top of page

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(27)

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(27) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(27) defines what constitutes unfair contract terms in agreements between consumers and sellers or service providers. This section safeguards consumers from terms that create significant imbalance or are detrimental to their rights. Understanding this provision helps consumers identify and challenge exploitative clauses in contracts.

This section is crucial for maintaining fairness in consumer contracts and preventing misuse of power by businesses. Both consumers and businesses should be aware of these rules to ensure transparent and equitable agreements, reducing disputes and fostering trust in commercial transactions.

Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27) – Exact Provision

This provision identifies contract terms that are unfair to consumers by creating an imbalance in rights and duties. It protects consumers from clauses that are harsh, one-sided, or restrict their legal protections. The section empowers consumers to question and seek remedies against such unfair terms.

  • Defines unfair contract terms clearly.

  • Focuses on imbalance and detriment to consumers.

  • Includes oppressive or one-sided clauses.

  • Protects consumer rights in contracts.

  • Enables legal challenge of unfair terms.

Explanation of Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

This section explains what makes a contract term unfair and who it protects.

  • States that unfair terms create significant imbalance against consumers.

  • Affects consumers, traders, service providers, and e-commerce platforms.

  • Applies to contracts involving goods or services for consumers.

  • Triggers when contract terms limit consumer rights or impose harsh obligations.

  • Grants consumers the right to challenge such terms legally.

  • Prohibits use of oppressive or one-sided contract clauses.

Purpose and Rationale of Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

This section aims to protect consumers from exploitative contract terms that unfairly restrict their rights or impose excessive obligations. It promotes fairness and transparency in consumer agreements, ensuring balanced trade relations and preventing misuse of power by sellers or service providers.

  • Protects consumer interests in contracts.

  • Promotes fair trade and transparency.

  • Prevents exploitation through unfair clauses.

  • Enhances consumer confidence and dispute resolution.

When Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27) Applies

This section applies whenever a consumer enters into a contract with a seller or service provider, especially when terms may be unfair or one-sided. It is relevant for goods, services, and digital platform agreements, empowering consumers to seek remedies.

  • Triggered during contract formation or enforcement.

  • Invoked by consumers facing unfair terms.

  • Applicable to physical and digital goods and services.

  • Excludes purely commercial or resale contracts.

Legal Effect of Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

This section strengthens consumer rights by invalidating or allowing challenge of unfair contract terms. It imposes duties on traders and service providers to draft fair and balanced contracts. It impacts dispute resolution by providing grounds to contest oppressive clauses and complements other consumer protection provisions.

  • Empowers consumers to seek relief against unfair terms.

  • Obligates businesses to avoid oppressive clauses.

  • Supports fair contract enforcement and dispute settlement.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

The section grants consumers the right to fair contract terms and obligates traders to avoid unfair clauses. These duties are mandatory and strict to prevent exploitation. Breach may lead to invalidation of terms and consumer claims for remedies.

  • Rights to fair and balanced contract terms.

  • Mandatory obligations on traders to avoid unfairness.

  • Strict enforcement to protect consumers.

  • Consequences include invalidation and compensation.

Stage of Consumer Dispute Where This Section Applies

This section is relevant at multiple stages: before purchase during contract formation, at purchase when terms are agreed, and post-purchase if disputes arise over unfair clauses. It supports complaint filing and proceedings in consumer commissions.

  • Pre-purchase contract review.

  • Purchase agreement stage.

  • Post-purchase grievance and dispute.

  • Consumer Commission complaint and hearings.

Remedies and Penalties under Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

Consumers can seek remedies such as invalidation of unfair terms, compensation, refund, or replacement. Consumer Commissions enforce these rights and may impose penalties on traders for violations, ensuring compliance and consumer protection.

  • Invalidation of unfair contract terms.

  • Compensation or refund for affected consumers.

  • Penalties on traders for unfair practices.

  • Enforcement by Consumer Protection Commissions.

Example of Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27) in Practical Use

X, a consumer, signed a service contract with a provider that included a clause waiving all liability for service defects. When the service failed, X challenged the clause as unfair under Section 2(27). The Consumer Commission ruled the clause unfair and invalid, ordering compensation to X.

  • Consumers can challenge oppressive contract clauses.

  • Section 2(27) ensures fair contract enforcement.

Historical Background of Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

The 2019 Act modernized consumer protection by introducing clear definitions of unfair contract terms, replacing the 1986 Act. This change addressed evolving market practices and digital commerce, enhancing consumer safeguards against exploitative agreements.

  • Updated from Consumer Protection Act 1986.

  • Introduced clearer unfair contract term definitions.

  • Adapted to modern trade and e-commerce.

