top of page

IPC Section 500

IPC Section 500 defines punishment for defamation, addressing harm to a person's reputation through false statements.

IPC Section 500 deals with the offence of defamation, which involves harming a person's reputation by making false or malicious statements. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from unwarranted attacks on their character and dignity. Defamation can occur through spoken words, written statements, or gestures that lower a person's esteem in the eyes of society.

Understanding IPC Section 500 is important because it balances the right to freedom of speech with the need to protect personal reputation. It ensures that people cannot spread false information without facing legal consequences, thus maintaining social harmony and respect.

IPC Section 500 – Exact Provision

This section means that if a person makes or publishes any statement or gesture that harms another person's reputation, they can be punished. The punishment can be imprisonment up to two years, a fine, or both. The law aims to deter false accusations and protect individuals from damage to their social standing.

  • Defamation involves harming someone's reputation through false statements.

  • It can be committed by words, writing, or gestures.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to two years, fine, or both.

  • The offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

  • It protects personal dignity and social respect.

Purpose of IPC Section 500

The primary objective of IPC Section 500 is to safeguard individuals against false and malicious statements that can damage their reputation. It ensures that freedom of speech is exercised responsibly without infringing on others' dignity. By penalizing defamation, the law promotes respect and trust within society, preventing the spread of harmful rumors and misinformation.

  • Protects personal reputation and dignity.

  • Prevents misuse of freedom of speech.

  • Maintains social harmony by discouraging false statements.

Cognizance under IPC Section 500

Cognizance of defamation cases under Section 500 is generally taken upon a complaint by the aggrieved party. The offence is cognizable, meaning the police can investigate without prior court approval. However, courts exercise caution to balance free speech and reputation rights.

  • Police can register FIR based on complaint.

  • Court takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Private complaint is necessary; no suo motu action by courts.

Bail under IPC Section 500

Defamation under IPC Section 500 is a non-bailable offence. However, since the punishment is relatively mild, courts often grant bail considering the facts of the case. The accused can apply for bail, but it is subject to judicial discretion.

  • Non-bailable offence but bail usually granted.

  • Bail depends on nature and circumstances of the case.

  • Court ensures accused does not misuse bail to intimidate complainant.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 500 are generally triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to two years, it falls under the jurisdiction of a Judicial Magistrate First Class. Sessions courts may try cases if combined with other offences.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries most defamation cases.

  • Sessions Court if linked with more serious offences.

  • Complaints filed in local jurisdiction of accused or complainant.

Example of IPC Section 500 in Use

Suppose a person publicly accuses a neighbor of theft without any proof, damaging the neighbor’s reputation in the community. The neighbor files a complaint under IPC Section 500. If the court finds the accusation false and malicious, the accused may be sentenced to imprisonment or fined. Conversely, if the accused proves the statement was true or made without malice, they may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 500

IPC Section 500 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, reflecting the colonial-era emphasis on protecting personal reputation. Over time, courts have refined its interpretation to balance free speech and reputation rights.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to address defamation.

  • Landmark cases have shaped its scope.

  • Judicial clarifications on truth and fair comment exceptions.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 500

In 2025, IPC Section 500 remains vital due to the rise of social media and digital communication, where defamatory content spreads rapidly. Courts increasingly interpret the section to address online defamation while protecting freedom of expression.

  • Applies to digital and social media defamation.

  • Court rulings emphasize responsible speech online.

  • Helps combat fake news and cyber defamation.

Related Sections to IPC Section 500

  • Section 499 – Definition of Defamation

  • Section 501 – Printing or Engraving Matter Known to be Defamatory

  • Section 502 – Sale of Printed Defamatory Matter

  • Section 503 – Criminal Intimidation

  • Section 505 – Statements Conducing to Public Mischief

Case References under IPC Section 500

  1. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994 AIR 1844, SC)

    – The Court balanced freedom of press with right to reputation, limiting defamation scope.

  2. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016 AIR SCW 7800)

    – Supreme Court upheld defamation as a criminal offence, emphasizing reputation protection.

  3. Khushwant Singh v. Maneka Gandhi (2002 AIR SCW 2975)

    – Court ruled truth with good intention is a valid defence against defamation.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 500

  • Section:

    500

  • Title:

    Punishment for Defamation

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Judicial Magistrate First Class

Conclusion on IPC Section 500

IPC Section 500 plays a crucial role in protecting individuals’ reputations from false and damaging statements. It ensures that freedom of speech is exercised responsibly and that malicious defamation is punishable by law. This balance is essential in a democratic society where personal dignity and social respect are valued.

With the growth of digital platforms, the importance of IPC Section 500 has increased, addressing new challenges posed by online defamation. Courts continue to interpret this section to safeguard reputations while upholding free expression, making it a vital provision in modern Indian law.

FAQs on IPC Section 500

What is defamation under IPC Section 500?

Defamation is making false statements that harm a person's reputation. Section 500 punishes such acts with imprisonment, fine, or both.

Is defamation a bailable offence?

Defamation under Section 500 is non-bailable, but courts often grant bail depending on case details.

Can truth be a defence against defamation?

Yes, if the statement is true and made with good intention, it can be a valid defence under IPC.

Which court tries defamation cases?

Usually, Judicial Magistrate First Class courts try defamation cases under Section 500.

Does IPC Section 500 apply to online defamation?

Yes, the section applies to defamatory statements made on social media and other digital platforms.

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 124 covering offences and penalties under CGST Act.

CrPC Section 45 defines the role and powers of the Public Prosecutor in criminal trials and proceedings.

Guns are conditionally legal in India with strict licensing and regulations under the Arms Act, 1959.

IPC Section 96 defines the right of private defense, allowing individuals to protect themselves or others from imminent harm.

Section 182 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish returns or comply with notices under Indian tax law.

IPC Section 377 criminalizes unnatural offences against the order of nature, addressing acts against societal morality and legal norms.

Section 206CB of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates higher TDS rates for non-filers of income tax returns in India.

Explore the legal status of Sci-Hub in India, including copyright laws, enforcement, and common misconceptions about accessing academic papers.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 119 empowers the CBDT to grant relief and condone delays in tax proceedings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 30 details the powers of Consumer Commissions to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 49A covering tax payment provisions and compliance.

Buying LKR (Sri Lankan Rupees) in India is legal with RBI guidelines and proper currency exchange procedures.

CrPC Section 357B mandates the constitution of Victim Compensation Fund to aid victims of crimes and their families.

Companies Act 2013 Section 306 governs the appointment and duties of liquidators during company winding-up.

100W car bulbs are legal in India if they comply with motor vehicle lighting standards and do not cause safety hazards.

CrPC Section 389 covers the procedure and powers of appellate courts to grant bail during appeal or revision.

Companies Act 2013 Section 360 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Keeping alligators as pets is illegal in India under wildlife protection laws.

Surety bonds are legal in India, governed by the Indian Contract Act with specific rules on their use and enforcement.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 272AA mandates quoting PAN in specified documents to ensure tax compliance and avoid penalties.

CrPC Section 58 details the procedure for medical examination of arrested persons to ensure their health and rights are protected.

CrPC Section 433A details the procedure for premature release of prisoners on probation or after admonition.

Understand the legality of sandwich leave in India and how it affects your leave entitlements at work.

Matka gambling is illegal in India, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions for participation.

Section 220 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the recovery of income tax dues in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 45A defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for complaints up to ₹1 crore.

bottom of page