top of page

IPC Section 479

IPC Section 479 defines punishment for using a false document as genuine, protecting authenticity in legal and official matters.

IPC Section 479 addresses the offence of using a false document as if it were genuine. This section is crucial because it protects the integrity of documents that hold legal or official value. Using a forged or counterfeit document knowingly can lead to serious legal consequences under this provision.

The law ensures that individuals cannot deceive others by presenting false documents, which could otherwise lead to fraud, wrongful gain, or damage to others' rights. Understanding this section helps in recognizing the severity of document-related offences in India.

IPC Section 479 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person knowingly uses a forged document as if it were authentic, they commit a criminal offence. The law punishes such acts to prevent misuse of documents that can affect legal rights or obligations.

  • It targets the use of forged documents, not just their creation.

  • Knowledge or reason to believe the document is forged is essential.

  • Punishment can extend up to seven years imprisonment and fine.

  • Applies to all documents with legal or official significance.

Purpose of IPC Section 479

The primary objective of IPC Section 479 is to safeguard the authenticity and trustworthiness of documents used in legal, financial, and official transactions. By penalizing the use of forged documents, the law aims to deter fraudulent activities that could harm individuals or institutions.

  • Protects public and private interests from document fraud.

  • Ensures reliability of documents in judicial and administrative processes.

  • Maintains social and economic order by preventing deception.

Cognizance under IPC Section 479

Cognizance of offences under Section 479 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or report is filed by the aggrieved party or investigating agency. Since the offence involves forgery and document fraud, it is treated seriously.

  • Offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without magistrate’s order.

  • Cognizance can be taken upon police report or complaint.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence that document was knowingly used as genuine despite being forged.

Bail under IPC Section 479

Offences under Section 479 are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving forgery and fraud. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but can be granted by courts.

  • Court considers factors like nature of offence, evidence, and risk of tampering.

  • Accused may apply for anticipatory bail in some cases.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 479 are triable by Sessions Courts because the offence carries imprisonment up to seven years, which is beyond the jurisdiction of Magistrate Courts.

  • Sessions Court tries offences punishable with more than three years imprisonment.

  • Magistrate Court may conduct preliminary inquiry or trial if punishment is less.

  • Special courts may have jurisdiction if related to specific statutes or contexts.

Example of IPC Section 479 in Use

Suppose a person submits a forged property deed to claim ownership of a house. Knowing the document is fake, they use it to register the property in their name. When the rightful owner challenges this, the court can prosecute the offender under Section 479 for using a false document as genuine.

If the accused had unknowingly used the document without knowledge of forgery, they may not be held liable under this section. Intent and knowledge are key factors in determining guilt.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 479

Section 479 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, reflecting the colonial government's intent to protect document authenticity for legal certainty.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to combat forgery-related offences.

  • Has evolved through judicial interpretations clarifying mens rea (knowledge) requirements.

  • Landmark cases have shaped its application in document fraud matters.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 479

In 2025, with increasing digital documentation and electronic records, Section 479 remains vital in addressing forged physical or digital documents used as genuine. Courts have expanded interpretations to include electronic documents under this provision.

  • Applicable to both physical and electronic forged documents.

  • Supports anti-fraud measures in financial and property transactions.

  • Courts emphasize strict proof of knowledge to convict.

Related Sections to IPC Section 479

  • Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 464 – Making a False Document

  • Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

Case References under IPC Section 479

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1960 AIR 550, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of forgery is essential to convict under Section 479.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1977 AIR 1325, SC)

    – Established that mere possession of forged documents without use does not attract Section 479.

  3. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980 AIR 1632, SC)

    – Clarified that use of forged documents must be intentional and for a fraudulent purpose.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 479

  • Section:

    479

  • Title:

    Using False Document as Genuine

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 479

IPC Section 479 plays a critical role in maintaining the sanctity of documents used in legal and official matters. By penalizing the use of forged documents as genuine, it deters fraudulent activities that can undermine trust and cause harm to individuals and institutions.

Its application in modern times extends to both physical and electronic documents, reflecting the evolving nature of fraud. Understanding this section is essential for legal practitioners, businesses, and individuals to safeguard their rights and ensure justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 479

What is the main offence under IPC Section 479?

The offence involves knowingly using a forged document as if it were genuine, which is punishable by imprisonment and fine.

Is IPC Section 479 a bailable offence?

No, it is a non-bailable offence, but bail may be granted at the court's discretion based on the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 479?

Sessions Courts generally have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 479 due to the severity of punishment.

Does Section 479 apply to electronic documents?

Yes, courts have interpreted Section 479 to include forged electronic documents used as genuine.

What is the punishment for using a false document under this section?

The punishment may extend to seven years imprisonment and includes a fine, depending on the case circumstances.

Related Sections

Understand the legality of relationship affairs in India, including rights, restrictions, and social implications under Indian law.

Section 194L of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on income from units of specified mutual funds in India.

Section 206CA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates PAN quoting for certain transactions to avoid higher TDS rates in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 141 governs the appointment, qualifications, and duties of auditors in Indian companies.

Vaping CBD is illegal in India due to strict drug laws and regulations on e-cigarettes and cannabis products.

CrPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in certain cases before any accusation is made.

Annulment in India is legal under specific grounds, distinct from divorce, with strict conditions and judicial enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 457 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Section 206A of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on certain specified payments in India.

Explore whether legal punishments in the USA or India are considered cruel under their laws and human rights standards.

Buying from Banggood is legal in India but subject to customs rules, taxes, and import restrictions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 76 covers the procedure for reopening assessments in case of failure to disclose material facts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 425 governs offences by companies and their liability under Indian corporate law.

IPC Section 502 defines the offence of using a false document for the purpose of cheating or dishonesty.

Understand the legality of photocopying books in India, including copyright rules and exceptions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 8 defines 'assessee' and related terms for tax purposes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 25 bars oral evidence to contradict or vary a written contract's terms.

Income Tax Act Section 271GB imposes penalties for failure to furnish statement of financial transaction or reportable account.

Companies Act 2013 Section 295 governs restrictions on loans and investments by companies to ensure financial prudence.

CrPC Section 292 deals with the punishment for selling or distributing obscene materials, protecting public morality under Indian law.

Flunipam is a prescription medication in India, legal only when prescribed by a doctor and used under medical supervision.

CrPC Section 213 details the procedure for framing charges by the Magistrate after considering the police report and evidence.

IPC Section 337 addresses causing hurt by rash or negligent acts, defining liability for injuries without intent.

Browsing the darknet in India is not illegal, but accessing illegal content or activities on it is prohibited and punishable by law.

Income Tax Act Section 44AC mandates audit for businesses exceeding specified turnover limits to ensure accurate tax compliance.

Discover the legal status of Atomy in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about its operations.

IPC Section 315 defines the offence of causing miscarriage without consent, outlining its scope and punishment to protect women's reproductive rights.

bottom of page