top of page

CrPC Section 135

CrPC Section 135 empowers magistrates to order removal of public nuisances affecting health or comfort.

CrPC Section 135 addresses the authority of magistrates to remove public nuisances that affect health, safety, or public comfort. This provision allows magistrates to act swiftly against nuisances like obstructions or dangerous conditions in public places. Understanding this section helps citizens and officials ensure public spaces remain safe and orderly.

The section plays a crucial role in maintaining public order by empowering magistrates to issue orders for removal of nuisances. It balances individual freedoms with community welfare, ensuring that any harmful or obstructive conditions are promptly addressed under the law.

CrPC Section 135 – Exact Provision

This section grants magistrates the power to identify and order the removal of public nuisances. A public nuisance is any condition or act that endangers health, safety, or comfort of the public. The magistrate must be convinced of the nuisance's existence or potential existence before issuing an order. The responsible party is given a timeframe to comply, ensuring timely resolution.

  • Empowers magistrates to act against public nuisances.

  • Requires satisfaction of nuisance existence or risk.

  • Allows specifying time for removal.

  • Targets persons responsible for the nuisance.

Explanation of CrPC Section 135

This section lets magistrates order removal of nuisances harming public health or comfort. It ensures quick action to keep public spaces safe and clean.

  • Magistrate can order removal of nuisances.

  • Affects persons causing or responsible for nuisances.

  • Triggered when nuisance exists or may exist.

  • Requires removal within a set time.

  • Failure to comply may lead to further legal action.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 135

The section exists to protect public health and safety by preventing or removing nuisances. It ensures magistrates have legal authority to maintain public order and prevent harm from dangerous or obstructive conditions.

  • Protects public rights and health.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure for nuisance removal.

  • Balances individual actions with community welfare.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring magistrate’s satisfaction.

When CrPC Section 135 Applies

This section applies when a magistrate is convinced a public nuisance exists or is likely. It involves nuisances affecting health, safety, or public comfort in public spaces.

  • Condition: existence or likelihood of nuisance.

  • Authority: Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.

  • Involves persons responsible for nuisance.

  • Applies to public places or affecting public.

  • Time limits specified in removal order.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 135

Cognizance is taken when a magistrate receives information or observes a public nuisance. The magistrate must be satisfied about the nuisance’s existence or risk before issuing an order. This process ensures lawful intervention only when justified.

  • Information or complaint triggers cognizance.

  • Magistrate’s satisfaction is essential.

  • Order issued specifying removal timeframe.

Bailability under CrPC Section 135

Since Section 135 deals with nuisance removal orders rather than offences, the concept of bailability is not directly applicable. However, non-compliance with orders may lead to penalties or further proceedings under other sections.

  • No direct bailability under this section.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties.

  • Further legal action possible under related laws.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 135)

Matters under Section 135 are handled by the Magistrate who issued the order. The magistrate’s jurisdiction covers issuing and enforcing removal orders for public nuisances.

  • Trial and enforcement by Magistrate’s court.

  • Summary proceedings typical.

  • Appeals or revisions handled by higher courts.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 135

Appeals against orders under Section 135 can be made to the Sessions Court or higher courts as per procedural rules. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge magistrate’s orders.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court.

  • Revision petitions possible.

  • Timelines depend on procedural laws.

Example of CrPC Section 135 in Practical Use

Person X runs a shop blocking a public footpath, causing obstruction and discomfort to pedestrians. The magistrate, upon complaint, issues an order under Section 135 directing X to remove the obstruction within 7 days. X complies, restoring free passage and public comfort.

  • Section ensured removal of obstruction.

  • Protected public right of way and comfort.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 135

Section 135 has evolved to empower magistrates to maintain public order by addressing nuisances. Amendments have clarified procedures and strengthened enforcement to adapt to urban growth and public health needs.

  • Introduced to address public nuisances legally.

  • Amendments improved procedural clarity.

  • Expanded scope with urbanization.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 135

In 2026, Section 135 remains vital for managing urban public spaces, ensuring safety and health. It supports quick magistrate action against nuisances like illegal encroachments or hazardous conditions.

