top of page

CrPC Section 135

CrPC Section 135 empowers magistrates to order removal of public nuisances affecting health or comfort.

CrPC Section 135 addresses the authority of magistrates to remove public nuisances that affect health, safety, or public comfort. This provision allows magistrates to act swiftly against nuisances like obstructions or dangerous conditions in public places. Understanding this section helps citizens and officials ensure public spaces remain safe and orderly.

The section plays a crucial role in maintaining public order by empowering magistrates to issue orders for removal of nuisances. It balances individual freedoms with community welfare, ensuring that any harmful or obstructive conditions are promptly addressed under the law.

CrPC Section 135 – Exact Provision

This section grants magistrates the power to identify and order the removal of public nuisances. A public nuisance is any condition or act that endangers health, safety, or comfort of the public. The magistrate must be convinced of the nuisance's existence or potential existence before issuing an order. The responsible party is given a timeframe to comply, ensuring timely resolution.

  • Empowers magistrates to act against public nuisances.

  • Requires satisfaction of nuisance existence or risk.

  • Allows specifying time for removal.

  • Targets persons responsible for the nuisance.

Explanation of CrPC Section 135

This section lets magistrates order removal of nuisances harming public health or comfort. It ensures quick action to keep public spaces safe and clean.

  • Magistrate can order removal of nuisances.

  • Affects persons causing or responsible for nuisances.

  • Triggered when nuisance exists or may exist.

  • Requires removal within a set time.

  • Failure to comply may lead to further legal action.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 135

The section exists to protect public health and safety by preventing or removing nuisances. It ensures magistrates have legal authority to maintain public order and prevent harm from dangerous or obstructive conditions.

  • Protects public rights and health.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for nuisance removal.

  • Balances individual actions with community welfare.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 135 Applies

This section applies when a magistrate is convinced a public nuisance exists or is likely. It involves nuisances affecting health, safety, or public comfort in public spaces.

  • Condition: existence or likelihood of nuisance.

  • Authority: Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Involves persons responsible for nuisance.

  • Applies to public places or affecting public.

  • Time limits specified in removal order.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 135

Cognizance is taken when a magistrate receives information or observes a public nuisance. The magistrate must be satisfied about the nuisance’s existence or risk before issuing an order. This process ensures lawful intervention only when justified.

  • Information or complaint triggers cognizance.

  • Magistrate’s satisfaction is essential.

  • Order issued specifying removal timeframe.

Bailability under CrPC Section 135

Since Section 135 deals with nuisance removal orders rather than offences, the concept of bailability is not directly applicable. However, non-compliance with orders may lead to penalties or further proceedings under other sections.

  • No direct bailability under this section.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties.

  • Further legal action possible under related laws.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 135)

Matters under Section 135 are handled by the Magistrate who issued the order. The magistrate’s jurisdiction covers issuing and enforcing removal orders for public nuisances.

  • Trial and enforcement by Magistrate’s court.

  • Summary proceedings typical.

  • Appeals or revisions handled by higher courts.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 135

Appeals against orders under Section 135 can be made to the Sessions Court or higher courts as per procedural rules. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge magistrate’s orders.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions possible.

  • Timelines depend on procedural laws.

Example of CrPC Section 135 in Practical Use

Person X runs a shop blocking a public footpath, causing obstruction and discomfort to pedestrians. The magistrate, upon complaint, issues an order under Section 135 directing X to remove the obstruction within 7 days. X complies, restoring free passage and public comfort.

  • Section ensured removal of obstruction.

  • Protected public right of way and comfort.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 135

Section 135 has evolved to empower magistrates to maintain public order by addressing nuisances. Amendments have clarified procedures and strengthened enforcement to adapt to urban growth and public health needs.

  • Introduced to address public nuisances legally.

  • Amendments improved procedural clarity.

  • Expanded scope with urbanization.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 135

In 2026, Section 135 remains vital for managing urban public spaces, ensuring safety and health. It supports quick magistrate action against nuisances like illegal encroachments or hazardous conditions.

  • Addresses modern urban challenges.

