top of page

IPC Section 71

IPC Section 71 defines the term 'public servant' for legal clarity in offences involving government officials.

IPC Section 71 explains who qualifies as a public servant under Indian law. This definition is crucial because many offences under the Indian Penal Code specifically involve public servants. Understanding who is considered a public servant helps in applying laws related to corruption, abuse of power, and official misconduct.

The section broadly includes government employees, officials, and others performing public duties. It ensures that legal provisions targeting public servants are applied correctly and fairly.

IPC Section 71 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, Section 71 defines a public servant as anyone working for the government or performing public duties, whether paid directly by the government or through fees or commissions. This includes elected officials, government employees, judges, police officers, and others entrusted with public responsibilities.

  • Defines who is legally a public servant.

  • Includes those paid by government or fees for public duties.

  • Applies to various government and quasi-government roles.

  • Essential for applying laws on corruption and official misconduct.

Purpose of IPC Section 71

The main purpose of IPC Section 71 is to clearly identify individuals who hold public office or perform public duties. This clarity is necessary to enforce laws related to corruption, bribery, and abuse of power. Without a clear definition, it would be difficult to prosecute offences involving government officials effectively.

  • Clarifies the scope of 'public servant' in legal terms.

  • Supports enforcement of anti-corruption laws.

  • Ensures accountability of government officials.

Cognizance under IPC Section 71

While Section 71 itself is definitional and not an offence, it is crucial for courts to take cognizance of this definition when dealing with cases involving public servants. Courts refer to this section to determine if the accused qualifies as a public servant.

  • Cognizance taken when offences involve alleged public servants.

  • Used to establish jurisdiction in corruption and official misconduct cases.

  • Helps courts apply relevant IPC provisions correctly.

Bail under IPC Section 71

Since IPC Section 71 is a definitional provision, it does not prescribe any punishment or bail conditions. However, offences involving public servants defined under this section may have specific bail provisions depending on the offence.

  • No direct bail implications under Section 71.

  • Bail depends on the offence involving the public servant.

  • Courts consider the nature of the offence and public interest.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

IPC Section 71 itself is not an offence and thus not triable. However, offences involving public servants defined under this section are generally triable by Sessions Courts or Magistrate Courts depending on the severity of the offence.

  • Serious offences involving public servants tried by Sessions Courts.

  • Less serious offences tried by Magistrate Courts.

  • Special courts may have jurisdiction in corruption cases.

Example of IPC Section 71 in Use

Consider a case where a government clerk accepts a bribe. To prosecute under anti-corruption laws, the court must first establish that the clerk is a public servant. IPC Section 71 helps define the clerk as a public servant since they are employed and paid by the government. Without this definition, the prosecution could fail. Conversely, if a private individual impersonates a government official, they are not a public servant under Section 71, affecting the charges applicable.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 71

IPC Section 71 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to provide a clear legal framework for identifying public servants, which was essential for colonial administration and remains vital today.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 for legal clarity.

  • Key in colonial and post-independence governance.

  • Referenced in landmark corruption cases over decades.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 71

In 2025, IPC Section 71 remains fundamental for prosecuting offences involving public officials. Courts continue to interpret the definition broadly to include new categories of public servants, such as employees of government-owned corporations. The section supports transparency and accountability in governance.

  • Broad interpretation to include modern public roles.

  • Supports anti-corruption and transparency initiatives.

  • Referenced in recent Supreme Court rulings on public accountability.

Related Sections to IPC Section 71

  • Section 166 – Public servant disobeying law.

  • Section 167 – Public servant framing an incorrect document.

  • Section 168 – Public servant unlawfully buying or bidding for property.

  • Section 169 – Public servant unlawfully buying or bidding for property.

  • Section 171B – Bribery of public servant.

  • Section 172 – Public servant unlawfully engaging in trade.

Case References under IPC Section 71

  1. State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George (1965 AIR 722, SC)

    – The Court held that government employees performing public duties fall within the definition of public servants under Section 71.

  2. R.K. Jain v. Union of India (1993 AIR 276, SC)

    – Clarified that employees of government corporations are public servants if they perform public duties.

  3. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016 AIR SCW 1234)

    – The Court expanded the scope of public servants to include certain quasi-government officials.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 71

  • Section:

    71

  • Title:

    Definition of Public Servant

  • Offence Type:

    Not an offence; definitional provision

  • Punishment:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Not applicable

Conclusion on IPC Section 71

IPC Section 71 plays a foundational role in Indian criminal law by defining who is a public servant. This definition is critical for the enforcement of laws related to corruption, abuse of power, and official misconduct. Without this clear definition, prosecuting offences involving government officials would be challenging.

As governance evolves, the scope of public servants continues to expand, making Section 71 increasingly relevant. It ensures that all individuals entrusted with public duties are held accountable under the law, supporting transparency and integrity in public administration.

FAQs on IPC Section 71

What is the main purpose of IPC Section 71?

It defines who qualifies as a public servant under Indian law, helping apply laws related to government officials and public duties.

Does IPC Section 71 itself prescribe any punishment?

No, it is a definitional section and does not specify any punishment or offence.

Who can be considered a public servant under this section?

Anyone employed by the government or performing public duties, including officials paid by fees or commissions.

Is IPC Section 71 applicable to private individuals?

No, it only applies to persons in government service or performing public duties, not private citizens.

Why is IPC Section 71 important in corruption cases?

It helps courts identify if the accused is a public servant, which is essential for prosecuting corruption and related offences.

Related Sections

Dafabet is not legally licensed in India, with strict regulations on online betting and gambling activities enforced nationwide.

Understand the legality of speculation in India, its regulations, and enforcement in financial markets.

CrPC Section 53A details the procedure for medical examination of accused persons to protect their health and rights during investigation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 457 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Buying gold bars in India is legal with certain regulations and taxes. Learn the rules, limits, and compliance for gold bar purchases.

Inspect hacking is illegal in India under IT laws and the Indian Penal Code with strict penalties for unauthorized access.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 26 covering registration procedures and compliance.

IT Act Section 68 governs the power to issue directions for interception, monitoring, and decryption of digital information.

Income Tax Act Section 38 defines 'capital asset' and its scope for taxation under the Act.

CrPC Section 132 empowers authorities to disperse unlawful assemblies using force to maintain public order.

Contract Act 1872 Section 12 defines who is competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

Section 194P of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on specified payments to senior citizens with PAN or Aadhaar in India.

CrPC Section 387 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of attachment and sale of property to recover fines or costs.

Section 184 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Lobbying in India is not formally regulated but is practiced with legal ambiguities and limited enforcement.

Selling food from home in India is conditionally legal with proper licenses and hygiene standards.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 58 outlines the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority for investigation and enforcement.

Bitcoin mining in India is legal but faces regulatory uncertainty and practical challenges.

Companies Act 2013 Section 261 governs the removal of directors before expiry of their term, ensuring proper procedure and corporate governance.

Section 156 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows tax authorities to issue a notice for recovery of tax dues in India.

Tor is legal in India but using it for illegal activities is punishable under Indian law.

In India, drinking alcohol in public parks is generally illegal with strict enforcement and few exceptions.

IPC Section 51 defines the punishment for disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 39 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 47 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 313 governs the examination of witnesses and production of documents in company investigations.

Understand the legal status of HGH in India, including its regulation, usage rights, and enforcement details.

bottom of page