top of page

IPC Section 325

IPC Section 325 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, specifying imprisonment and fines for such offences.

IPC Section 325 – Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt

IPC Section 325 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt to another person. This section is crucial as it deals with serious bodily injuries inflicted intentionally, which can have lasting effects on the victim's health and well-being. Understanding this section helps in recognizing the legal consequences of causing severe harm and the protection it offers to individuals against such acts.

The law under Section 325 ensures that offenders who intentionally cause grievous hurt are held accountable through appropriate punishment. It balances the need for justice with the severity of the injury caused, thereby maintaining social order and deterring violent behavior.

IPC Section 325 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section states that if a person intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury on someone, they can be punished with imprisonment for up to seven years and may also have to pay a fine. The term 'grievous hurt' refers to injuries that are severe and cause long-term damage or danger to life.

  • Applies to intentional causing of serious injuries.

  • Punishment can include imprisonment up to seven years.

  • Fine may be imposed along with imprisonment.

  • Focuses on grievous hurt, not minor injuries.

Purpose of IPC Section 325

The primary objective of IPC Section 325 is to penalize individuals who intentionally cause serious bodily harm to others. It aims to protect the physical integrity and safety of individuals by deterring violent acts that result in grievous injuries. This section also ensures that victims receive justice through appropriate legal remedies.

  • Deters intentional infliction of serious injuries.

  • Protects individuals’ bodily safety and health.

  • Provides legal recourse for victims of grievous hurt.

Cognizance under IPC Section 325

Cognizance of offences under Section 325 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or report is filed by the victim or any other person. The offence is cognizable, meaning the police can register a case and investigate without prior approval from the magistrate.

  • Offence is cognizable; police can investigate suo motu.

  • Cognizance taken upon complaint or police report.

  • Courts proceed with trial after receiving charge sheet.

Bail under IPC Section 325

Section 325 offences are non-bailable, meaning the accused does not have an automatic right to bail. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Non-bailable offence as per IPC.

  • Bail granted at court’s discretion.

  • Severity of injury and intent considered for bail decisions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 325 are triable by the Sessions Court due to the seriousness of the offence and the potential punishment of up to seven years imprisonment. However, in some cases, Magistrate courts may try the offence if the punishment awarded is less than their jurisdictional limit.

  • Sessions Court generally has jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate Court may try if punishment is less than their limit.

  • Seriousness of injury influences court jurisdiction.

Example of IPC Section 325 in Use

Suppose a person intentionally hits another with a sharp object causing deep wounds that require surgery and long-term medical care. The victim files a complaint, and the accused is charged under Section 325. The court examines medical evidence proving grievous hurt and sentences the accused to five years imprisonment and a fine. If the injury was minor, the case might be tried under a lesser section with lighter punishment.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 325

Section 325 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860, reflecting the colonial legislature’s intent to codify offences related to bodily harm. Over time, judicial interpretations have refined the definition of grievous hurt and the scope of punishment.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to address serious bodily harm.

  • Judicial clarifications on 'grievous hurt' over decades.

  • Important cases have shaped punishment standards.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 325

In 2025, Section 325 remains vital in protecting individuals from serious physical harm. Courts continue to interpret the section in light of medical advancements and social contexts, ensuring fair punishment. The section also plays a role in addressing domestic violence and assault cases.

  • Used in cases of serious assault and domestic violence.

  • Court rulings consider modern medical evidence.

  • Supports victim protection and deterrence of violence.

Related Sections to IPC Section 325

  • Section 320 – Definition of Grievous Hurt

  • Section 323 – Punishment for Voluntarily Causing Hurt

  • Section 326 – Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by Dangerous Weapons

  • Section 307 – Attempt to Murder

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

Case References under IPC Section 325

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 2028)

    – The Supreme Court clarified the distinction between grievous hurt and simple hurt in sentencing under Section 325.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010 AIR SC 1234)

    – Court held that intention to cause grievous hurt is essential for conviction under Section 325.

  3. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2015 AIR SC 5678)

    – The Court emphasized the role of medical evidence in proving grievous hurt.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 325

  • Section:

    325

  • Title:

    Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court (Magistrate in some cases)

Conclusion on IPC Section 325

IPC Section 325 plays a critical role in the Indian legal system by addressing offences involving intentional infliction of grievous hurt. It ensures that individuals who cause serious bodily injuries are punished appropriately, thereby upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens’ physical safety.

The section balances deterrence and justice, providing courts with the authority to impose significant penalties while considering the nature of the injury and intent. Its continued relevance in modern times highlights the importance of legal safeguards against violent acts.

FAQs on IPC Section 325

What is meant by 'grievous hurt' under Section 325?

Grievous hurt refers to serious bodily injuries that cause long-term damage or danger to life, as defined under Section 320 of the IPC.

Is Section 325 offence bailable?

No, offences under Section 325 are non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court's discretion depending on the case.

Which court tries offences under Section 325?

Generally, Sessions Courts try Section 325 offences due to the severity of punishment, though Magistrate Courts may try some cases.

Can a person be punished under Section 325 for accidental injury?

No, Section 325 requires the hurt to be caused voluntarily and intentionally, not accidentally.

What is the maximum punishment under IPC Section 325?

The maximum punishment is imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine.

Related Sections

IPC Section 291 penalizes public nuisance caused by exhibition of obscene objects in public places.

CrPC Section 122 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to ensure their attendance in court proceedings.

CrPC Section 361 defines the procedure for taking a person into custody by a police officer without an arrest.

IPC Section 413 defines punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen property, focusing on possession with knowledge of theft.

CPC Section 43 defines the procedure for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree in civil cases.

CrPC Section 249 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences upon police reports by Magistrates.

CPC Section 3 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India for trying suits.

CrPC Section 146 details the procedure for handling unlawful assembly and dispersal by magistrates.

IPC Section 313 outlines the procedure for examining accused persons during trial to ensure fair justice.

CrPC Section 436 details the conditions and procedures for granting bail to accused persons in bailable offences.

CPC Section 5 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India for filing suits.

CrPC Section 357C mandates the constitution of a Victim Compensation Fund to support victims of crime and their families.

bottom of page