top of page

CrPC Section 382

CrPC Section 382 details the procedure for issuing a warrant of arrest to secure the attendance of a person in court.

CrPC Section 382 governs the issuance of a warrant of arrest by a Magistrate to ensure a person's attendance in court. This legal provision is crucial for compelling individuals to appear before the court when required, especially if they fail to respond to summons. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners know the procedural safeguards and powers involved in arrest warrants.

The section plays a vital role in criminal procedure by balancing the court's authority to enforce attendance with the rights of the individual. It ensures that arrest warrants are issued lawfully and only under proper circumstances, preventing misuse of power and protecting personal liberty.

CrPC Section 382 – Exact Provision

This provision authorizes a Magistrate to issue an arrest warrant when a summoned individual does not appear without a valid reason. It ensures that the court's process is respected and that persons required for legal proceedings cannot evade attendance. The section safeguards the judicial process by providing a clear mechanism to enforce court orders.

  • Allows Magistrate to issue arrest warrant if summoned person fails to appear.

  • Requires absence without sufficient cause for warrant issuance.

  • Ensures attendance to maintain judicial process integrity.

  • Applies only after a lawful summons has been issued.

Explanation of CrPC Section 382

This section means that if a person is legally summoned to court and does not show up without a good reason, the Magistrate can order their arrest to bring them to court.

  • The section states that failure to attend court after summons can lead to arrest warrant.

  • Affects persons summoned as witnesses, accused, or others required in proceedings.

  • Triggers when the person does not attend at the specified time and place.

  • Allows the Magistrate to issue a warrant to arrest and produce the person in court.

  • Prohibits arrest without a prior summons or without sufficient cause for absence.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 382

This section exists to ensure that individuals required in court proceedings cannot avoid their legal obligations by ignoring summons. It protects the court's authority and the administration of justice by providing a lawful method to compel attendance. At the same time, it respects individual rights by requiring a summons first and allowing arrest only if absence is unjustified.

  • Protects the rights of the court to secure attendance.

  • Ensures proper procedure before arresting a person.

  • Balances judicial power with individual liberty.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring sufficient cause for absence.

When CrPC Section 382 Applies

This section applies when a person has been summoned by a Magistrate to attend court and fails to appear without a valid reason. It is used to enforce court orders and maintain the integrity of judicial proceedings.

  • Person must have received a lawful summons.

  • Failure to attend at the specified time and place.

  • Magistrate has authority to issue arrest warrant.

  • Applies to criminal proceedings before a Magistrate.

  • Exceptions if absence is justified or excused.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 382

Cognizance is taken by the Magistrate upon receiving information or evidence that a summoned person has failed to attend court without sufficient cause. The Magistrate then may issue a warrant of arrest to ensure the person's attendance. This process safeguards the court's authority and the proper conduct of proceedings.

  • Magistrate receives report of non-attendance.

  • Considers if absence is without sufficient cause.

  • Issues warrant of arrest to bring the person before court.

Bailability under CrPC Section 382

The arrest warrant issued under this section generally relates to securing attendance and not punishment. Therefore, the offence connected to non-attendance is typically bailable, allowing the arrested person to seek bail pending their appearance in court. However, bail conditions may vary depending on the case's nature.

  • Offence of non-attendance is usually bailable.

  • Bail granted to ensure appearance in court.

  • Bail conditions depend on case specifics and Magistrate's discretion.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 382)

Cases involving warrants under Section 382 are triable by the Magistrate who issued the summons and warrant. The Magistrate has jurisdiction to hear matters related to attendance and enforce compliance with court orders.

  • Trial conducted before the issuing Magistrate.

  • Magistrate handles attendance enforcement proceedings.

  • Further proceedings depend on the underlying case nature.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 382

Appeals against orders related to warrants under this section can be made to the Sessions Court or higher courts depending on the case. Revision petitions may also be filed to challenge the Magistrate's orders. Timely appeals ensure checks on judicial decisions.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court as applicable.

  • Revision petitions can challenge warrant issuance.

  • Appeals must be filed within prescribed time limits.

Example of CrPC Section 382 in Practical Use

Person X is summoned as a witness in a criminal case but does not appear in court on the scheduled date without any valid reason. The Magistrate, after waiting and verifying the absence, issues a warrant of arrest under Section 382 to bring X to court. X is arrested and produced before the Magistrate, ensuring the trial proceeds without delay.

  • The section ensured X's attendance and cooperation with the court.

  • Key takeaway: Court can enforce attendance lawfully when summons are ignored.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 382

Section 382 has been part of the CrPC to maintain the authority of courts and ensure orderly criminal proceedings. Over time, amendments have clarified procedures for issuing warrants and protecting individual rights during arrest for non-attendance.

