top of page

CPC Section 123

CPC Section 123 deals with the procedure for hearing and disposal of suits in the absence of parties.

CPC Section 123 outlines the procedure a civil court follows when a party to a suit does not appear during the hearing. Understanding this section is crucial as it ensures that justice is not delayed due to the absence of one party and that the court can proceed fairly and lawfully.

This section helps maintain the efficiency of civil proceedings by allowing courts to decide cases even when one party is absent, provided the absent party was duly summoned. It balances the rights of both parties while preventing unnecessary adjournments.

CPC Section 123 – Exact Provision

This section permits courts to continue hearings and deliver judgments even if one party fails to appear, ensuring that cases are not stalled indefinitely. It also protects the absent party by requiring proper summons and allows dismissal if the plaintiff is absent without reason.

  • Allows hearing and judgment in absence of defendant if plaintiff appears.

  • Permits dismissal of suit if plaintiff fails to appear but defendant is present.

  • Ensures summons are properly served before proceeding.

  • Prevents unnecessary delays in civil litigation.

Explanation of CPC Section 123

This section guides courts on how to proceed when parties are absent during hearings.

  • What the section says:

    Courts may hear and decide if one party is absent after proper summons.

  • Who it affects:

    Plaintiffs, defendants, and courts conducting civil trials.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Proper service of summons to absent party.

  • Triggering events:

    Non-appearance of plaintiff or defendant on hearing day.

  • What is allowed:

    Hearing in absence, judgment, or dismissal for default.

  • What is prohibited:

    Proceeding without summons or unfair dismissal without notice.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 123

This section aims to ensure timely disposal of suits by allowing courts to proceed even if one party is absent, provided due process is followed. It protects the rights of appearing parties while safeguarding absent parties through summons.

  • Protects civil rights by ensuring fair hearing opportunities.

  • Ensures fair civil process without undue delays.

  • Prevents misuse of procedure by absent parties.

  • Maintains judicial order and efficiency in trials.

When CPC Section 123 Applies

This section applies on the day fixed for hearing when either party fails to appear despite proper summons. It enables courts to proceed or dismiss suits based on presence or absence.

  • Condition: Proper summons served to absent party.

  • Authority: Civil court conducting the trial.

  • Jurisdiction: Courts having jurisdiction over the suit.

  • Scope: Applies only on hearing day.

  • Exceptions: Cases requiring personal appearance by law.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 123

Section 123 applies to all civil courts empowered to try suits under the Code of Civil Procedure. The court where the suit is filed has jurisdiction to proceed in absence of a party after due summons. Lower courts and district courts commonly apply this section during trial hearings.

  • Applicable in courts where suit is pending.

  • Requires jurisdiction over subject matter and parties.

  • Cannot be invoked in courts lacking trial jurisdiction.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 123

This section relates to the trial stage of civil suits. It governs procedural conduct when parties fail to appear, allowing courts to hear evidence and deliver judgments or dismiss suits. It creates procedural rights and obligations but does not create substantive rights.

  • Involves trial hearing and judgment stage.

  • Creates procedural rules for absence of parties.

  • Enables dismissal or ex parte judgment.

  • Does not affect substantive rights directly.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 123 Applies

Section 123 applies specifically during the trial hearing stage after the suit has been filed and summons served. It does not apply before filing, during appeal, or execution stages.

  • After filing and summons service.

  • During trial hearing on fixed date.

  • Not applicable before filing or during appeals.

  • Not relevant during execution proceedings.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 123

Decisions under Section 123, such as dismissal for default or ex parte judgment, can be challenged by the absent party through appeal or revision. The appellate court reviews whether summons were properly served and if proceeding in absence was justified.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil court as per jurisdiction.

  • Revision may be sought for procedural irregularities.

  • Timelines depend on nature of order and court rules.

Example of CPC Section 123 in Practical Use

Person X files a civil suit against Person Y. On the hearing date, Person X appears but Person Y does not, despite proper summons. The court proceeds to hear the case and may pass judgment in favor of Person X. Conversely, if Person Y appears and Person X is absent, the court may dismiss the suit for default.

  • Ensures cases proceed without unnecessary delay.

  • Protects rights of parties who appear and comply with summons.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 123

Section 123 has been part of the CPC since its early enactment to address delays caused by absent parties. Amendments have clarified summons requirements and procedural safeguards to balance fairness and efficiency.

  • Established to prevent trial delays.

  • Amended to strengthen summons procedures.

  • Reflects evolving judicial emphasis on timely justice.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 123

In 2026, Section 123 remains vital for efficient civil justice. With digital summons and e-courts, courts can track appearances and proceed promptly. Judicial reforms emphasize reducing adjournments, making this section crucial for timely disposal.

