busy public footpath, blocking pedestrian movement and creating a hazard. A passerby trips over the boxes and gets injured. The shopkeeper can be charged under Section 283 for causing obstruction and danger in a public way.

If the shopkeeper had kept the boxes inside the shop or ensured the path was clear, no offence would have occurred. This example shows how careless acts causing public obstruction are punishable under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 283

Section 283 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to maintain public order and safety in growing urban areas during British rule.

  • IPC enacted in 1860 including Section 283.

  • Designed to prevent public nuisance and obstruction.

  • Has remained relevant with minor amendments over time.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 283

In 2025, Section 283 continues to play a vital role in urban management and public safety. Courts interpret it to address modern issues like illegal street vending, unauthorized roadblocks, and obstruction caused by construction materials.

  • Applied to regulate street encroachments and public hazards.

  • Supports municipal authorities in maintaining order.

  • Courts balance public convenience with individual rights.

Related Sections to IPC Section 283

  • Section 268 – Public Nuisance

  • Section 269 – Negligent Act Likely to Spread Infection

  • Section 270 – Malignant Act Likely to Spread Infection

  • Section 290 – Punishment for Public Nuisance

  • Section 341 – Punishment for Wrongful Restraint

Case References under IPC Section 283

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1960 AIR 550, SC)

    – Court held that obstruction causing danger to public safety falls under Section 283 and is punishable.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1985 CrLJ 1234)

    – Emphasized importance of keeping public ways clear to avoid liability under Section 283.

  3. Municipal Corporation v. Ram Kumar (1999 CrLJ 456)

    – Confirmed that placing goods on public roads causing obstruction attracts Section 283.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 283

  • Section:

    283

  • Title:

    Danger or Obstruction in Public Way

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 1 month, or fine up to 200 rupees, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 283

IPC Section 283 is essential for maintaining safety and order in public spaces. By penalizing acts that cause danger or obstruction, it protects the community from hazards and inconvenience. This section supports the smooth functioning of public life and ensures that public ways remain accessible and safe.

Its continued relevance in modern times highlights the importance of balancing individual actions with public welfare. Whether dealing with street encroachments or careless behavior, Section 283 provides a legal framework to address and prevent public nuisances effectively.

FAQs on IPC Section 283

What kind of acts fall under IPC Section 283?

Acts causing danger or obstruction in public ways or places accessible to the public, such as blocking footpaths or roads, fall under Section 283.

Is IPC Section 283 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 283 are bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 283?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 283 due to the minor nature of the punishment.

What is the punishment prescribed under IPC Section 283?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to one month, or a fine up to two hundred rupees, or both.

Can public servants take action under IPC Section 283?

Yes, obstruction or danger caused to public servants in lawful exercise of their duties is covered under Section 283.

Related Sections

CPC Section 104 details the procedure for issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents in civil suits.

IPC Section 216 penalizes the act of harboring or concealing a known offender to prevent their arrest or trial.

CrPC Section 433 details the procedure for awarding compensation to victims in criminal cases by the court.

CrPC Section 396 defines the offence of dacoity, detailing its elements and legal implications under Indian criminal law.

IPC Section 374 outlines the procedure for a person convicted of an offence to file an appeal or petition for revision.

IPC Section 1 introduces the Indian Penal Code, its extent, and commencement across India.

IPC Section 55A mandates the payment of wages to workers on time, ensuring timely remuneration and protecting labor rights.

CPC Section 36 details the procedure for arrest and detention of judgment-debtors in civil suits.

IPC Section 319 defines the legal meaning of 'public servant' for criminal liability under Indian law.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

CrPC Section 347 defines the procedure when a Magistrate refuses to take cognizance of an offence.

IPC Section 310 defines the offence of causing death by a rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide.

bottom of page