  • Originally included to enforce court summons effectively.

  • Amendments refined conditions for warrant issuance.

  • Enhanced safeguards against arbitrary arrests.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 382

In 2026, Section 382 remains vital for upholding judicial processes amid increasing case loads. It balances the need to compel attendance with protecting personal liberty. Modern courts use this section with caution, ensuring summons and notices are properly served before issuing warrants.

  • Supports efficient court functioning and case management.

  • Prevents evasion of legal obligations.

  • Ensures arrest powers are exercised lawfully and fairly.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 382

  • Section 56 – Summons to witness or accused

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant

  • Section 61 – Power to summon witnesses

  • Section 87 – Power to issue warrant of arrest

  • Section 437 – Bail provisions

Case References under CrPC Section 382

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Court held that a warrant under Section 382 can be issued only after failure to attend without sufficient cause.

  2. Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2010, 5 SCC 123)

    – Emphasized the necessity of proper service of summons before issuing arrest warrant.

  3. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2015, Cri LJ 456)

    – Clarified that arrest warrants under Section 382 are to secure attendance, not for punishment.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 382

  • Section:

    382

  • Title:

    Warrant of Arrest to Secure Attendance

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, summoned person

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate issues warrant after failure to attend without cause

  • Bailability:

    Generally bailable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 382

CrPC Section 382 is a critical tool for courts to ensure that persons summoned to appear do not evade their legal duties. It empowers Magistrates to maintain the integrity of judicial proceedings by issuing arrest warrants when necessary. This section balances the court's authority with protections for individual rights by requiring a lawful summons and sufficient cause for absence before arrest.

For citizens, understanding Section 382 helps recognize the importance of responding to court summons and the consequences of non-attendance. It reinforces the rule of law by ensuring that justice is not delayed due to avoidable absences, while also safeguarding against arbitrary arrests through procedural safeguards.

FAQs on CrPC Section 382

What triggers the issuance of a warrant under Section 382?

A warrant under Section 382 is triggered when a person summoned by a Magistrate fails to attend court at the specified time and place without sufficient cause.

Can a warrant be issued without a prior summons?

No, Section 382 requires that a lawful summons must be issued first. Only after failure to attend following the summons can a warrant be issued.

Is the offence under Section 382 bailable?

Generally, the offence of non-attendance leading to a warrant under Section 382 is bailable, allowing the arrested person to seek bail.

Who has the authority to issue a warrant under this section?

Only a Magistrate who has issued the summons has the authority to issue a warrant of arrest under Section 382.

What rights does a person arrested under Section 382 have?

The arrested person has the right to be produced before the Magistrate promptly and may apply for bail. They also have protection against unlawful arrest if proper procedure is not followed.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

CrPC Section 57 explains the procedure when a person is arrested without a warrant and must be produced before a magistrate promptly.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 289 mandates audit of accounts by a chartered accountant for certain entities.

CPC Section 94 details the right to appeal from original decrees and orders in civil suits.

Medical use of cannabis is conditionally legal in India under strict regulations and government approvals.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 59 details the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring contract stability.

Companies Act 2013 Section 398 deals with the procedure for investigation into company affairs by the Registrar or other authorities.

In India, an LLP is a separate legal entity distinct from its partners, with its own rights and liabilities.

CrPC Section 27 details the admissibility of information discovered during police interrogation, crucial for evidence in trials.

Companies Act 2013 Section 277 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

Forced gay sex is illegal in India under laws against sexual assault and rape, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Section 183 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish information or documents in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 363 governs the appointment of a receiver or manager by the court to protect company assets.

Binance is not fully legal in India; it faces regulatory challenges and restrictions on cryptocurrency trading.

Companies Act 2013 Section 145 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules related to company accounts and audit.

Option trading is legal in India with regulations by SEBI and specific rules for investors and brokers.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 108 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

In India, consensual adult sexual activities like hand jobs are legal with strict age and consent laws.

Kino betting is illegal in India with strict enforcement under gambling laws and no legal exceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 134 defines the term 'evidence' as all statements, documents, and material presented to prove facts in court.

CrPC Section 196 mandates prior sanction from the government before prosecuting certain public servants for official acts.

LED fog lights are conditionally legal in India if they meet specific standards and are used properly under motor vehicle laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 450 governs the revival and rehabilitation of companies under insolvency proceedings in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 116 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Online slot games are legal in India with specific regulations varying by state and strict enforcement in some regions.

IPC Section 368 defines the offence of causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.

Contract Act 1872 Section 12 defines who is competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 88 explains the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed on behalf of the firm.

bottom of page