top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 90

IT Act Section 90 empowers the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and public order.

Section 90 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, authorises the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt any digital information transmitted through any computer resource. This provision is crucial in addressing cyber threats, terrorism, and safeguarding national security in the digital age.

In today's interconnected world, digital communication is widespread, making it essential for law enforcement agencies to have legal tools to prevent and investigate cybercrimes. Section 90 balances individual privacy with the state's responsibility to maintain public order and security.

Information Technology Act Section 90 – Exact Provision

This section grants the government authority to legally access digital information under strict conditions. It applies only when national security or public order is at risk. The power to intercept or decrypt is exercised through official orders, ensuring oversight.

  • Authorises government interception of digital data.

  • Applies for sovereignty, security, public order reasons.

  • Requires official orders for action.

  • Targets prevention of serious offences.

  • Balances security with legal safeguards.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 90

This section empowers authorised government officers to access digital information for specific security reasons.

  • States the government can intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital data.

  • Applies to computer resources including networks and devices.

  • Targets threats to sovereignty, integrity, security, and public order.

  • Triggered by risks of serious cognizable offences.

  • Allows only authorised officers to act under government orders.

  • Prohibits unauthorised interception or monitoring.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 90

The section aims to empower the government to protect national security and public order in the digital environment by legally accessing digital communications when necessary.

  • Protects sovereignty and integrity of India.

  • Prevents cyber terrorism and serious cybercrimes.

  • Ensures lawful interception for security agencies.

  • Regulates digital communication surveillance.

When IT Act Section 90 Applies

This section applies when digital information poses a threat to national security or public order, and lawful interception is required.

  • When digital data relates to security threats or offences.

  • Government or authorised officers invoke the power.

  • Requires official orders based on valid grounds.

  • Evidence must show risk to sovereignty or public order.

  • Does not apply to routine data access without cause.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 90

Section 90 creates a legal framework for government interception of digital information, restricting individual privacy in favour of national security. Penalties apply for unauthorised interception. It complements other laws like the Indian Telegraph Act and IPC provisions on security offences.

  • Grants lawful interception rights to the government.

  • Restricts privacy for security purposes.

  • Penalises unauthorised interception or disclosure.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 90

This section primarily deals with regulatory compliance and criminal liability for unauthorised interception. Offences under this section are cognizable and non-bailable, reflecting the seriousness of security breaches.

  • Imposes criminal liability for unauthorised interception.

  • Offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

  • Arrest may require warrant depending on circumstances.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 90 Applies

The section is relevant during investigation, evidence collection, and trial stages involving digital interception for security offences.

  • Investigation includes authorised interception and data gathering.

  • Digital evidence such as decrypted data is collected.

  • Complaints filed based on intercepted information.

  • Trial considers legality of interception and evidence.

  • Appeals may address procedural compliance.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 90

Unauthorised interception or disclosure under this section attracts imprisonment and fines. Corporate entities may face penalties if involved. Intermediaries must comply with lawful orders or face consequences.

  • Imprisonment up to three years or fine or both.

  • Corporate liability for failure to prevent offences.

  • Intermediary liability for non-compliance.

  • Compensation claims possible for affected parties.

Example of IT Act Section 90 in Practical Use

X, a government officer authorised under Section 90, intercepts encrypted messages suspected to plan a terrorist attack. Using lawful orders, X decrypts and monitors the communication, enabling authorities to prevent the attack. This lawful interception helps maintain public safety while respecting legal procedures.

  • Authorised interception aids in crime prevention.

  • Legal safeguards ensure privacy is not violated arbitrarily.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 90

The IT Act was introduced in 2000 to address emerging cyber issues, including digital communication security. Section 90 reflects the need for lawful interception powers. The 2008 Amendment strengthened provisions for cybercrime and security. Interpretation has evolved with technology and privacy concerns.

  • Introduced to regulate digital communication security.

  • 2008 Amendment enhanced interception powers.

  • Adapted to evolving cyber threats and technology.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 90

In 2026, cybersecurity and data protection are critical. Section 90 supports lawful interception amid growing online threats, fintech, and digital identity systems. It balances enforcement challenges with privacy rights in social media and communication platforms.

