top of page

IPC Section 21

IPC Section 21 defines 'Public Servant' and outlines who is considered a public servant under Indian law.

IPC Section 21 – Definition of Public Servant

IPC Section 21 provides a clear definition of who qualifies as a "public servant" under Indian law. This classification is crucial because many offences under the Indian Penal Code specifically relate to actions by or against public servants. Understanding this section helps in identifying the scope of various legal provisions that protect public servants or regulate their conduct.

The section broadly includes government officials, employees of government companies, and others who perform public duties. It ensures that individuals holding public office are accountable and subject to specific legal standards. This clarity is essential for enforcing laws related to corruption, abuse of power, and other offences involving public servants.

IPC Section 21 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, IPC Section 21 identifies who is considered a public servant. It covers a wide range of individuals working for the government or performing public duties, whether paid by salary, fees, or commission. This definition is important because it determines who is subject to laws that apply specifically to public servants.

  • Includes government employees and officials.

  • Covers persons paid by government or performing public duties.

  • Applies to those remunerated by fees or commissions for public service.

  • Forms basis for offences related to public servants.

Purpose of IPC Section 21

The main legal objective of IPC Section 21 is to clearly define the term "public servant" to ensure proper application of laws concerning public officials. This clarity helps in prosecuting offences like corruption, bribery, and misconduct involving public servants. It also protects public interest by holding accountable those entrusted with public duties.

  • Defines scope of public servants under law.

  • Enables enforcement of laws against corruption and abuse.

  • Protects integrity of public administration.

Cognizance under IPC Section 21

Cognizance under IPC Section 21 is generally taken when an offence involves a public servant as defined by this section. Courts verify whether the accused qualifies as a public servant before proceeding with trial under relevant provisions.

  • Court confirms status of accused as public servant.

  • Essential for offences under chapters related to public servants.

  • Cognizance can be taken suo moto or on complaint.

Bail under IPC Section 21

Since IPC Section 21 itself is a definitional section, it does not prescribe punishment or bail conditions. However, offences involving public servants as defined here can be serious and often non-bailable, depending on the specific offence charged.

  • Bail depends on the offence involving the public servant.

  • Serious offences like corruption often non-bailable.

  • Court considers role of accused as public servant in bail decisions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences involving public servants defined under IPC Section 21 are triable by courts depending on the nature and severity of the offence. Sessions Courts generally try serious offences, while Magistrate Courts handle less severe cases.

  • Sessions Court tries serious offences involving public servants.

  • Magistrate Court handles minor offences or preliminary matters.

  • Special courts may have jurisdiction in corruption cases.

Example of IPC Section 21 in Use

Consider a government clerk accused of accepting a bribe. Before proceeding under anti-corruption laws, the court must confirm if the clerk qualifies as a public servant under IPC Section 21. If confirmed, the clerk can be prosecuted under relevant IPC sections for corruption. Conversely, if the person does not meet the definition, the case may not proceed under those provisions.

This example shows how Section 21 acts as a gateway to applying laws meant for public servants, ensuring only eligible persons are prosecuted under such laws.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 21

IPC Section 21 has evolved to keep pace with changing definitions of public service. Initially, it covered traditional government employees but has expanded to include various categories of public officials and persons performing public duties.

  • Introduced in original IPC draft of 1860.

  • Expanded through amendments to include broader categories.

  • Landmark cases clarified scope and interpretation.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 21

In 2025, IPC Section 21 remains vital for defining public servants amid expanding government functions and privatization. Courts interpret it to include employees of government companies and others performing public duties. This ensures accountability and legal oversight in diverse public service roles.

  • Includes employees of government-owned corporations.

  • Supports anti-corruption and transparency laws.

  • Helps courts address misconduct in evolving public sectors.

Related Sections to IPC Section 21

  • Section 19 – Definition of Government

  • Section 22 – Public Servant Acting in Official Capacity

  • Section 161 – Public Servant Taking Gratification

  • Section 166 – Public Servant Disobeying Law

  • Section 420 – Cheating (often involving public servants)

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

Case References under IPC Section 21

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003 AIR 3463, SC)

    – The Court clarified the scope of "public servant" including persons in government service and those discharging public duties.

  2. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (1993 AIR 237, SC)

    – Held that employees of government companies can be public servants under IPC Section 21.

  3. Subramanian Swamy v. Director, CBI (2014 AIR SCW 3147)

    – Affirmed that the definition of public servant is broad and includes persons remunerated by government for public duties.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 21

  • Section:

    21

  • Title:

    Definition of Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Not an offence; definitional section

  • Punishment:

    N/A

  • Triable By:

    Depends on offence involving public servant

Conclusion on IPC Section 21

IPC Section 21 plays a foundational role in Indian criminal law by defining who is a public servant. This definition is critical for applying numerous IPC provisions that regulate the conduct of public officials and protect public interest. Without this clarity, prosecuting offences involving public servants would be challenging.

As public administration evolves, Section 21 ensures that the law keeps pace by encompassing various categories of public servants. Its role in supporting anti-corruption efforts and maintaining governmental integrity makes it indispensable in modern legal practice.

FAQs on IPC Section 21

What is the main purpose of IPC Section 21?

It defines who qualifies as a public servant under Indian law, enabling proper application of laws related to public officials.

Does IPC Section 21 itself prescribe any punishment?

No, it is a definitional section and does not prescribe punishment or bail conditions.

Are employees of government companies considered public servants under this section?

Yes, employees of government companies performing public duties are included in the definition.

How does IPC Section 21 affect prosecution of corruption cases?

It helps courts determine if the accused is a public servant, which is essential for applying anti-corruption laws.

Can a private individual be considered a public servant under IPC Section 21?

Only if they are remunerated by the government or perform public duties as defined in the section.

Related Sections

IPC Section 419 defines punishment for cheating by personation, addressing fraudulent impersonation to deceive others.

CrPC Section 56 empowers police to arrest persons escaping from lawful custody to maintain order and justice.

IPC Section 9 defines punishment for abetment of offence punishable with death or life imprisonment.

CrPC Section 306 deals with abetment of suicide, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects under Indian law.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

CrPC Section 185 defines the offence and penalties for disobedience to summons issued by a criminal court.

CrPC Section 23 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where the offence was committed.

IPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in non-bailable offences.

IPC Section 436 defines the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substance, focusing on damage caused to property.

IPC Section 440 defines house-breaking by night, detailing its scope and legal consequences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 41B mandates police officers to inform arrested persons of their right to bail and the grounds of arrest promptly.

IPC Section 171G penalizes the promotion or attempt to promote feelings of enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.

bottom of page