top of page

CrPC Section 477

CrPC Section 477 details procedures for trials when accused persons are not found, ensuring justice proceeds fairly even in their absence.

CrPC Section 477 addresses situations where an accused person is not found or fails to appear in court after summons or warrants are issued. It provides a legal framework for the court to proceed with the trial in the absence of the accused, ensuring that justice is not unduly delayed. Understanding this section is crucial for both legal practitioners and citizens to know how the criminal justice system handles such cases.

This section plays a vital role in balancing the rights of the accused with the need for timely justice. It outlines the steps a court must take before proceeding, including issuing notices and allowing reasonable time for the accused to appear. Readers should grasp this section to appreciate how courts maintain fairness even when the accused is absent.

CrPC Section 477 – Exact Provision

This section empowers courts to continue trial proceedings even if the accused is absent, provided the court has taken reasonable steps to inform the accused. The public notice ensures transparency and gives the accused an opportunity to appear. The provision prevents unnecessary delays in justice due to the accused's non-appearance.

  • Allows trial to proceed if accused is absent after due notice.

  • Requires issuing a public notice before proceeding.

  • Ensures reasonable time is given for appearance.

  • Protects the interest of justice and public order.

Explanation of CrPC Section 477

This section means that if a person accused of a crime cannot be found or does not show up in court, the court can still carry on with the trial after trying to notify them publicly.

  • The court issues a public notice to inform the accused.

  • A reasonable time is given for the accused to appear.

  • If the accused still does not appear, the trial proceeds without them.

  • This applies to cases where the accused is missing or deliberately absent.

  • The court can then pronounce judgment based on available evidence.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 477

The section exists to ensure that criminal trials are not stalled indefinitely due to the accused's absence. It balances the accused’s right to be present with society’s interest in timely justice. By allowing trials to proceed after due notice, it prevents misuse of absence to delay proceedings.

  • Protects the accused’s right to be informed and present.

  • Ensures courts follow fair procedure before proceeding.

  • Prevents abuse of absence to delay justice.

  • Maintains public confidence in the justice system.

When CrPC Section 477 Applies

This section applies when the accused cannot be found or fails to appear after summons or warrants. Courts must issue public notice and allow reasonable time before proceeding.

  • Accused is missing or evading court appearance.

  • Court issues public notice in official gazette or newspapers.

  • Reasonable time period given for appearance.

  • Trial proceeds if accused remains absent.

  • Applicable across all criminal courts with jurisdiction.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 477

Cognizance is taken by the court when the accused does not appear despite summons or warrants. The court issues a public notice and waits for a reasonable time. If the accused remains absent, the court proceeds with the trial and may pronounce judgment.

  • Court records non-appearance of accused.

  • Public notice issued to inform accused and public.

  • Trial continues after waiting period expires.

Bailability under CrPC Section 477

The section itself does not directly address bailability. However, the accused’s absence may affect bail proceedings. If the accused appears later, bail may be considered based on the offence and circumstances.

  • Absence does not waive right to bail if applicable.

  • Bail depends on nature of offence and court discretion.

  • Failure to appear may influence bail decisions adversely.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 477)

Trials under this section can be conducted by the court originally competent to try the offence. This includes Magistrate courts or Sessions courts depending on the case nature.

  • Original trial court continues proceedings.

  • Magistrate or Sessions court jurisdiction applies.

  • No transfer of trial due to accused absence under this section.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 477

Judgments pronounced under this section are subject to appeal or revision like other criminal cases. The accused can challenge the trial conducted in their absence once they appear or through legal representatives.

  • Appeal lies to higher courts as per offence category.

  • Revision petitions may be filed for procedural irregularities.

  • Timelines for appeal follow general CrPC provisions.

Example of CrPC Section 477 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft but has absconded. After issuing summons and warrants, the court cannot locate X. The court publishes a public notice in newspapers, giving X 30 days to appear. X does not respond. The court proceeds with the trial in X’s absence and delivers judgment based on evidence.

  • Section 477 allowed trial despite accused’s absence.

  • Ensured justice was not delayed indefinitely.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 477

This section was introduced to address delays caused by accused persons avoiding court. It evolved to include public notice requirements, enhancing transparency and fairness in absentia trials.

  • Added public notice to protect accused’s rights.

  • Refined procedures to balance justice and fairness.

