top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 383

Companies Act 2013 Section 383 governs the appointment and qualifications of company secretaries in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 383 deals with the appointment of a company secretary and the qualifications required for the role. This section is crucial for ensuring that companies have a qualified professional to handle compliance, governance, and secretarial duties effectively.

Understanding Section 383 is essential for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals. It promotes good corporate governance by mandating the presence of a qualified company secretary in certain companies, thereby improving transparency and regulatory compliance.

Companies Act Section 383 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that certain companies must appoint a whole-time company secretary who is a qualified member of the ICSI. The company secretary plays a key role in ensuring that the company complies with legal and regulatory requirements.

  • Applies to listed companies and companies with paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 crore.

  • Company secretary must be a member of ICSI.

  • Appointment must be full-time.

  • Ensures compliance and governance support.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 specifies who must appoint a company secretary and the qualifications required.

  • States that listed companies and companies with paid-up capital of ₹10 crore or more must appoint a whole-time company secretary.

  • Applies to companies, their boards, and secretarial professionals.

  • Requires the company secretary to be a qualified member of ICSI.

  • Mandates full-time employment of the company secretary.

  • Prohibits appointment of unqualified persons for this role.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 383

This section strengthens corporate governance by ensuring qualified professionals manage secretarial functions.

  • Enhances compliance with company law and regulations.

  • Protects shareholders by ensuring proper record-keeping and disclosures.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in corporate management.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure through professional oversight.

When Companies Act Section 383 Applies

The section applies based on company type and capital thresholds.

  • Mandatory for all listed companies.

  • Applies to companies with paid-up share capital of ₹10 crore or more.

  • Must be complied with at all times after incorporation.

  • Exemptions may apply to smaller companies below the threshold.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 creates a legal obligation for qualifying companies to appoint a qualified company secretary. This duty involves compliance with secretarial standards and regulatory filings. Failure to comply can lead to penalties and impact corporate governance quality. The provision interacts with MCA rules on company secretary appointments and disclosures.

  • Creates mandatory appointment duty.

  • Requires disclosure of company secretary details in filings.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties under the Act.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 383

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing for qualifying companies. The company secretary is responsible for maintaining statutory records, ensuring compliance, and advising the board. The obligation impacts internal governance by embedding professional oversight into company operations.

  • Mandatory and continuous compliance.

  • Responsibility lies with the company and its board.

  • Company secretary acts as compliance officer.

  • Enhances internal governance and risk management.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 383 applies at various stages of a company’s lifecycle.

  • During incorporation, companies must plan for appointment if thresholds are met.

  • Board decision stage involves appointing the company secretary.

  • Shareholder approval may be required for appointment or removal.

  • Filing and disclosure stage requires updating MCA records with appointment details.

  • Ongoing compliance includes maintaining secretarial standards.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 383

Non-compliance with Section 383 can lead to monetary fines and other consequences. The company and officers responsible may face penalties. Persistent violations can result in further legal actions and impact company reputation.

  • Monetary fines for company and officers.

  • Possible disqualification of officers.

  • Additional fees for late filings.

  • Remedial directions from regulatory authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 383 in Practical Use

Company X, a listed entity, appointed a qualified company secretary as required under Section 383. The secretary ensured timely compliance with board meeting filings and regulatory disclosures. Conversely, Director Y of Company Z failed to appoint a company secretary despite the paid-up capital exceeding ₹10 crore, leading to penalties and increased regulatory scrutiny.

  • Proper appointment ensures smooth compliance and governance.

  • Failure to appoint leads to penalties and reputational risk.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 evolved from the Companies Act, 1956, which also mandated company secretaries for certain companies. The 2013 Act introduced clearer thresholds and qualifications to strengthen governance. Amendments have refined the scope and compliance requirements over time.

  • Replaced earlier provisions from the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced clearer capital thresholds and qualifications.