Modern Relevance of Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

With the rise of e-commerce and digital contracts, Section 2(27) is vital for protecting consumers from unfair online terms. It supports consumer safety and fair trade in digital marketplaces, ensuring practical enforcement in 2026 and beyond.

  • Applies to digital and online contracts.

  • Enhances consumer safety in e-commerce.

  • Supports practical dispute resolution in modern markets.

Related Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(7) – Definition of consumer.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(47) – Unfair trade practices.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 17 – Jurisdiction of State Commission.

  • Contract Act Section 73 – Compensation for loss caused by breach.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving defect or deficiency.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant for misleading advertisements.

Case References under Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

  • Section: 2(27)

  • Title: Unfair Contract Terms

  • Category: Consumer rights, unfair contract practices

  • Applies To: Consumers, traders, service providers, e-commerce platforms

  • Stage: Contract formation, dispute resolution

  • Legal Effect: Invalidates unfair terms, protects consumer rights

  • Related Remedies: Compensation, invalidation, penalties

Conclusion on Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

Section 2(27) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 plays a crucial role in safeguarding consumers against unfair contract terms. By clearly defining what constitutes an unfair term, it empowers consumers to challenge exploitative clauses and ensures fairness in commercial agreements.

This provision promotes transparency and balance in consumer contracts, fostering trust between consumers and businesses. Its relevance continues to grow with the expansion of digital commerce, making it an essential tool for consumer protection in modern India.

FAQs on Consumer Protection Act Section 2(27)

What is an unfair contract term under Section 2(27)?

An unfair contract term is a clause that creates a significant imbalance in rights and obligations, disadvantaging the consumer. It includes oppressive or one-sided terms that limit consumer protections unfairly.

Who can challenge unfair contract terms?

Consumers who enter into contracts with sellers or service providers can challenge unfair terms. Consumer Protection Commissions provide a forum to raise such disputes.

Does Section 2(27) apply to online contracts?

Yes, this section applies to contracts formed online or through digital platforms, protecting consumers from unfair terms in e-commerce agreements.

What remedies are available for unfair contract terms?

Consumers can seek invalidation of unfair terms, compensation, refund, or replacement. Penalties may also be imposed on traders violating the law.

How does this section affect businesses?

Businesses must ensure their contracts are fair and balanced. They face legal consequences if they include unfair terms that harm consumers.

Related Sections

Macess are not legal in India as they involve unauthorized use of digital content violating copyright laws.

Income Tax Act Section 80R provides deduction for interest paid on loans for higher education of self or relatives.

CrPC Section 395 defines the offence of dacoity and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Treasure hunting in India is conditionally legal with strict permissions and regulations under the Antiquities Act and Indian laws.

Metal trading in India is legal with regulations under the Forward Contracts Act and SEBI guidelines to ensure fair practices.

Dogecoin is legal in India but regulated under cryptocurrency laws with restrictions on trading and usage.

Wrapping is legal in India with certain restrictions related to safety, environment, and consumer protection laws.

CrPC Section 382 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest to secure the attendance of a person in court.

Algo trading is legal in India with specific regulations by SEBI and stock exchanges to ensure fair use and transparency.

Taking currency out of India is legal within RBI limits and rules; exceeding limits without declaration is illegal.

Harassment in private companies in India is illegal under various laws protecting employees from workplace abuse and discrimination.

Understand the legal status of 5 paisa coins in India and their use in transactions today.

Service bonds are legal in India if reasonable and clearly defined, protecting employer interests without violating labor laws.

IVF is legal in India with regulations ensuring safe and ethical fertility treatments under the ART Act 2021.

Wikileaks is not legal in India due to laws on national security and unauthorized disclosure of classified information.

भारत में क्राउडफंडिंग कानूनी है, लेकिन नियमों और प्रतिबंधों के साथ। जानिए कैसे काम करता है और क्या ध्यान रखें।

IPC Section 488 addresses the offence of making a false statement in a declaration which is legally required.

Hoosexuality is legal in India following the 2018 Supreme Court ruling decriminalizing consensual same-sex relations.

Car tuning in India is legal with restrictions on noise, emissions, and safety compliance enforced by law.

Bike wrapping is legal in India with specific rules on design, reflectivity, and safety compliance.

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

IPC Section 138 addresses dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds, penalizing the drawer for bounced cheques.

Contract Act 1872 Section 12 defines who is competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

Understand the legal status of Forex Broker Services (FBS) in India, including regulations and enforcement details.

In India, pimping is illegal and punishable under various laws protecting against human trafficking and exploitation.

Buying potassium nitrate in India is legal with restrictions; it is regulated due to its use in explosives and fertilizers.

CrPC Section 239 details the procedure for discharge of an accused when the Magistrate finds no sufficient grounds for proceeding.

bottom of page