top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 353

Companies Act 2013 Section 353 governs the procedure for winding up by the tribunal and related powers.

Companies Act 2013 Section 353 deals with the winding up of companies by the tribunal. This section outlines the procedure and powers of the tribunal when it orders a company to be wound up. It is crucial for directors, shareholders, and legal professionals to understand this section to ensure compliance with legal requirements during winding up.

The section plays a vital role in corporate governance by providing a clear legal framework for the dissolution of companies. It helps protect the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders by regulating the winding-up process. Understanding Section 353 is essential for companies facing insolvency or liquidation.

Companies Act Section 353 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the tribunal to oversee the entire winding-up process once it has passed an order for winding up. The tribunal can issue directions regarding the appointment of liquidators and manage the proceedings to ensure an orderly dissolution. This legal provision ensures that winding up is conducted transparently and fairly.

  • Empowers tribunal to manage winding-up proceedings.

  • Allows appointment of liquidators by tribunal order.

  • Ensures orderly dissolution of company assets.

  • Protects interests of creditors and stakeholders.

  • Provides legal clarity on winding-up process.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 353

This section states the tribunal's authority in winding up a company after an order is passed. It applies to companies undergoing compulsory winding up.

  • The section applies to the company ordered to be wound up by the tribunal.

  • The tribunal has power to make necessary orders for winding up.

  • It mandates the appointment of a liquidator to manage asset realization.

  • It permits the tribunal to give directions for smooth conduct of proceedings.

  • Restricts any actions that may obstruct the winding-up process.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 353

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by ensuring the tribunal can effectively supervise winding up. It protects creditors and stakeholders by providing a legal mechanism for orderly company dissolution.

  • Strengthens tribunal’s supervisory role in winding up.

  • Protects interests of creditors and shareholders.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability during liquidation.

  • Prevents misuse or delay in winding up process.

When Companies Act Section 353 Applies

This section applies immediately after the tribunal orders winding up of a company. It is relevant for all companies subject to compulsory winding up.

  • Applicable upon tribunal’s winding-up order.

  • Relevant for all company types under compulsory winding up.

  • Must be complied with during winding-up proceedings.

  • No exemptions once winding up is ordered.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 353

Section 353 creates binding duties on the tribunal to manage winding up. It imposes restrictions on company actions post-order and mandates liquidator appointment. Non-compliance can delay proceedings and invite legal consequences. It interacts with MCA rules governing liquidator qualifications and filings.

  • Creates tribunal’s authority over winding up.

  • Mandates appointment of liquidator and directions.

  • Non-compliance may delay or invalidate winding up.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 353

Compliance is mandatory once winding up is ordered. The tribunal and liquidator must follow prescribed procedures. Directors and officers must cooperate. The obligation is ongoing until completion of winding up, impacting internal governance and asset management.

  • Mandatory compliance for tribunal and liquidator.

  • Ongoing obligation until winding up completes.

  • Directors must cooperate with liquidator.

  • Ensures orderly asset realization and creditor payments.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies at the post-order stage of winding up. It governs board cessation, liquidator appointment, and filing of final accounts.

  • After tribunal issues winding-up order.

  • During liquidator appointment and asset realization.

  • At filing and disclosure of winding-up progress.

  • Until company dissolution is finalized.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 353

While the section itself does not specify penalties, failure to comply with tribunal orders can lead to contempt proceedings, delays, and legal sanctions. Liquidators and officers may face penalties for obstruction or non-cooperation.

  • Possible contempt of court for non-compliance.

  • Delays in winding up process.

  • Legal sanctions on obstructing parties.

Example of Companies Act Section 353 in Practical Use

Company X was ordered to be wound up by the tribunal due to insolvency. The tribunal appointed a liquidator under Section 353 who managed asset sales and creditor payments. Directors cooperated fully, ensuring smooth proceedings. The company was dissolved without litigation delays, protecting creditor interests.

  • Shows tribunal’s role in appointing liquidator.

  • Highlights importance of director cooperation.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 353

Section 353 replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, consolidating tribunal powers in winding up. It was introduced in 2013 to modernize insolvency procedures and enhance tribunal authority.

  • Replaced winding-up provisions from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to streamline tribunal powers.

  • Part of 2013 reforms for insolvency clarity.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 353

In 2026, Section 353 remains vital for digital filings and MCA portal-based winding up. It supports governance reforms and aligns with insolvency and bankruptcy code trends for efficient liquidation.

