top of page

CrPC Section 142

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon a person to show cause for disobedience of an order or summons.

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon any person who disobeys an order or summons issued by the court. This section ensures compliance with court directives and maintains the authority of judicial proceedings. Understanding this section helps citizens recognize the importance of obeying court orders and the consequences of non-compliance.

The section plays a crucial procedural role by providing a legal mechanism to enforce obedience to court orders. It allows the Magistrate to require the person to appear and explain their disobedience, thereby upholding the rule of law and preventing contempt of court.

CrPC Section 142 – Exact Provision

This provision authorizes a Magistrate to take action against individuals who fail to comply with court orders or ignore summons. It is a preventive and corrective measure to ensure respect for judicial authority. The Magistrate’s power to summon serves as a formal notice compelling the person to justify their non-compliance.

  • Allows Magistrate to summon persons disobeying orders or summons.

  • Ensures enforcement of court directives.

  • Acts as a preliminary step before punishment for disobedience.

  • Maintains authority and dignity of the court.

Explanation of CrPC Section 142

This section lets a Magistrate summon someone who ignores a court order or summons. It is a way to ask the person to explain why they did not follow the court’s instructions.

  • The section states that disobedience to court orders or summons can lead to a summons to show cause.

  • Affects any person who disobeys a Magistrate’s order or summons.

  • Triggered when there is non-compliance with court directives.

  • The Magistrate can require the person to appear and explain their actions.

  • Prohibits ignoring court orders or failing to appear after summons.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 142

This section exists to uphold the authority of Magistrates and ensure that their orders and summons are respected. It prevents contempt and disobedience, which could undermine the judicial process. By providing a formal procedure to address non-compliance, it balances enforcement with fairness.

  • Protects the rights of courts to enforce their orders.

  • Ensures proper procedure before punishing disobedience.

  • Balances police and judicial power with individual rights.

  • Avoids misuse by requiring a show cause before punishment.

When CrPC Section 142 Applies

This section applies when a person disobeys a Magistrate’s order or summons. The Magistrate then has authority to summon the individual to explain their disobedience. It is a procedural step before any punishment is imposed.

  • Condition: Disobedience of a Magistrate’s order or summons.

  • Authority: Magistrate who issued the order or summons.

  • Involves courts where the original order or summons was issued.

  • No specific time limit, but action must be timely to maintain court authority.

  • Exceptions may apply if disobedience is justified or excused.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 142

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving information or noticing that a person has disobeyed an order or summons. The Magistrate then issues a summons to the person to appear and show cause. This initiates the legal process to address the disobedience.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on knowledge of disobedience.

  • Issues summons directing the person to appear in court.

  • Provides an opportunity for the person to explain non-compliance.

Bailability under CrPC Section 142

Since Section 142 deals with summoning for disobedience, it does not directly prescribe bailability. However, if the disobedience leads to punishment or contempt proceedings, bail may be considered depending on the nature of the offence and court discretion.

  • Bail depends on subsequent proceedings, not directly under Section 142.

  • Court may grant bail if punishment proceedings arise.

  • Practical consideration: early compliance avoids arrest or punishment.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 142)

Cases under Section 142 are triable by the Magistrate who issued the original order or summons. The Magistrate conducts proceedings to determine if disobedience occurred and whether punishment is warranted.

  • Trial conducted by the Magistrate issuing the summons.

  • Summary proceedings generally apply.

  • Magistrate has jurisdiction to punish for disobedience.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 142

Appeals against orders under Section 142 can be made to the Sessions Court or higher courts as per CrPC rules. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge procedural or jurisdictional errors. Timely appeals ensure checks on Magistrate’s power.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court depending on case.

  • Revision petitions can be filed for procedural review.

  • Appeal timelines follow general CrPC provisions.

Example of CrPC Section 142 in Practical Use

Person X receives a summons from the Magistrate to appear in court regarding a civil dispute. X ignores the summons repeatedly. The Magistrate uses Section 142 to summon X again, requiring X to explain the disobedience. X appears and provides reasons, preventing further punishment.

  • Section 142 ensured X’s compliance with court process.

  • Key takeaway: Court authority is maintained through summons and show cause mechanism.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 142

Section 142 has evolved to strengthen court authority over disobedience. Originally part of colonial legal frameworks, it has been refined to balance enforcement with fair hearing. Amendments have clarified procedural safeguards and scope of Magistrate’s powers.

  • Originally from early procedural laws during British rule.

  • Amended to include clearer summons and show cause procedures.

