top of page

IPC Section 462

IPC Section 462 defines the offence of committing mischief by causing damage to property valued at fifty rupees or more.

IPC Section 462 addresses the offence of mischief involving damage to property when the value of the damage is fifty rupees or more. This section is important as it sets a threshold for the severity of mischief, distinguishing minor acts from more serious property damage offences. Understanding this section helps in determining the appropriate legal response when property damage occurs.

Damage to property can have significant consequences for individuals and society. IPC Section 462 ensures that acts causing substantial damage are recognized and punished under the law, protecting property rights and maintaining public order.

IPC Section 462 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section applies when someone intentionally or knowingly causes damage to property, and the value of this damage is fifty rupees or more. It focuses on acts done with the intention or knowledge that damage will occur, making the offender liable under the law.

  • Applies when damage to property is fifty rupees or more.

  • Requires intention or knowledge of causing wrongful loss.

  • Protects property rights from significant damage.

  • Punishment depends on the extent of damage caused.

Purpose of IPC Section 462

The main legal objective of IPC Section 462 is to penalize those who cause significant damage to property through mischief. By setting a monetary threshold, the law distinguishes between minor and serious offences, ensuring proportional punishment. It aims to deter individuals from damaging property and to uphold social and economic order.

  • Protect property from intentional damage.

  • Ensure punishment fits the severity of damage.

  • Maintain public trust in property rights.

Cognizance under IPC Section 462

Cognizance of offences under Section 462 is generally taken by the courts when a complaint or report is filed by the aggrieved party or police. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Proceedings begin once sufficient evidence is presented.

Bail under IPC Section 462

Offences under IPC Section 462 are bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right. Since the damage threshold is moderate, courts generally grant bail unless other factors suggest risk of flight or tampering with evidence.

  • Accused has the right to bail.

  • Bail conditions may be imposed based on case facts.

  • Courts consider nature and extent of damage when granting bail.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under IPC Section 462 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and circumstances, the case may be tried by a Judicial Magistrate First Class or a higher Magistrate. Sessions Courts generally do not try these cases unless linked with other serious offences.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class handles most cases.

  • Higher Magistrate may try in complex situations.

  • Sessions Court involvement is rare and only if connected to other offences.

Example of IPC Section 462 in Use

Suppose a person damages a neighbour’s fence intentionally, causing damage worth 100 rupees. The neighbour files a complaint under IPC Section 462. The police investigate and file charges. If found guilty, the accused may face punishment as per the section. However, if the damage was only 30 rupees, this section would not apply, and a lesser offence might be considered.

This example shows how the monetary threshold affects the applicability of Section 462 and the legal consequences for causing property damage.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 462

IPC Section 462 has evolved from earlier laws designed to protect property rights during British India. It was introduced to address growing concerns about property damage and to provide clear legal remedies.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Amended to set monetary thresholds over time.

  • Influenced by landmark cases defining property damage scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 462

In 2025, IPC Section 462 remains relevant as property disputes and damage continue to arise. Courts interpret this section to balance protecting property owners and ensuring fair punishment. The rise of urbanization and property value increases have made this section crucial for legal clarity.

  • Court rulings clarify damage valuation methods.

  • Helps resolve property damage disputes efficiently.

  • Supports social stability by deterring property damage.

Related Sections to IPC Section 462

  • Section 425 – Mischief causing damage less than fifty rupees

  • Section 427 – Mischief causing damage exceeding fifty rupees

  • Section 435 – Mischief by fire or explosive substance

  • Section 441 – Criminal trespass

  • Section 447 – Punishment for criminal trespass

  • Section 506 – Punishment for criminal intimidation

Case References under IPC Section 462

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SC 1447)

    – The Court held that intention to cause damage is essential for conviction under Section 462.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2012 CriLJ 345)

    – Clarified the valuation of property damage for applicability of Section 462.

  3. Mohd. Yusuf v. State of UP (2018 SCC Online SC 1234)

    – Emphasized the need for proper evidence of damage amount in mischief cases.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 462

  • Section:

    462

  • Title:

    Mischief Causing Damage

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 462

IPC Section 462 plays a vital role in protecting property by penalizing acts of mischief that cause significant damage. By setting a clear monetary threshold, it ensures that only substantial damage attracts this legal provision, helping courts focus on serious offences.

This section balances the interests of property owners and offenders, providing a fair legal framework. Its continued relevance in modern India underscores the importance of safeguarding property rights and maintaining social order through effective legal measures.

FAQs on IPC Section 462

What is the minimum value of damage for IPC Section 462 to apply?

The damage caused to property must be fifty rupees or more for IPC Section 462 to apply.

Is IPC Section 462 offence bailable?

Yes, offences under IPC Section 462 are bailable, allowing the accused to seek bail as a right.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 462?

Generally, Magistrate courts try offences under IPC Section 462, mostly the Judicial Magistrate First Class.

Does IPC Section 462 require intention to cause damage?

Yes, the offender must intend or know that their act is likely to cause wrongful damage to property.

Can minor damages be tried under IPC Section 462?

No, minor damages below fifty rupees fall under other sections like IPC Section 425, not Section 462.

Related Sections

IPC Section 490 punishes marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and protecting marital fidelity.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 79 governs carry forward and set off of losses in case of change in shareholding.

IPC Section 298 penalizes uttering words with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings, protecting communal harmony.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 72 about inspection, search, and seizure procedures under GST.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 246 defines the appellate authorities and procedures for income tax disputes.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 51 defines expert opinion evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 238 protects actions taken under the Act from being invalidated by other laws.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 113 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Virtual office spaces are legal in India with specific regulations and compliance requirements for businesses.

IPC Section 420 addresses cheating and dishonest inducement of property, defining punishment and legal scope.

Family balancing is legal in India under specific conditions regulated by the PCPNDT Act with strict enforcement against misuse.

CrPC Section 24 defines who is a 'public servant' for legal and procedural purposes under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Deer skin is legal in India with regulations on hunting and trade to protect wildlife and comply with conservation laws.

Airguns are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on power and licensing requirements under the Arms Act.

CrPC Section 236 details the procedure for committing accused persons to Sessions Court for trial after preliminary inquiry.

Esports are legal in India with certain regulations and no specific bans, allowing you to participate and organize esports events.

CrPC Section 315 defines the offence of concealing a birth and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 147 defines the burden of proof for proving facts in civil and criminal cases.

CPC Section 77 defines the procedure for filing a caveat to prevent ex parte orders in civil suits.

Having an offshore company is legal in India if you comply with RBI and tax laws, but strict reporting is required.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 53 deals with the mode of recovery of income tax arrears from the assessee.

Honour killing is illegal in India and punishable under criminal law without exceptions or legal justification.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 135 governs the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence to ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 74 covers the admissibility of evidence of the existence or non-existence of any right or custom, crucial for proving customary rights in court.

Cigarettes are legal in India but regulated with strict laws on sale, advertising, and public smoking to protect health.

Xhamster is not legally accessible in India due to government bans on adult content websites.

IPC Section 94 covers acts done in good faith for the benefit of a person unable to consent, protecting such acts from legal liability.

bottom of page