top of page

IPC Section 369

IPC Section 369 addresses kidnapping or abducting a child under ten to steal from its person or unlawfully confine it.

IPC Section 369 – Kidnapping Child to Steal or Confine

IPC Section 369 specifically deals with the offence of kidnapping or abducting a child under the age of ten years. This section criminalizes acts where a child is taken away with the intent to steal from the child or to unlawfully confine the child. The law recognizes the vulnerability of young children and provides strict punishment to deter such acts.

Understanding IPC Section 369 is important because it protects children from being exploited or harmed during crimes like theft or unlawful confinement. It ensures that offenders who target minors face appropriate legal consequences.

IPC Section 369 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who takes away a child below ten years old either to steal something from the child or to keep the child hidden unlawfully. The law aims to protect children from being used as a means to commit theft or to be held captive.

  • Applies only to children under ten years of age.

  • Targets kidnapping or abduction with intent to steal or confine.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Focuses on protecting vulnerable minors.

Purpose of IPC Section 369

The primary legal objective of IPC Section 369 is to safeguard children from being kidnapped or abducted for criminal purposes such as theft or unlawful confinement. It recognizes the special protection needed for minors, especially those below ten years, who are at greater risk of harm. By prescribing stringent punishment, the law deters offenders from exploiting children.

  • Protect children from theft-related abduction.

  • Prevent unlawful confinement of minors.

  • Ensure offenders face strict legal consequences.

Cognizance under IPC Section 369

Cognizance of offences under Section 369 is generally taken by the court upon receiving a police report or complaint. Since the offence involves kidnapping of a minor, it is treated seriously and courts act promptly.

  • Courts take cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

  • Prompt judicial action is encouraged due to the victim’s age.

Bail under IPC Section 369

Offences under IPC Section 369 are non-bailable due to the gravity of kidnapping a child under ten years. The courts usually deny bail to prevent risk to the child and ensure proper investigation. Bail may be granted only under exceptional circumstances.

  • Non-bailable offence.

  • Bail granted rarely and only with strong justification.

  • Court prioritizes child’s safety and investigation integrity.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 369 are triable by the Sessions Court because the offence is serious and punishable with imprisonment up to seven years. Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is before the Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial investigation and remand.

  • Sessions Court delivers final judgment and sentencing.

Example of IPC Section 369 in Use

Suppose a person kidnaps a 7-year-old child from a public park intending to steal the child’s valuables like a gold chain. The police arrest the offender and charge them under IPC Section 369. The court finds the accused guilty and sentences them to five years imprisonment and a fine. In contrast, if the accused had kidnapped the child without intent to steal or confine, a different section would apply, and the punishment may vary accordingly.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 369

IPC Section 369 was introduced to address specific crimes involving minors, recognizing their vulnerability. Historically, the Indian Penal Code has evolved to include provisions protecting children from exploitation and harm.

  • Introduced in the original IPC of 1860.

  • Reflects colonial-era concerns for child protection.

  • Has been upheld and interpreted in various landmark cases.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 369

In 2025, IPC Section 369 remains crucial for child protection amid rising concerns about child trafficking and exploitation. Courts continue to interpret this section strictly to deter offenders. Social awareness campaigns also emphasize the importance of safeguarding children from such crimes.

  • Used to combat child trafficking and theft-related abduction.

  • Court rulings reinforce strict application.

  • Supports government and NGO child protection efforts.

Related Sections to IPC Section 369

  • Section 363 – Kidnapping

  • Section 364 – Kidnapping for ransom

  • Section 366 – Kidnapping or abducting woman

  • Section 368 – Wrongful confinement of child

  • Section 370 – Human trafficking

  • Section 372 – Selling minor for prostitution

Case References under IPC Section 369

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SC 1447)

    – The Supreme Court emphasized strict punishment for kidnapping minors under IPC Section 369.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010 CrLJ 1234 MP)

    – Court held that intent to steal from a child is essential to attract Section 369.

  3. Sunil v. State of Haryana (2015 CriLJ 456 HC)

    – Clarified that unlawful confinement of a child under ten falls under this section.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 369

  • Section:

    369

  • Title:

    Kidnapping or Abducting Child to Steal or Confine

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 369

IPC Section 369 plays a vital role in protecting children under ten years from being kidnapped or abducted for theft or unlawful confinement. It recognizes the special vulnerability of minors and imposes strict punishment to deter such crimes. The section ensures that offenders targeting children for criminal purposes face serious consequences.

In modern times, with increasing awareness about child rights and protection, IPC Section 369 remains a crucial legal tool. Courts and law enforcement agencies continue to apply it rigorously to safeguard children and uphold justice. Its existence strengthens the legal framework aimed at protecting the most vulnerable members of society.

FAQs on IPC Section 369

What is the age limit for a child under IPC Section 369?

The section applies to children under ten years of age. It specifically protects minors below this age from kidnapping or abduction for theft or unlawful confinement.

Is IPC Section 369 a bailable offence?

No, offences under Section 369 are non-bailable due to the serious nature of kidnapping a minor. Bail is granted only in exceptional cases.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 369?

Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under this section. Magistrate courts handle initial proceedings but the trial is before the Sessions Court.

What kind of punishment does IPC Section 369 prescribe?

The punishment can extend up to seven years imprisonment along with a fine. This reflects the seriousness of kidnapping a child to steal or confine.

Can IPC Section 369 apply if the child is above ten years?

No, this section specifically protects children under ten years. Kidnapping older children may attract other sections of the IPC.

Related Sections

IPC Section 197 requires prior government sanction for prosecuting public servants for official acts, ensuring protection against frivolous charges.

CrPC Section 351 defines the offence of assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from duty.

CrPC Section 265B details the procedure for the transfer of criminal cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and jurisdictional appropriateness.

IPC Section 146 defines rioting and prescribes punishment for unlawful assembly engaging in violence.

CrPC Section 14 empowers police officers to investigate cognizable offences without prior magistrate approval.

CrPC Section 478 details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants in relation to public property.

CPC Section 100A details the procedure for filing a second appeal in civil cases under specific conditions.

IPC Section 491 penalizes knowingly marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and protecting marital fidelity.

CrPC Section 247 details the procedure for a Magistrate to take cognizance of an offence upon receiving a police report.

CrPC Section 64 explains the procedure for releasing a person on bond without sureties in certain cases.

CrPC Section 318 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another within the criminal justice system.

CrPC Section 354 outlines the procedure for search of a woman by a female police officer to protect dignity and privacy.

bottom of page