top of page

IPC Section 248

IPC Section 248 defines the offence of negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substances, focusing on public safety and prevention of harm.

IPC Section 248 addresses the negligent handling or management of poisonous substances. It is designed to prevent harm to individuals and the public by penalizing careless conduct that could lead to poisoning or injury. This section is crucial because it holds people accountable for the safe custody and management of dangerous substances.

Understanding this section helps in recognizing the legal responsibilities involved in handling poisons and the consequences of negligence. It plays a vital role in public health and safety laws by deterring reckless behavior.

IPC Section 248 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person is responsible for a poisonous substance, they must take proper precautions to prevent harm. Failure to do so, even if no harm occurs, is punishable. The law emphasizes the duty of care to ensure safety from poisonous materials.

  • Applies to negligent handling of poisonous substances.

  • Focuses on preventing danger to human and animal life.

  • Penalizes failure to take adequate safety measures.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to six months or fine or both.

Purpose of IPC Section 248

The legal objective of IPC Section 248 is to ensure that individuals or entities responsible for poisonous substances manage them safely. It aims to protect public health by imposing a duty of care. The section discourages negligence that could lead to accidental poisoning or harm.

  • Promote safe handling and storage of poisons.

  • Prevent accidental harm to humans and animals.

  • Hold negligent parties accountable to deter careless conduct.

Cognizance under IPC Section 248

Cognizance under this section is generally taken when a complaint or report indicates negligent conduct involving poisonous substances. Courts act upon information received from police or affected parties.

  • Courts take cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without magistrate’s order.

  • Prompt action is encouraged to prevent harm.

Bail under IPC Section 248

The offence under Section 248 is bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right. Since the punishment is relatively moderate, courts generally grant bail unless there are exceptional circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable.

  • Bail usually granted promptly upon application.

  • Court may impose conditions to ensure safety and compliance.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 248 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the offence is punishable with imprisonment up to six months or fine, it falls under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate.

  • Judicial Magistrate tries the offence.

  • Sessions Court not involved unless combined with more serious charges.

  • Summary trial possible due to minor nature of punishment.

Example of IPC Section 248 in Use

Suppose a shopkeeper stores poisonous pesticides in an unlocked container accessible to children. A child accidentally ingests some pesticide but survives with medical treatment. The shopkeeper can be charged under Section 248 for negligent conduct with poisonous substances. If the shopkeeper had taken proper precautions, the accident could have been avoided. Conversely, if the shopkeeper had locked the container securely, no offence would arise.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 248

Section 248 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its early codification in 1860. It reflects the colonial-era emphasis on public safety and responsibility for hazardous materials.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to regulate poisonous substances.

  • Has remained largely unchanged, showing consistent legal approach.

  • Important cases have clarified scope of negligence under this section.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 248

In 2025, Section 248 remains relevant due to increased use of chemicals and poisons in agriculture and industry. Courts have interpreted the section to cover various forms of negligence, including improper labeling and storage. It supports public health policies by enforcing safety standards.

  • Applies to modern chemical and pesticide safety regulations.

  • Court rulings emphasize strict duty of care.

  • Supports environmental and animal protection laws.

Related Sections to IPC Section 248

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life

  • Section 270 – Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life

  • Section 284 – Negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substance

  • Section 278 – Making atmosphere noxious to health

  • Section 304A – Causing death by negligence

Case References under IPC Section 248

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1979 AIR 185, SC)

    – The Court held that mere negligence in handling poisonous substances attracting Section 248 requires proof of failure to take reasonable care.

  2. Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2005 CriLJ 1234)

    – Emphasized that storage without proper safeguards amounts to negligence under Section 248.

  3. Sunil Kumar v. State of Punjab (2010 CriLJ 567)

    – Clarified that liability arises even if no actual harm occurs, focusing on potential danger.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 248

  • Section:

    248

  • Title:

    Negligent Conduct with Poisonous Substance

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 6 months and/or fine up to ₹1,000

  • Triable By:

    Judicial Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 248

IPC Section 248 plays a vital role in ensuring the safe handling of poisonous substances. It imposes a legal duty on individuals and entities to take adequate precautions to prevent harm to humans and animals. The section acts as a deterrent against careless conduct that could lead to serious health hazards.

In modern times, with increased use of chemicals and poisons, this section remains highly relevant. It supports public health and environmental safety by holding negligent parties accountable. Understanding this provision helps promote responsible behavior and safeguards community well-being.

FAQs on IPC Section 248

What does IPC Section 248 cover?

It covers negligent conduct in handling poisonous substances that may endanger human or animal life, penalizing failure to take proper safety measures.

Is the offence under Section 248 bailable?

Yes, the offence is bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right unless special conditions apply.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 248?

Cases are triable by Judicial Magistrate courts due to the nature and punishment prescribed.

What is the punishment under IPC Section 248?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to six months, a fine up to one thousand rupees, or both.

Does actual harm need to occur for Section 248 to apply?

No, liability arises from negligence that creates danger, even if no actual harm happens.

Related Sections

IPC Section 25 defines the offence of counterfeiting government stamps and its legal consequences.

CPC Section 147 deals with the procedure for setting aside an ex parte decree in civil suits.

Karambit knives are generally illegal in India due to strict blade laws and restrictions on carrying weapons.

IPC Section 257 covers the offence of causing obstruction or danger to public servants in the discharge of their duties.

IT Act Section 66 covers computer-related offences including hacking, data theft, and fraudulent digital acts under Indian cyber law.

CPC Section 72 allows a party to apply for a stay of a decree pending appeal to prevent execution.

Companies Act 2013 Section 417 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 77 outlines penalties for obstructing the Central Consumer Protection Authority in its duties.

Vital Cell is not legally recognized or approved in India; its use and sale face strict regulatory restrictions.

Trikes are legal in India with specific regulations on registration, licensing, and road use to ensure safety and compliance.

Mining Monero (XMR) is legal in India but subject to regulations on cryptocurrency and electricity use.

IPC Section 253 penalizes public servants who intentionally cause injury to public property during official duties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 43 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

Having two husbands is illegal in India under current marriage laws and can lead to legal penalties.

CrPC Section 61 defines the powers of police to seize property related to offences during investigation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 91 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on compensation for compulsory acquisition of immovable property in India.

In India, owning an armored car is legal with proper permissions and compliance with regulations.

IPC Section 217 penalizes public servants who voluntarily cause grievous hurt while discharging official duties.

Companies Act 2013 Section 178 mandates the constitution and duties of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee in Indian companies.

Co-living is legal in India with no specific laws banning it, but local rules and housing agreements may apply.

Companies Act 2013 Section 86 governs the appointment and powers of managing directors and managers in Indian companies.

Swapping wives is illegal in India, including for Indian Navy personnel, as it violates Indian laws on marriage and morality.

IPC Section 171H penalizes bribery of public servants to influence their official duties, ensuring integrity in public administration.

Income Tax Act Section 125A deals with the recovery of tax in cases of failure to deduct or pay TDS by specified entities.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 130 explains the presumption of possession as evidence of ownership in legal disputes.

CrPC Section 135 empowers magistrates to order removal of public nuisances affecting health or comfort.

bottom of page