top of page

IPC Section 212

IPC Section 212 defines the offence of harboring or concealing a known offender to prevent their apprehension.

IPC Section 212 addresses the crime of knowingly harboring or concealing a person who has committed an offence. This section is crucial because it helps law enforcement agencies apprehend offenders by penalizing those who aid in evading arrest. It ensures that individuals cannot shield criminals from justice by providing them shelter or hiding their whereabouts.

Understanding this section is important for both legal professionals and the general public, as it clarifies the responsibilities of citizens in cooperating with law enforcement and discourages complicity in criminal activities.

IPC Section 212 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to knowingly hide or shelter someone who has committed a crime. The law targets those who help offenders avoid arrest by providing them refuge or assistance. The punishment can include imprisonment, a fine, or both, depending on the case.

  • Applies to persons who knowingly harbor or conceal offenders.

  • Harboring is done to prevent apprehension by authorities.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Focuses on aiding offenders after the commission of a crime.

  • Requires knowledge or reasonable belief of the person's guilt.

Purpose of IPC Section 212

The main legal objective of IPC Section 212 is to deter people from assisting criminals in evading law enforcement. By penalizing those who harbor offenders, the law strengthens the criminal justice system's ability to bring culprits to trial. It promotes public cooperation with police investigations and discourages complicity in crime.

  • To prevent obstruction of justice by shielding offenders.

  • To encourage citizens to report and not protect criminals.

  • To uphold the rule of law and ensure offenders face trial.

Cognizance under IPC Section 212

Cognizance of an offence under Section 212 is generally taken by the court when a complaint or police report is filed. The offence is cognizable, meaning the police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can initiate investigation suo moto or on complaint.

  • Cognizable offence, so police have authority to act immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance upon receiving charge sheet or complaint.

Bail under IPC Section 212

Offences under IPC Section 212 are generally bailable. The accused who is charged with harboring an offender can apply for bail, and the court usually grants it unless there are special circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable, allowing release on bail.

  • Bail conditions depend on case facts and court discretion.

  • Early bail helps prevent unnecessary detention of accused persons.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 212 are triable by a Magistrate’s court. Since the punishment is up to three years, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Magistrate courts handle trials under Section 212.

  • Sessions Court jurisdiction not required due to lower punishment.

  • Summary trial possible depending on state laws.

Example of IPC Section 212 in Use

Suppose Ram knows that his friend Shyam committed theft and is hiding at Ram’s house to avoid arrest. Ram provides shelter and food to Shyam, preventing the police from finding him. When the police discover this, Ram can be charged under IPC Section 212 for harboring a known offender.

If Ram had no knowledge of Shyam’s crime, he would not be liable. However, since Ram knowingly concealed Shyam, he faces punishment. This example shows the importance of knowledge or belief about the offence for Section 212 to apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 212

Section 212 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the problem of offenders escaping justice with help from accomplices or sympathizers.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to prevent obstruction of justice.

  • Has been amended to clarify the scope of harboring and concealment.

  • Landmark cases have interpreted the requirement of knowledge or belief.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 212

In 2025, IPC Section 212 remains vital in combating crime by discouraging sheltering of offenders. Courts have emphasized the need for clear proof of knowledge or belief before convicting under this section. It also plays a role in cybercrime and organized crime cases where offenders rely on networks for concealment.

  • Courts require strong evidence of harboring with knowledge.

  • Used in cases involving organized crime and cyber offences.

  • Supports law enforcement in timely apprehension of criminals.

Related Sections to IPC Section 212

  • Section 211 – False charge of offence

  • Section 213 – Harboring offender knowing a different offence

  • Section 214 – Concealing birth of a child

  • Section 215 – Concealing evidence of offence

  • Section 216 – Harbouring deserters

  • Section 217 – Harboring escaped prisoners

Case References under IPC Section 212

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde (1990 AIR 713, SC)

    – The Supreme Court held that mere presence is not harboring; active concealment with knowledge is required.

  2. Rameshwar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1984 AIR 148, SC)

    – Knowledge or reason to believe is essential to establish offence under Section 212.

  3. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2001 CriLJ 3450, Raj HC)

    – Providing shelter to a known offender to evade arrest constitutes harboring under Section 212.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 212

  • Section:

    212

  • Title:

    Harboring a Known Offender

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 212

IPC Section 212 plays a crucial role in the Indian criminal justice system by penalizing those who aid offenders in evading arrest. It ensures that criminals cannot escape punishment simply by relying on others to hide them. This section promotes accountability and cooperation with law enforcement agencies.

Its clear focus on knowledge or reasonable belief protects innocent persons from wrongful prosecution. In modern times, Section 212 continues to be relevant in addressing traditional crimes as well as new challenges like cybercrime. Understanding this section helps citizens recognize their legal duties and supports the rule of law.

FAQs on IPC Section 212

What does IPC Section 212 cover?

It covers the offence of harboring or concealing a person known to have committed a crime to prevent their arrest.

Is harboring an offender under Section 212 a bailable offence?

Yes, it is generally bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail during trial.

What punishment does IPC Section 212 prescribe?

It prescribes imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both, depending on the case.

Who tries offences under IPC Section 212?

Magistrate courts have jurisdiction to try offences under this section.

Does Section 212 apply if the person did not know about the offence?

No, the person must know or have reason to believe that the individual is guilty of an offence to be liable under Section 212.

Related Sections

Buying weed online is illegal in India with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions for recreational use.

In India, domestication of tigers is illegal under wildlife protection laws with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

Contract Act 1872 Section 29 defines the legality of agreements, prohibiting contracts with unlawful consideration or objects.

Online trading in India is legal with regulations by SEBI and RBI, requiring compliance and registration for safe trading.

CPC Section 92 empowers courts to order temporary injunctions to prevent harm during civil suits.

Brothels are illegal in India, but prostitution laws vary with strict enforcement and some exceptions.

Pregnancy control tablets are legal in India with conditions and prescriptions under medical supervision.

CPC Section 158 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

Shotguns are conditionally legal in India with strict licensing under the Arms Act, 1959 and related rules.

Companies Act 2013 Section 250 governs the appointment and powers of the liquidator during company winding-up.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245E defines the procedure for set-off and carry forward of tax refunds against outstanding demands.

CrPC Section 20 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where offences occur.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 122 covering offences and penalties under CGST Act.

Buying turtles in India is conditionally legal with strict regulations to protect wildlife and prevent illegal trade.

Ozone therapy in India is legal with regulations; learn about its use, restrictions, and enforcement in medical practice.

CrPC Section 241 details the procedure for issuing summons for appearance in summons cases, ensuring proper notice to accused persons.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 31 deals with the treatment of capital assets converted into stock-in-trade.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(6) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and dispute resolution.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(43) defines 'product liability' and its scope under the Act.

Explore the legality of Best Gore in India, including laws on violent content, censorship, and online restrictions.

Shell companies are conditionally legal in India but face strict regulations to prevent misuse for illegal activities.

IPC Section 315 defines the offence of causing miscarriage without consent, outlining its scope and punishment to protect women's reproductive rights.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54EE offers exemption on capital gains invested in specified units within 6 months.

CrPC Section 357B mandates the constitution of Victim Compensation Fund to aid victims of crimes and their families.

Companies Act 2013 Section 408 mandates the auditor's report submission to the Registrar of Companies within prescribed timelines.

Companies Act 2013 Section 9 governs the effect of registration of a company and its legal status.

CrPC Section 66 details the procedure for police to seize property related to offences, ensuring lawful custody and protection of evidence.

bottom of page