top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 62

Contract Act 1872 Section 62 explains how a contract continues when an offer or proposal is accepted after the original contract is void or terminated.

Contract Act Section 62 deals with situations where an agreement or contract, which was initially void or terminated, is later accepted or acted upon, leading to its revival. This provision is crucial in understanding when a contract can be considered to continue despite earlier invalidity or cessation.

Understanding Section 62 helps businesses and individuals know when their actions or acceptance can revive a contract, ensuring clarity in ongoing commercial transactions and avoiding disputes over contract validity.

Contract Act Section 62 – Exact Provision

This section means that even if a contract was initially void or ended, if both parties knowingly agree to continue it or behave in a way that shows they want to keep it alive, the contract will be treated as valid. It prevents parties from escaping obligations by claiming the contract ended if they have acted otherwise.

  • Revives contracts previously void or terminated.

  • Requires parties' knowledge of prior invalidity or termination.

  • Consent or conduct showing intention to continue is essential.

  • Ensures fairness by honoring parties' continued agreement.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 62

Section 62 states that a contract, though initially void or ended, can be revived if parties knowingly agree to continue it or act accordingly.

  • The section applies when a contract is void or terminated.

  • Parties involved are those who made the original contract.

  • Legal requirement: knowledge of the contract's void or terminated status.

  • Triggering event: express assent or conduct showing continuation.

  • Valid continuation depends on clear intention to keep the contract alive.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 62

This section protects contractual fairness by recognizing parties' intentions to continue a contract despite earlier issues. It prevents unjust avoidance of obligations and promotes certainty in agreements.

  • Protects contractual fairness by honoring parties' intentions.

  • Ensures free and informed consent to continue contracts.

  • Prevents fraud or misuse of contract termination claims.

  • Maintains certainty and stability in commercial dealings.

When Contract Act Section 62 Applies

Section 62 applies when a contract is void or terminated but parties later decide to continue it knowingly. It is invoked to validate ongoing obligations despite prior invalidity.

  • Conditions: prior void or terminated contract with parties' knowledge.

  • Parties who made the original contract may invoke it.

  • Affects contracts where continuation is intended after termination.

  • Scope includes express or implied assent through conduct.

  • Exceptions: no revival without parties' knowledge or intention.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 62

Section 62 affects the enforceability of contracts by reviving those previously void or terminated when parties consent to continue. It interacts with Sections 10–30 by reinforcing free consent and valid agreement principles, ensuring contracts remain binding if parties agree to proceed.

  • Revives contracts, affecting enforceability and obligations.

  • Requires knowledge and consent, aligning with free consent rules.

  • Prevents parties from avoiding liabilities by claiming termination.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 62

The section creates rights for parties to enforce a contract continued after prior voidance or termination. Obligations become mandatory once continuation is established, and non-performance may lead to legal consequences.

  • Rights to enforce revived contract obligations.

  • Mandatory duties arise upon continuation.

  • Non-performance can result in breach remedies.

  • Parties must act in good faith to continue contracts.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 62 Applies

Section 62 applies primarily at the post-termination or post-voidance stage, when parties decide to continue the contract. It bridges contract formation and performance stages by validating continuation.

  • Post-contract termination or voidance stage.

  • During contract revival or continuation discussions.

  • Before or during performance of revived contract.

  • Not applicable at initial offer or acceptance stages.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 62

When a contract is revived under Section 62, parties gain rights to sue for performance or damages if obligations are breached. The contract is treated as valid, enabling remedies like specific performance or injunctions.

  • Right to sue for breach of revived contract.

  • Damages for non-performance.

  • Specific performance may be ordered.

  • Injunctions to prevent breach.

Example of Contract Act Section 62 in Practical Use

Person X entered a contract with Y which was later terminated due to a misunderstanding. Both parties, aware of the termination, later agreed to continue the contract and acted accordingly. Section 62 validates this continuation, making the contract enforceable again.

  • Shows how parties' knowledge and assent revive contracts.

  • Prevents escape from obligations after acting to continue.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 62

Section 62 was introduced to address situations where parties, despite contract termination or voidance, wished to continue their agreement. Courts historically applied it to uphold parties' intentions and prevent unjust avoidance of contracts. Amendments have clarified the knowledge and assent requirements.

  • Created to uphold parties' intentions post-termination.

