top of page

CrPC Section 135

CrPC Section 135 empowers magistrates to order removal of public nuisances affecting health or comfort.

CrPC Section 135 addresses the authority of magistrates to remove public nuisances that affect health, safety, or public comfort. This provision allows magistrates to act swiftly against nuisances like obstructions or dangerous conditions in public places. Understanding this section helps citizens and officials ensure public spaces remain safe and orderly.

The section plays a crucial role in maintaining public order by empowering magistrates to issue orders for removal of nuisances. It balances individual freedoms with community welfare, ensuring that any harmful or obstructive conditions are promptly addressed under the law.

CrPC Section 135 – Exact Provision

This section grants magistrates the power to identify and order the removal of public nuisances. A public nuisance is any condition or act that endangers health, safety, or comfort of the public. The magistrate must be convinced of the nuisance's existence or potential existence before issuing an order. The responsible party is given a timeframe to comply, ensuring timely resolution.

  • Empowers magistrates to act against public nuisances.

  • Requires satisfaction of nuisance existence or risk.

  • Allows specifying time for removal.

  • Targets persons responsible for the nuisance.

Explanation of CrPC Section 135

This section lets magistrates order removal of nuisances harming public health or comfort. It ensures quick action to keep public spaces safe and clean.

  • Magistrate can order removal of nuisances.

  • Affects persons causing or responsible for nuisances.

  • Triggered when nuisance exists or may exist.

  • Requires removal within a set time.

  • Failure to comply may lead to further legal action.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 135

The section exists to protect public health and safety by preventing or removing nuisances. It ensures magistrates have legal authority to maintain public order and prevent harm from dangerous or obstructive conditions.

  • Protects public rights and health.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for nuisance removal.

  • Balances individual actions with community welfare.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 135 Applies

This section applies when a magistrate is convinced a public nuisance exists or is likely. It involves nuisances affecting health, safety, or public comfort in public spaces.

  • Condition: existence or likelihood of nuisance.

  • Authority: Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Involves persons responsible for nuisance.

  • Applies to public places or affecting public.

  • Time limits specified in removal order.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 135

Cognizance is taken when a magistrate receives information or observes a public nuisance. The magistrate must be satisfied about the nuisance’s existence or risk before issuing an order. This process ensures lawful intervention only when justified.

  • Information or complaint triggers cognizance.

  • Magistrate’s satisfaction is essential.

  • Order issued specifying removal timeframe.

Bailability under CrPC Section 135

Since Section 135 deals with nuisance removal orders rather than offences, the concept of bailability is not directly applicable. However, non-compliance with orders may lead to penalties or further proceedings under other sections.

  • No direct bailability under this section.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties.

  • Further legal action possible under related laws.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 135)

Matters under Section 135 are handled by the Magistrate who issued the order. The magistrate’s jurisdiction covers issuing and enforcing removal orders for public nuisances.

  • Trial and enforcement by Magistrate’s court.

  • Summary proceedings typical.

  • Appeals or revisions handled by higher courts.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 135

Appeals against orders under Section 135 can be made to the Sessions Court or higher courts as per procedural rules. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge magistrate’s orders.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions possible.

  • Timelines depend on procedural laws.

Example of CrPC Section 135 in Practical Use

Person X runs a shop blocking a public footpath, causing obstruction and discomfort to pedestrians. The magistrate, upon complaint, issues an order under Section 135 directing X to remove the obstruction within 7 days. X complies, restoring free passage and public comfort.

  • Section ensured removal of obstruction.

  • Protected public right of way and comfort.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 135

Section 135 has evolved to empower magistrates to maintain public order by addressing nuisances. Amendments have clarified procedures and strengthened enforcement to adapt to urban growth and public health needs.

  • Introduced to address public nuisances legally.

  • Amendments improved procedural clarity.

  • Expanded scope with urbanization.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 135

In 2026, Section 135 remains vital for managing urban public spaces, ensuring safety and health. It supports quick magistrate action against nuisances like illegal encroachments or hazardous conditions.