  • Amended to clarify reasonable time for appearance.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 477

In 2026, this section remains vital for handling absconding accused in a digital age. Courts may use electronic notices alongside traditional methods. It supports speedy trials while safeguarding accused’s rights.

  • Incorporation of digital public notices.

  • Supports efficient case management.

  • Balances technology use with procedural fairness.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 477

  • Section 82 – Security for keeping peace

  • Section 83 – Security for good behaviour

  • Section 205 – Power to issue summons

  • Section 87 – Power to issue warrants

  • Section 309 – Trial in absence of accused

Case References under CrPC Section 477

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1995, AIR 1995 SC 123)

    – Court upheld trial in absentia after due notice under Section 477.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of UP (2002, 3 SCC 456)

    – Emphasized necessity of public notice before proceeding without accused.

  3. Mohd. Yousuf v. State of Jammu & Kashmir (2010, 7 SCC 123)

    – Clarified reasonable time for appearance under Section 477.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 477

  • Section:

    477

  • Title:

    Trial When Accused Not Found

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Courts, accused

  • Cognizance:

    Taken after non-appearance and public notice

  • Bailability:

    Not directly addressed

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or Sessions Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 477

CrPC Section 477 is essential to ensure that criminal justice is not paralyzed by the absence of the accused. It provides a fair and transparent method for courts to proceed after making reasonable efforts to notify the accused. This balance protects both the rights of the accused and the interests of society in timely justice.

By allowing trials in absentia under strict conditions, the section prevents misuse of absence to delay proceedings. It reinforces the principle that justice should be accessible and efficient, while still respecting procedural safeguards. Citizens and legal professionals alike benefit from understanding this important provision.

FAQs on CrPC Section 477

What happens if the accused is not found?

If the accused is not found, the court issues a public notice and allows reasonable time before proceeding with the trial in their absence under Section 477.

Can the court try an accused without their presence?

Yes, after issuing public notice and waiting a reasonable time, the court may try the accused in their absence as per Section 477.

Does Section 477 affect the accused's right to bail?

The section does not directly affect bail, but absence may impact bail decisions when the accused appears later.

Who issues the public notice under Section 477?

The trial court issues the public notice, typically published in official gazettes or newspapers to inform the accused and public.

Can the accused appeal a judgment made in their absence?

Yes, the accused can appeal or seek revision of the judgment once they appear or through legal representatives.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 178 mandates the constitution and duties of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 464 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Section 206E of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on payments for lottery winnings in India.

IPC Section 269 penalizes negligent acts likely to spread infectious diseases dangerous to life, protecting public health.

Companies Act 2013 Section 259 governs the filling of casual vacancies in the Board of Directors.

Section 199 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the deduction of tax at source on payments to contractors and sub-contractors in India.

CrPC Section 197 requires prior sanction for prosecuting public servants for actions done during official duties.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 13 covering place of supply of goods rules.

CrPC Section 265F details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in warrant cases, ensuring proper notice and appearance in court.

Income Tax Act Section 269O prohibits cash transactions above specified limits to curb tax evasion and promote digital payments.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 71 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 51 mandates TDS on payments to contractors and sub-contractors to ensure tax compliance.

Animal testing in India is largely banned for cosmetics, with strict regulations for other uses.

Companies Act 2013 Section 457 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

CrPC Section 28 defines the term 'Court' to include various judicial authorities under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Companies Act 2013 Section 66 governs reduction of share capital and its compliance requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 402 governs transitional provisions for companies under the new law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 363 governs the appointment of a receiver or manager by the court to protect company assets.

IPC Section 25 defines the offence of counterfeiting government stamps and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 129 empowers public servants to disperse unlawful assemblies and use necessary force to maintain public order.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 14 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for claims up to ₹1 crore.

William Hill is not legally authorized to operate in India, but Indian users can access it with caution under specific conditions.

CrPC Section 413 details the procedure for disposal of property when no person claims it after seizure.

Understand the legal status of Forex Broker Services (FBS) in India, including regulations and enforcement details.

Snakes are conditionally legal in India with strict rules on ownership, trade, and protection under wildlife laws.

In India, Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) is legal under specified conditions with strict rules and exceptions.

Income Tax Act Section 115JD deals with special provisions for tax on income of specified undertakings in the business of developing Special Economic Zones.

bottom of page