top of page

CrPC Section 142

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon a person to show cause for disobedience of an order or summons.

CrPC Section 142 empowers a Magistrate to summon any person who disobeys an order or summons issued by the court. This section ensures compliance with court directives and maintains the authority of judicial proceedings. Understanding this section helps citizens recognize the importance of obeying court orders and the consequences of non-compliance.

The section plays a crucial procedural role by providing a legal mechanism to enforce obedience to court orders. It allows the Magistrate to require the person to appear and explain their disobedience, thereby upholding the rule of law and preventing contempt of court.

CrPC Section 142 – Exact Provision

This provision authorizes a Magistrate to take action against individuals who fail to comply with court orders or ignore summons. It is a preventive and corrective measure to ensure respect for judicial authority. The Magistrate’s power to summon serves as a formal notice compelling the person to justify their non-compliance.

  • Allows Magistrate to summon persons disobeying orders or summons.

  • Ensures enforcement of court directives.

  • Acts as a preliminary step before punishment for disobedience.

  • Maintains authority and dignity of the court.

Explanation of CrPC Section 142

This section lets a Magistrate summon someone who ignores a court order or summons. It is a way to ask the person to explain why they did not follow the court’s instructions.

  • The section states that disobedience to court orders or summons can lead to a summons to show cause.

  • Affects any person who disobeys a Magistrate’s order or summons.

  • Triggered when there is non-compliance with court directives.

  • The Magistrate can require the person to appear and explain their actions.

  • Prohibits ignoring court orders or failing to appear after summons.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 142

This section exists to uphold the authority of Magistrates and ensure that their orders and summons are respected. It prevents contempt and disobedience, which could undermine the judicial process. By providing a formal procedure to address non-compliance, it balances enforcement with fairness.

  • Protects the rights of courts to enforce their orders.

  • Ensures proper procedure before punishing disobedience.

  • Balances police and judicial power with individual rights.

  • Avoids misuse by requiring a show cause before punishment.

When CrPC Section 142 Applies

This section applies when a person disobeys a Magistrate’s order or summons. The Magistrate then has authority to summon the individual to explain their disobedience. It is a procedural step before any punishment is imposed.

  • Condition: Disobedience of a Magistrate’s order or summons.

  • Authority: Magistrate who issued the order or summons.

  • Involves courts where the original order or summons was issued.

  • No specific time limit, but action must be timely to maintain court authority.

  • Exceptions may apply if disobedience is justified or excused.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 142

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving information or noticing that a person has disobeyed an order or summons. The Magistrate then issues a summons to the person to appear and show cause. This initiates the legal process to address the disobedience.

  • Magistrate takes cognizance on knowledge of disobedience.

  • Issues summons directing the person to appear in court.

  • Provides an opportunity for the person to explain non-compliance.

Bailability under CrPC Section 142

Since Section 142 deals with summoning for disobedience, it does not directly prescribe bailability. However, if the disobedience leads to punishment or contempt proceedings, bail may be considered depending on the nature of the offence and court discretion.

  • Bail depends on subsequent proceedings, not directly under Section 142.

  • Court may grant bail if punishment proceedings arise.

  • Practical consideration: early compliance avoids arrest or punishment.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 142)

Cases under Section 142 are triable by the Magistrate who issued the original order or summons. The Magistrate conducts proceedings to determine if disobedience occurred and whether punishment is warranted.

  • Trial conducted by the Magistrate issuing the summons.

  • Summary proceedings generally apply.

  • Magistrate has jurisdiction to punish for disobedience.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 142

Appeals against orders under Section 142 can be made to the Sessions Court or higher courts as per CrPC rules. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge procedural or jurisdictional errors. Timely appeals ensure checks on Magistrate’s power.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court depending on case.

  • Revision petitions can be filed for procedural review.

  • Appeal timelines follow general CrPC provisions.

Example of CrPC Section 142 in Practical Use

Person X receives a summons from the Magistrate to appear in court regarding a civil dispute. X ignores the summons repeatedly. The Magistrate uses Section 142 to summon X again, requiring X to explain the disobedience. X appears and provides reasons, preventing further punishment.

  • Section 142 ensured X’s compliance with court process.

  • Key takeaway: Court authority is maintained through summons and show cause mechanism.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 142

Section 142 has evolved to strengthen court authority over disobedience. Originally part of colonial legal frameworks, it has been refined to balance enforcement with fair hearing. Amendments have clarified procedural safeguards and scope of Magistrate’s powers.

