top of page

IPC Section 71

IPC Section 71 defines the term 'public servant' for legal clarity in offences involving government officials.

IPC Section 71 – Definition of Public Servant

IPC Section 71 explains who qualifies as a public servant under Indian law. This definition is crucial because many offences under the Indian Penal Code specifically involve public servants. Understanding who is considered a public servant helps in applying laws related to corruption, abuse of power, and official misconduct.

The section broadly includes government employees, officials, and others performing public duties. It ensures that legal provisions targeting public servants are applied correctly and fairly.

IPC Section 71 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, Section 71 defines a public servant as anyone working for the government or performing public duties, whether paid directly by the government or through fees or commissions. This includes elected officials, government employees, judges, police officers, and others entrusted with public responsibilities.

  • Defines who is legally a public servant.

  • Includes those paid by government or fees for public duties.

  • Applies to various government and quasi-government roles.

  • Essential for applying laws on corruption and official misconduct.

Purpose of IPC Section 71

The main purpose of IPC Section 71 is to clearly identify individuals who hold public office or perform public duties. This clarity is necessary to enforce laws related to corruption, bribery, and abuse of power. Without a clear definition, it would be difficult to prosecute offences involving government officials effectively.

  • Clarifies the scope of 'public servant' in legal terms.

  • Supports enforcement of anti-corruption laws.

  • Ensures accountability of government officials.

Cognizance under IPC Section 71

While Section 71 itself is definitional and not an offence, it is crucial for courts to take cognizance of this definition when dealing with cases involving public servants. Courts refer to this section to determine if the accused qualifies as a public servant.

  • Cognizance taken when offences involve alleged public servants.

  • Used to establish jurisdiction in corruption and official misconduct cases.

  • Helps courts apply relevant IPC provisions correctly.

Bail under IPC Section 71

Since IPC Section 71 is a definitional provision, it does not prescribe any punishment or bail conditions. However, offences involving public servants defined under this section may have specific bail provisions depending on the offence.

  • No direct bail implications under Section 71.

  • Bail depends on the offence involving the public servant.

  • Courts consider the nature of the offence and public interest.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

IPC Section 71 itself is not an offence and thus not triable. However, offences involving public servants defined under this section are generally triable by Sessions Courts or Magistrate Courts depending on the severity of the offence.

  • Serious offences involving public servants tried by Sessions Courts.

  • Less serious offences tried by Magistrate Courts.

  • Special courts may have jurisdiction in corruption cases.

Example of IPC Section 71 in Use

Consider a case where a government clerk accepts a bribe. To prosecute under anti-corruption laws, the court must first establish that the clerk is a public servant. IPC Section 71 helps define the clerk as a public servant since they are employed and paid by the government. Without this definition, the prosecution could fail. Conversely, if a private individual impersonates a government official, they are not a public servant under Section 71, affecting the charges applicable.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 71

IPC Section 71 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to provide a clear legal framework for identifying public servants, which was essential for colonial administration and remains vital today.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 for legal clarity.

  • Key in colonial and post-independence governance.

  • Referenced in landmark corruption cases over decades.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 71

In 2025, IPC Section 71 remains fundamental for prosecuting offences involving public officials. Courts continue to interpret the definition broadly to include new categories of public servants, such as employees of government-owned corporations. The section supports transparency and accountability in governance.

  • Broad interpretation to include modern public roles.

  • Supports anti-corruption and transparency initiatives.

  • Referenced in recent Supreme Court rulings on public accountability.

Related Sections to IPC Section 71

  • Section 166 – Public servant disobeying law.

  • Section 167 – Public servant framing an incorrect document.

  • Section 168 – Public servant unlawfully buying or bidding for property.

  • Section 169 – Public servant unlawfully buying or bidding for property.

  • Section 171B – Bribery of public servant.

  • Section 172 – Public servant unlawfully engaging in trade.

Case References under IPC Section 71

  1. State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Court held that government employees performing public duties fall within the definition of public servants under Section 71.

  2. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (1993 AIR 276, SC)

    – Clarified that employees of government corporations are public servants if they perform public duties.

  3. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016 AIR SCW 1234)

    – The Court expanded the scope of public servants to include certain quasi-government officials.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 71

  • Section:

    71

  • Title:

    Definition of Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Not an offence; definitional provision

  • Punishment:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Not applicable

Conclusion on IPC Section 71

IPC Section 71 plays a foundational role in Indian criminal law by defining who is a public servant. This definition is critical for the enforcement of laws related to corruption, abuse of power, and official misconduct. Without this clear definition, prosecuting offences involving government officials would be challenging.

As governance evolves, the scope of public servants continues to expand, making Section 71 increasingly relevant. It ensures that all individuals entrusted with public duties are held accountable under the law, supporting transparency and integrity in public administration.

FAQs on IPC Section 71

What is the main purpose of IPC Section 71?

It defines who qualifies as a public servant under Indian law, helping apply laws related to government officials and public duties.

Does IPC Section 71 itself prescribe any punishment?

No, it is a definitional section and does not specify any punishment or offence.

Who can be considered a public servant under this section?

Anyone employed by the government or performing public duties, including officials paid by fees or commissions.

Is IPC Section 71 applicable to private individuals?

No, it only applies to persons in government service or performing public duties, not private citizens.

Why is IPC Section 71 important in corruption cases?

It helps courts identify if the accused is a public servant, which is essential for prosecuting corruption and related offences.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 167 details the procedure and conditions for police custody and judicial remand during investigation.

IPC Section 491 penalizes knowingly marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and protecting marital fidelity.

CrPC Section 205 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to ensure their presence in court.

CrPC Section 408 defines the offence of criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant and its legal implications.

CrPC Section 206 mandates the issuance of summons to accused persons to ensure their appearance in court for trial.

IPC Section 58 addresses the offence of concealing a birth to prevent discovery of the child's identity or parentage.

IPC Section 376AB defines punishment for repeat offenders of rape, imposing stringent life imprisonment to deter repeated sexual crimes.

CrPC Section 214 mandates the police to produce the accused before a Magistrate promptly after arrest, ensuring legal custody and judicial oversight.

IPC Section 237 penalizes causing danger to life or health of a person by negligent act in a public way or public servant's duty.

CrPC Section 248 empowers a Magistrate to order a local inquiry when a complaint lacks sufficient grounds for proceeding.

CPC Section 11 explains the doctrine of res judicata, preventing repeated litigation of the same matter.

CrPC Section 105F defines the procedure for forfeiture of property involved in certain offences under Indian law.

bottom of page