  • Supports collection of digital evidence.

  • Ensures online safety and national security.

  • Addresses enforcement challenges in digital era.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 69 – Powers to issue directions for interception or monitoring.

  • IPC Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy, relevant for organised cybercrime.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 90

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 90

  • Section: 90

  • Title: Interception and Monitoring Powers

  • Category: Cybersecurity, Surveillance, Regulation

  • Applies To: Government, authorised officers, digital communication systems

  • Stage: Investigation, evidence collection, trial

  • Legal Effect: Authorises lawful interception, restricts privacy

  • Penalties: Imprisonment, fines, corporate and intermediary liability

Conclusion on IT Act Section 90

Section 90 is a vital legal provision empowering the Indian government to intercept and monitor digital communications for protecting national security and public order. It provides a lawful framework ensuring that interception is conducted under strict conditions and official orders.

This section balances the need for security with individual privacy rights, making it a cornerstone in India's cybersecurity and cybercrime prevention strategy. Its relevance continues to grow with increasing digital communication and cyber threats.

FAQs on IT Act Section 90

What does Section 90 of the IT Act allow the government to do?

Section 90 allows the government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for reasons related to sovereignty, security, public order, or preventing serious offences.

Who can exercise the powers under Section 90?

Only the Central Government or officers specially authorised by it can exercise these powers under official orders.

Is interception under Section 90 legal without government orders?

No, interception or monitoring without proper government orders is illegal and punishable under the IT Act.

What penalties apply for unauthorised interception under Section 90?

Unauthorised interception can lead to imprisonment up to three years, fines, or both, along with possible corporate liability.

How does Section 90 balance privacy and security?

Section 90 permits interception only under strict conditions and official orders, ensuring that privacy is protected while addressing security needs.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 175 mandates the attendance of witnesses and the penalties for non-compliance during criminal proceedings.

IPC Section 505A addresses statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred, or ill-will between groups, aiming to maintain public peace.

Companies Act 2013 Section 70 governs the registration of charges created by companies, ensuring transparency and creditor protection.

IPC Section 121A defines conspiracy to commit offences against the state, addressing plans to disrupt national security.

CrPC Section 422 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by a Magistrate upon police report or complaint.

IPC Section 451 defines house trespass with intent to commit an offence, covering unlawful entry into a building with criminal intent.

CrPC Section 126 empowers police to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public order and prevent violence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 1 outlines the short title, extent, commencement, and application of the Act.

CrPC Section 292 deals with the punishment for selling or distributing obscene materials, protecting public morality under Indian law.

IPC Section 445 defines house-trespass, covering unlawful entry into a property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

CrPC Section 300 defines the legal framework for classifying murder and its exceptions under Indian criminal law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 30 covers admissions by party-opponents, allowing statements against interest as evidence in civil and criminal cases.

CrPC Section 345 defines the procedure for trial of warrant cases by Magistrates, ensuring proper legal process.

Companies Act 2013 Section 161 governs appointment of directors to fill casual vacancies on the board.

IPC Section 508 addresses the offence of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, focusing on maintaining public order and respect.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(32) defines 'deficiency' in services, crucial for consumer rights and complaint resolution.

Companies Act 2013 Section 187 governs the inspection of registers and documents by members and others.

Companies Act 2013 Section 188 governs related party transactions ensuring transparency and fairness in corporate dealings.

CrPC Section 482 empowers High Courts to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice by exercising inherent powers.

IPC Section 44 defines the offence of making a false declaration before a public servant, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 125 mandates maintenance of wives, children, and parents to prevent destitution and neglect.

IPC Section 245 defines the offence of wrongful restraint, preventing a person from moving freely.

IPC Section 348 defines wrongful confinement in a place of worship or religious assembly to outrage religious feelings.

CrPC Section 265G details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

IPC Section 472 defines the offence of using as genuine a forged document, detailing its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 165 defines punishment for public servants who disobey lawful orders, ensuring accountability and rule of law.

bottom of page