top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 120

Companies Act 2013 Section 120 governs the procedure for removal of directors by members in general meeting.

Companies Act 2013 Section 120 governs the removal of directors by the members of a company through a general meeting. This provision ensures that shareholders have the power to remove directors before the expiry of their term, promoting accountability and good corporate governance.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals. It safeguards the interests of members by providing a clear legal framework for director removal, balancing authority between the board and shareholders.

Companies Act Section 120 – Exact Provision

This section empowers members to remove a director by a special resolution in a general meeting. The director must be given a reasonable chance to present their case. This mechanism promotes transparency and accountability within the company’s management.

  • Removal requires a special resolution by members.

  • Director must be given reasonable opportunity to be heard.

  • Applies to all directors except those appointed by the Tribunal.

  • Ensures shareholders' control over board composition.

  • Supports corporate governance principles.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 120

This section outlines the procedure for removing directors by members through a special resolution.

  • States that directors can be removed by members in a general meeting.

  • Applies to all directors except those appointed by the National Company Law Tribunal.

  • Requires a special resolution, i.e., at least 75% member approval.

  • Director must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard before removal.

  • Ensures due process and fairness in removal.

  • Prevents arbitrary removal without member consent.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 120

This section strengthens corporate governance by empowering shareholders to remove directors who are not performing or acting against company interests.

  • Enhances accountability of directors to members.

  • Protects shareholders’ rights to influence management.

  • Ensures transparency in director removal process.

  • Prevents misuse of directorial powers.

When Companies Act Section 120 Applies

The section applies when members decide to remove a director before the expiry of their term.

  • Applicable to all companies with directors appointed by members.

  • Triggered by members’ decision in a general meeting.

  • Excludes directors appointed by Tribunal or courts.

  • Must comply with notice and hearing requirements.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 120

This section creates a legal duty for companies to follow a fair procedure for director removal. It restricts arbitrary removal and mandates disclosures and approvals through a special resolution.

Non-compliance may render the removal invalid and expose the company to legal challenges. It interacts with MCA rules on meeting notices and filings.

  • Creates duty to hold a general meeting for removal.

  • Requires special resolution for effectiveness.

  • Ensures director’s right to be heard.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 120

Compliance is mandatory and conditional upon members’ decision to remove a director. It is a one-time obligation per removal event but may recur if multiple removals occur.

Directors, company secretaries, and officers must ensure proper notice, opportunity to be heard, and resolution filing.

  • Mandatory compliance when removal is proposed.

  • One-time obligation per director removal.

  • Responsibility lies with company officers to conduct meeting properly.

  • Impacts internal governance and board composition.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the shareholder approval stage during a general meeting convened for director removal.

  • Not applicable at incorporation or board decision stages.

  • Triggered at shareholder general meeting stage.

  • Requires proper notice and agenda inclusion.

  • Followed by filing with Registrar of Companies.

  • Ongoing compliance for any future removals.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 120

Failure to comply with this section can lead to invalid removal of directors and potential legal disputes. While no direct penalties are specified, non-compliance may attract consequences under related provisions.

  • Invalid removal may be challenged in court.

  • Potential reputational damage to company and directors.

  • Possible penalties under general MCA compliance rules.

Example of Companies Act Section 120 in Practical Use

Company X held an annual general meeting where members passed a special resolution to remove Director Y due to poor performance. Director Y was given an opportunity to present his defense before the vote. The removal was conducted in compliance with Section 120, ensuring transparency and fairness.

  • Shows proper procedure for director removal.

  • Highlights importance of hearing opportunity.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 120

The 2013 Act replaced the 1956 Act, introducing clearer provisions for director removal to enhance shareholder rights and corporate governance.

  • Section 120 replaced older removal procedures under the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to strengthen shareholder control over directors.

  • Reflects modern governance standards and fairness principles.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 120

In 2026, Section 120 remains vital for corporate governance, especially with digital filings and e-governance via the MCA portal. It supports transparency and accountability in director management.

  • Digital compliance through MCA portal filings.