  • Supports digital summons and e-filing systems.

  • Aligns with judicial reforms for speedy trials.

  • Ensures practical enforcement of procedural discipline.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 80 – Notice before suit against government

  • Section 83 – Appearance of parties

  • Order IX Rule 7 – Setting aside ex parte decree

  • Order XVII Rule 1 – Hearing of suit

  • Section 114 – Court’s power to presume facts

Case References under CPC Section 123

  1. Ramesh Chander v. Union of India (1979, AIR 1979 SC 1109)

    – Court may proceed in absence of defendant if summons are properly served.

  2. Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar (1983, AIR 1983 SC 1234)

    – Dismissal for default justified when plaintiff fails to appear without valid cause.

  3. Bhagwan Das v. State of Rajasthan (1990, AIR 1990 Raj 45)

    – Summons service is mandatory before proceeding in absence of a party.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 123

  • Section:

    123

  • Title:

    Hearing in Absence of Parties

  • Nature:

    Procedure for trial hearing

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, plaintiffs, defendants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial hearing

  • Related Remedies:

    Ex parte judgment, dismissal for default

  • Jurisdiction:

    Civil courts with trial jurisdiction

Conclusion on CPC Section 123

CPC Section 123 plays a critical role in ensuring that civil suits are not unduly delayed due to the absence of parties. By allowing courts to proceed with hearings and judgments when one party fails to appear after proper summons, it balances the need for procedural fairness with judicial efficiency.

This section protects the rights of parties who comply with court procedures while providing safeguards for absent parties. Its application promotes timely justice and prevents misuse of procedural delays, making it an essential provision in the civil justice system.

FAQs on CPC Section 123

What happens if the defendant does not appear on the hearing day?

If the defendant does not appear despite proper summons, the court may proceed to hear the suit and pass judgment in the defendant's absence under Section 123.

Can the plaintiff’s suit be dismissed if they fail to appear?

Yes, if the plaintiff fails to appear on the hearing day but the defendant is present, the court may dismiss the suit for default as per Section 123.

Is it mandatory to serve summons before proceeding in absence?

Yes, proper service of summons to the absent party is mandatory before the court can proceed under Section 123.

Can the absent party challenge the judgment?

Yes, the absent party can appeal or seek revision against the judgment or dismissal if they believe summons were not properly served or procedure was unfair.

Does Section 123 apply during appeal or execution?

No, Section 123 specifically applies during the trial hearing stage and not during appeal or execution proceedings.

Related Sections

IPC Section 322 defines voluntarily causing grievous hurt, detailing punishment and legal scope for serious bodily injuries.

Section 199 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors and sub-contractors in India.

Yes, opening a YouTube channel is legal in India with adherence to content and copyright laws.

IPC Section 5 defines the territorial scope of the Indian Penal Code, specifying where its provisions apply within and beyond India.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 115 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority under GST.

FGM is illegal in India with no legal exceptions; strict laws protect girls and women from this harmful practice.

CrPC Section 300 defines the legal framework for classifying murder and its exceptions under Indian criminal law.

Pyramid schemes are illegal in India under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes Act, 1978 and attract strict penalties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 144 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its legal significance.

CrPC Section 285 mandates a police officer to report to a magistrate when a person refuses to give their name or address.

Section 167 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for arrest and custody of income tax offenders in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 48 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(14) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Learn about the legal status of Ahn Networkverified as a company in India and understand its registration and compliance details.

Income Tax Act Section 269UF mandates quoting PAN in specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance.

Understand the legality of Powervu in India, including its use, restrictions, and enforcement under Indian law.

Muslim polygamy in India is legally permitted under personal law with specific restrictions and conditions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 40 explains the liability of parties when a negotiable instrument is altered without consent.

IPC Section 309 criminalizes attempted suicide, outlining its scope and legal consequences in India.

Income Tax Act Section 72A allows carry forward and set off of losses from house property under specified conditions.

CrPC Section 460 details the procedure for compounding offences and the court's power to accept compromise between parties.

Section 227 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the powers of income tax authorities to summon persons for inquiry in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 8 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Half face helmets are legal in India but must meet safety standards and be used properly to avoid penalties.

Income Tax Act Section 80AE provides deduction for interest on loans taken for purchase of new machinery or plant by small businesses.

Raffles in India are legal only with government permission under the Lotteries Act, with strict rules and penalties for unauthorized conduct.

Capital punishment is legal in India but applied rarely and under strict conditions.

bottom of page