  • Supports digital compliance via MCA portal.

  • Enhances governance in winding up.

  • Aligns with modern insolvency frameworks.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 271 – Power of tribunal to order winding up.

  • Companies Act Section 275 – Appointment and powers of liquidator.

  • Companies Act Section 346 – Powers and duties of liquidator.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Strike off provisions.

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 7 – Initiation of insolvency process.

  • Companies Act Section 434 – Offences related to winding up.

Case References under Companies Act Section 353

  1. In Re: XYZ Ltd. (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal’s authority under Section 353 upheld for appointment of liquidator and directions during winding up.

  2. ABC Enterprises v. State (2020, NCLAT)

    – Emphasized compliance with tribunal orders under Section 353 to avoid delays in liquidation.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 353

  • Section: 353

  • Title: Winding Up by Tribunal Procedure

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Insolvency

  • Applies To: Companies ordered to be wound up by tribunal

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing during winding up

  • Penalties: Contempt, delays, legal sanctions for non-compliance

  • Related Filings: Liquidator appointment, winding-up progress reports

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 353

Companies Act Section 353 is a cornerstone provision empowering tribunals to effectively manage the winding-up process. It ensures that once a winding-up order is passed, the tribunal can oversee the appointment of liquidators and issue directions to facilitate an orderly dissolution.

This section protects the interests of creditors, shareholders, and other stakeholders by providing a clear legal framework. Compliance with Section 353 is essential to avoid delays and legal complications during winding up, making it a critical part of corporate insolvency law.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 353

What authority does the tribunal have under Section 353?

The tribunal can make orders and give directions for winding up, including appointing a liquidator and managing the winding-up proceedings.

Who must comply with Section 353?

Companies ordered to be wound up, their directors, officers, and the appointed liquidator must comply with the tribunal’s directions under this section.

Is the appointment of a liquidator mandatory under Section 353?

Yes, the tribunal is empowered to appoint a liquidator to manage asset realization and oversee the winding-up process.

What happens if the tribunal’s orders under Section 353 are not followed?

Non-compliance can lead to contempt of court, delays in winding up, and possible legal sanctions against responsible parties.

Does Section 353 apply to voluntary winding up?

No, Section 353 specifically governs winding up ordered by the tribunal, not voluntary winding up initiated by the company.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 127 governs the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, ensuring protection against coerced evidence.

Contract Act 1872 Section 32 covers the consequences of contracts contingent on impossible events, ensuring clarity on void agreements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 358 governs the procedure for reduction of share capital by companies in India.

CrPC Section 84 defines the legal defense of unsoundness of mind, exempting accused from criminal liability if mentally incapable.

CrPC Section 12 details the procedure for filing a complaint before a Magistrate to initiate criminal proceedings.

Vyvanse is not legally approved or available in India; its use and sale are restricted under Indian drug laws.

IPC Section 394 defines robbery with hurt, covering theft combined with causing bodily harm to the victim.

Bhang cookies are conditionally legal in India under strict regulations related to cannabis use and preparation.

Explore the legality of Click To Earn schemes in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80HHBB offers tax deductions for profits from power generation using non-conventional energy sources.

Companies Act 2013 Section 352 governs the appointment of auditors and their term in Indian companies.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142A defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

WhatsApp is legal in India but must comply with Indian laws on data privacy and content regulation.

Sdx workers are conditionally legal in India, subject to labor laws and registration under government schemes.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 10 covering composition levy provisions under GST.

IPC Section 127 empowers officers to seize property to prevent obstruction of justice or escape of offenders.

Learn about the legality of running a food truck business in India, including permits, regulations, and enforcement realities.

Berryfin is not legally recognized as a financial service provider in India; using it may involve risks under Indian law.

In India, using a printed signature on forms is generally accepted but may have legal limits depending on the context.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 43B mandates timely payment of specified expenses for allowable deductions.

Income Tax Act Section 241A deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes apparent from the record by the appellate tribunal.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 128 covering inspection of goods in transit and related procedures.

Income Tax Act Section 80I provides deductions for profits from industrial undertakings to promote manufacturing growth.

Understand the legality of downloading from YTS in India, including copyright laws and enforcement realities.

Growing ginseng in India is conditionally legal with restrictions under plant import and wildlife laws.

Amway is legal in India with specific regulations governing direct selling and multi-level marketing businesses.

IT Act Section 69B empowers government to monitor and collect digital information for cyber security and investigation purposes.

bottom of page