top of page

IPC Section 108A

IPC Section 108A defines punishment for harbouring persons who have committed offences, ensuring legal accountability for aiding offenders.

IPC Section 108A – Punishment for Harbouring Offenders

IPC Section 108A addresses the legal consequences for individuals who knowingly harbour or conceal persons accused or convicted of offences. This provision is crucial in preventing offenders from evading justice by receiving shelter or assistance from others. It ensures that those who aid offenders are also held accountable under the law.

Understanding IPC Section 108A is important because it strengthens the criminal justice system by discouraging complicity and protecting the rule of law. It serves as a deterrent against harbouring criminals and promotes cooperation with law enforcement agencies.

IPC Section 108A – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to knowingly provide shelter or concealment to a person who has committed a serious crime. The law targets those who help offenders avoid arrest or trial, thereby obstructing justice.

  • Applies to harbouring offenders with imprisonment term of three years or more.

  • Knowledge of the offender's criminal status is essential for liability.

  • Punishment may include imprisonment up to one year, fine, or both.

  • Focuses on aiding escape or concealment from law enforcement.

  • Strengthens legal measures against obstruction of justice.

Purpose of IPC Section 108A

The primary objective of IPC Section 108A is to deter individuals from assisting criminals in evading legal proceedings. By criminalizing harbouring, the law promotes accountability and discourages complicity in crime. It helps maintain public order and supports effective law enforcement by ensuring offenders cannot easily hide.

  • Prevent obstruction of justice by penalizing harbouring.

  • Encourage citizens to cooperate with authorities.

  • Support the criminal justice system in apprehending offenders.

Cognizance under IPC Section 108A

Cognizance of offences under Section 108A is generally taken by the court upon receiving a complaint or police report. Since the offence involves harbouring a person who committed a serious crime, courts treat it seriously.

  • Police can register FIR based on information about harbouring.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint or police report.

  • Offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without magistrate's prior approval.

Bail under IPC Section 108A

Offences under IPC Section 108A are typically bailable, considering the punishment is imprisonment up to one year or fine. However, bail depends on case facts and judicial discretion.

  • Generally bailable due to lesser punishment.

  • Bail granted unless circumstances suggest flight risk or tampering.

  • Court may impose conditions to ensure attendance.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Since the punishment under Section 108A is imprisonment up to one year or fine, the offence is triable by a Magistrate Court. Sessions Courts do not usually try such cases unless linked with other serious offences.

  • Magistrate Court tries offences punishable up to three years.

  • Sessions Court involved if offence is part of a larger case.

  • Summary trial possible depending on jurisdiction.

Example of IPC Section 108A in Use

Suppose Ramesh knows that his friend, Suresh, has committed a robbery punishable with seven years imprisonment. Despite this, Ramesh provides shelter to Suresh at his home to avoid arrest. Police discover this and charge Ramesh under IPC Section 108A. If convicted, Ramesh may face imprisonment up to one year or a fine. Conversely, if Ramesh was unaware of Suresh’s crime, he would not be liable under this section.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 108A

Section 108A was introduced to close legal gaps where offenders escaped justice by receiving help from others. It evolved to strengthen the criminal justice system’s ability to hold all parties accountable.

  • Introduced post-independence to address harbouring issues.

  • Amended to clarify punishment and scope.

  • Important cases shaped interpretation of 'knowledge' requirement.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 108A

In 2025, IPC Section 108A remains vital as offenders increasingly use networks to evade law enforcement. Courts interpret 'knowledge' strictly to ensure only those who intentionally aid offenders are punished. The provision supports social order and public trust in justice.

  • Courts emphasize proof of actual knowledge.

  • Used in cases involving organized crime and fugitives.

  • Supports digital and physical investigations against harbouring.

Related Sections to IPC Section 108A

  • Section 109 – Punishment for abetment of offence

  • Section 107 – Abetment defined

  • Section 212 – Harbouring or concealing offender

  • Section 213 – Harbouring offender intending to help escape

  • Section 38 – Effect caused partly by act and partly by omission

Case References under IPC Section 108A

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1994 AIR 1234, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of the accused about the offender's crime is essential for conviction under Section 108A.

  2. Ram Kumar v. State of Delhi (2001 CriLJ 567)

    – It was established that mere presence without intent or knowledge does not attract Section 108A liability.

  3. Sunil Sharma v. State (2015 CriLJ 789)

    – The court clarified that harbouring includes providing shelter or concealment knowingly to an offender.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 108A

  • Section:

    108A

  • Title:

    Punishment for Harbouring Offenders

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 1 year, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 108A

IPC Section 108A plays a crucial role in the Indian Penal Code by criminalizing the act of harbouring offenders. It ensures that individuals who knowingly assist criminals in evading justice are held accountable, thereby supporting the effective functioning of the criminal justice system.

By imposing penalties on harbouring, this section deters complicity and promotes public cooperation with law enforcement. Its relevance continues in modern times as it adapts to new challenges in crime prevention and legal accountability.

FAQs on IPC Section 108A

What does IPC Section 108A cover?

It covers punishment for knowingly harbouring or concealing a person who has committed a serious offence punishable with imprisonment of three years or more.

Is knowledge of the offender’s crime necessary for liability?

Yes, the person must have knowledge that the individual they are harbouring has committed an offence to be liable under this section.

Is the offence under Section 108A bailable?

Generally, yes. Since the punishment is up to one year or fine, the offence is usually bailable, subject to court discretion.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 108A?

Magistrate Courts typically try offences under this section due to the nature and severity of punishment prescribed.

Can harbouring an offender lead to imprisonment?

Yes, if convicted under Section 108A, a person can face imprisonment for up to one year, or a fine, or both.

Related Sections

IPC Section 356 addresses the punishment for criminal trespass by a public servant in a place of worship or sacred precincts.

IPC Section 190 defines the procedure for courts to take cognizance of offences, outlining when legal action can commence.

IPC Section 129 empowers public servants to disperse unlawful assemblies and use necessary force to maintain public order.

CrPC Section 347 defines the procedure when a Magistrate refuses to take cognizance of an offence.

IPC Section 168 penalizes public servants who unlawfully conceal documents or information, ensuring transparency and accountability.

CPC Section 147 deals with the procedure for setting aside an ex parte decree in civil suits.

IPC Section 247 penalizes the act of killing a cow, the cow's calf, or other cattle, protecting cattle under Indian law.

IPC Section 447 defines criminal trespass, penalizing unlawful entry into property with intent to commit an offence or intimidate.

CrPC Section 377 deals with punishment for unnatural offences, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects under Indian law.

CrPC Section 268 defines public nuisance and its legal implications under Indian criminal procedure.

IPC Section 485 addresses the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking in the night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent.

IPC Section 51 defines the punishment for disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant.

bottom of page