  • Originally from early procedural laws during British rule.

  • Amended to include clearer summons and show cause procedures.

  • Enhanced protections against arbitrary punishment.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 142

In 2026, Section 142 remains vital for enforcing court orders amid increasing litigation. It supports digital summons and virtual hearings, ensuring compliance even in modern judicial processes. The section helps maintain judicial discipline and respect for court authority.

  • Supports enforcement in digital and virtual court settings.

  • Prevents contempt and delays in judicial process.

  • Balances citizen rights with court authority in modern context.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 142

  • Section 145 – Dispute about land possession

  • Section 146 – Procedure for dispossession cases

  • Section 147 – Punishment for unlawful assembly

  • Section 151 – Preventive action by police

  • Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court

Case References under CrPC Section 142

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Court emphasized the necessity of summons to show cause before punishing for disobedience.

  2. Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Union of India (1964, AIR 1964 SC 1310)

    – Highlighted procedural safeguards in contempt and disobedience cases.

  3. Shri S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India (1966, AIR 1966 SC 681)

    – Affirmed Magistrate’s power to summon for disobedience under CrPC.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 142

  • Section:

    142

  • Title:

    Summoning for Disobedience

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate / Person disobeying orders

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate takes cognizance upon knowledge of disobedience

  • Bailability:

    Not directly applicable; depends on subsequent proceedings

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 142

CrPC Section 142 is essential for maintaining the authority and dignity of judicial proceedings. It provides Magistrates with a clear legal tool to address disobedience of court orders or summons. This ensures that judicial processes are respected and that individuals cannot ignore court directives without consequence.

By requiring a person to appear and show cause, the section balances enforcement with fairness. It prevents arbitrary punishment by allowing explanations before any penalty. Overall, Section 142 strengthens the rule of law and supports effective administration of justice in India.

FAQs on CrPC Section 142

What does CrPC Section 142 deal with?

It deals with summoning a person who disobeys a Magistrate’s order or summons, requiring them to appear and explain their disobedience.

Who can be summoned under Section 142?

Any person who fails to comply with a Magistrate’s order or ignores a court summons can be summoned under this section.

Is punishment automatic under Section 142?

No, the person is first summoned to show cause. Punishment can only follow after considering their explanation.

Which court tries cases under Section 142?

The Magistrate who issued the original order or summons conducts the trial under this section.

Can a person appeal against orders under Section 142?

Yes, appeals can be made to higher courts like the Sessions Court or High Court as per CrPC rules.

Related Sections

IPC Section 393 defines robbery and prescribes punishment for committing robbery with violence or threat.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 69 details the penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(34) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 244 deals with refunds of excess tax paid by taxpayers.

Bacon is legal in India, but cultural and religious factors affect its consumption and availability.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 44 prescribes presumptive taxation for professionals under specified conditions.

Understand the legal status of borewells in India, including permissions, regulations, and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act Section 275B mandates furnishing of information by specified entities to aid tax administration and compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 122 details the procedure for assessment and reassessment of income under the Act.

Munia finches are conditionally legal in India, subject to wildlife protection laws and local regulations.

IPC Section 488 addresses the offence of making a false statement in a declaration which is legally required.

In India, working as a call boy is not explicitly illegal but may involve legal risks related to solicitation and public decency laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 113 deals with the computation of income in case of non-resident Indians and foreign companies.

Mining Monero (XMR) is legal in India but subject to regulations on cryptocurrency and electricity use.

Companies Act 2013 Section 271 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

IPC Section 368 defines the offence of causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.

Back to back tenders are conditionally legal in India, subject to strict compliance with procurement laws and anti-corruption rules.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 37 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

CPC Section 116 details the procedure for examination of witnesses in civil trials, ensuring fair evidence recording.

CrPC Section 239 details the procedure for discharge of an accused when the Magistrate finds no sufficient grounds for proceeding.

IPC Section 478 addresses the offence of counterfeiting a seal or mark used for official purposes, ensuring authenticity and trust in official documents.

Income Tax Act Section 80CCG offers deductions for investments under the Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme to encourage equity market participation.

IPC Section 395 defines robbery, detailing its scope, punishment, and legal implications under Indian law.

Betting sites are mostly illegal in India, with a few exceptions under state laws and licenses.

Owning a thermal scope in India is conditionally legal with strict regulations and licensing under arms laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 300 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term.

Companies Act 2013 Section 264 covers the resignation process of directors and related compliance requirements.

bottom of page