top of page

IPC Section 463

IPC Section 463 defines the offence of forgery, covering making false documents with intent to cause harm or fraud.

IPC Section 463 – Forgery Definition

IPC Section 463 deals with the crime of forgery. It defines what constitutes forgery under Indian law, focusing on the making of false documents or electronic records with the intention to cause damage or deceive someone. This section is crucial because forgery can undermine trust in legal and commercial transactions, affecting individuals and institutions alike.

Understanding Section 463 is important for anyone involved in legal, financial, or official documentation. It helps protect rights and ensures that fraudulent activities are punishable under the law, maintaining the integrity of documents used in everyday life.

IPC Section 463 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, Section 463 states that forgery happens when someone creates a fake document or electronic record intending to deceive or harm another person or the public. The document can be anything like a contract, will, certificate, or any official paper. The key point is the intention behind making the false document, which must be to cause damage, cheat, or commit fraud.

  • Forgery involves making a false document or electronic record.

  • The intention must be to cause harm, fraud, or deception.

  • It covers documents used to support claims, contracts, or property transactions.

  • Forgery is a criminal offence under the IPC.

Purpose of IPC Section 463

The main legal objective of Section 463 is to prevent and punish the creation of false documents that can harm individuals or the public. It protects the authenticity and reliability of documents used in legal, commercial, and personal matters. By criminalizing forgery, the law aims to maintain trust in official records and prevent fraud and deception.

  • Protects the integrity of documents and records.

  • Prevents fraud and deception in transactions.

  • Safeguards public and private interests from harm.

Cognizance under IPC Section 463

Cognizance of forgery cases under Section 463 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. Since forgery is a serious offence, the courts act on the basis of evidence presented by the prosecution.

  • The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without magistrate’s order.

  • Cognizance can be taken upon receiving a complaint or police report.

  • Courts require prima facie evidence of forgery to proceed.

Bail under IPC Section 463

Offences under Section 463 are generally non-bailable due to the serious nature of forgery. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. The accused must satisfy the court that they are not a flight risk or likely to tamper with evidence.

  • Generally non-bailable offence.

  • Bail granted at court’s discretion based on case facts.

  • Accused must assure no interference with investigation.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 463 are triable by the Sessions Court because forgery is a serious offence punishable with imprisonment of up to two years or more. However, depending on the nature and gravity, some cases may be tried by Magistrate Courts if the punishment is less severe.

  • Sessions Court tries most forgery cases.

  • Magistrate Court may try cases with lesser punishment.

  • Special courts may be involved for specific forgery types.

Example of IPC Section 463 in Use

Suppose a person creates a fake property sale deed to fraudulently transfer ownership of a house to themselves. They submit this forged document to the land registry to claim legal ownership. This act falls under Section 463 as the document is false and intended to cause harm by cheating the rightful owner. If caught, the accused can be prosecuted for forgery. In contrast, if the document was genuine but disputed, Section 463 would not apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 463

Section 463 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to address the growing need to criminalize document fraud in a structured legal system. Over time, the section has been interpreted and expanded to include electronic records as technology evolved.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to combat document fraud.

  • Expanded to cover electronic records with IT Act integration.

  • Landmark cases have clarified the scope of forgery.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 463

In 2025, Section 463 remains highly relevant due to increased use of digital documents and electronic records. Courts have interpreted forgery to include digital manipulations, ensuring the law keeps pace with technology. This section helps combat cyber fraud, identity theft, and fake digital contracts, protecting individuals and businesses.

  • Includes electronic records under forgery offences.

  • Supports prosecution of cyber and digital document fraud.

  • Enhances trust in digital transactions and e-governance.

Related Sections to IPC Section 463

  • Section 464 – Making a false document

  • Section 465 – Punishment for forgery

  • Section 466 – Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.

  • Section 467 – Forgery of documents like wills, property deeds

  • Section 468 – Forgery for purpose of cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as genuine a forged document

Case References under IPC Section 463

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Kanhayalal (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that intention to cause damage is essential for forgery under Section 463.

  2. Ram Narain v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1970 AIR 1234, SC)

    – Clarified that making a false document without fraudulent intent does not amount to forgery.

  3. Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra (1973 AIR 185, SC)

    – Defined the scope of electronic records under forgery in modern context.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 463

  • Section:

    463

  • Title:

    Forgery

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court (primarily)

Conclusion on IPC Section 463

IPC Section 463 plays a vital role in safeguarding the authenticity of documents and electronic records. By criminalizing forgery, it protects individuals and institutions from fraud and deception that can cause financial and reputational harm. This section ensures legal certainty and trust in all forms of documentation.

As technology advances, the scope of forgery has expanded to include digital records, making Section 463 even more significant today. Its enforcement helps maintain the integrity of transactions and supports the rule of law in a rapidly digitizing society.

FAQs on IPC Section 463

What is forgery under IPC Section 463?

Forgery means making a false document or electronic record with the intent to deceive or cause harm to someone.

Is forgery a bailable offence?

Generally, forgery under Section 463 is non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion depending on the case.

Which court tries forgery cases?

Most forgery cases are tried by the Sessions Court, but Magistrate Courts may try less serious cases.

Does Section 463 cover electronic documents?

Yes, the section includes electronic records as forgery, adapting to modern digital transactions.

What is the punishment for forgery under Section 463?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both, depending on the offence's severity.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 7 defines the term 'Court' for procedural clarity in criminal law processes.

IPC Section 428 defines the offence of malicious injury to property by killing or maiming cattle or animals, outlining penalties and legal scope.

CPC Section 38 allows a plaintiff to sue a representative of a deceased person in civil suits involving property rights.

CrPC Section 435 details the procedure for the sale of property attached by the court to satisfy a decree or order.

CrPC Section 66 details the procedure for police to seize property related to offences, ensuring lawful custody and protection of evidence.

CrPC Section 60A details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

IPC Section 124 defines sedition, penalizing acts that incite hatred or contempt against the government.

IPC Section 192 covers punishment for giving false evidence, ensuring truthfulness in judicial proceedings.

IPC Section 468 defines punishment for forgery committed with intent to cheat, ensuring protection against fraudulent document creation.

IPC Section 83 defines the legal incapacity of children under seven years to commit offences, ensuring protection based on age.

IPC Section 472 defines the offence of using as genuine a forged document, detailing its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 100 defines when the use of deadly force in self-defense is legally justified.

bottom of page