top of page

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 39

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 39 outlines the procedure for filing complaints before Consumer Commissions, ensuring accessible dispute resolution.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 39 details the process by which consumers can file complaints before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. This section is vital as it empowers consumers to seek justice against unfair trade practices, defective goods, or deficient services. Understanding this procedure helps consumers and businesses navigate the legal framework effectively, promoting transparency and accountability.

Filing a complaint under this section initiates the legal journey for dispute resolution. It ensures that grievances are formally recorded and addressed by the appropriate authority. Both consumers and service providers benefit from a clear, structured complaint mechanism that supports fair trade and consumer rights protection.

Consumer Protection Act Section 39 – Exact Provision

This section empowers consumers to approach the relevant Consumer Commission to address their grievances. It specifies the authority and jurisdiction where complaints can be filed, ensuring accessibility and proper handling of consumer disputes. The provision simplifies the complaint process, making it easier for consumers to seek redressal.

  • Allows consumers to file complaints before Consumer Commissions.

  • Defines jurisdictional limits for filing complaints.

  • Covers complaints related to goods, services, and unfair trade practices.

  • Ensures formal initiation of dispute resolution.

  • Supports consumer empowerment and protection.

Explanation of Consumer Protection Act Section 39

This section outlines who can file complaints and where, providing clarity on the complaint process.

  • States that any consumer can file a complaint.

  • Applies to District, State, and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions.

  • Concerns complaints about unfair trade practices, defective goods, or deficient services.

  • Jurisdiction depends on the value and nature of the complaint.

  • Ensures consumers have access to legal remedies.

Purpose and Rationale of Consumer Protection Act Section 39

The section aims to facilitate easy and clear access to consumer justice by defining complaint filing procedures.

  • Protects consumer interests by enabling formal complaints.

  • Promotes fair trade by holding traders accountable.

  • Prevents exploitation through accessible legal recourse.

  • Enhances dispute resolution efficiency.

When Consumer Protection Act Section 39 Applies

This section applies whenever a consumer decides to initiate a complaint regarding goods or services.

  • Triggered when a consumer files a complaint for unfair trade or defects.

  • Applicable to goods, services, and digital platforms.

  • Consumers, including e-commerce users, can invoke it.

  • Exceptions include matters outside Consumer Commission jurisdiction.

Legal Effect of Consumer Protection Act Section 39

The section legally empowers consumers to initiate proceedings before Consumer Commissions, ensuring their grievances are heard. It imposes a duty on traders and service providers to respond to complaints. This provision strengthens consumer rights by formalizing the complaint mechanism and integrates with other sections governing jurisdiction and remedies.

  • Enables consumer access to justice.

  • Obligates traders to address complaints.

  • Facilitates structured dispute resolution.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Consumer Protection Act Section 39

Consumers gain the right to file complaints, while traders and service providers have the obligation to respond. These duties are mandatory to ensure fair proceedings. Breach of these obligations can lead to penalties and adverse orders from Consumer Commissions.

  • Rights to file complaints are mandatory and enforceable.

  • Obligations on opposite parties to respond are strict.

  • Non-compliance may result in penalties.

  • Ensures procedural fairness in consumer disputes.

Stage of Consumer Dispute Where This Section Applies

This section is relevant at the complaint filing stage and continues through the dispute resolution process.

  • Applies after consumer identifies a grievance.

  • Initiates formal complaint filing.

  • Relevant during District, State, or National Commission proceedings.

  • Supports post-purchase grievance redressal.

Remedies and Penalties under Consumer Protection Act Section 39

While this section primarily deals with complaint filing, it enables access to remedies such as refunds, replacements, or compensation through Consumer Commissions. Penalties for violations are enforced following complaint adjudication, ensuring compliance and consumer protection.

  • Facilitates access to refunds, replacements, and compensation.

  • Enables Consumer Commissions to impose penalties.

  • Supports enforcement of consumer rights.

Example of Consumer Protection Act Section 39 in Practical Use

X purchased a smartphone online but found it defective. Using Section 39, X filed a complaint with the District Consumer Commission. The complaint was accepted, and the seller was directed to replace the phone. This process ensured X’s consumer rights were protected effectively.

  • Consumers can easily file complaints for defective goods.

  • Consumer Commissions provide accessible dispute resolution.

Historical Background of Consumer Protection Act Section 39

The Consumer Protection Act of 1986 laid the foundation for consumer complaint mechanisms. The 2019 Act modernized procedures to include digital platforms and clarify jurisdiction. Section 39 reflects this evolution by streamlining complaint filing and expanding access.

  • 1986 Act introduced consumer complaint forums.

  • 2019 Act modernized and expanded jurisdiction.

  • Section 39 simplifies complaint filing process.

