top of page

IPC Section 42

IPC Section 42 defines the procedure for arrest without a warrant by a private person or public servant.

IPC Section 42 outlines the legal framework for arresting a person without a warrant. It empowers both public servants and private individuals to arrest someone who has committed a cognizable offence or is a suspected offender. This provision is crucial for maintaining law and order by enabling immediate action when obtaining a warrant is not feasible.

Understanding IPC Section 42 is important because it balances individual rights with public safety. It ensures that arrests without warrants are conducted lawfully, preventing misuse while allowing prompt intervention in urgent situations.

IPC Section 42 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes private individuals to arrest a person without a warrant under specific conditions. It applies only to non-bailable and cognizable offences. The arrested person must be either fleeing or attempting to flee. After arrest, the person must be handed over to a Magistrate or Police Officer, who is then responsible for custody.

  • Allows private persons to arrest without warrant in certain cases.

  • Applicable only for non-bailable, cognizable offences.

  • Arrested person must be escaping or attempting to escape.

  • Arrested individual must be presented before Magistrate or Police Officer.

  • Ensures lawful custody after arrest.

Purpose of IPC Section 42

The main objective of IPC Section 42 is to empower citizens and officials to act promptly against offenders when immediate arrest is necessary. It prevents criminals from evading justice by fleeing before authorities can intervene. This provision supports swift law enforcement while safeguarding legal procedures.

  • Enable prompt arrest without waiting for a warrant.

  • Prevent escape of offenders involved in serious crimes.

  • Maintain public order and safety.

Cognizance under IPC Section 42

Cognizance under this section arises when a person commits a cognizable and non-bailable offence and is attempting to escape. Courts take cognizance upon receiving the arrested person from the arresting party.

  • Cognizance is taken when a person is handed over after arrest without warrant.

  • Applicable only for cognizable offences.

  • Magistrate or Police Officer must record the arrest and proceed accordingly.

Bail under IPC Section 42

Since IPC Section 42 deals with arrest procedure rather than the offence itself, bail depends on the nature of the underlying offence. Generally, the arrested person may apply for bail as per the rules governing the specific offence.

  • Section 42 itself does not specify bail conditions.

  • Bail eligibility depends on the offence for which arrest is made.

  • Non-bailable offences may restrict bail options.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

The trial for offences leading to arrest under Section 42 depends on the original offence committed. Typically, cognizable offences are triable by Magistrate or Sessions Courts depending on severity.

  • Magistrate courts try less serious cognizable offences.

  • Sessions courts handle serious offences.

  • Jurisdiction depends on offence classification, not Section 42 itself.

Example of IPC Section 42 in Use

Suppose a private citizen witnesses a person committing theft and tries to escape. The citizen can lawfully arrest the thief without a warrant under Section 42. The arrested individual must then be handed over to the nearest Police Officer or Magistrate. If the citizen fails to do so, the arrest may be considered unlawful. Conversely, if the person arrested is innocent or the offence is non-cognizable, the arrest could be challenged in court.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 42

Section 42 has its roots in colonial-era laws designed to empower citizens and officials to maintain law and order. It has evolved to clarify the conditions under which private persons can arrest without a warrant.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Clarified in various judicial pronouncements over decades.

  • Reinforced the balance between citizen powers and legal safeguards.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 42

In 2025, Section 42 remains vital for immediate law enforcement, especially in emergencies. Courts have emphasized the need for caution to prevent misuse. Social awareness about lawful arrest procedures has increased, reducing arbitrary detentions.

  • Court rulings stress protecting individual rights during arrest.

  • Used in community policing and citizen vigilance efforts.

  • Supports quick action in digital crime and public safety scenarios.

Related Sections to IPC Section 42

  • Section 41 – Power of police to arrest without warrant

  • Section 43 – Arrest to prevent commission of cognizable offence

  • Section 44 – Arrest to prevent breach of peace

  • Section 46 – How to arrest

  • Section 50 – Person arrested to be informed of grounds

  • Section 57 – Arrested person to be produced before magistrate

Case References under IPC Section 42

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999 AIR 2378, SC)

    – The Court held that private persons have limited power to arrest without warrant only under strict conditions.

