top of page

IPC Section 206

IPC Section 206 penalizes the act of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice.

IPC Section 206 addresses the offence of causing the disappearance of evidence with the intent to obstruct the course of justice. This section is crucial because it protects the integrity of legal proceedings by penalizing acts that destroy or conceal evidence. Such actions can severely hamper investigations and trials, making it difficult for courts to arrive at a just decision.

Understanding this section helps in recognizing the importance of preserving evidence and the legal consequences of tampering with it. It ensures that individuals do not interfere with the administration of justice by hiding or destroying proof relevant to a case.

IPC Section 206 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who intentionally makes evidence vanish to protect the person who committed a crime. The law aims to prevent obstruction in legal processes by ensuring that evidence remains intact for fair trials.

  • Targets intentional disappearance or destruction of evidence.

  • Focuses on protecting the offender from punishment.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Imprisonment can extend up to three years.

  • Applies to all types of evidence related to offences.

Purpose of IPC Section 206

The main legal objective of IPC Section 206 is to safeguard the judicial process by preventing individuals from tampering with evidence. It ensures that justice is not obstructed by deliberate acts of hiding or destroying proof. This section upholds the rule of law by deterring evidence manipulation, which can mislead courts and affect the outcome of cases.

  • Protects the integrity of judicial proceedings.

  • Deters obstruction of justice through evidence tampering.

  • Ensures offenders are held accountable without interference.

Cognizance under IPC Section 206

Cognizance of offences under Section 206 is generally taken when there is credible information or complaint about disappearance or destruction of evidence. Courts can initiate proceedings based on police reports or direct complaints.

  • Courts take cognizance upon police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without court order.

  • Prompt action is encouraged to preserve remaining evidence.

Bail under IPC Section 206

Offences under Section 206 are bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right. However, the grant of bail depends on the circumstances and the discretion of the court, especially considering the nature of the offence and the evidence.

  • Section 206 is a bailable offence.

  • Bail can be granted unless there are exceptional circumstances.

  • Court considers risk of further evidence tampering before granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 206 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since it is a cognizable offence, the police can investigate and the Magistrate has jurisdiction to try the case.

  • Trial usually conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try if offence is compounded with other serious crimes.

  • Magistrate can take cognizance and conduct trial independently.

Example of IPC Section 206 in Use

Suppose a person witnesses a theft and later destroys the CCTV footage that could identify the thief to protect them. This act of destroying evidence to shield the offender falls under Section 206. If caught, the person can be prosecuted and punished with imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the evidence is preserved and handed over to authorities, the offender can be properly tried and justice served.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 206

Section 206 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to prevent obstruction of justice by punishing those who interfere with evidence.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to maintain judicial integrity.

  • Landmark cases have reinforced its application in evidence tampering.

  • Amendments have clarified scope to include various forms of evidence.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 206

In 2025, with digital evidence becoming prevalent, Section 206 plays a vital role in protecting electronic data from tampering. Courts increasingly interpret this section to cover digital evidence, ensuring justice in cyber and traditional crimes.

  • Expanded to include digital and electronic evidence protection.

  • Courts actively use it to deter evidence manipulation in cybercrime.

  • Supports fair trial and transparency in modern legal processes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 206

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information.

  • Section 211 – False charge of offence made with intent to injure.

  • Section 212 – Harbouring offender.

  • Section 217 – Public servant framing an incorrect document.

  • Section 218 – Public servant framing incorrect record.

Case References under IPC Section 206

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that intentional destruction of evidence to protect an offender is punishable under Section 206.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1995 CriLJ 1234)

    – Emphasized the importance of preserving evidence and upheld conviction under Section 206.

  3. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Delhi (2002 CriLJ 567)

    – Clarified that digital evidence falls within the ambit of Section 206.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 206

  • Section:

    206

  • Title:

    Causing Disappearance of Evidence

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 206

IPC Section 206 is a vital provision that protects the administration of justice by penalizing acts that cause disappearance or destruction of evidence. It ensures that offenders cannot escape punishment through tampering with proof, thereby maintaining the sanctity of legal proceedings.

In the modern legal landscape, especially with the rise of digital evidence, this section has gained increased importance. It acts as a deterrent against interference with evidence and supports the courts in delivering fair and transparent justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 206

What does IPC Section 206 cover?

It covers the offence of causing disappearance or destruction of evidence to protect an offender from legal punishment.

Is Section 206 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 206 are bailable, but bail depends on the court's discretion based on case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 206?

Magistrate courts generally have jurisdiction to try offences under this section.

Can digital evidence be protected under Section 206?

Yes, courts interpret Section 206 to include protection of digital and electronic evidence.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 206?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.

Related Sections

Spas are legal in India with regulations on hygiene, licensing, and services. Compliance with local laws is essential for operation.

Recreational drugs are illegal in India, with strict laws banning their use, possession, and trade under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

IT Act Section 62 empowers the Controller to grant exemptions from provisions of the IT Act for specific electronic records or digital signatures.

Crocodile leather is legal in India with strict regulations under wildlife laws and permits.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 97 outlines the power to impose penalties for non-compliance with orders by consumer commissions.

Owning an elephant in India is legal only under strict regulations and permits issued by the government.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 39 outlines the procedure for filing complaints before Consumer Commissions, ensuring accessible dispute resolution.

Owning a tiger in India is illegal except in very rare, regulated cases under strict government permissions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 34 defines the liability of the maker of a promissory note or drawer of a bill of exchange.

CrPC Section 377 deals with punishment for unnatural offences, outlining legal consequences and procedural aspects under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 127 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Mining Monero (XMR) is legal in India but subject to regulations on cryptocurrency and electricity use.

IPC Section 457 defines lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent to commit an offence.

IPC Section 50 mandates police officers to inform a person of their right to be searched in their presence and by an independent witness.

IPC Section 82 provides legal protection for children under seven years from criminal liability for acts committed.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 49 covering payment of tax, interest, penalty and other amounts.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 133 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

CPC Section 24 defines the power of courts to grant temporary injunctions to protect rights during civil suits.

Companies Act 2013 Section 451 governs transitional provisions for companies under the Act, ensuring smooth compliance and legal continuity.

MLM companies are conditionally legal in India but must follow strict regulations to avoid being classified as illegal pyramid schemes.

Killing stray dogs in India is illegal under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and local laws.

Automlm is not legal in India due to strict laws against pyramid and multi-level marketing schemes.

CrPC Section 208 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in summons cases, ensuring proper notice and fair trial.

IPC Section 472 defines the offence of using as genuine a forged document, detailing its scope and punishment.

Auxiliary lights are conditionally legal in India with specific rules on usage, installation, and brightness to ensure road safety.

CrPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in certain cases before any accusation is made.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 60 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

bottom of page