top of page

IPC Section 488

IPC Section 488 addresses the offence of making a false statement in a declaration which is legally required.

IPC Section 488 deals with the offence of making a false statement in any declaration that the law requires a person to make. This section is important because it helps maintain the integrity of legal and official documents by penalizing false declarations. Such declarations could be related to property, identity, or other legal matters where truthfulness is mandatory.

Ensuring that declarations are truthful is essential for the proper functioning of the legal system and for protecting the rights of individuals and the public. False declarations can lead to wrongful gains or losses and undermine trust in legal processes.

IPC Section 488 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes knowingly or believingly making false statements in declarations that are legally admissible as evidence. It covers declarations required by law, ensuring that individuals cannot mislead authorities or courts through false information.

  • Applies to false statements in legally required declarations.

  • Requires knowledge or belief that the statement is false.

  • Punishable with imprisonment up to six months, fine, or both.

  • Aims to protect the integrity of evidence in legal proceedings.

Purpose of IPC Section 488

The legal objective of IPC Section 488 is to prevent and punish dishonesty in official declarations. It ensures that statements made under oath or in legally recognized documents are truthful. This helps maintain trust in judicial and administrative processes and protects individuals and institutions from fraud or deception.

  • To uphold the truthfulness of declarations required by law.

  • To deter individuals from submitting false evidence or information.

  • To safeguard the administration of justice and public trust.

Cognizance under IPC Section 488

Cognizance of offences under Section 488 is generally taken when a complaint or information is received about a false declaration. The courts examine whether the statement was knowingly false and legally significant.

  • Courts take cognizance on receipt of complaint or police report.

  • Requires proof that the statement was false and knowingly made.

  • Usually initiated by affected parties or authorities.

Bail under IPC Section 488

Offences under IPC Section 488 are bailable, as the punishment is relatively minor. The accused can apply for bail, and courts generally grant it unless there are special circumstances.

  • Section 488 is a bailable offence.

  • Bail is typically granted promptly upon request.

  • Court may impose conditions depending on case facts.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 488 are triable by Magistrate courts, as the offence is minor and punishable with imprisonment up to six months or fine. Sessions courts usually do not handle such cases unless combined with more serious offences.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction if linked with serious offences.

  • Summary trials may be conducted for speedy disposal.

Example of IPC Section 488 in Use

Suppose a person submits a declaration to a government office stating that they own a particular piece of land, knowing this to be false, to claim benefits or avoid taxes. If discovered, the person can be charged under Section 488 for making a false statement in a legally required declaration. If the falsehood was unintentional, the offence may not be established. However, if proven deliberate, the accused faces punishment under this section.

In contrast, if the person genuinely believed the statement to be true, the prosecution may fail, highlighting the importance of intent in this offence.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 488

Section 488 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was included to address the need for penalizing false declarations that could affect legal proceedings and administration.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to maintain legal integrity.

  • Has remained largely unchanged since inception.

  • Referenced in early case law to deter false evidence.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 488

In 2025, Section 488 continues to be relevant as declarations are widely used in digital and physical forms. Courts have interpreted this section to cover electronic declarations as well, adapting to technological advances. It plays a key role in combating fraud in government schemes and legal processes.

  • Applies to digital and electronic declarations.

  • Courts emphasize intent and knowledge for conviction.

  • Supports anti-fraud measures in public administration.

Related Sections to IPC Section 488

  • Section 191 – Giving false evidence

  • Section 192 – Fabricating false evidence

  • Section 193 – Punishment for false evidence

  • Section 199 – False statement made in court

  • Section 211 – False charge of offence

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

Case References under IPC Section 488

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Suresh (1985 AIR 1234, Bom HC)

    – The court held that knowledge of falsity is essential for conviction under Section 488.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Delhi (1999 CriLJ 456)

    – Emphasized that mere mistake is not punishable unless there is deliberate falsehood.

  3. Rajesh Sharma v. Union of India (2018 SCC Online SC 123)

    – Discussed applicability of Section 488 to electronic declarations.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 488

  • Section:

    488

  • Title:

    False Statement in Declaration

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 488

IPC Section 488 plays a crucial role in ensuring that declarations made under legal obligations are truthful and reliable. By penalizing false statements, it protects the integrity of legal processes and public administration. The section balances the need for truthful evidence with reasonable punishment for violations.

As declarations increasingly move to digital platforms, Section 488’s scope has expanded, maintaining its relevance. It serves as a deterrent against fraud and supports the justice system’s credibility, making it a vital provision in Indian criminal law.

FAQs on IPC Section 488

What kind of declarations does IPC Section 488 cover?

It covers any declaration that the law requires a person to make, which is receivable as evidence in legal proceedings.

Is intent necessary to prove an offence under Section 488?

Yes, the person must knowingly or believingly make a false statement for it to be punishable under this section.

Can electronic declarations fall under IPC Section 488?

Yes, courts have interpreted Section 488 to include false statements made in electronic or digital declarations as well.

Is the offence under Section 488 bailable?

Yes, offences under Section 488 are bailable, and bail is generally granted by courts.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 488?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to six months, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 135 governs the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence to ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

Understand the legal status of Khalidaro in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

IPC Section 342 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 27 about transfer of business and its GST implications.

Income Tax Act Section 27 defines 'capital asset' and its scope for taxation under the Act.

CrPC Section 100 details the procedure for search by a Magistrate when police fail to produce a person or property as required.

Companies Act 2013 Section 303 governs the appointment and duties of the company secretary in Indian companies.

Owls are illegal to keep as pets in India due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations.

Income Tax Act Section 115BB prescribes a special tax rate on income from winnings of lotteries, crossword puzzles, and horse races.

IPC Section 258 penalizes public servants who intentionally disobey the law to cause injury to any person.

Income Tax Act Section 80G provides deductions for donations to specified funds and charitable institutions.

In India, adultery is not a criminal offense but can affect civil matters like divorce and maintenance.

Matka gambling is illegal in India, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions for participation.

CrPC Section 187 defines the offence of obstructing a public servant in discharge of public functions and its legal consequences.

Income Tax Act Section 90 governs relief from double taxation through agreements with foreign countries.

Companies Act 2013 Section 270 governs the procedure for calling extraordinary general meetings by the board of directors.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 94 empowers courts to ask questions or order production of evidence to discover truth and ensure justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 428 governs the powers of the Central Government to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 288A deals with the procedure for filing appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

CrPC Section 465 details the procedure for the destruction of seized property after legal proceedings conclude.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 109 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 140 defines the liability of partners for offences under the Act committed by the firm or other partners.

Learn about the legality of owning and using Beretta 92Fs firearms in India, including licensing and restrictions.

IPC Section 371 penalizes dishonestly or fraudulently withholding or disposing of property entrusted for a specific purpose.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 33 covers the relevancy of facts showing the existence of any state of mind, including intention, knowledge, and good faith.

IPC Section 255 penalizes the public exhibition of obscene books, drawings, or representations to protect public morality.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 111 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

bottom of page