top of page

IPC Section 206

IPC Section 206 penalizes the act of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice.

IPC Section 206 addresses the offence of causing the disappearance of evidence with the intent to obstruct the course of justice. This section is crucial because it protects the integrity of legal proceedings by penalizing acts that destroy or conceal evidence. Such actions can severely hamper investigations and trials, making it difficult for courts to arrive at a just decision.

Understanding this section helps in recognizing the importance of preserving evidence and the legal consequences of tampering with it. It ensures that individuals do not interfere with the administration of justice by hiding or destroying proof relevant to a case.

IPC Section 206 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who intentionally makes evidence vanish to protect the person who committed a crime. The law aims to prevent obstruction in legal processes by ensuring that evidence remains intact for fair trials.

  • Targets intentional disappearance or destruction of evidence.

  • Focuses on protecting the offender from punishment.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Imprisonment can extend up to three years.

  • Applies to all types of evidence related to offences.

Purpose of IPC Section 206

The main legal objective of IPC Section 206 is to safeguard the judicial process by preventing individuals from tampering with evidence. It ensures that justice is not obstructed by deliberate acts of hiding or destroying proof. This section upholds the rule of law by deterring evidence manipulation, which can mislead courts and affect the outcome of cases.

  • Protects the integrity of judicial proceedings.

  • Deters obstruction of justice through evidence tampering.

  • Ensures offenders are held accountable without interference.

Cognizance under IPC Section 206

Cognizance of offences under Section 206 is generally taken when there is credible information or complaint about disappearance or destruction of evidence. Courts can initiate proceedings based on police reports or direct complaints.

  • Courts take cognizance upon police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without court order.

  • Prompt action is encouraged to preserve remaining evidence.

Bail under IPC Section 206

Offences under Section 206 are bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right. However, the grant of bail depends on the circumstances and the discretion of the court, especially considering the nature of the offence and the evidence.

  • Section 206 is a bailable offence.

  • Bail can be granted unless there are exceptional circumstances.

  • Court considers risk of further evidence tampering before granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 206 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since it is a cognizable offence, the police can investigate and the Magistrate has jurisdiction to try the case.

  • Trial usually conducted by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try if offence is compounded with other serious crimes.

  • Magistrate can take cognizance and conduct trial independently.

Example of IPC Section 206 in Use

Suppose a person witnesses a theft and later destroys the CCTV footage that could identify the thief to protect them. This act of destroying evidence to shield the offender falls under Section 206. If caught, the person can be prosecuted and punished with imprisonment or fine. Conversely, if the evidence is preserved and handed over to authorities, the offender can be properly tried and justice served.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 206

Section 206 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was introduced to prevent obstruction of justice by punishing those who interfere with evidence.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to maintain judicial integrity.

  • Landmark cases have reinforced its application in evidence tampering.

  • Amendments have clarified scope to include various forms of evidence.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 206

In 2025, with digital evidence becoming prevalent, Section 206 plays a vital role in protecting electronic data from tampering. Courts increasingly interpret this section to cover digital evidence, ensuring justice in cyber and traditional crimes.

  • Expanded to include digital and electronic evidence protection.

  • Courts actively use it to deter evidence manipulation in cybercrime.

  • Supports fair trial and transparency in modern legal processes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 206

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information.

  • Section 211 – False charge of offence made with intent to injure.

  • Section 212 – Harbouring offender.

  • Section 217 – Public servant framing an incorrect document.

  • Section 218 – Public servant framing incorrect record.

Case References under IPC Section 206

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that intentional destruction of evidence to protect an offender is punishable under Section 206.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1995 CriLJ 1234)

    – Emphasized the importance of preserving evidence and upheld conviction under Section 206.

  3. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Delhi (2002 CriLJ 567)

    – Clarified that digital evidence falls within the ambit of Section 206.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 206

  • Section:

    206

  • Title:

    Causing Disappearance of Evidence

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 206

IPC Section 206 is a vital provision that protects the administration of justice by penalizing acts that cause disappearance or destruction of evidence. It ensures that offenders cannot escape punishment through tampering with proof, thereby maintaining the sanctity of legal proceedings.

In the modern legal landscape, especially with the rise of digital evidence, this section has gained increased importance. It acts as a deterrent against interference with evidence and supports the courts in delivering fair and transparent justice.

FAQs on IPC Section 206

What does IPC Section 206 cover?

It covers the offence of causing disappearance or destruction of evidence to protect an offender from legal punishment.

Is Section 206 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 206 are bailable, but bail depends on the court's discretion based on case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 206?

Magistrate courts generally have jurisdiction to try offences under this section.

Can digital evidence be protected under Section 206?

Yes, courts interpret Section 206 to include protection of digital and electronic evidence.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 206?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.

Related Sections

CPC Section 49 mandates that all decrees must be signed by the presiding judge to be valid and enforceable.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 105 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

In India, owning and carrying a balisong (butterfly knife) is illegal under arms laws with strict enforcement and no general exceptions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 76 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder under the Act.

IT Act Section 67A prohibits publishing or transmitting sexually explicit material in electronic form, addressing child pornography and protecting minors online.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 114 covering powers of inspection, search, and seizure.

Understand the legal status of Alibaba in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

CPC Section 53 details the procedure for execution of decrees, ensuring proper enforcement of civil court orders.

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

Companies Act 2013 Section 107 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

Contract Act 1872 Section 44 explains the liability of sureties in contracts of guarantee and their rights.

Flying DJI Tello drones in India is legal with compliance to DGCA drone rules and local regulations.

Section 196 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source (TDS) on payments to non-residents in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 11 defines when facts become relevant by making other facts more or less probable in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 428 details the procedure for the disposal of property when no person claims it during investigation.

Zodiac Casino is not legally permitted in India; online gambling laws restrict such platforms without proper licensing.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 64 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, crucial for fair criminal trials.

Converting religion is legal in India, but it must be voluntary without coercion or fraud under Indian law.

Football betting in India is largely illegal except in certain states with specific regulations and exceptions.

CrPC Section 236 details the procedure for committing accused persons to Sessions Court for trial after preliminary inquiry.

Discover the legal status of offline poker in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement practices across states.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 58 covering refund procedures and compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 18 governs the registration of charges created by companies, ensuring proper documentation and public notice.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 33AB provides deduction for profits of specified undertakings in free trade zones.

Income Tax Act Section 80ID offers deductions for profits from industrial undertakings in specified backward areas.

IPC Section 285 penalizes negligent acts likely to cause danger to human life or public safety, ensuring public protection.

bottom of page