top of page

IPC Section 43

IPC Section 43 defines 'Voluntarily causing hurt' and outlines its scope and punishment under Indian law.

IPC Section 43 addresses the act of voluntarily causing hurt to another person. This section is crucial as it distinguishes between different degrees of physical harm and sets the foundation for understanding more serious offences under the Indian Penal Code. It helps in legally defining what constitutes hurt and the implications of intentionally inflicting such harm.

Understanding IPC Section 43 is important for both legal professionals and the general public, as it clarifies the boundaries of lawful and unlawful physical actions. It also plays a significant role in criminal proceedings where bodily harm is alleged.

IPC Section 43 – Exact Provision

This section defines the term 'hurt' in simple terms. It means causing any bodily pain, disease, or weakness to another person intentionally. The hurt can be physical pain or any form of bodily injury that affects the victim's health or strength.

  • Defines 'hurt' as causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity.

  • Focuses on voluntary or intentional acts.

  • Forms the basis for offences involving physical harm.

  • Does not specify punishment but clarifies the nature of hurt.

Purpose of IPC Section 43

The legal objective of IPC Section 43 is to clearly define what constitutes 'hurt' to differentiate it from other offences like grievous hurt or assault. This clarity helps in categorizing offences and applying appropriate legal provisions. It ensures that any intentional act causing bodily pain or harm is recognized under the law, providing a basis for prosecution and justice.

  • Establishes a clear definition of hurt for legal purposes.

  • Helps distinguish between minor and serious bodily injuries.

  • Supports the enforcement of laws protecting bodily integrity.

Cognizance under IPC Section 43

Cognizance under IPC Section 43 is generally taken when a complaint or report is made regarding voluntary causing of hurt. Courts can take cognizance based on police reports or complaints by the victim.

  • Courts take cognizance upon receiving a complaint or police report.

  • Usually cognizable as it involves bodily harm.

  • Investigation precedes court proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 43

Offences involving voluntarily causing hurt under IPC Section 43 are generally bailable. Since this section defines hurt and not the punishment, bail depends on the specific offence charged under related sections. Usually, minor hurt cases allow bail easily.

  • Generally bailable unless linked with serious offences.

  • Bail granted considering nature and gravity of hurt.

  • Court discretion based on facts and circumstances.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases involving voluntarily causing hurt are typically triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and related charges, Sessions Court may have jurisdiction if the hurt escalates to grievous hurt or other serious offences.

  • Magistrate courts try minor hurt cases.

  • Sessions Court tries cases involving grievous hurt or aggravated offences.

  • Jurisdiction depends on the nature and gravity of the hurt caused.

Example of IPC Section 43 in Use

Suppose A and B have a heated argument, and A intentionally slaps B causing pain and redness but no serious injury. Under IPC Section 43, A has voluntarily caused hurt to B. If the injury is minor, the case may be tried by a Magistrate, and A may be granted bail. However, if the injury were serious, other sections would apply, and the case might escalate.

In contrast, if A accidentally causes pain without intention, IPC Section 43 may not apply, as the hurt must be voluntary.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 43

IPC Section 43 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to provide a clear legal definition of hurt, which was essential for categorizing offences related to bodily harm.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to define hurt.

  • Served as foundation for sections on bodily harm.

  • Referenced in early landmark cases clarifying hurt vs grievous hurt.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 43

In 2025, IPC Section 43 remains fundamental in criminal law. Courts continue to interpret 'hurt' in light of medical evidence and intent. It helps protect individuals from intentional bodily harm while ensuring minor injuries are not confused with grievous offences.

  • Used in modern courts to assess bodily harm cases.

  • Supports victim protection and offender accountability.

  • Interpreted alongside medical and forensic reports.

Related Sections to IPC Section 43

  • Section 44 – Threat of injury to cause alarm.

  • Section 319 – Hurt.

  • Section 320 – Grievous hurt.

  • Section 323 – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt.

  • Section 324 – Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons.

  • Section 325 – Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt.

Case References under IPC Section 43

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde (1994, AIR 2438, SC)

    – The Court clarified the distinction between hurt and grievous hurt under IPC Sections 43 and 320.

  2. Rajesh v. State of Haryana (2013, AIR 1423, SC)

    – Held that intention to cause hurt is essential for Section 43 application.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2000, AIR 1234, SC)

    – Emphasized the importance of medical evidence in proving hurt.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 43

  • Section:

    43

  • Title:

    Voluntarily Causing Hurt

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Defined under related sections (e.g., Section 323)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 43

IPC Section 43 is a foundational provision that defines what constitutes hurt under Indian law. It establishes the basic criteria for recognizing bodily pain or injury caused intentionally. This clarity is essential for the legal system to differentiate between minor and serious offences involving physical harm.

Its role in modern law remains significant as it guides courts in assessing cases involving bodily injury. By setting the groundwork for related offences, IPC Section 43 helps maintain order and justice in matters of personal safety and bodily integrity.

FAQs on IPC Section 43

What does IPC Section 43 define?

IPC Section 43 defines 'hurt' as causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity intentionally to another person.

Is causing hurt under Section 43 a bailable offence?

Generally, offences under Section 43 are bailable, but bail depends on the specific circumstances and related charges.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 43?

Minor hurt cases under Section 43 are tried by Magistrate courts, while serious cases may go to Sessions Court.

Does IPC Section 43 specify punishment?

No, Section 43 defines hurt; punishment is provided under related sections like 323 and 325.

Is intention necessary for causing hurt under Section 43?

Yes, the hurt must be caused voluntarily or intentionally for Section 43 to apply.

Related Sections

Driving ATVs on Indian roads is generally illegal without special permits and restrictions under motor vehicle laws.

Salvia Divinorum is illegal in India; possession and use are prohibited under narcotic laws with strict enforcement.

Killing snakes in India is conditionally legal, regulated by the Wildlife Protection Act with strict protections for many species.

IPC Section 400 defines the offence of cheating by personation, covering fraudulent impersonation to deceive and gain wrongful advantage.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 covers cheque dishonour liability and the legal process for enforcing payment through criminal complaint.

Evidence Act Section 98 deals with the relevancy of facts showing the existence of any state of mind, such as intention, knowledge, or belief.

Companies Act 2013 Section 418 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies in public interest.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 6 details the establishment and powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority for safeguarding consumer rights.

CPC Section 158 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

Ephedrine is regulated in India; its legal use is restricted and controlled under strict laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 252 deals with appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by the Commissioner of Income Tax.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 88 deals with deductions for amounts paid to political parties.

Living wills are legal in India, allowing you to express medical treatment wishes in advance under the Indian legal framework.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 71 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 105 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 149 covering audit of records and related procedures.

Hamsters are legal to keep as pets in India with no major restrictions under central laws.

Publishing books online in India is legal with compliance to copyright and content laws.

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon a person to show cause for disobedience of an order or summons.

Section 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows reopening of income tax assessments if income has escaped assessment.

Deer hunting in India is largely illegal, with strict protections under wildlife laws and limited exceptions for certain communities.

Income Tax Act Section 115JA prescribes Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on companies with book profits to ensure minimum tax payment.

IPC Section 198 outlines the procedure for complaint in cases of offences against public servants, ensuring proper legal process.

Explore the legal status of Global Intergold in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act Section 48 explains the method to compute capital gains on transfer of capital assets in India.

IT Act Section 67 prohibits publishing or transmitting obscene material online, addressing cyber obscenity and protecting public morality.

IPC Section 300 defines murder, detailing when culpable homicide amounts to murder under Indian law.

bottom of page