  2. Joginder Kumar v. State of UP (1994 AIR 1349, SC)

    – Arrest without warrant must comply with legal safeguards to prevent abuse.

  3. Raghunathrao Ganpatrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra (1977 AIR 2447, SC)

    – Emphasized the duty of police to take arrested persons into custody promptly.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 42

  • Section:

    42

  • Title:

    Arrest Without Warrant Procedure

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable, Cognizable (arrest power applies)

  • Punishment:

    Not specified in this section; depends on underlying offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on offence

Conclusion on IPC Section 42

IPC Section 42 plays a crucial role in empowering both private citizens and public servants to arrest offenders without a warrant under specific conditions. This provision helps prevent offenders from escaping justice and supports swift law enforcement action.

However, it also incorporates safeguards to protect individual rights by requiring the arrested person to be handed over to proper authorities. In modern India, this balance between authority and rights remains essential for maintaining public order and justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 42

Who can arrest a person without a warrant under IPC Section 42?

Both private persons and public servants can arrest without a warrant if the person has committed a non-bailable, cognizable offence and is escaping or attempting to escape.

Is IPC Section 42 applicable for all offences?

No, it applies only to non-bailable and cognizable offences where the offender is fleeing or trying to escape.

What must be done after arresting a person under Section 42?

The arrested person must be taken before a Magistrate or Police Officer, who is then responsible for lawful custody.

Does Section 42 specify punishment for the offence?

No, Section 42 only deals with arrest procedure. Punishment depends on the offence committed.

Can misuse of arrest power under Section 42 be challenged?

Yes, unlawful or wrongful arrests can be challenged in court to protect individual rights.

Related Sections

Section 196D of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on income of foreign institutional investors in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 298 governs the powers of the Board of Directors to manage company affairs and delegate authority.

Understand the legal status of Showlion in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Niyog, an ancient practice, is not legally recognized in India under current family and inheritance laws.

Honour killing is illegal in India and punishable under criminal law without exceptions or legal justification.

IPC Section 257 covers the offence of causing obstruction or danger to public servants in the discharge of their duties.

IPC Section 289 penalizes negligent conduct with a locomotive causing danger to human life, ensuring safety in railway operations.

Explore the legal status of Aviator game in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about online gaming laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 81 explains the liability of partners for negotiable instruments made or endorsed by a firm.

CrPC Section 301 details the procedure for conducting an inquiry or trial when a Magistrate receives information about a cognizable offence.

Owning a limo in India is legal with proper registration and adherence to transport laws and permits.

Cinemas on Hotstar are legal in India if they comply with copyright laws and streaming regulations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 7 defines the rule of 'Judicial Notice' where courts accept certain facts without requiring proof.

Companies Act 2013 Section 98 governs the transfer of shares, ensuring proper procedure and rights protection in share transactions.

Prostitution in Bangalore, India is legal but regulated with restrictions on public solicitation and brothel operation.

CPC Section 100 details the appeal process from original decrees in civil suits, outlining grounds and procedures for second appeals.

Iron trade is legal in India but regulated under various laws and licenses to ensure compliance with trade and environmental norms.

Freelotto is not legally authorized in India due to strict gambling laws and lack of official licensing.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 283 empowers tax authorities to summon persons for inquiry or investigation.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 9 outlines the jurisdiction of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions for consumer complaints.

IPC Section 205 defines the offence of concealing a design to commit an offence, addressing criminal intent and secrecy.

CrPC Section 482 empowers High Courts to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice by exercising inherent powers.

In India, driving a car wearing flip flops is not illegal but may be unsafe and discouraged by traffic authorities.

IPC Section 229A penalizes the act of falsely claiming to be a member of the armed forces to deceive others.

Cockfighting is illegal on Indian reservations in the U.S., with strict enforcement and no exceptions under tribal or federal law.

Electric skateboards are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on speed, usage areas, and safety compliance.

bottom of page