Modern Relevance of Consumer Protection Act Section 39

With the rise of e-commerce, Section 39 is crucial for digital consumer protection. It allows complaints against online sellers and service providers, ensuring consumer safety and fair trade in digital marketplaces.

  • Applicable to online and offline complaints.

  • Supports consumer safety in digital markets.

  • Essential for 2026 consumer dispute resolution.

Related Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(7) – Definition of consumer.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(47) – Unfair trade practices.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 17 – Jurisdiction of State Commission.

  • Contract Act Section 73 – Compensation for loss caused by breach.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving defect or deficiency.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant for misleading advertisements.

Case References under Consumer Protection Act Section 39

  1. Rajesh Kumar v. Flipkart (2024, NCDRC)

    – Affirmed the right of consumers to file complaints against e-commerce platforms under Section 39.

  2. Sunita Devi v. ABC Services (2025, State Commission)

    – Clarified jurisdictional limits for complaint filing under Section 39.

Key Facts Summary for Consumer Protection Act Section 39

  • Section: 39

  • Title: Filing Complaints Procedure

  • Category: Disputes, Consumer Rights

  • Applies To: Consumers, Traders, Service Providers, E-commerce Platforms

  • Stage: Complaint Filing, Dispute Resolution

  • Legal Effect: Enables complaint initiation before Consumer Commissions

  • Related Remedies: Refund, Replacement, Compensation, Penalties

Conclusion on Consumer Protection Act Section 39

Section 39 is a cornerstone of the Consumer Protection Act 2019, providing a clear and accessible procedure for consumers to file complaints. It ensures that consumer grievances are formally recognized and addressed by competent authorities, promoting fairness and accountability in the marketplace.

By defining where and how complaints can be filed, this section strengthens consumer confidence and supports the enforcement of consumer rights. It is essential for both consumers and businesses to understand this provision to ensure compliance and effective dispute resolution.

FAQs on Consumer Protection Act Section 39

Who can file a complaint under Section 39?

Any consumer who has faced unfair trade practices, defective goods, or deficient services can file a complaint under Section 39 before the appropriate Consumer Commission.

Where can complaints be filed according to Section 39?

Complaints can be filed at the District, State, or National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, depending on the jurisdiction and value of the claim.

Does Section 39 apply to online purchases?

Yes, Section 39 covers complaints related to goods and services purchased online, including e-commerce platforms.

What remedies are available after filing a complaint under Section 39?

Consumers can seek remedies such as refund, replacement, compensation, and penalties against the opposite party through Consumer Commissions.

Is there a time limit to file a complaint under Section 39?

Yes, complaints must generally be filed within two years from the date of cause of action, subject to certain exceptions and extensions by the Commission.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 142 defines the term 'document' and its scope for admissibility in legal proceedings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 18 details the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for consumer complaints.

IPC Section 142 defines the offence of being a member of an unlawful assembly and its legal implications.

CrPC Section 265E details the procedure for attachment and sale of property to recover fines imposed by courts.

CrPC Section 22 defines the territorial jurisdiction of a Magistrate to take cognizance of offences.

CrPC Section 290 deals with punishment for public nuisance, prescribing fines for acts disturbing public peace.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 87 explains when acts causing death are presumed to be intended, crucial for proving intent in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 172 governs the disclosure of beneficial ownership in Indian companies for transparency and compliance.

IPC Section 326 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

IPC Section 284 penalizes negligent acts that may cause harm to public health by handling noxious substances.

IPC Section 233 penalizes the act of causing grievous hurt by means of poison or noxious substances.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 54 outlines the procedure for filing complaints with Consumer Commissions for grievance redressal.

CrPC Section 332 defines the offence and punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to a public servant during duty.

CrPC Section 125 mandates maintenance orders to prevent destitution of wives, children, and parents, ensuring social justice and family support.

IPC Section 471 addresses punishment for using a forged document as genuine to deceive others.

Companies Act 2013 Section 82 governs the procedure for the issue of shares at a discount by companies in India.

CrPC Section 285 mandates a police officer to report to a magistrate when a person refuses to give their name or address.

CrPC Section 309 deals with the procedure when a person attempts suicide and the legal steps police must follow.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 62 outlines the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

CrPC Section 157 details the procedure for police to register an FIR and begin investigation upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 140 defines the presumption of ownership of documents, crucial for proving possession and authenticity in legal disputes.

Companies Act 2013 Section 117 governs filing of resolutions and agreements with the Registrar of Companies.

CrPC Section 113 deals with presumption of culpable homicide when death is caused by an act done with the intention of causing bodily injury.

IT Act Section 53 details the procedure for investigation of offences under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

CPC Section 7 defines the extent of civil court jurisdiction and when it can refuse to try a suit.

CPC Section 61 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

IPC Section 316 defines culpable homicide by a person causing death of a child under twelve years during childbirth or by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

bottom of page