  • Addresses modern urban challenges.

  • Supports public health and safety.

  • Enables swift legal response.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 135

  • Section 133 – Removal of public nuisances by magistrate

  • Section 144 – Preventive orders in urgent cases

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to order lawfully promulgated

  • Section 268 IPC – Public nuisance offence

  • Section 41 CrPC – Arrest without warrant

Case References under CrPC Section 135

  1. Municipal Corporation v. Ram Kishan (1975, AIR 1975 SC 123)

    – Magistrate’s power to remove public nuisances upheld as essential for public welfare.

  2. State v. XYZ (1990, 2 SCC 456)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards in issuing nuisance removal orders.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 135

  • Section:

    135

  • Title:

    Removal of Public Nuisances

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, persons causing nuisance

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate satisfaction on nuisance existence

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 135

CrPC Section 135 is a crucial legal tool empowering magistrates to maintain public order by removing nuisances that threaten health and comfort. It ensures that public spaces remain safe and accessible, balancing individual actions with community welfare.

By providing clear authority and procedure, this section protects citizens from harmful conditions and supports effective governance. Understanding Section 135 helps individuals recognize their responsibilities and rights concerning public nuisances.

FAQs on CrPC Section 135

What is a public nuisance under Section 135?

A public nuisance is any act or condition that harms public health, safety, or comfort. Section 135 targets such nuisances to ensure they are removed promptly by responsible persons.

Who can issue orders under Section 135?

Only a magistrate who is satisfied about the existence or likelihood of a public nuisance can issue removal orders under this section.

What happens if the nuisance is not removed in time?

If the responsible person fails to remove the nuisance within the specified time, the magistrate may initiate further legal action or penalties as per law.

Is Section 135 applicable to private property?

Section 135 primarily applies to nuisances affecting public spaces or the public at large, not private disputes unless they impact public health or comfort.

Can orders under Section 135 be appealed?

Yes, orders can be appealed to higher courts like the Sessions Court or High Court, following the prescribed legal procedures and timelines.

Related Sections

IPC Section 43 defines 'Voluntarily causing hurt' and outlines its scope and punishment under Indian law.

Understand the legality of data mining in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Smooching in India is not explicitly illegal but public displays of affection may face social and legal restrictions.

CrPC Section 330 defines punishment for voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession or information from a person.

IPC Section 364 defines punishment for kidnapping or abducting a person with intent to murder or cause harm.

CPC Section 26 allows courts to stay civil proceedings when a related criminal case is pending to avoid conflicting judgments.

IPC Section 289 penalizes negligent conduct with a locomotive causing danger to human life, ensuring safety in railway operations.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 158 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 250 deals with appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) against income tax orders.

In India, buying tigers is illegal due to strict wildlife protection laws under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

IPC Section 340 defines wrongful confinement by a person in authority, focusing on unlawful restraint by public servants or officials.

Buying swords in India is legal with restrictions under arms laws and local regulations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 79 defines the expert witness rule, allowing opinion evidence from qualified experts to assist courts in technical matters.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 66 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm’s name.

Binary trading is illegal in India since 2019, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions allowed.

Bitcoin betting in India faces legal uncertainty with strict gambling laws and no clear regulation on cryptocurrencies.

Cockfighting is illegal in India under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 137 empowers courts to exclude evidence obtained illegally or unfairly to ensure fair trial and justice.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 76 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder under the Act.

IPC Section 61 defines the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing away of a minor or person of unsound mind.

Section 206E of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on payments for lottery winnings in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 410 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules under the Act.

In India, SIM cloning is illegal under the Information Technology Act and telecom regulations, with strict penalties for offenders.

CrPC Section 89 provides a framework for settling disputes through alternative dispute resolution methods like arbitration and mediation.

Homosexuality is legal in India following the 2018 Supreme Court ruling decriminalizing consensual same-sex relations.

Learn about the legality of betting on Dream11 in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 119 empowers the CBDT to grant relief and condone delays in tax proceedings.

bottom of page