CrPC Section 238
CrPC Section 238 empowers a Sessions Judge to transfer cases to another Sessions Court for fair trial and justice.
CrPC Section 238 provides the Sessions Judge with the authority to transfer any case pending before one Sessions Court to another Sessions Court within the same district. This power ensures that trials are conducted fairly and without bias, maintaining public confidence in the criminal justice system.
Understanding this section is crucial for legal practitioners, accused persons, and victims alike, as it safeguards the right to a fair trial by allowing transfer of cases when circumstances demand it. It prevents undue influence or inconvenience that may affect the course of justice.
CrPC Section 238 – Exact Provision
This provision empowers the Sessions Judge to ensure justice by transferring cases between Sessions Courts in the same district. The transfer must be based on sufficient reasons, which may include concerns about impartiality, convenience, or other factors affecting a fair trial. It is a procedural safeguard to uphold judicial integrity and protect parties involved.
Allows transfer of cases between Sessions Courts in the same district.
Requires sufficient reasons for transfer.
Ensures fair and impartial trial.
Maintains public confidence in the justice system.
Explanation of CrPC Section 238
This section lets a Sessions Judge move a criminal case from one Sessions Court to another within the same district if there are valid reasons. It helps avoid bias or unfairness during trial.
Section states transfer power lies with Sessions Judge.
Affects accused, prosecution, and courts involved.
Triggered by concerns over fairness or convenience.
Allows transfer to ensure impartial trial.
Prohibits arbitrary or unjustified transfers.
Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 238
The section exists to protect the right to a fair trial by allowing transfer of cases within the district when impartiality or convenience is in question. It balances judicial efficiency with fairness, preventing misuse of judicial process or influence.
Protects accused and parties from biased trials.
Ensures proper judicial procedure is followed.
Balances Sessions Judge’s authority and fairness.
Avoids misuse or manipulation of court assignments.
When CrPC Section 238 Applies
This section applies when a Sessions Judge identifies sufficient reasons to transfer a case pending in one Sessions Court to another within the same district. It is used to maintain fairness and avoid prejudice during trial.
Case must be pending before a Sessions Court.
Transfer limited to Sessions Courts within same district.
Sessions Judge has authority to order transfer.
No specific time limit but usually before or during trial.
Exceptions if transfer affects jurisdiction adversely.
Cognizance under CrPC Section 238
Cognizance under this section is taken by the Sessions Judge upon reviewing the case circumstances. The Judge considers requests or suo motu reasons to transfer the case. The order is recorded, and the case file is sent to the transferee court.
Sessions Judge reviews case and reasons for transfer.
Issues formal transfer order with reasons recorded.
Case record physically or electronically transferred to new court.
Bailability under CrPC Section 238
Section 238 itself does not affect bailability, as it deals with case transfer only. Bailability depends on the nature of the offence under trial. The transferee court continues with existing bail conditions or may modify them as per law.
Bail status remains as per original offence and court orders.
Transfer does not cancel or alter bail automatically.
Transferee court may review bail conditions if necessary.
Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 238)
Cases under this section are triable only by Sessions Courts within the same district. The section empowers the Sessions Judge to transfer cases between these courts but not outside the district.
Applicable only to Sessions Courts within a district.
Trial continues in transferee Sessions Court.
Sessions Judge has supervisory jurisdiction.
Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 238
Orders under Section 238 can be challenged by appeal or revision before the High Court. The aggrieved party may file a revision petition if they believe the transfer was unjustified or prejudicial.
Appeal lies to High Court against transfer order.
Revision petitions can be filed for judicial review.
Timelines depend on High Court rules, generally within 30 days.
Example of CrPC Section 238 in Practical Use
Person X is accused in a criminal case pending before Sessions Court A. X alleges bias by the presiding judge and fears unfair trial. The Sessions Judge reviews the request and finds sufficient reasons to transfer the case to Sessions Court B in the same district. The transfer order is issued, ensuring a fair trial for X without undue influence.
Section 238 enabled transfer to prevent bias.
Ensured impartiality and fairness in trial.
Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 238
Section 238 was introduced to empower Sessions Judges to manage their courts effectively and ensure justice by transferring cases when necessary. Over time, amendments clarified the scope and procedural safeguards to prevent misuse.
Initially part of procedural reforms in CrPC.
Amendments enhanced clarity on transfer grounds.
Strengthened judicial control over case allocation.
Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 238
In 2026, Section 238 remains vital for maintaining fair trials amid increasing case loads and complex criminal matters. It helps address concerns of bias and logistical challenges, supporting judicial independence and public trust.
Supports fair trial in diverse and busy courts.
Prevents undue influence or local pressures.
Facilitates efficient case management within districts.
Related Sections to CrPC Section 238
Section 406 – Transfer of cases by High Court.
Section 407 – Transfer of cases by Supreme Court.
Section 321 – Withdrawal or compromise by Public Prosecutor.
Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court.
Section 209 – Commitment of cases to Sessions Court.
Case References under CrPC Section 238
- State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003, 4 SCC 601)
– Supreme Court emphasized fair trial and upheld transfer powers to ensure impartiality.
- Ramesh Kumari v. State of Delhi (2006, 2 SCC 677)
– Transfer of cases to avoid bias was recognized as essential for justice.
- Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP (2017, 8 SCC 745)
– Court clarified sufficient reasons needed for transfer under Section 238.
Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 238
- Section:
238
- Title:
Transfer of Sessions Cases
- Nature:
Procedural power
- Applies To:
Sessions Judge, accused, prosecution
- Cognizance:
Taken by Sessions Judge on sufficient reasons
- Bailability:
Not affected by this section
- Triable By:
Sessions Courts within the district
Conclusion on CrPC Section 238
CrPC Section 238 is a crucial provision that empowers Sessions Judges to transfer cases within the district to ensure fairness and impartiality in criminal trials. It acts as a safeguard against bias, undue influence, or inconvenience that may compromise justice.
By allowing transfers on sufficient reasons, this section upholds the integrity of the criminal justice system and protects the rights of accused and victims. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals appreciate the mechanisms that promote fair trial and judicial independence.
FAQs on CrPC Section 238
Who can order the transfer of a case under Section 238?
The Sessions Judge of the district has the authority to transfer any case pending before one Sessions Court to another Sessions Court within the same district under Section 238.
Can a case be transferred outside the district under this section?
No, Section 238 permits transfer only between Sessions Courts within the same district. Transfers outside the district require other provisions like Section 406 or 407.
Does transfer under Section 238 affect bail conditions?
No, the transfer of a case does not automatically change bail conditions. The transferee court may review bail if necessary, but existing orders remain valid until then.
What qualifies as sufficient reasons for transfer?
Sufficient reasons include concerns about bias, convenience, impartiality, or any factor that may affect a fair trial. The Sessions Judge assesses these before ordering transfer.
Can the transfer order be challenged?
Yes, an aggrieved party can challenge the transfer order by filing an appeal or revision petition before the High Court within the prescribed time.