top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 383

Companies Act 2013 Section 383 governs the appointment and qualifications of company secretaries in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 383 deals with the appointment of a company secretary and the qualifications required for the role. This section is crucial for ensuring that companies have a qualified professional to handle compliance, governance, and secretarial duties effectively.

Understanding Section 383 is essential for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals. It promotes good corporate governance by mandating the presence of a qualified company secretary in certain companies, thereby improving transparency and regulatory compliance.

Companies Act Section 383 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that certain companies must appoint a whole-time company secretary who is a qualified member of the ICSI. The company secretary plays a key role in ensuring that the company complies with legal and regulatory requirements.

  • Applies to listed companies and companies with paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 crore.

  • Company secretary must be a member of ICSI.

  • Appointment must be full-time.

  • Ensures compliance and governance support.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 specifies who must appoint a company secretary and the qualifications required.

  • States that listed companies and companies with paid-up capital of ₹10 crore or more must appoint a whole-time company secretary.

  • Applies to companies, their boards, and secretarial professionals.

  • Requires the company secretary to be a qualified member of ICSI.

  • Mandates full-time employment of the company secretary.

  • Prohibits appointment of unqualified persons for this role.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 383

This section strengthens corporate governance by ensuring qualified professionals manage secretarial functions.

  • Enhances compliance with company law and regulations.

  • Protects shareholders by ensuring proper record-keeping and disclosures.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in corporate management.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure through professional oversight.

When Companies Act Section 383 Applies

The section applies based on company type and capital thresholds.

  • Mandatory for all listed companies.

  • Applies to companies with paid-up share capital of ₹10 crore or more.

  • Must be complied with at all times after incorporation.

  • Exemptions may apply to smaller companies below the threshold.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 creates a legal obligation for qualifying companies to appoint a qualified company secretary. This duty involves compliance with secretarial standards and regulatory filings. Failure to comply can lead to penalties and impact corporate governance quality. The provision interacts with MCA rules on company secretary appointments and disclosures.

  • Creates mandatory appointment duty.

  • Requires disclosure of company secretary details in filings.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties under the Act.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 383

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing for qualifying companies. The company secretary is responsible for maintaining statutory records, ensuring compliance, and advising the board. The obligation impacts internal governance by embedding professional oversight into company operations.

  • Mandatory and continuous compliance.

  • Responsibility lies with the company and its board.

  • Company secretary acts as compliance officer.

  • Enhances internal governance and risk management.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 383 applies at various stages of a company’s lifecycle.

  • During incorporation, companies must plan for appointment if thresholds are met.

  • Board decision stage involves appointing the company secretary.

  • Shareholder approval may be required for appointment or removal.

  • Filing and disclosure stage requires updating MCA records with appointment details.

  • Ongoing compliance includes maintaining secretarial standards.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 383

Non-compliance with Section 383 can lead to monetary fines and other consequences. The company and officers responsible may face penalties. Persistent violations can result in further legal actions and impact company reputation.

  • Monetary fines for company and officers.

  • Possible disqualification of officers.

  • Additional fees for late filings.

  • Remedial directions from regulatory authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 383 in Practical Use

Company X, a listed entity, appointed a qualified company secretary as required under Section 383. The secretary ensured timely compliance with board meeting filings and regulatory disclosures. Conversely, Director Y of Company Z failed to appoint a company secretary despite the paid-up capital exceeding ₹10 crore, leading to penalties and increased regulatory scrutiny.

  • Proper appointment ensures smooth compliance and governance.

  • Failure to appoint leads to penalties and reputational risk.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 evolved from the Companies Act, 1956, which also mandated company secretaries for certain companies. The 2013 Act introduced clearer thresholds and qualifications to strengthen governance. Amendments have refined the scope and compliance requirements over time.

  • Replaced earlier provisions from the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced clearer capital thresholds and qualifications.