  • Addresses modern urban challenges.

  • Supports public health and safety.

  • Enables swift legal response.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 135

  • Section 133 – Removal of public nuisances by magistrate

  • Section 144 – Preventive orders in urgent cases

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order lawfully promulgated

  • Section 268 IPC – Public nuisance offence

  • Section 41 CrPC – Arrest without warrant

Case References under CrPC Section 135

  1. Municipal Corporation v. Ram Kishan (1975, AIR 1975 SC 123)

    – Magistrate’s power to remove public nuisances upheld as essential for public welfare.

  2. State v. XYZ (1990, 2 SCC 456)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in issuing nuisance removal orders.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 135

  • Section:

    135

  • Title:

    Removal of Public Nuisances

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, persons causing nuisance

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate satisfaction on nuisance existence

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 135

CrPC Section 135 is a crucial legal tool empowering magistrates to maintain public order by removing nuisances that threaten health and comfort. It ensures that public spaces remain safe and accessible, balancing individual actions with community welfare.

By providing clear authority and procedure, this section protects citizens from harmful conditions and supports effective governance. Understanding Section 135 helps individuals recognize their responsibilities and rights concerning public nuisances.

FAQs on CrPC Section 135

What is a public nuisance under Section 135?

A public nuisance is any act or condition that harms public health, safety, or comfort. Section 135 targets such nuisances to ensure they are removed promptly by responsible persons.

Who can issue orders under Section 135?

Only a magistrate who is satisfied about the existence or likelihood of a public nuisance can issue removal orders under this section.

What happens if the nuisance is not removed in time?

If the responsible person fails to remove the nuisance within the specified time, the magistrate may initiate further legal action or penalties as per law.

Is Section 135 applicable to private property?

Section 135 primarily applies to nuisances affecting public spaces or the public at large, not private disputes unless they impact public health or comfort.

Can orders under Section 135 be appealed?

Yes, orders can be appealed to higher courts like the Sessions Court or High Court, following the prescribed legal procedures and timelines.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Tyre retreading is legal in India under strict regulations to ensure safety and environmental standards.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 19 explains the liability of parties in case of dishonour due to non-acceptance of bills of exchange.

In India, anal sex between consenting adults is legal following Supreme Court rulings removing previous bans.

Walking rickshaws are legal in India with specific regulations varying by state and city.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 57 details the penalty for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers from deceptive practices.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 243 deals with penalties for failure to comply with directions of income tax authorities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 39 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

CPC Section 127 allows courts to grant temporary injunctions to prevent harm during civil suits.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73A defines the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts, ensuring their legal recognition.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 17 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 1 outlines the short title, extent, commencement, and application of the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 180 outlines the powers of the Board of Directors requiring shareholder approval for key decisions.

CrPC Section 271 details penalties for disobedience to summons or warrants issued by a criminal court.

In India, the legal age to participate in the lottery is 18 years, with strict regulations and state-specific rules governing lottery operations.

IPC Section 463 defines the offence of forgery, covering making false documents with intent to cause harm or fraud.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 40 explains how admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

CBS Fantasy is not legally recognized in India due to strict laws on online fantasy gaming and betting.

Learn about the legality of Predict and Win games in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misunderstandings.

Waging is illegal in India under the Public Gambling Act, 1867, with strict penalties for organizing or participating in betting activities.

Golden Tobacco is legal in India but regulated under strict laws controlling sale and use of tobacco products.

SARMs are not fully legal in India; their sale and use face restrictions under drug laws and regulatory controls.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 75 deals with the presumption of ownership of documents, aiding proof of possession and control in legal proceedings.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 137 on electronic way bill requirements and compliance.

Magnessa is not legally approved for use in India; understand its legal status and enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 54 governs the procedure and conditions for the issue of sweat equity shares by companies.

Trading US oil from India is legal under Indian laws with compliance to import-export regulations and international trade rules.

Section 214 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for recovery of income tax arrears in India.

bottom of page