top of page

IPC Section 423

IPC Section 423 defines dishonestly receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 423 – Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

IPC Section 423 addresses the offence of dishonestly receiving stolen property. It is an important provision that targets individuals who knowingly accept or possess goods that have been stolen. This section helps in curbing the circulation of stolen goods and supports the enforcement of property rights.

Understanding IPC Section 423 is crucial because it holds not only the original thief accountable but also those who facilitate the crime by receiving stolen items. This ensures a wider net of legal responsibility and discourages illegal trade in stolen property.

IPC Section 423 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who accepts or keeps stolen goods, knowing or suspecting that they are stolen. The law does not require the receiver to have stolen the property themselves, but only to have received it dishonestly.

  • Applies to anyone who receives stolen goods dishonestly.

  • Knowledge or reason to believe the property is stolen is necessary.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Focuses on preventing the circulation of stolen property.

  • Helps in tracing and recovering stolen goods.

Purpose of IPC Section 423

The main objective of IPC Section 423 is to deter people from becoming part of the chain that enables theft by receiving stolen goods. It aims to protect property rights and maintain public order by discouraging the handling of stolen property. This provision supports law enforcement efforts to reduce crime and recover stolen items.

  • Discourages the illegal trade of stolen goods.

  • Protects rightful owners’ property rights.

  • Supports crime prevention and recovery efforts.

Cognizance under IPC Section 423

Cognizance of an offence under Section 423 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves dishonestly receiving stolen property, it is a cognizable offence, allowing the police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register a case and investigate on their own.

  • Cognizance taken upon receiving complaint or police report.

  • Trial initiated after sufficient evidence is gathered.

Bail under IPC Section 423

Offences under IPC Section 423 are usually bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail and be released pending trial. However, the grant of bail depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, including the nature of the offence and the accused’s background.

  • Generally a bailable offence.

  • Bail granted unless there are strong reasons to deny it.

  • Court considers risk of tampering with evidence or fleeing.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 423 are triable by a Magistrate’s Court. Since the punishment is up to three years, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate, who can conduct the trial and pass sentence accordingly.

  • Trial conducted by Magistrate’s Court.

  • Sessions Court may hear appeals or connected cases.

  • Summary trial possible if facts are straightforward.

Example of IPC Section 423 in Use

Suppose a person buys a smartphone at a very low price from a stranger, suspecting it might be stolen. Later, the police recover the phone and investigate. If it is proven that the buyer knew or had reason to believe the phone was stolen, they can be charged under IPC Section 423. If the buyer had no such knowledge, they may be acquitted. This example shows how knowledge or suspicion plays a key role in applying this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 423

IPC Section 423 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the problem of stolen goods being circulated in society, which undermined property rights and law enforcement.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to combat stolen goods trade.

  • Has undergone minor amendments to clarify terms.

  • Referenced in landmark cases defining 'dishonest receipt'.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 423

In 2025, IPC Section 423 remains vital due to the rise of online marketplaces and second-hand goods trade. Courts have interpreted the section to include digital goods and electronic devices. It helps in curbing the illegal sale and purchase of stolen property in modern commerce.

  • Applies to physical and digital stolen goods.

  • Court rulings emphasize the importance of knowledge element.

  • Supports consumer protection and crime prevention.

Related Sections to IPC Section 423

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly receiving stolen property (general definition)

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

  • Section 379 – Theft

  • Section 406 – Criminal breach of trust

  • Section 414 – Assisting in concealment of stolen property

Case References under IPC Section 423

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand (1990 AIR 939, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge or reason to believe the property is stolen is essential for conviction under Section 423.

  2. R. v. Turner (1971) 1 QB 373

    – Established that possession alone is insufficient without dishonest knowledge.

  3. Ram Narain v. State of U.P. (1960 AIR 1187, SC)

    – Clarified the scope of 'dishonestly receiving' in relation to stolen goods.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 423

  • Section:

    423

  • Title:

    Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 423

IPC Section 423 plays a crucial role in the Indian legal system by targeting those who facilitate theft through the dishonest receipt of stolen goods. It ensures that the chain of crime does not continue unchecked and that property rights are protected effectively.

By penalizing receivers who knowingly handle stolen property, this section supports law enforcement and deters illegal trade. Its relevance continues to grow in the modern era, where stolen goods can include not only physical items but also digital assets.

FAQs on IPC Section 423

What is the main element required to prove offence under IPC Section 423?

The key element is that the accused must have received stolen property dishonestly, knowing or having reason to believe it was stolen.

Is IPC Section 423 a bailable offence?

Yes, it is generally bailable, but bail depends on the case facts and court discretion.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 423?

Magistrate’s Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under this section.

Does possession alone amount to offence under Section 423?

No, mere possession is not enough; dishonest knowledge or suspicion about the stolen nature is necessary.

Can digital goods be covered under IPC Section 423?

Yes, courts have extended the section’s application to include digital or electronic stolen property.

Related Sections

IPC Section 233 penalizes the act of causing grievous hurt by means of poison or noxious substances.

IPC Section 33 defines the liability of a person for acts done by another under their direction or in their aid.

CrPC Section 465 details the procedure for the destruction of seized property after legal proceedings conclude.

IPC Section 297 penalizes trespassing on places of worship or burial with intent to insult religious feelings.

CrPC Section 184 empowers magistrates to issue search warrants to prevent offences or recover stolen property.

IPC Section 229 punishes the act of voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

IPC Section 222 punishes wrongful confinement in secret places to prevent discovery of an offence or offender.

IPC Section 424 covers the offence of maliciously sending letters or articles with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

IPC Section 171G penalizes the promotion or attempt to promote feelings of enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.

CrPC Section 171 defines offences related to public servants disobeying lawful directions, ensuring accountability and lawful conduct.

IPC Section 510 addresses intentional insult or interruption with intent to provoke breach of peace, ensuring public order protection.

bottom of page