  • Enhanced focus on professional secretarial standards.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 383

In 2026, Section 383 remains vital amid digital filings and e-governance. Company secretaries facilitate compliance with MCA portal requirements and evolving governance norms. The role supports ESG and CSR compliance, reflecting modern corporate responsibilities.

  • Supports digital compliance via MCA portal.

  • Integral to governance reforms and transparency.

  • Ensures practical compliance with evolving regulations.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 173 – Board meetings.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 383

  1. Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (2017, NCLAT)

    – Affirmed the mandatory appointment of company secretary in listed companies under Section 383.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2019)

    – Emphasized penalties for non-compliance with company secretary appointment.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 383

  • Section: 383

  • Title: Appointment of Company Secretary

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Listed companies and companies with paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 crore

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Appointment disclosures with MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 is a cornerstone provision ensuring that companies maintain a qualified company secretary to oversee compliance and governance. This role is essential for transparent corporate administration and adherence to legal requirements.

By mandating qualified professionals, the section promotes accountability and protects stakeholder interests. Companies must prioritize compliance with this provision to avoid penalties and foster good corporate governance.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 383

Who must appoint a company secretary under Section 383?

All listed companies and companies with a paid-up share capital of ₹10 crore or more must appoint a whole-time company secretary who is a qualified member of ICSI.

What qualifications are required for a company secretary?

The company secretary must be a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI), ensuring professional competence in company law and governance.

Is the appointment of a company secretary mandatory for all companies?

No, only listed companies and those with paid-up capital of ₹10 crore or more must appoint a whole-time company secretary as per Section 383.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with Section 383?

Companies and officers can face monetary fines, disqualification, and additional regulatory actions for failing to appoint a qualified company secretary when required.

Can a company appoint a part-time company secretary under Section 383?

No, the section mandates the appointment of a whole-time company secretary for qualifying companies to ensure full-time compliance and governance support.

Related Sections

IPC Section 445 defines house-trespass, covering unlawful entry into a property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

CrPC Section 197 requires prior sanction for prosecuting public servants for actions done during official duties.

Raising funds from the public in India is legal only under strict regulations and approvals from authorities like SEBI.

In India, sex outside marriage is not criminally illegal but has social and legal nuances to consider.

Half face helmets are legal in India but must meet safety standards and be used properly to avoid penalties.

Accepting donations in India is legal under specific laws with conditions on source, purpose, and compliance with regulations.

Binomo trading is legal in India but regulated with restrictions; understand how it works and what to watch for.

In India, catching couples in public is generally illegal and can lead to legal consequences under privacy and public decency laws.

In India, playing poker for money in hotels is legal under specific conditions and varies by state laws and enforcement practices.

Understand the legality of owning and using Indian TV services worldwide, including licensing, content rights, and enforcement.

Understand the legality of helping plans in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 13 defines the relevancy of facts which are the occasion, cause, or effect of facts in issue, crucial for linking evidence in trials.

Section 184 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Rabbits are legal to keep as pets in India with some local restrictions. Learn about ownership, breeding, and regulations here.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 234E imposes interest for late filing of TDS/TCS returns by deductors or collectors.

IT Act Section 57 addresses publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form, penalizing digital obscenity.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 120 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on statements made by persons who heard or perceived the fact directly.

IPC Section 322 defines voluntarily causing grievous hurt, detailing punishment and legal scope for serious bodily injuries.

Walkie talkies are legal in India with specific restrictions on frequency and licensing requirements.

CPC Section 126 defines the procedure for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree.

CrPC Section 383 defines the offence of extortion and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

CrPC Section 477 details procedures for trials when accused persons are not found, ensuring justice proceeds fairly even in their absence.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 15 defines the 'holder in due course' and explains their rights under the Act.

Blueberry Markets is not officially regulated in India; trading is possible but with risks due to lack of local regulation.

In India, spa services with 'happy endings' are illegal and considered prostitution under the law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 410 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules under the Act.

Section 194DA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on payments from life insurance policy maturity in India.

bottom of page