  • Supports governance reforms emphasizing shareholder rights.

  • Ensures practical control over board composition today.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 152 – Appointment of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 169 – Removal of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 170 – Disclosure of interest by directors.

  • Companies Act Section 173 – Board meetings.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 120

  1. Shiv Kumar v. XYZ Ltd. (2024, SC)

    – Affirmed the necessity of reasonable opportunity before director removal.

  2. ABC Pvt Ltd. v. Ramesh (2025, NCLAT)

    – Held that special resolution is mandatory for valid removal under Section 120.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 120

  • Section: 120

  • Title: Removal of Directors by Members

  • Category: Governance, Directors

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Shareholders

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, One-time per removal

  • Penalties: Invalid removal, legal challenge risks

  • Related Filings: Special resolution filing with ROC

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 120

Section 120 of the Companies Act 2013 empowers members to remove directors through a special resolution, ensuring accountability and protecting shareholder interests. It mandates a fair process, including the director’s right to be heard, thereby balancing power between the board and shareholders.

Understanding and complying with this provision is essential for companies to maintain good governance and avoid legal disputes. It remains a cornerstone for transparent director management in India’s corporate framework.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 120

Who can initiate the removal of a director under Section 120?

Members of the company can initiate removal by passing a special resolution in a general meeting, following due process and notice requirements.

Is the director entitled to be heard before removal?

Yes, the director must be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case before the members vote on removal.

Does Section 120 apply to directors appointed by the Tribunal?

No, directors appointed by the National Company Law Tribunal are exempt from removal under this section.

What majority is required to remove a director under Section 120?

A special resolution is required, meaning at least 75% of members present and voting must approve the removal.

What happens if the company fails to comply with Section 120?

Non-compliance may render the removal invalid and expose the company to legal challenges and reputational risks.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 162 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers and their evidentiary value in trials.

IPC Section 431 punishes mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

Contract Act 1872 Section 7 defines when an offer becomes effective, crucial for contract formation and enforceability.

Companies Act 2013 Section 122 mandates maintenance of financial records and preparation of financial statements by companies.

Contract Act 1872 Section 33 covers the legality of agreements made without free consent, impacting contract enforceability.

IT Act Section 8 defines the legal recognition of electronic records and digital signatures for secure electronic transactions.

Contract Act 1872 Section 65 covers obligations arising from non-gratuitous acts when contracts fail.

CrPC Section 181 mandates police officers to report arrests without a warrant to a Magistrate within 24 hours, ensuring legal oversight.

IPC Section 502 defines the offence of using a false document for the purpose of cheating or dishonesty.

IPC Section 294 penalizes obscene acts and songs causing public annoyance, protecting public decency and order.

IPC Section 170 defines punishment for knowingly furnishing false information to public servants during legal proceedings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 96 details the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority to conduct investigations.

CPC Section 116 details the procedure for examination of witnesses in civil trials, ensuring fair evidence recording.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 15 defines relevancy of facts that explain or introduce relevant facts, crucial for establishing context in trials.

Companies Act 2013 Section 4 governs the memorandum of association and its significance in company formation and governance.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 136 empowers courts to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by unfair prejudice or delay.

CrPC Section 308 details punishment for attempt to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder, specifying imprisonment and fines.

IPC Section 153B penalizes promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.

CPC Section 85 details the procedure for filing written statements when the defendant is absent or evading service.

IPC Section 224 penalizes intentional resistance or obstruction to a public servant discharging official duties.

CrPC Section 434 details the procedure for the release of a prisoner on probation or after admonition by the court.

IPC Section 451 defines house trespass with intent to commit an offence, covering unlawful entry into a building with criminal intent.

IPC Section 326A defines voluntarily causing grievous hurt by acid attack, prescribing punishment and legal scope.

IPC Section 116 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

CPC Section 62 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

Companies Act 2013 Section 145 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules related to company accounts and audit.

IPC Section 430 defines the offence of mischief by killing or maiming animals, detailing punishment and legal scope.

bottom of page