  • Courts used it to prevent misuse of contract voidance.

  • Clarified through amendments on consent and knowledge.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 62

In 2026, Section 62 remains vital for digital and e-commerce contracts where agreements may be terminated but parties continue dealings. It supports online contract continuity and resolves disputes over contract status in modern business.

  • Applies to digital transactions and e-contracts.

  • Important for commercial continuity in e-commerce.

  • Helps resolve disputes over contract termination online.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 13 – Meaning of consent.

  • Contract Act Section 23 – Lawful consideration and object.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 62

  1. Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (1974 AIR 1590)

    – The court held that parties' conduct after termination can revive a contract under Section 62.

  2. Shri Ram Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1966 AIR 740)

    – Affirmed that knowledge and assent are essential for contract continuation.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 62

  • Section: 62

  • Title: Continuation of Contract

  • Category: Validity, enforceability, contract revival

  • Applies To: Parties to void or terminated contracts

  • Transaction Stage: Post-termination or voidance, contract continuation

  • Legal Effect: Revives contracts with parties' knowledge and assent

  • Related Remedies: Suit for performance, damages, injunctions

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 62

Contract Act Section 62 plays a crucial role in ensuring that contracts are not unfairly discarded when parties continue to act under them knowingly. It upholds the principle that parties' intentions and conduct are paramount in determining contractual obligations.

This section fosters certainty and fairness in commercial transactions by validating contracts that might otherwise be considered void or terminated. Understanding Section 62 helps parties navigate contract disputes and maintain business relationships effectively.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 62

What does Section 62 of the Contract Act mean?

Section 62 means that if parties knowingly agree to continue a contract that was void or terminated, or act as if continuing it, the contract is considered valid and enforceable.

Who can invoke Section 62?

Parties to the original contract who are aware of its void or terminated status can invoke Section 62 by expressing assent or acting to continue the contract.

Does Section 62 apply if parties are unaware of termination?

No, Section 62 requires that parties have knowledge of the contract's void or terminated status before agreeing to continue it.

What remedies are available under Section 62?

Parties can sue for performance, claim damages, or seek injunctions as the contract is treated as valid once continued under Section 62.

How does Section 62 affect digital contracts?

Section 62 applies to digital contracts by validating continuation when parties knowingly proceed after termination, supporting e-commerce and online agreements.

Related Sections

CPC Section 135A details the procedure for attachment before judgment to secure a decree.

CrPC Section 337 defines the offence of causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.

IT Act Section 71 mandates intermediaries to preserve and provide user information for cybercrime investigations.

CrPC Section 321 empowers a public prosecutor to withdraw from a case with court approval, ensuring efficient justice delivery.

IT Act Section 5 defines the scope and territorial application of the Information Technology Act, 2000 in India.

IPC Section 497 defines adultery, its scope, and legal consequences under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 197 governs the overall limits on managerial remuneration in Indian companies.

IT Act Section 13 defines the scope and application of the Act, establishing its territorial and jurisdictional reach.

CPC Section 62 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

IT Act Section 10 validates electronic agreements, ensuring digital contracts hold legal recognition under Indian law.

IPC Section 401 defines criminal breach of trust by a public servant, emphasizing misuse of entrusted property or dominion.

IPC Section 351 defines assault, covering acts causing apprehension of criminal force without physical contact.

IPC Section 120 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining when two or more persons agree to commit an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 78 outlines the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority to investigate unfair trade practices.

CrPC Section 428 details the procedure for the disposal of property when no person claims it during investigation.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(9) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 286 defines the offence of negligent conduct with respect to explosive substances and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 130 defines the offence of resisting lawful arrest or detention, ensuring public order and authority of law enforcement.

Contract Act 1872 Section 4 defines what constitutes a proposal and acceptance in contract formation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 79 governs the appointment and powers of the Company Secretary in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 16 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, ensuring cases are tried in the proper location.

IT Act Section 16 defines secure electronic records, ensuring data integrity and authenticity in digital transactions.

IPC Section 288 penalizes negligent acts likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life, protecting public health.

CPC Section 61 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

CrPC Section 403 defines the offence of dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

CrPC Section 105F defines the procedure for forfeiture of property involved in certain offences under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 103 covers the presumption of possession of stolen goods, crucial for proving theft-related offenses.

bottom of page