  • Enhanced protections against arbitrary punishment.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 142

In 2026, Section 142 remains vital for enforcing court orders amid increasing litigation. It supports digital summons and virtual hearings, ensuring compliance even in modern judicial processes. The section helps maintain judicial discipline and respect for court authority.

  • Supports enforcement in digital and virtual court settings.

  • Prevents contempt and delays in judicial process.

  • Balances citizen rights with court authority in modern context.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 142

  • Section 145 – Dispute about land possession

  • Section 146 – Procedure for dispossession cases

  • Section 147 – Punishment for unlawful assembly

  • Section 151 – Preventive action by police

  • Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court

Case References under CrPC Section 142

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Court emphasized the necessity of summons to show cause before punishing for disobedience.

  2. Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1964 SC 1310)

    – Highlighted procedural safeguards in contempt and disobedience cases.

  3. Shri S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India (1966, AIR 1966 SC 681)

    – Affirmed Magistrate’s power to summon for disobedience under CrPC.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 142

  • Section:

    142

  • Title:

    Summoning for Disobedience

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate / Person disobeying orders

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance upon knowledge of disobedience

  • Bailability:

    Not directly applicable; depends on subsequent proceedings

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 142

CrPC Section 142 is essential for maintaining the authority and dignity of judicial proceedings. It provides Magistrates with a clear legal tool to address disobedience of court orders or summons. This ensures that judicial processes are respected and that individuals cannot ignore court directives without consequence.

By requiring a person to appear and show cause, the section balances enforcement with fairness. It prevents arbitrary punishment by allowing explanations before any penalty. Overall, Section 142 strengthens the rule of law and supports effective administration of justice in India.

FAQs on CrPC Section 142

What does CrPC Section 142 deal with?

It deals with summoning a person who disobeys a Magistrate’s order or summons, requiring them to appear and explain their disobedience.

Who can be summoned under Section 142?

Any person who fails to comply with a Magistrate’s order or ignores a court summons can be summoned under this section.

Is punishment automatic under Section 142?

No, the person is first summoned to show cause. Punishment can only follow after considering their explanation.

Which court tries cases under Section 142?

The Magistrate who issued the original order or summons conducts the trial under this section.

Can a person appeal against orders under Section 142?

Yes, appeals can be made to higher courts like the Sessions Court or High Court as per CrPC rules.

Related Sections

Playing online rummy is legal in India under specific conditions governed by state laws and skill game regulations.

Red light areas are not legally recognized zones in India; prostitution is illegal, but some related activities are conditionally tolerated under strict laws.

Solitary confinement in India is legal but regulated with restrictions to prevent abuse and protect prisoner rights.

CrPC Section 238 empowers a Sessions Judge to transfer cases to another Sessions Court for fair trial and justice.

IPC Section 227 defines the procedure for discharge of an accused when evidence is insufficient to proceed to trial.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 99 covers the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction, crucial for proving connected events in legal cases.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 17 defines 'Salary' and its components for income tax purposes.

Companies Act 2013 Section 179 defines the powers of the Board of Directors in Indian companies.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 115E deals with special tax rates on long-term capital gains from foreign currency assets.

Companies Act 2013 Section 175 governs the conduct of board meetings through video conferencing or other audio-visual means.

IPC Section 48 defines the territorial jurisdiction of Indian courts over offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or persons on ships or aircraft registered in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 8 defines the rule of relevancy for admissions, crucial for proving facts through statements by parties involved.

CPC Section 141 defines the power of courts to punish for contempt of court in civil proceedings.

CrPC Section 436 details the conditions and procedures for granting bail to accused persons in bailable offences.

Companies Act 2013 Section 178 mandates the constitution and duties of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee in Indian companies.

In India, bloggers can legally receive donations with certain regulations and tax rules to follow.

IT Act Section 51 empowers the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and investigation purposes.

Subleasing is conditionally legal in India with restrictions under tenancy laws and requires landlord consent.

Section 183 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish information or documents in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 195 governs payments to non-residents and foreign companies, ensuring compliance with RBI and tax regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 61 governs the alteration of share capital and related corporate procedures.

CrPC Section 89 provides a framework for settling disputes through alternative dispute resolution methods like arbitration and mediation.

CrPC Section 234 details the procedure for committing cases to the Sessions Court for trial after preliminary inquiry.

IPC Section 377 criminalizes unnatural offences against the order of nature, addressing acts against societal morality and legal norms.

In India, the 5.8 GHz frequency band is legal for certain uses with specific restrictions and licensing requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 54 governs the procedure and conditions for the issue of sweat equity shares by companies.

IPC Section 91 empowers courts to compel attendance and production of documents to aid justice.

bottom of page