Indian Law

Evidence Act 1872 Section 23 defines when oral evidence is relevant to facts in issue or relevant facts in a trial.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 24 excludes evidence obtained by illegal means, protecting fairness in trials and ensuring only lawful proof is admitted.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 25 bars oral evidence to contradict or vary a written contract's terms.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 26 defines the rule against hearsay, excluding secondhand statements to ensure reliable evidence in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 27 covers admissions by persons whose statements explain or are connected to a fact in issue, aiding proof in trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 28 defines the rule against hearsay, restricting secondhand statements to ensure reliable evidence in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 29 defines when oral evidence is relevant and admissible to prove facts in dispute in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 30 covers admissions by party-opponents, allowing statements against interest as evidence in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 31 covers admissions by party-opponents, allowing statements against interest as evidence in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 32 covers admissions by persons who cannot be called as witnesses, crucial for proving facts in their absence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 33 covers the relevancy of facts showing the existence of any state of mind, including intention, knowledge, and good faith.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 34 covers the rule of res inter alios acta, excluding evidence of transactions irrelevant to the parties involved.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 35 defines the relevancy of facts that explain or introduce relevant facts, crucial for establishing context in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 36 defines the relevance of facts showing the existence of a course of dealing, crucial for proving habitual conduct in disputes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 37 explains when oral evidence is admissible to prove the terms of a document, focusing on the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict written contracts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 38 defines the admissibility of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 39 defines the admissibility of oral evidence and its role in proving facts in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 40 explains how admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 41 defines the relevancy of admissions, crucial for proving facts in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 42 defines the admissibility of statements made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 43 defines the admissibility of expert opinion to assist courts in understanding technical or specialized facts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 44 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on facts that can be perceived by the senses and directly related to the case.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 45 covers expert opinion evidence, allowing specialists to give opinions to assist courts in complex matters.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 46 defines how facts can be proved by oral evidence, emphasizing the importance of witness testimony in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 47 defines the rule on how oral admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 47A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 48 defines the admissibility of oral evidence, emphasizing that it must relate to facts in issue or relevant facts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 49 defines the admissibility of expert opinion to assist courts in understanding complex facts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 50 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant and admissible in court proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 51 defines expert opinion evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 52 defines the admissibility of oral evidence, specifying when oral statements are relevant and acceptable in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 53 defines the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, outlining when such confessions are valid in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 54 defines the admissibility of confessions made by accused persons, crucial for criminal trials and fair justice.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 55 defines when oral evidence is admissible to prove the terms of a contract or grant, emphasizing written documents' primacy.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 56 defines the admissibility of expert opinion when facts are beyond common knowledge.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 57 mandates courts to judicially notice certain facts without requiring proof, ensuring efficiency and certainty in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 58 defines oral evidence as statements made by witnesses in court, crucial for proving facts in trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 59 details the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring contract stability.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 60 defines oral evidence as statements made by witnesses verbally, crucial for proving facts in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 61 defines the competency of witnesses, outlining who may testify in court and its significance in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 62 explains when oral admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 63 defines the meaning of 'document' for evidence purposes, covering all material produced by handwriting, printing, or other means.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 64 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, crucial for fair criminal trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65 deals with the admissibility of secondary evidence when original documents are unavailable.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65B governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 66 governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 67 deals with the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring written agreements are upheld.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 67A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 68 governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 69 deals with the admissibility of secondary evidence when original documents are unavailable.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 70 covers the presumption of ownership for documents produced by a person in possession, aiding proof of authenticity.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 71 addresses the admissibility of electronic records as evidence, ensuring their authenticity and reliability in court.

Evidence Act Section 72 defines the admissibility of expert opinion when the court requires specialized knowledge to understand facts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73 deals with the admissibility of evidence of character to prove conduct in civil or criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73A defines the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts, ensuring their legal recognition.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 74 covers the admissibility of evidence of the existence or non-existence of any right or custom, crucial for proving customary rights in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 75 deals with the presumption of ownership of documents, aiding proof of possession and control in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 76 addresses the admissibility of confessions caused by inducement, threat, or promise, ensuring such confessions are not used as evidence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 77 defines the presumption of ownership for possession of movable property, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.