  • Enhanced focus on professional secretarial standards.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 383

In 2026, Section 383 remains vital amid digital filings and e-governance. Company secretaries facilitate compliance with MCA portal requirements and evolving governance norms. The role supports ESG and CSR compliance, reflecting modern corporate responsibilities.

  • Supports digital compliance via MCA portal.

  • Integral to governance reforms and transparency.

  • Ensures practical compliance with evolving regulations.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 173 – Board meetings.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 383

  1. Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (2017, NCLAT)

    – Affirmed the mandatory appointment of company secretary in listed companies under Section 383.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2019)

    – Emphasized penalties for non-compliance with company secretary appointment.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 383

  • Section: 383

  • Title: Appointment of Company Secretary

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Listed companies and companies with paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 crore

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Appointment disclosures with MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 383

Section 383 is a cornerstone provision ensuring that companies maintain a qualified company secretary to oversee compliance and governance. This role is essential for transparent corporate administration and adherence to legal requirements.

By mandating qualified professionals, the section promotes accountability and protects stakeholder interests. Companies must prioritize compliance with this provision to avoid penalties and foster good corporate governance.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 383

Who must appoint a company secretary under Section 383?

All listed companies and companies with a paid-up share capital of ₹10 crore or more must appoint a whole-time company secretary who is a qualified member of ICSI.

What qualifications are required for a company secretary?

The company secretary must be a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI), ensuring professional competence in company law and governance.

Is the appointment of a company secretary mandatory for all companies?

No, only listed companies and those with paid-up capital of ₹10 crore or more must appoint a whole-time company secretary as per Section 383.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with Section 383?

Companies and officers can face monetary fines, disqualification, and additional regulatory actions for failing to appoint a qualified company secretary when required.

Can a company appoint a part-time company secretary under Section 383?

No, the section mandates the appointment of a whole-time company secretary for qualifying companies to ensure full-time compliance and governance support.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Indiacsonline.com is legal in India but must comply with IT laws and content regulations to operate lawfully.

CrPC Section 270 defines the offence of public nuisance and its legal consequences under Indian criminal law.

Stake.com is not legally authorized in India; online betting faces strict regulations and enforcement varies by state.

Charas is illegal in India under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

CrPC Section 360 deals with the power of the court to release offenders on probation of good conduct instead of sentencing them.

IPC Section 276 penalizes the negligent act of knowingly exposing others to infectious diseases, protecting public health.

CrPC Section 293 governs the sale of perishable goods seized by police, ensuring lawful disposal and protection of property rights.

Marrying in India is legal with conditions like age, consent, and following marriage laws such as the Hindu Marriage Act or Special Marriage Act.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 82 covering tax deduction at source rules and compliance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115G exempts certain income of non-resident Indians from tax under specified conditions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 95 defines the holder in due course and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Understand the legal status of Finebooker in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Contract Act 1872 Section 24 defines agreements void due to coercion, affecting contract validity and free consent.

CrPC Section 195A details the procedure for filing complaints about offences against public servants during duty.

Gbwhatsapp is not legal in India due to copyright and privacy violations, with strict enforcement against its use.

Keeping gold is legal in India with certain regulations on purchase, holding, and reporting large amounts.

Public drinking in India is generally illegal with strict enforcement, but rules vary by state and exceptions exist for licensed venues.

Understand the legality of data mining in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

CrPC Section 308 details punishment for attempt to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder, specifying imprisonment and fines.

Discover the legal status of Mobilebet365 in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities for online betting.

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

Learn about the legitimacy of OnlineLegalIndia.com, its services, and how to verify if it's a real legal website in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 437 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

CrPC Section 231 details the procedure for the discharge of an accused when the prosecution fails to establish a prima facie case.

Income Tax Act Section 80GGA provides deductions for donations to scientific research and rural development projects.

IPC Section 303 punishes a life convict who commits murder with the death penalty or life imprisonment, ensuring strict deterrence.

IT Act Section 6A mandates electronic signature authentication for secure digital transactions under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

bottom of page