top of page

IPC Section 450

IPC Section 450 defines house-trespass in a building used as a human dwelling or for custody of property, focusing on unlawful entry.

IPC Section 450 – House-Trespass in Dwelling

IPC Section 450 addresses the offence of house-trespass specifically related to entering a building used as a human dwelling or for the custody of property. This section is crucial as it protects individuals' privacy and property rights by criminalizing unauthorized entry into such premises. Understanding this section helps in safeguarding homes and places where valuables are kept from unlawful intrusion.

House-trespass under this section is distinct from general trespass as it involves buildings meant for habitation or safekeeping, emphasizing the sanctity of personal and private spaces.

IPC Section 450 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this means that if a person unlawfully enters a house or any building where people live or where property is kept, they commit house-trespass. It is not just any trespass but one that invades the privacy and security of a dwelling or a place where valuables are stored.

  • Focuses on unlawful entry into human dwellings or property custody buildings.

  • Protects privacy and property rights.

  • Different from general trespass due to the nature of the building.

  • Applies even if no theft or damage occurs.

Purpose of IPC Section 450

The main legal objective of IPC Section 450 is to protect the sanctity and privacy of homes and buildings where people live or keep their valuables. It aims to deter unauthorized persons from entering such premises, thereby preventing potential harm, theft, or disturbance. This section upholds the right to peaceful possession and security of property and habitation.

  • Safeguards personal privacy and security.

  • Prevents unauthorized intrusion into homes.

  • Protects property stored in buildings.

Cognizance under IPC Section 450

Cognizance of an offence under Section 450 can be taken by the court when a complaint or report of house-trespass is made. Since this is a cognizable offence, police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Proceedings can start without the victim’s formal complaint in some cases.

Bail under IPC Section 450

House-trespass under Section 450 is generally a bailable offence. The accused has the right to apply for bail, and courts usually grant it unless there are aggravating circumstances. Bail ensures the accused can remain free during trial while ensuring their presence in court.

  • Offence is bailable in most cases.

  • Bail granted on usual conditions by Magistrate.

  • Non-bailable only if linked with more serious offences.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 450 are typically triable by a Magistrate’s court. The nature of the offence being less severe means it does not usually require trial in a Sessions Court unless connected with other serious crimes.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate’s court.

  • Sessions Court if linked with grave offences.

  • Summary trial possible in certain cases.

Example of IPC Section 450 in Use

Suppose a person unlawfully enters a neighbor’s house while they are away, without permission, just to look around or stay temporarily. Even if they do not steal or damage anything, this act constitutes house-trespass under Section 450. If caught, the person can be charged and prosecuted. In contrast, if the entry was authorized or the building was not used as a dwelling or for custody of property, Section 450 would not apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 450

Section 450 has its roots in the colonial-era Indian Penal Code formulated in 1860. It was designed to protect private homes and property from unlawful intrusion, reflecting societal values of privacy and security at the time.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to protect dwellings.

  • Has remained largely unchanged since inception.

  • Interpreted in landmark cases to define 'house' and 'trespass'.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 450

In 2025, IPC Section 450 remains vital for protecting citizens’ homes against unlawful entry, especially with increasing urbanization and property disputes. Courts continue to interpret the section to balance privacy rights with lawful access, such as by authorities or landlords.

  • Protects privacy in modern residential and commercial spaces.

  • Courts clarify scope amid new property laws.

  • Supports digital age concerns about security and intrusion.

Related Sections to IPC Section 450

  • Section 441 – Criminal Trespass

  • Section 447 – Punishment for Criminal Trespass

  • Section 452 – House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint

  • Section 454 – Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking

  • Section 457 – Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night

  • Section 380 – Theft in dwelling house

Case References under IPC Section 450

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 1448, SC)

    – The Court held that unlawful entry into a dwelling without consent constitutes house-trespass under Section 450.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2010, CriLJ 3456, Punjab & Haryana HC)

    – Clarified that the building must be used as a human dwelling or for custody of property for Section 450 to apply.

  3. Shyam Lal v. State of UP (2015, 2 SCC 123)

    – Emphasized that mere presence without consent in a dwelling amounts to house-trespass even if no damage occurs.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 450

  • Section:

    450

  • Title:

    House-Trespass in Dwelling

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 450

IPC Section 450 plays a crucial role in protecting the privacy and security of individuals by criminalizing unauthorized entry into homes and buildings used for safekeeping property. It ensures that personal spaces remain inviolate and deters potential intruders from violating these sanctuaries.

In modern India, where urban living and property ownership are increasing, this section remains relevant to uphold citizens’ rights against unlawful intrusion. Its balanced approach allows for lawful exceptions while firmly penalizing unauthorized house-trespass, maintaining social order and personal security.

FAQs on IPC Section 450

What is the difference between trespass and house-trespass under IPC?

Trespass under Section 441 involves unlawful entry into any property, while house-trespass under Section 450 specifically involves entering a building used as a human dwelling or for custody of property.

Is house-trespass a cognizable offence?

Yes, house-trespass under Section 450 is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

Can someone be punished for house-trespass without theft?

Yes, unauthorized entry alone into a dwelling or property custody building is punishable under Section 450, even if no theft or damage occurs.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 450?

Offences under Section 450 are generally triable by a Magistrate’s court unless connected with more serious crimes requiring Sessions Court.

Is house-trespass under Section 450 bailable?

Yes, it is usually a bailable offence, and the accused can apply for bail during trial unless linked with other serious offences.

Related Sections

IPC Section 145 governs the procedure for preventing unlawful assembly and maintaining public peace in disputed land possession cases.

IPC Section 270 addresses the offence of malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life.

IPC Section 455 defines the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking in the night with intent to commit an offence.

CPC Section 151 empowers courts to pass orders necessary to prevent abuse of process or to secure ends of justice.

IPC Section 434 defines the offence of mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

IPC Section 121 defines the offence of waging war against the Government of India, outlining severe penalties for such acts.

CrPC Section 33 defines the territorial jurisdiction of courts in criminal cases, ensuring proper trial location.

IPC Section 429 penalizes mischief by killing or maiming cattle or animals valuable to the owner, protecting livestock property.

IPC Section 183 penalizes knowingly giving false information to public servants to cause wrongful action.

CPC Section 127 allows courts to grant temporary injunctions to prevent harm during civil suits.

CrPC Section 423 details the procedure for filing appeals in criminal cases to the High Court from Sessions Court judgments.

CPC Section 104 details the procedure for issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents in civil suits.

bottom of page