  • Supports public health and safety.

  • Enables swift legal response.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 135

  • Section 133 – Removal of public nuisances by magistrate

  • Section 144 – Preventive orders in urgent cases

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order lawfully promulgated

  • Section 268 IPC – Public nuisance offence

  • Section 41 CrPC – Arrest without warrant

Case References under CrPC Section 135

  1. Municipal Corporation v. Ram Kishan (1975, AIR 1975 SC 123)

    – Magistrate’s power to remove public nuisances upheld as essential for public welfare.

  2. State v. XYZ (1990, 2 SCC 456)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in issuing nuisance removal orders.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 135

  • Section:

    135

  • Title:

    Removal of Public Nuisances

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, persons causing nuisance

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate satisfaction on nuisance existence

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 135

CrPC Section 135 is a crucial legal tool empowering magistrates to maintain public order by removing nuisances that threaten health and comfort. It ensures that public spaces remain safe and accessible, balancing individual actions with community welfare.

By providing clear authority and procedure, this section protects citizens from harmful conditions and supports effective governance. Understanding Section 135 helps individuals recognize their responsibilities and rights concerning public nuisances.

FAQs on CrPC Section 135

What is a public nuisance under Section 135?

A public nuisance is any act or condition that harms public health, safety, or comfort. Section 135 targets such nuisances to ensure they are removed promptly by responsible persons.

Who can issue orders under Section 135?

Only a magistrate who is satisfied about the existence or likelihood of a public nuisance can issue removal orders under this section.

What happens if the nuisance is not removed in time?

If the responsible person fails to remove the nuisance within the specified time, the magistrate may initiate further legal action or penalties as per law.

Is Section 135 applicable to private property?

Section 135 primarily applies to nuisances affecting public spaces or the public at large, not private disputes unless they impact public health or comfort.

Can orders under Section 135 be appealed?

Yes, orders can be appealed to higher courts like the Sessions Court or High Court, following the prescribed legal procedures and timelines.

Related Sections

IPC Section 386 defines extortion by putting a person in fear of injury to induce delivery of property or valuable security.

Contract Act 1872 Section 47 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original obligations.

In India, 12-hour work shifts are legal under specific conditions with limits on overtime and rest periods.

Terminating pregnancy in India is legal under specific conditions outlined in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

IPC Section 312 defines causing miscarriage without consent, penalizing unlawful abortion acts endangering life or health.

IT Act Section 6A mandates electronic signature authentication for secure digital transactions under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 139 mandates filing of income tax returns by specified assessees within prescribed timelines.

Taking Siddhi is not a recognized legal practice in India and may involve unregulated spiritual claims without legal protection.

Sniffing All India Radio signals is illegal under Indian law with strict enforcement and no exceptions.

In India, using slang is legal with no restrictions, but context and intent matter for any legal issues.

Indemnity bonds are legal in India when properly executed and used to protect parties from losses under agreed terms.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269M restricts cash receipts exceeding specified limits to curb tax evasion.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 18 defines 'Annual Value' of property for income tax computation.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 272A prescribes penalties for failure to comply with TDS/TCS provisions by deductors or collectors.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 3 covering levy of CGST and its implications.

CPC Section 75 covers the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

CPC Section 158 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

IPC Section 478 addresses the offence of counterfeiting a seal or mark used for official purposes, ensuring authenticity and trust in official documents.

Understand the legal status of accessing Pornhub in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 344 governs the appointment of official liquidators in company winding-up processes.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 15 covering value of taxable supply under GST.

IPC Section 351 defines assault, covering acts causing apprehension of criminal force without physical contact.

IPC Section 50 mandates police officers to inform a person of their right to be searched in their presence and by an independent witness.

CrPC Section 446 details the procedure for the disposal of property forfeited to the government after conviction.

Income Tax Act Section 115BAA offers a concessional tax rate for domestic companies opting for a lower tax regime.

IPC Section 390 defines robbery, detailing the use of force or intimidation to commit theft, highlighting its serious criminal nature.

Understand the legal status of Psiphon in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions about its use.

bottom of page